立即打开
这个职位眼下在美国供不应求,每周能够挣5000美元

这个职位眼下在美国供不应求,每周能够挣5000美元

Kat Eschner 2021-12-26
自新冠疫情爆发以来,旅行护士的市场规模不断增长。

当新冠疫情开始时,杰西·莫格勒担任急诊室护士还不到一年。他说,那段时间里他在美国新墨西哥州法明顿市的圣胡安地区医疗中心(San Juan Regional Medical Center)繁忙的急诊室工作,当时就有旅行护士,每个班次可能一到两人。旅行护士的经验往往不如全职护士,帮助他们适应急诊室的做事方式也要资深护士花费不少时间。尽管如此,旅行护士还是很有帮助,尤其是人们不喜欢的晚班。

等到一年后他离开时,新冠病毒的传播已经呈现出燎原之势,医院里也到处是旅行护士,尤其是晚班和夜班。他说,有时甚至是半夜负责统管各项事务的主管护士也是“旅行护士”。

莫格勒2018年毕业于护理学校,他发现自己正在迅速变成业内经验最丰富的护士之一。当时他需要照顾的病人数量比以往任何时候都多,有时还负责6到10个急诊病例。

莫格勒说,在学校里,老师不断强调,分配给护士的病人如果出现可以预防的事故或死亡,护士就可能面临质询甚至撤销护理执照,更别提知晓自己为不必要的痛苦承担责任带来的创伤。“我们越发感觉到,每次上班都在努力避免创伤性事故、创伤或危重病人,阻止不必要的死亡。”他说。“病人很危险,当护士也很危险。”

为了给日渐耗尽精力的工作争取更高薪水(也是为了尽快摆脱感觉不安全的环境),莫格勒在旅行护士求职公告栏上发布了消息,而且很快就收到了大量招聘短信和语音邮件。今年10月,他开始联系招聘方,决定前往新墨西哥州的杜兰戈工作到2021年年底,每小时的收入是全职护士的四倍。

从早期的呼吸机短缺到如今无休止拖延的常规程序,新冠病毒对医疗行业的影响非常广泛。但最显著的影响之一是对照顾病人的职业市场的影响。对愿意为出价最高者工作的人们而言,旅行护士需求激增大幅提升了其工资。基于过去90天内59000份活跃招聘职位的信息,医疗保健工作委员会(Healthcare job board)的维维安估计,目前美国旅行注册护士的平均工资几乎达到每周3200美元。按照维维安的说法,平均每周工作36小时的旅行护士的时薪近90美元。根据美国劳工统计局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的数据,这一水平是2020年美国护理人员时薪中位数的两倍多。但一些人表示,人员轮换破坏了医院稳定,而即将进入新冠疫情第三年的医护人员已经濒临崩溃。随着冬季疫情病例激增,奥密克戎变异毒株来势汹汹,再加上流感季的到来,重症监护室纷纷开始补充人手,协助医院运行的不稳定系统将面临挑战。

成为“旅行护士”

蒙大拿州立大学(Montana State University)的护理政策专家彼得·布尔豪斯称,早在20世纪70年代,旅行护士就已经存在。“这群人从来都不是护士队伍的重要组成部分。”他说。该领域一度被用来填补局部护士短缺,在新冠疫情爆发前就开始增长。市场研究机构Grand View Research于2020年年初发布的一份市场报告称,仅2019年一年,旅行护士市场就增长了7%,部分原因是医院正在削减全职员工成本。

自新冠疫情爆发以来,旅行护士的市场规模不断增长。据Staffing Industry Analysts告诉估计,2020年,美国旅行护士人力资源行业增长了35%,从2019年的62亿美元增至84亿美元。Staffing Industry Analysts预计到2021年年底,这一市场将进一步扩大40%,达到118亿美元。

“虽然2020年和2021年的旅行护士人数增长迅速,但市场规模增长在很大程度上是因为需求与供给不平衡导致工资的大幅上升。”Staffing Industry Analysts的北美研究主管蒂莫西·兰德胡伊斯说。

Facebook(已改名为Meta——编注)的活跃群组“周薪至少5000美元的旅行护士工作”(Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up)的成员超过10万人,招聘人员发布的信息和帖子非常多。不管是招聘网站还是Facebook小组,都是旅行护士找工作的主要方式。AMN Healthcare是美国最大的医疗人才公司之一,今年5月,公司的首席执行官苏珊·萨尔卡在美国银行(Bank of America)的医疗状况虚拟会议上表示,该公司的业务主要依靠口碑来推动。

在新冠疫情期间,医疗人才公司的收入相当可观。AMN Healthcare的2021年三季报中收入相比2020年增幅达60%。另一家知名公司Cross Country Healthcare的业绩增长更加明显,2021年三季度同比增幅达93%。

通常来说,旅行护士只能够在护理执照有效的特定州或地区工作。乔治·华盛顿大学(George Washington University)的卫生人力研究中心(Health Workforce Research Center)的主任波利·皮特曼说,第一波疫情期间,州政府放松了限制,旅行护理的案例也为人才跨州流动至最需要的地方工作提供了框架。到第三波疫情时,新冠病毒已经无处不在,护士仍然可以自由选择工作地点。竞价大战随后爆发。

“我认为旅行护士具有重要的作用,如果适度的话。”皮特曼说。大量研究表明,如果过多聘用旅行护士,对医院底线、员工士气或患者并无益处。

皮特曼说,在新冠疫情期间,财力充足的大型医院招聘的护士已经足够。然而为新冠病毒易感人群提供治疗的小型医院,例如圣胡安地区医院(San Juan Regional),一家只有250张床位的社区医院,想稳住员工并花钱聘请旅行护士就很困难。

花钱请旅行护士会严重影响医院的底线,也会影响护理质量。2021年,美国医疗保健人才和保留机构NSI护理解决方案公司(NSI Nursing Solutions)对超过3000家医院进行调查后估计,医院如果能够少请20位旅行护士,平均就可以节省300万美元。

医院与全职员工的关系也因此遇到了挑战。皮特曼告诉《财富》杂志,在新冠疫情期间,医院广泛聘请旅行护士,全职护士们不禁想问,为什么医院不愿意花钱为他们提高待遇,多招一些全职护士减轻负担。“结果陷入了士气低落的恶性循环。”皮特曼说。

很多护理人员精疲力竭且负担过重,不断有人离开行业,或者像莫格勒一样转向旅行护士。“如果普通护士每小时挣50美元,而旅行护士每小时挣150美元,差距就实在太大了。”全美黑人护士协会(National Black Nurses Association)的主席玛莎·道森说。“我不能因此反对旅行护士,只能说现有制度为他们提供了很强的赚钱能力。”

“郁积之火”

匹兹堡大学(University of Pittsburgh)的护理学博士后朱厄尔·斯科特认为,新冠疫情爆发前的护理行业仿佛郁积之火。如果一直观察该行业,就会发现诸如全职员工比例过低、责任不断增加和缺乏制度支持等问题热度不断上升。然而如果离得远一些,是无法发现的。“新冠疫情爆发像有人在火上倒了一桶汽油。”斯科特说。

曾经几乎所有护士都要学习一年获得资格证书,也就是LPN,执业护士执照,整个职业生涯都在一两家机构度过。过去40年里,随着医疗普遍更加高科技和专业化,护理专业化程度显著提高。如今,大多数美国护士都获得了三年制学位,然后成为注册护士,很多人还会继续深造。很多人成了能够在无医生监督时工作的执业护士,获得例如护士麻醉师等更专业的职位,有些护士甚至攻读博士学位,然后进入学术界。

各项因素都意味着,作为医院和疗养院主力的急症护理注册护士供应比过去少得多。布尔豪斯表示:“总是存在缺护士的情况”,而导致本地短缺的因素可能是,某个科室有几名护士同时休育儿假,或者被竞争对手医院挖走。

但过去几十年的趋势加剧了结构性短缺,全美护理人员体系更加脆弱。在注册护士中,有相当一部分是婴儿潮一代。自2000年达到顶峰以来,很多护士已经退休。在新冠疫情爆发前,每年约有70000名护士退休。

如果从劳动力总数来看,这个比例并不高。“但是如果考虑到很多具有20年、30年工作经验的老人离开,需要替换人员数字就很大了。”布尔豪斯说。在过去几年里,他和同事一直听到医院抱怨,在复杂且要求高的领域里,例如重症监护和急诊护理科室,想招聘经验丰富的护士很困难。

根据美国劳工统计局的数据,目前全美正在从业的注册护士约有308万人。预计到2030年,需求将增长9%,也就是缺近30万名护士。但在今年4月,美国护理学院协会(American Association of Colleges of Nursing)的报告称,尽管劳动力主体逐渐退休,对护士的需求也在增长,但去年全美各地的护理学校拒绝了超过6万名的合格申请者。

主要原因是护理学校师资力量不足,尤其是有色人种师资。斯科特指出,全职护理教授里有色人种占比不到10%。大约四分之一的护士都是有色人种。研究表明,无论学生的种族如何,如果能够向多民族文化背景的人学习,成绩就会更好。有色人种的学生受益更大,因为有机会获得分享自己经历的教师指导,归属感也更强。

从斯科特的经历来看,她说有一位黑人护理教授玛瓦·普莱斯曾经主动与她讨论攻读研究生的问题,激励她争取更高学历,并最终成为护理教授。“毫无疑问,支持非常重要。”她说。

培训护士不仅仅在教室里。加州大学旧金山分校卫生政策研究所(UCSF Institute for Health Policy)的所长乔安妮·斯佩茨说,很少有医院向护士在职培训投资,现在身兼重负的老护士们纷纷离开,极其重要的实践教学存在缺失。

当新冠疫情来袭时,种种背后的问题变得非常紧迫。“极其狭窄的专业迅速出现压倒性需求,医院均受到冲击。”布尔豪斯说。实习护士、新手护士被迫跟随留下的经验丰富护士一起提供重症护理。这是恶性循环。“人员编制不足导致护士流失,而护士流失导致编制减少。”美国重症护理护士协会(American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)最近发表的一篇评论称。这一循环在新冠疫情期间愈加棘手。麦肯锡公司(McKinsey & Company)最近一项调查表明,美国22%的护士计划未来两年内可能不再从事直接护理病人的工作。参与调查的300多名受访者面临的首要问题是:人员不足。“在新冠疫情期间,以往相对安全的照顾病人数量被拉到极限。”密歇根大学(University of Michigan)的护理教授苏·安妮·贝尔说,她专门研究防灾领域,新冠疫情期间,曾经在社区工作了四个月。

除了降低护士的工作满意度,人员流动也明显增加了劳动力成本。NSI的报告发现,2021年,每失去一位注册护士的平均成本为40038美元,而且单个损失会迅速累积。一家医院人员轮换率每降低一个百分点,每年平均能够节省270800美元。最近一组研究人员在一项定量研究中写道,护士轮换也会降低护理质量。“用药错误、跌倒或其他与护士相关的情况出现几率可能增加,其中也包括医疗相关感染。”

“全美危机”

从这个意义上说,旅行护士造成了棘手的问题。虽然旅行护士提升了小部分极度疲累护士的地位,也能够提供一定安慰,然而导致的问题也更加严重,让护理工作从一开始就变困难。美国公共卫生协会(Public Health Association)的主席乔治·本杰明表示,导致当前危机的长期问题并不会迅速消失。他说,各项问题可以随着时间推移逐步解决,不过需要持续努力。

但解决问题的第一步是承认问题存在。9月1日,美国护士协会(American Nurses Association)向美国卫生与公共服务部(Department of Health and Human Service)的部长泽维尔·贝塞拉提交了一封信。协会请贝塞拉宣布“全国护士出现人员危机,并立即采取措施制定并实施短期和长期解决方案。”

“我们非常盼望很快收到贝塞拉部长的回复。”信件提交一周后,美国护士协会的主席欧内斯特·格兰特对《财富》杂志表示。截至12月本文发布时,该协会仍未收到回应。

至于离开全职岗位成为旅行护士的莫格勒,对自己的选择也很纠结。他说:“离开病情严重急需护理的病人,人手严重不足的医院,还有无法像我一样转型的同事们,我感觉并不好。”

但是,工作量太大存在风险,他和同事也感觉不到医院的支持,这些都是他选择离开的重要原因。他说:“我会一份合同一份合同地工作,直到没有什么钱可赚,或者情况开始改善,全职护士工作的吸引力提高了再说。”(财富中文网)

译者:梁宇

审校:夏林

当新冠疫情开始时,杰西·莫格勒担任急诊室护士还不到一年。他说,那段时间里他在美国新墨西哥州法明顿市的圣胡安地区医疗中心(San Juan Regional Medical Center)繁忙的急诊室工作,当时就有旅行护士,每个班次可能一到两人。旅行护士的经验往往不如全职护士,帮助他们适应急诊室的做事方式也要资深护士花费不少时间。尽管如此,旅行护士还是很有帮助,尤其是人们不喜欢的晚班。

等到一年后他离开时,新冠病毒的传播已经呈现出燎原之势,医院里也到处是旅行护士,尤其是晚班和夜班。他说,有时甚至是半夜负责统管各项事务的主管护士也是“旅行护士”。

莫格勒2018年毕业于护理学校,他发现自己正在迅速变成业内经验最丰富的护士之一。当时他需要照顾的病人数量比以往任何时候都多,有时还负责6到10个急诊病例。

莫格勒说,在学校里,老师不断强调,分配给护士的病人如果出现可以预防的事故或死亡,护士就可能面临质询甚至撤销护理执照,更别提知晓自己为不必要的痛苦承担责任带来的创伤。“我们越发感觉到,每次上班都在努力避免创伤性事故、创伤或危重病人,阻止不必要的死亡。”他说。“病人很危险,当护士也很危险。”

为了给日渐耗尽精力的工作争取更高薪水(也是为了尽快摆脱感觉不安全的环境),莫格勒在旅行护士求职公告栏上发布了消息,而且很快就收到了大量招聘短信和语音邮件。今年10月,他开始联系招聘方,决定前往新墨西哥州的杜兰戈工作到2021年年底,每小时的收入是全职护士的四倍。

从早期的呼吸机短缺到如今无休止拖延的常规程序,新冠病毒对医疗行业的影响非常广泛。但最显著的影响之一是对照顾病人的职业市场的影响。对愿意为出价最高者工作的人们而言,旅行护士需求激增大幅提升了其工资。基于过去90天内59000份活跃招聘职位的信息,医疗保健工作委员会(Healthcare job board)的维维安估计,目前美国旅行注册护士的平均工资几乎达到每周3200美元。按照维维安的说法,平均每周工作36小时的旅行护士的时薪近90美元。根据美国劳工统计局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的数据,这一水平是2020年美国护理人员时薪中位数的两倍多。但一些人表示,人员轮换破坏了医院稳定,而即将进入新冠疫情第三年的医护人员已经濒临崩溃。随着冬季疫情病例激增,奥密克戎变异毒株来势汹汹,再加上流感季的到来,重症监护室纷纷开始补充人手,协助医院运行的不稳定系统将面临挑战。

成为“旅行护士”

蒙大拿州立大学(Montana State University)的护理政策专家彼得·布尔豪斯称,早在20世纪70年代,旅行护士就已经存在。“这群人从来都不是护士队伍的重要组成部分。”他说。该领域一度被用来填补局部护士短缺,在新冠疫情爆发前就开始增长。市场研究机构Grand View Research于2020年年初发布的一份市场报告称,仅2019年一年,旅行护士市场就增长了7%,部分原因是医院正在削减全职员工成本。

自新冠疫情爆发以来,旅行护士的市场规模不断增长。据Staffing Industry Analysts告诉估计,2020年,美国旅行护士人力资源行业增长了35%,从2019年的62亿美元增至84亿美元。Staffing Industry Analysts预计到2021年年底,这一市场将进一步扩大40%,达到118亿美元。

“虽然2020年和2021年的旅行护士人数增长迅速,但市场规模增长在很大程度上是因为需求与供给不平衡导致工资的大幅上升。”Staffing Industry Analysts的北美研究主管蒂莫西·兰德胡伊斯说。

Facebook(已改名为Meta——编注)的活跃群组“周薪至少5000美元的旅行护士工作”(Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up)的成员超过10万人,招聘人员发布的信息和帖子非常多。不管是招聘网站还是Facebook小组,都是旅行护士找工作的主要方式。AMN Healthcare是美国最大的医疗人才公司之一,今年5月,公司的首席执行官苏珊·萨尔卡在美国银行(Bank of America)的医疗状况虚拟会议上表示,该公司的业务主要依靠口碑来推动。

在新冠疫情期间,医疗人才公司的收入相当可观。AMN Healthcare的2021年三季报中收入相比2020年增幅达60%。另一家知名公司Cross Country Healthcare的业绩增长更加明显,2021年三季度同比增幅达93%。

通常来说,旅行护士只能够在护理执照有效的特定州或地区工作。乔治·华盛顿大学(George Washington University)的卫生人力研究中心(Health Workforce Research Center)的主任波利·皮特曼说,第一波疫情期间,州政府放松了限制,旅行护理的案例也为人才跨州流动至最需要的地方工作提供了框架。到第三波疫情时,新冠病毒已经无处不在,护士仍然可以自由选择工作地点。竞价大战随后爆发。

“我认为旅行护士具有重要的作用,如果适度的话。”皮特曼说。大量研究表明,如果过多聘用旅行护士,对医院底线、员工士气或患者并无益处。

皮特曼说,在新冠疫情期间,财力充足的大型医院招聘的护士已经足够。然而为新冠病毒易感人群提供治疗的小型医院,例如圣胡安地区医院(San Juan Regional),一家只有250张床位的社区医院,想稳住员工并花钱聘请旅行护士就很困难。

花钱请旅行护士会严重影响医院的底线,也会影响护理质量。2021年,美国医疗保健人才和保留机构NSI护理解决方案公司(NSI Nursing Solutions)对超过3000家医院进行调查后估计,医院如果能够少请20位旅行护士,平均就可以节省300万美元。

医院与全职员工的关系也因此遇到了挑战。皮特曼告诉《财富》杂志,在新冠疫情期间,医院广泛聘请旅行护士,全职护士们不禁想问,为什么医院不愿意花钱为他们提高待遇,多招一些全职护士减轻负担。“结果陷入了士气低落的恶性循环。”皮特曼说。

很多护理人员精疲力竭且负担过重,不断有人离开行业,或者像莫格勒一样转向旅行护士。“如果普通护士每小时挣50美元,而旅行护士每小时挣150美元,差距就实在太大了。”全美黑人护士协会(National Black Nurses Association)的主席玛莎·道森说。“我不能因此反对旅行护士,只能说现有制度为他们提供了很强的赚钱能力。”

“郁积之火”

匹兹堡大学(University of Pittsburgh)的护理学博士后朱厄尔·斯科特认为,新冠疫情爆发前的护理行业仿佛郁积之火。如果一直观察该行业,就会发现诸如全职员工比例过低、责任不断增加和缺乏制度支持等问题热度不断上升。然而如果离得远一些,是无法发现的。“新冠疫情爆发像有人在火上倒了一桶汽油。”斯科特说。

曾经几乎所有护士都要学习一年获得资格证书,也就是LPN,执业护士执照,整个职业生涯都在一两家机构度过。过去40年里,随着医疗普遍更加高科技和专业化,护理专业化程度显著提高。如今,大多数美国护士都获得了三年制学位,然后成为注册护士,很多人还会继续深造。很多人成了能够在无医生监督时工作的执业护士,获得例如护士麻醉师等更专业的职位,有些护士甚至攻读博士学位,然后进入学术界。

各项因素都意味着,作为医院和疗养院主力的急症护理注册护士供应比过去少得多。布尔豪斯表示:“总是存在缺护士的情况”,而导致本地短缺的因素可能是,某个科室有几名护士同时休育儿假,或者被竞争对手医院挖走。

但过去几十年的趋势加剧了结构性短缺,全美护理人员体系更加脆弱。在注册护士中,有相当一部分是婴儿潮一代。自2000年达到顶峰以来,很多护士已经退休。在新冠疫情爆发前,每年约有70000名护士退休。

如果从劳动力总数来看,这个比例并不高。“但是如果考虑到很多具有20年、30年工作经验的老人离开,需要替换人员数字就很大了。”布尔豪斯说。在过去几年里,他和同事一直听到医院抱怨,在复杂且要求高的领域里,例如重症监护和急诊护理科室,想招聘经验丰富的护士很困难。

根据美国劳工统计局的数据,目前全美正在从业的注册护士约有308万人。预计到2030年,需求将增长9%,也就是缺近30万名护士。但在今年4月,美国护理学院协会(American Association of Colleges of Nursing)的报告称,尽管劳动力主体逐渐退休,对护士的需求也在增长,但去年全美各地的护理学校拒绝了超过6万名的合格申请者。

主要原因是护理学校师资力量不足,尤其是有色人种师资。斯科特指出,全职护理教授里有色人种占比不到10%。大约四分之一的护士都是有色人种。研究表明,无论学生的种族如何,如果能够向多民族文化背景的人学习,成绩就会更好。有色人种的学生受益更大,因为有机会获得分享自己经历的教师指导,归属感也更强。

从斯科特的经历来看,她说有一位黑人护理教授玛瓦·普莱斯曾经主动与她讨论攻读研究生的问题,激励她争取更高学历,并最终成为护理教授。“毫无疑问,支持非常重要。”她说。

培训护士不仅仅在教室里。加州大学旧金山分校卫生政策研究所(UCSF Institute for Health Policy)的所长乔安妮·斯佩茨说,很少有医院向护士在职培训投资,现在身兼重负的老护士们纷纷离开,极其重要的实践教学存在缺失。

当新冠疫情来袭时,种种背后的问题变得非常紧迫。“极其狭窄的专业迅速出现压倒性需求,医院均受到冲击。”布尔豪斯说。实习护士、新手护士被迫跟随留下的经验丰富护士一起提供重症护理。这是恶性循环。“人员编制不足导致护士流失,而护士流失导致编制减少。”美国重症护理护士协会(American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)最近发表的一篇评论称。这一循环在新冠疫情期间愈加棘手。麦肯锡公司(McKinsey & Company)最近一项调查表明,美国22%的护士计划未来两年内可能不再从事直接护理病人的工作。参与调查的300多名受访者面临的首要问题是:人员不足。“在新冠疫情期间,以往相对安全的照顾病人数量被拉到极限。”密歇根大学(University of Michigan)的护理教授苏·安妮·贝尔说,她专门研究防灾领域,新冠疫情期间,曾经在社区工作了四个月。

除了降低护士的工作满意度,人员流动也明显增加了劳动力成本。NSI的报告发现,2021年,每失去一位注册护士的平均成本为40038美元,而且单个损失会迅速累积。一家医院人员轮换率每降低一个百分点,每年平均能够节省270800美元。最近一组研究人员在一项定量研究中写道,护士轮换也会降低护理质量。“用药错误、跌倒或其他与护士相关的情况出现几率可能增加,其中也包括医疗相关感染。”

“全美危机”

从这个意义上说,旅行护士造成了棘手的问题。虽然旅行护士提升了小部分极度疲累护士的地位,也能够提供一定安慰,然而导致的问题也更加严重,让护理工作从一开始就变困难。美国公共卫生协会(Public Health Association)的主席乔治·本杰明表示,导致当前危机的长期问题并不会迅速消失。他说,各项问题可以随着时间推移逐步解决,不过需要持续努力。

但解决问题的第一步是承认问题存在。9月1日,美国护士协会(American Nurses Association)向美国卫生与公共服务部(Department of Health and Human Service)的部长泽维尔·贝塞拉提交了一封信。协会请贝塞拉宣布“全国护士出现人员危机,并立即采取措施制定并实施短期和长期解决方案。”

“我们非常盼望很快收到贝塞拉部长的回复。”信件提交一周后,美国护士协会的主席欧内斯特·格兰特对《财富》杂志表示。截至12月本文发布时,该协会仍未收到回应。

至于离开全职岗位成为旅行护士的莫格勒,对自己的选择也很纠结。他说:“离开病情严重急需护理的病人,人手严重不足的医院,还有无法像我一样转型的同事们,我感觉并不好。”

但是,工作量太大存在风险,他和同事也感觉不到医院的支持,这些都是他选择离开的重要原因。他说:“我会一份合同一份合同地工作,直到没有什么钱可赚,或者情况开始改善,全职护士工作的吸引力提高了再说。”(财富中文网)

译者:梁宇

审校:夏林

Jesse Mogler had been working as an emergency room nurse for less than a year when the pandemic started. During that time, he says, he worked with travel nurses—maybe one or two per shift—in the busy ER of San Juan Regional Medical Center in Farmington, N.M. They were often less experienced than staff nurses, he says, and helping to orient them to the practices of the specific ER took time from more senior nurses on the floor. Still, the travel nurses were helpful, especially on the unpopular late shifts.

By the time he left, over a year later, the COVID-19 pandemic was in full swing, and the floor was primarily staffed by travel nurses—especially during the evening and overnight shifts. By midnight, he says, sometimes even the nurse in charge of running everything—known, appropriately, as the charge nurse—was a “traveler.”

Mogler, who finished nursing school in 2018, found that he was rapidly becoming one of the most experienced nurses on the floor. He was charged with looking after a higher number of patients than ever before, sometimes overseeing six to 10 emergency cases, he says.

In school, he says, teachers constantly reinforce that preventable accidents or deaths among the patients a nurse is assigned to can result in an inquest and the loss of your nursing license—to say nothing of the trauma of knowing you had a role in unnecessary suffering. “It increasingly felt like every shift, we [were] about one traumatic accident, one trauma or critical patient away from unnecessary deaths,” he says. “It was risky to be a patient. It was risky to be a nurse.”

Looking for higher compensation for an increasingly draining job (as well as the ability to move on quickly from an environment that felt unsafe), he posted on a travel nurse job board and got a rush of text messages and voicemails from recruiters. He started his first contact in October and will be working in Durango, N.M., until the end of 2021—making four times the hourly rate he made as a staff nurse.

COVID has transformed many aspects of health care—from early ventilator shortages to endlessly delayed routine procedures. But one of the most striking effects the virus has had is on the career market for the people that care for you. The explosion of travel nurses has massively increased pay for those willing to work for the highest bidder. Healthcare job board Vivian estimates that the average travel RN salary in the U.S. is presently almost $3,200 per week, based on 59,000 active job listings in the past 90 days. That works out to almost $90 per hour for the average 36-hour travel nursing week, according to Vivian. It's also more than twice the median hourly pay of a staff nurse in the United States in 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But a rotating cast of for-hire staffers has also, some say, destabilized hospitals where employees soon entering year three of the pandemic were already at a breaking point. As ICUs begin to fill up again with a winter COVID-19 surge and the Omicron variant, as well as flu season, this shaky system keeping hospitals afloat will be put to the test.

Becoming a “traveler”

Travel nurses were around as far back as the 1970s, says Peter Buerhaus, a nursing policy expert from Montana State University. “They have never been a large component of the nursing workforce,” he says. The field, once used to bridge brief localized nursing shortages, started growing pre-pandemic: A market report from Grand View Research published in early 2020 found that in 2019 alone the market for travel nurses grew by 7%, driven in part by hospitals’ ongoing attempts to cut permanent-staffing costs.

The market has ballooned in size since the pandemic began. Staffing Industry Analysts (SIA) estimates that the U.S. travel nurse staffing industry grew 35% in 2020, from $6.2 billion in 2019 to $8.4 billion. By the end of 2021, SIA predicts a further 40% expansion, to $11.8 billion.

“While the volume of travel nurses on assignment grew in 2020 and 2021, much of the market size growth has been due to large increases in pay rates due to the imbalance of demand with supply,” notes Timothy Landhuis, North America director of research at SIA.

The active Facebook group “Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up” has more than 100,000 members and is peppered with listings and posts from recruiters. Job boards and groups like the Facebook group are the main ways that travel nurses find work. The business of AMN Healthcare, one of the largest health care staffing firms, is driven predominantly by word of mouth, CEO Susan Salka told a Bank of America virtual conference on the state of health care in May.

Health care staffing firms have posted impressive returns during the pandemic. AMN reported a whopping 60% bump in revenue over 2020 in its third quarter 2021. Cross Country Healthcare, another prominent firm, was even higher, with a 93% year-over-year increase in Q3 2021.

Usually, travel nurses are restricted to the specific states or regions where their nursing licenses are valid. During the first wave of the pandemic, those restrictions were waived by state governments, and travel nursing provided a framework to move people across state lines to where they were needed most, says Polly Pittman, director of the Health Workforce Research Center at George Washington University. By the time of the third wave, when COVID-19 was ubiquitous, nurses could still work almost anywhere. A bidding war ensued.

“I think travel nurses have an important function, in moderation,” says Pittman. But a large body of research shows that overuse of travel nurses isn’t good—for hospital bottom lines, for staff morale, or for patients.

During the pandemic, big hospital systems that can afford to pay have been able to hire the nurses they needed, says Pittman. Smaller health care facilities that provide care to some of those most vulnerable to COVID-19—like San Juan Regional, a community hospital with about 250 beds—have struggled to maintain staff and find the funds to pay for travelers.

Paying travel nurses has a serious effect on hospital bottom lines, which also impacts quality of care. NSI Nursing Solutions, a national health care staffing and retention agency, conducted a survey of over 3,000 hospitals in 2021 and estimated that hospitals could save an average of $3 million for every 20 travel nurse positions eliminated.

And it hurts relationships with the regular workforce. The widespread use of travel nurses during this pandemic has left staff nurses asking why hospitals can’t find the money to pay them better and hire more staff nurses to reduce their load, multiple sources including Pittman told Fortune. “It creates this downward spiral of low morale,” Pittman says.

Exhausted and overburdened, many staff nurses are leaving the profession altogether or, like Mogler, turning to travel nursing. “If you have a regular nurse making $50 an hour and a travel nurse making $150 an hour, that’s a big gap,” says Martha Dawson, president of the National Black Nurses Association. “I can’t hold that against the nurse, because for them that’s the current system that provides them with earning power.”

“A smoldering fire”

Jewel Scott, a postdoctoral nursing scholar at the University of Pittsburgh, compares nursing before the pandemic to a smoldering fire. If you were right beside the profession, you could see the heat of issues like low staffing ratios, ever-increasing responsibilities, and lack of institutional support flickering. Farther away, though, they were invisible. “Then COVID-19 hit, and [it was like] somebody poured a gallon of gasoline on the fire,” Scott says.

Once upon a time, nearly all nurses got a single one-year qualification—known as the LPN, or licensed practical nurse—and spent their entire career at one or two facilities. Nursing has professionalized significantly in the past 40 years, as health care generally has become more high-tech and specialized. Today, most American nurses get a three-year degree, which makes them RNs, or registered nurses, and many go on to further qualifications. They can become nurse practitioners, who work without the supervision of a doctor, go into more specialized positions like nurse anesthetist, and some even get Ph.D.s and go into academia.

All of those factors mean that acute care RNs, the mainstay of hospital and nursing home staffing, are in much shorter supply than they used to be. “There are always background shortages of nurses,” says Buerhaus. Local shortages can result from factors like several nurses on a ward all going on parental leave at the same time, or poaching by a competitor hospital, he says.

But trends in the past few decades have exacerbated structural shortages—and made the national workforce more vulnerable. The baby boomers who make up the bulk of the RN workforce have been retiring in large numbers since their generational workforce peaked in 2000. Pre-pandemic, about 70,000 of these nurses retired per year.

As a fraction of the total workforce, that’s not a huge percentage. “But when you think about the 20 and 30 years of experience that are leaving the workforce, that’s a big number to replace,” Buerhaus says. For the past few years, he and his colleagues have been hearing from hospitals that experienced nurses in complicated, demanding areas like intensive care and emergency care have been difficult to hire.

At present, about 3.08 million registered nurses are employed around the country, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Demand is predicted to grow by 9% by 2030—that means almost 300,000 nurses. But even though the mainstay of the labor force is retiring and demand for nurses is growing, nursing schools around the country are turning away qualified applicants—over 60,000 last year, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing reported in April.

There just aren’t enough faculty available to staff nursing schools—especially faculty who are people of color. They make up less than 10% of full nursing professors, Scott notes. About one-quarter of nurses identify as people of color. Studies show that outcomes are better for students who learn from people with a mix of ethnocultural backgrounds, regardless of the student's race. Students who are people of color especially benefit because they have the opportunity to be mentored by people who share their lived experiences and feel more like they belong.

In her case, Scott says having a Black nursing professor, Marva Price, reach out to talk to her about pursuing graduate studies led her to seek out further qualifications and eventually become a nursing professor herself. "Without a doubt, representation matters," she says.

And training nurses isn’t just about what happens in the classroom. Few hospitals have invested in nurse training on the job, says Joanne Spetz, director of the UCSF Institute for Health Policy studies. Now that the older nurses who were carrying so much weight are leaving, she says, there’s nobody who can do that vital teaching.

When the pandemic hit, these background issues became an urgent problem. “Hospitals were hit by this very fast, overwhelming demand for this very narrow specialty,” Buerhaus says. Trainee nurses and novice nurses were pressed into service in critical care, alongside the experienced nurses who remained. It’s a vicious cycle. “Poor staffing causes nurse attrition, and nurse attrition sustains poor staffing,” reads a recent commentary from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. This cycle has become more intractable during COVID-19. A recent McKinsey & Company survey suggests that as many as 22% of the country’s nurses may plan to leave direct patient care in the next two years. The top issue for the survey’s more than 300 respondents: insufficient staffing. “During the pandemic, what is considered to be a safe number of patients to care for has been stretched to the absolute limit,” says Sue Anne Bell, a University of Michigan nursing professor who specializes in disaster preparedness and has been deployed to communities for four months during the pandemic.

In addition to lowering nurse job satisfaction, turnover dramatically increases labor force costs. Each RN lost to a hospital costs on average $40,038 in 2021, the NSI report finds. Those individual losses add up quickly: With each percentage point a hospital improves its turnover rate, it saves an average of $270,800 annually. Nurse turnover also detracts from quality of care, a team of researchers wrote in a recent quantitative study, “with potentially increased rates of medication errors, falls, or other nurse-sensitive outcomes including health care–associated infections.”

A “national crisis”

In that sense, travel nursing has created a tricky problem: While it elevates and provides relief for a small subset of burned-out nurses, it magnifies the issues making the job so hard in the first place. The long-standing issues that paved the way for the current crisis also aren't going away anytime soon, says Georges Benjamin, president of the American Public Health Association. They could be solved over time, he says, although it would take sustained effort.

But the first step in solving a problem is acknowledging that it exists. On Sept.1, the American Nurses Association submitted a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra. The association asked him to declare “a national nurse staffing crisis and take immediate steps to develop and implement both short- and long-term solutions.”

“We do hope to hear from Secretary Becerra soon,” ANA president Ernest Grant told Fortune a week after the letter was submitted As of this article's publication in December, the ANA had received no response.

As for Mogler, the nurse that left his staff job for a travel position, he struggles with his choice. “I don’t feel great having left a very sick and needy population in a very understaffed hospital and coworkers who…were not able to take the same transition I did,” he says.

But the risk of handling a too-big workload and the feeling that his hospital wasn’t supporting him or his colleagues were too big an incentive to leave. As it is, he says, “I’m going to transition from one contract to the next until either the money is no longer worthwhile or situations start to improve and staff nursing becomes more appealing.”

热读文章
热门视频
扫描二维码下载财富APP