立即打开
企业界终于明白,必须将这个理念融入经营

企业界终于明白,必须将这个理念融入经营

Declan Harty 2021-10-04
在2021年的《财富》全球可持续性论坛上,高管、政府官员和投资者谈到了围绕当今企业在环境可持续性中所扮演角色的潮流变化。

企业界终于明白了可持续性的重要性。

多年来,不知为何高管层从未重视这一概念。正如米尔顿·弗里德曼提出的,公司唯一的责任是对股东负责:董事会和高管行为都应该不计成本地将投资者回报最大化。

但在一场疫情过后,基调出现了巨大的变化。

如今,全球各地各种规模的公司和企业逐渐接受了曾经的边缘思想,而且接受程度越来越高,即企业对环境负有责任且必须适应环境。9月28日举行的在线《财富》全球可持续论坛上,就充分展示了这一转变。

“必须成为经营常态。”论坛上,好时(Hershey)的董事长、总裁兼首席执行官米歇尔·巴克在谈到可持续性时表示。“我们正在将可持续性融入到核心商业运营中,因此,进行中的业务不仅要有传统的盈亏视角,也要有可持续性视角。”

JUST Capital称,迄今为止,罗素1000指数中约42.8%的公司已经公开承诺减少碳排放,其中超过十分之一的公司表示,将努力在2050年实现净零排放。

但这远远不够。气候变化已经影响了全社会,今年早些时候联合宣布,《巴黎协定》中世界平均气温升高限制在1.5摄氏度的目标基本上已经无法实现。因此,政府官员、投资者甚至高管终于认识到,承诺终究只是一句空话。公司要采取切实措施,为有望实现脱碳的未来规划好自身定位,可能也有利于公司经营。

“一旦确定某件事情重要,就要设定明确目标分配资源,制定好计划然后负起责来。至于计划,可以是数字,也能够是实施途径。”3M的首席执行官迈克·罗曼在论坛上表示。

供应链脱碳

公司要解决环境足迹问题,最清晰、可能限制也最少的方法之一是控制供应链。

以全球前八大供应链为例:汽车、建筑、消费品、电子、时尚、快消、货运和专业服务。加在一起目前占全球温室气体排放量一半以上。但1月波士顿咨询公司和世界经济论坛的一份报告发现,供应链脱碳后,消费者成本仅会上升1%至4%。

“拥有全球庞大供应链的跨国大企业有着巨大的影响力,不仅覆盖公司总部周边,也包括遍布全球的偏远地区供应链。”《财富》论坛上,波士顿咨询公司的首席执行官李瑞麒(Rich Lesser)向与会者表示。

例如,多年来,宜家一直在努力提升其标志性自行组装产品的可持续性。宜家特许经营商(Ingka)的首席执行官杰斯珀·布罗丁表示,来自瑞典的家具制造商宜家在全球购买了数十万英亩的森林,近年来甚至开始用废料制造床垫,这也是宜家“价格合理的原材料最佳来源”,英格卡管理着超过85%的宜家门店。公司计划到2030年产品100%使用可再生或可回收原材料。

在论坛上,布罗丁表示:“我们在加紧确保正确结合可再生材料和循环材料实现平衡。”他鼓励其他高管审核公司的范围3(Scope 3)排放,该评估可以追溯到一家公司的间接碳排放量。布罗丁指出,虽然类似的审查可能很困难,并且会引发“很多问题和担忧”,但也能为业务创造新机会。

“做生意和从事良好业务实际上是一回事。”他说。

核能是未来?

对道明尼能源公司(Dominion Energy)来说,在如何更可持续开展业务方面与宜家之类公司面临的问题差别很大。

该电力公司位于美国弗吉尼亚州,长期以来跟其他能源巨头一样面临难题,即如何不大幅提价,又利用可持续电力为客户提供优质服务。

到目前为止,该公司已经将煤炭用量从2005年的超过50%成功减少到现在的10%。该公司计划,到2035年将煤炭用量进一步削减到1%以下,届时希望实现脱碳。虽然太阳能和风能等可再生能源将在转型中发挥关键作用,不过首席执行官罗伯特·布鲁表示,核能也将发挥作用。

“现在只有一种电力能源可以做到24小时无碳,就是核能。”布鲁在《财富》论坛上说。

虽然核能仍然存在争议,但美国能源部部长詹妮弗·格兰霍姆和拜登政府的其他成员表示,如果未来几年美国电网想降低对煤炭的依赖,就要使用核能。(2020年,煤炭发电量与核能和可再生能源发电量大致相等。)9月28日,格兰霍姆说:“核能很安全。美国监管标准非常严格。”格兰霍姆还鼓励商界领袖公开支持拜登的预算和基础设施法案,为清洁能源提供更多资金。

压力不会减弱

全球各地的公司可能正在朝着正确方向发展,但由于过度依赖化石燃料,所以不愿意承担业务面临的风险,来自投资者压力不太可能很快消失。

从最大的贝莱德(BlackRock)到Engine No. 1之类的小型对冲基金,多年来各种规模的投资者一直加大对投资组合公司环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题的审查力度。

尽管有一部分公司仍然在考虑撤资的选项,但管理近5000亿美元资产的美国加州公务员退休基金(CalPERS)表示,当前和未来的重点是参与。

“美国加州公务员退休基金是机构投资者,也是共同所有者。”9月28日,该基金的首席执行官玛西·弗罗斯特说。“并不是说,如果我们认为某家公司未能适当管理风险,就果断放弃。这并不是首选。参与其中才是最重要的。”(财富中文网)

译者:夏林

企业界终于明白了可持续性的重要性。

多年来,不知为何高管层从未重视这一概念。正如米尔顿·弗里德曼提出的,公司唯一的责任是对股东负责:董事会和高管行为都应该不计成本地将投资者回报最大化。

但在一场疫情过后,基调出现了巨大的变化。

如今,全球各地各种规模的公司和企业逐渐接受了曾经的边缘思想,而且接受程度越来越高,即企业对环境负有责任且必须适应环境。9月28日举行的在线《财富》全球可持续论坛上,就充分展示了这一转变。

“必须成为经营常态。”论坛上,好时(Hershey)的董事长、总裁兼首席执行官米歇尔·巴克在谈到可持续性时表示。“我们正在将可持续性融入到核心商业运营中,因此,进行中的业务不仅要有传统的盈亏视角,也要有可持续性视角。”

JUST Capital称,迄今为止,罗素1000指数中约42.8%的公司已经公开承诺减少碳排放,其中超过十分之一的公司表示,将努力在2050年实现净零排放。

但这远远不够。气候变化已经影响了全社会,今年早些时候联合宣布,《巴黎协定》中世界平均气温升高限制在1.5摄氏度的目标基本上已经无法实现。因此,政府官员、投资者甚至高管终于认识到,承诺终究只是一句空话。公司要采取切实措施,为有望实现脱碳的未来规划好自身定位,可能也有利于公司经营。

“一旦确定某件事情重要,就要设定明确目标分配资源,制定好计划然后负起责来。至于计划,可以是数字,也能够是实施途径。”3M的首席执行官迈克·罗曼在论坛上表示。

供应链脱碳

公司要解决环境足迹问题,最清晰、可能限制也最少的方法之一是控制供应链。

以全球前八大供应链为例:汽车、建筑、消费品、电子、时尚、快消、货运和专业服务。加在一起目前占全球温室气体排放量一半以上。但1月波士顿咨询公司和世界经济论坛的一份报告发现,供应链脱碳后,消费者成本仅会上升1%至4%。

“拥有全球庞大供应链的跨国大企业有着巨大的影响力,不仅覆盖公司总部周边,也包括遍布全球的偏远地区供应链。”《财富》论坛上,波士顿咨询公司的首席执行官李瑞麒(Rich Lesser)向与会者表示。

例如,多年来,宜家一直在努力提升其标志性自行组装产品的可持续性。宜家特许经营商(Ingka)的首席执行官杰斯珀·布罗丁表示,来自瑞典的家具制造商宜家在全球购买了数十万英亩的森林,近年来甚至开始用废料制造床垫,这也是宜家“价格合理的原材料最佳来源”,英格卡管理着超过85%的宜家门店。公司计划到2030年产品100%使用可再生或可回收原材料。

在论坛上,布罗丁表示:“我们在加紧确保正确结合可再生材料和循环材料实现平衡。”他鼓励其他高管审核公司的范围3(Scope 3)排放,该评估可以追溯到一家公司的间接碳排放量。布罗丁指出,虽然类似的审查可能很困难,并且会引发“很多问题和担忧”,但也能为业务创造新机会。

“做生意和从事良好业务实际上是一回事。”他说。

核能是未来?

对道明尼能源公司(Dominion Energy)来说,在如何更可持续开展业务方面与宜家之类公司面临的问题差别很大。

该电力公司位于美国弗吉尼亚州,长期以来跟其他能源巨头一样面临难题,即如何不大幅提价,又利用可持续电力为客户提供优质服务。

到目前为止,该公司已经将煤炭用量从2005年的超过50%成功减少到现在的10%。该公司计划,到2035年将煤炭用量进一步削减到1%以下,届时希望实现脱碳。虽然太阳能和风能等可再生能源将在转型中发挥关键作用,不过首席执行官罗伯特·布鲁表示,核能也将发挥作用。

“现在只有一种电力能源可以做到24小时无碳,就是核能。”布鲁在《财富》论坛上说。

虽然核能仍然存在争议,但美国能源部部长詹妮弗·格兰霍姆和拜登政府的其他成员表示,如果未来几年美国电网想降低对煤炭的依赖,就要使用核能。(2020年,煤炭发电量与核能和可再生能源发电量大致相等。)9月28日,格兰霍姆说:“核能很安全。美国监管标准非常严格。”格兰霍姆还鼓励商界领袖公开支持拜登的预算和基础设施法案,为清洁能源提供更多资金。

压力不会减弱

全球各地的公司可能正在朝着正确方向发展,但由于过度依赖化石燃料,所以不愿意承担业务面临的风险,来自投资者压力不太可能很快消失。

从最大的贝莱德(BlackRock)到Engine No. 1之类的小型对冲基金,多年来各种规模的投资者一直加大对投资组合公司环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题的审查力度。

尽管有一部分公司仍然在考虑撤资的选项,但管理近5000亿美元资产的美国加州公务员退休基金(CalPERS)表示,当前和未来的重点是参与。

“美国加州公务员退休基金是机构投资者,也是共同所有者。”9月28日,该基金的首席执行官玛西·弗罗斯特说。“并不是说,如果我们认为某家公司未能适当管理风险,就果断放弃。这并不是首选。参与其中才是最重要的。”(财富中文网)

译者:夏林

Corporate America has finally wised up in realizing that sustainability matters.

For years, the concept was somehow framed as outside the C-suite’s purview. Like Milton Friedman imagined, a company’s sole duty was to its shareholders: Board directors and executives were to act with the intent of maximizing their investors’ returns, no matter the cost.

A pandemic later and the tone has shifted considerably.

Corporations and businesses of all sizes around the world are slowly but increasingly becoming indoctrinated into the one-time fringe school of thought that they bear a responsibility for the environment and must adapt accordingly—a theme that was on full display at the Fortune Global Sustainability Forum held virtually on September 28.

“It has to become a way of doing business,” Hershey Chairman, President, and CEO Michele Buck said of sustainability during the event. “We are integrating sustainability into the core commercial operations of our business, so that any initiative we’re working on not only has that traditional P&L lens, but also has the sustainability lens as well.”

So far, about 42.8% of companies included in the Russell 1000 have publicly committed to cutting their carbon emissions, with a little more than a tenth saying they will try and reach net zero by 2050, according to JUST Capital.

It’s far from enough, though. Climate change is bearing down on society, with the United Nations having declared earlier this year that the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting the world’s average temperature increases to 1.5°C is essentially unreachable now. Government officials, investors and even C-suite executives, as a result, are finally recognizing that commitments are just that. Companies need to be taking specific steps toward positioning themselves for what will hopefully be a decarbonized future, which could prove to be beneficial for their own operations, too.

“Once you decide something is a priority, you set clear goals, allocate the resources, put a plan in front of you—the math and the path, so to speak—and then you hold yourself accountable,”3M CEO Mike Roman said at the September 28 event.

Decarbonizing the supply chain

One of the clearest and possibly least restrictive ways companies can address their environmental footprint lies in their supply chains.

Take the top eight global supply chains: automotive, construction, consumer goods, electronics, fashion, fast-moving consumer goods, freight, and professional services. Together, they currently account for more than half of global greenhouse gas emissions. But a January report from Boston Consulting Group and the World Economic Forum found that decarbonizing those supply chains would only raise consumer costs by 1% to 4%.

“The large leading companies of the world with these massive global supply chains have enormous power to shape, not just what happens close to their corporate headquarters, but in the far reaches of their supply chains that extend all around the world,” BCG CEO Rich Lesser told participants at the Fortune event.

IKEA, for instance, has for years pushed to make its iconic assemble-yourself products more sustainably. The Swedish furniture maker has been buying up hundreds of thousands of acres of forests around the world, and, in recent years, has even moved to make mattresses with materials from disposed ones, which represents IKEA’s “best source of affordable raw material,” said Ingka CEO Jesper Brodin, whose company oversees more than 85% of IKEA stores. The company now plans to be using 100% renewable or recycled raw materials in its products by 2030.

“We are in a hurry to make sure that our equation is built on the right combination” of renewable and circular material, Brodin said on September 28. Brodin encouraged other executives to conduct a review of their companies’ Scope 3 emissions, which assess the indirect carbon output that can be traced back to a company. And while such a review can be difficult and open up “a lot of questions and some concerns,” it can also create new opportunities for a company’s business, Brodin said.

“Being in business and doing good business is actually the same thing,” he said.

Is the future nuclear?

For Dominion Energy, the question of how to do business more sustainably is a vastly different one than a company like IKEA faces.

The Virginia-based electric utility has long faced a conundrum—along with other energy giants—on how to best serve its customers with sustainable forms of electricity while not drastically raising prices.

So far, it has managed to cut down its use of coal from more than 50% in 2005 to just 10% today. But the company plans to slash that even further to less than 1% by 2035, when it hopes to have decarbonized. And while renewable forms of energy like solar and wind will play a critical role in the transition, CEO Robert Blue says nuclear power will, too.

“There’s only one source of round-the-clock, carbon-free electricity that exists today, and it’s nuclear,” Blue said at the Fortune event.

Nuclear energy remains controversial for many Americans, but U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, like other members of President Joe Biden’s administration, says the power source will need to be used if the U.S. electricity grid is to become less reliant on coal in the years ahead. (In 2020, about the same amount of electricity was generated by coal as it was by nuclear power and renewable ones.) Said Granholm on September 28: “Nuclear is safe. We have the gold standard in the United States of regulation.” Granholm also encouraged business leaders to speak up in support of Biden's budget and infrastructure bills, which would provide more funding for clean energy.

The pressure isn’t going to subside

Companies around the world may be trending in the right direction, but the pressure from investors for not handling the risks their businesses face from a perceived over-reliance on fossil fuels is unlikely to stop any time soon.

Investors big and small—ranging from the world’s largest in BlackRock to the tiny hedge fund that could with Engine No. 1—have been ramping up their scrutiny of their portfolio companies over such environmental, social, and governance issues for several years now.

And while divestment does remain on the table for some, CalPERS, the pension fund that oversees almost $500 billion of assets, says engagement is where its focus lies today and in the future.

“For CalPERS, being this institutional investor, we’re a universal owner,” CalPERS CEO Marcie Frost said Tuesday. “It’s not that we would not move away from a particular company if we do not think that they are managing their risks appropriately. It is never our first step. Engagement is.”

热读文章
热门视频
扫描二维码下载财富APP