立即打开
群体免疫无望,死亡率超美国,瑞典仍坚持既有防疫政策

群体免疫无望,死亡率超美国,瑞典仍坚持既有防疫政策

Niclas Rolander, 彭博社 2020-07-22
最新数据显示,瑞典距离实现所谓的“群体免疫”还有很长的路要走。

瑞典首相斯特凡•勒文表示,虽然备受争议,但他坚信自己国家的防疫策略并无任何不当之处。

由于未能采取适当的封城措施,瑞典新冠死亡人数迅速上升,勒文的支持率也因此出现下降,但在接受瑞典《晚报》采访时,勒文表示仍然坚信“我们的策略是正确的。”

此前有迹象表明,虽然瑞典民众暴露在新冠病毒前的几率比其他许多地方高得多,但群体免疫效果并不明显。与此同时,瑞典每10万人的死亡率甚至比美国还高。

免疫谜题

瑞典人新冠肺炎阳性比例远超其他北欧国家。但最新数据显示,瑞典距离实现所谓的“群体免疫”还有很长的路要走。

瑞典公共卫生局微生物研究部门负责人卡琳•特格马克•维塞尔在7月14日说:“我们知道,由于大部分人并未受过感染,所以他们对病毒并没有免疫力。也就是说,人群中的易感性仍然很高。”

该机构于6月公布的数据显示,在瑞典疫情最严重的斯德哥尔摩地区,约有10%的人已经产生了新冠病毒抗体。过去四周,瑞典首都地区有超过14万人报名参加了免费抗体检测,其中有17.6%的人检测结果呈阳性。

但要想弄清楚新冠肺炎的免疫机理,还有很多东西有待研究。世界卫生组织负责新冠肺炎相关技术事务的官员玛利亚•范•科克霍夫表示,虽然其他冠状病毒的相关数据表明,感染者在康复后会有一定免疫力,但新冠病毒是否如此还很难确定。

科克霍夫在7月13号的新闻发布会上表示:“我们确实期望感染者会产生某种程度的免疫反应。但我们不知道这种保护力度有多大,也不知道其能持续多久。”

国王学院(King’s College)的研究人员在最近一项研究中发现,新冠肺炎患者在感染三个月后的免疫水平就出现了大幅下降。

不幸的结果

在谈到这项研究结果时,特格马克•维塞尔说:“这当然不是个好消息。这项研究表明,抗体的保护作用无法持续很长时间,但免疫系统的其他部分也会提供保护,如T细胞反应和细胞免疫。”

然而“群体免疫”这个概念本身就备受争议,瑞典的公共卫生专家也一直表示,他们从未将“群体免疫”当做疫情防控目标。

上周,23名学者联合撰写了一篇评论文章,痛斥瑞典的新冠肺炎应对策略。他们对所谓“从未将群体免疫当作防疫目标”的说法提出了质疑,并认为当局虽未明说,但却一直有意让大量民众暴露在病毒面前。

过去几周,除卢森堡外,瑞典是所有欧盟国家中新增病例比率最高的国家。这在一定程度上反映出,在一拖再拖之后,该国终于开始加大检测力度。但这种情况也表明,相比那些采取了更加严格管控措施的国家,瑞典的新冠疫情形势更为严峻。

这个由23名专家组成的小组(其中多人曾经主张瑞典应该采取更为严格的封城措施)表示,为了挽救民众的生命,瑞典现在应该考虑多管齐下,采取包括隔离确诊患者的无症状接触者、建议民众在公共场合佩戴口罩在内的多种措施。

口罩

口罩问题在瑞典尤为棘手,该国的首席流行病学家安德斯•特格内尔在疫情爆发初期就公开否认了口罩的有效性,虽然最近其观点有些动摇,但仍未建议民众佩戴口罩。

而世卫组织却建议民众佩戴口罩,美国、英国政府也建议人们在难以保持社交距离时佩戴口罩。

23人小组成员、传染病教授比约恩•奥尔森表示:“无症状传播和口罩这两个词现在被污名化了,我们需要为其去除这种污名。”他说,美国国家过敏症与传染病研究所所长安东尼•福奇佩戴口罩的画面发出了“非常明确的信号,瑞典没有理由认为自己比他的信息更准确。”

特格内尔认为,目前尚无足够证据表明口罩是否有效,并且佩戴口罩甚至可能使人们产生一种错误的安全感,进而忽视洗手、社交疏离等基本防疫措施。但一项由世界卫生组织资助、针对172项研究进行的回顾分析发现,戴口罩确实可以防控新冠疫情的传播。

特格马克•维塞尔表示,保持距离仍然是预防感染最有效的方法。但她同时指出,她所供职的机构也计划研究如何应对无法保持社交距离的情况,“以及口罩(对疫情防控)是否能有所帮助”。

作为最早对瑞典新冠防控策略提出批评的人士之一,奥尔森担心,无论免疫水平如何,瑞典疫情恐怕都难以在短时间内得到控制。他表示,如果在疫情爆发初期就采取封城措施,那么可能会获得较为理想的结果,但现在已经太迟了。

“今年3月我们本有机会更好地控制住疫情发展,但我们没有把握住。如果当时我们把握住了机会,疫情防控局面可能也会大不相同。” 奥尔森说。(财富中文网)

译者:Feb

瑞典首相斯特凡•勒文表示,虽然备受争议,但他坚信自己国家的防疫策略并无任何不当之处。

由于未能采取适当的封城措施,瑞典新冠死亡人数迅速上升,勒文的支持率也因此出现下降,但在接受瑞典《晚报》采访时,勒文表示仍然坚信“我们的策略是正确的。”

此前有迹象表明,虽然瑞典民众暴露在新冠病毒前的几率比其他许多地方高得多,但群体免疫效果并不明显。与此同时,瑞典每10万人的死亡率甚至比美国还高。

免疫谜题

瑞典人新冠肺炎阳性比例远超其他北欧国家。但最新数据显示,瑞典距离实现所谓的“群体免疫”还有很长的路要走。

瑞典公共卫生局微生物研究部门负责人卡琳•特格马克•维塞尔在7月14日说:“我们知道,由于大部分人并未受过感染,所以他们对病毒并没有免疫力。也就是说,人群中的易感性仍然很高。”

该机构于6月公布的数据显示,在瑞典疫情最严重的斯德哥尔摩地区,约有10%的人已经产生了新冠病毒抗体。过去四周,瑞典首都地区有超过14万人报名参加了免费抗体检测,其中有17.6%的人检测结果呈阳性。

但要想弄清楚新冠肺炎的免疫机理,还有很多东西有待研究。世界卫生组织负责新冠肺炎相关技术事务的官员玛利亚•范•科克霍夫表示,虽然其他冠状病毒的相关数据表明,感染者在康复后会有一定免疫力,但新冠病毒是否如此还很难确定。

科克霍夫在7月13号的新闻发布会上表示:“我们确实期望感染者会产生某种程度的免疫反应。但我们不知道这种保护力度有多大,也不知道其能持续多久。”

国王学院(King’s College)的研究人员在最近一项研究中发现,新冠肺炎患者在感染三个月后的免疫水平就出现了大幅下降。

不幸的结果

在谈到这项研究结果时,特格马克•维塞尔说:“这当然不是个好消息。这项研究表明,抗体的保护作用无法持续很长时间,但免疫系统的其他部分也会提供保护,如T细胞反应和细胞免疫。”

然而“群体免疫”这个概念本身就备受争议,瑞典的公共卫生专家也一直表示,他们从未将“群体免疫”当做疫情防控目标。

上周,23名学者联合撰写了一篇评论文章,痛斥瑞典的新冠肺炎应对策略。他们对所谓“从未将群体免疫当作防疫目标”的说法提出了质疑,并认为当局虽未明说,但却一直有意让大量民众暴露在病毒面前。

过去几周,除卢森堡外,瑞典是所有欧盟国家中新增病例比率最高的国家。这在一定程度上反映出,在一拖再拖之后,该国终于开始加大检测力度。但这种情况也表明,相比那些采取了更加严格管控措施的国家,瑞典的新冠疫情形势更为严峻。

这个由23名专家组成的小组(其中多人曾经主张瑞典应该采取更为严格的封城措施)表示,为了挽救民众的生命,瑞典现在应该考虑多管齐下,采取包括隔离确诊患者的无症状接触者、建议民众在公共场合佩戴口罩在内的多种措施。

口罩

口罩问题在瑞典尤为棘手,该国的首席流行病学家安德斯•特格内尔在疫情爆发初期就公开否认了口罩的有效性,虽然最近其观点有些动摇,但仍未建议民众佩戴口罩。

而世卫组织却建议民众佩戴口罩,美国、英国政府也建议人们在难以保持社交距离时佩戴口罩。

23人小组成员、传染病教授比约恩•奥尔森表示:“无症状传播和口罩这两个词现在被污名化了,我们需要为其去除这种污名。”他说,美国国家过敏症与传染病研究所所长安东尼•福奇佩戴口罩的画面发出了“非常明确的信号,瑞典没有理由认为自己比他的信息更准确。”

特格内尔认为,目前尚无足够证据表明口罩是否有效,并且佩戴口罩甚至可能使人们产生一种错误的安全感,进而忽视洗手、社交疏离等基本防疫措施。但一项由世界卫生组织资助、针对172项研究进行的回顾分析发现,戴口罩确实可以防控新冠疫情的传播。

特格马克•维塞尔表示,保持距离仍然是预防感染最有效的方法。但她同时指出,她所供职的机构也计划研究如何应对无法保持社交距离的情况,“以及口罩(对疫情防控)是否能有所帮助”。

作为最早对瑞典新冠防控策略提出批评的人士之一,奥尔森担心,无论免疫水平如何,瑞典疫情恐怕都难以在短时间内得到控制。他表示,如果在疫情爆发初期就采取封城措施,那么可能会获得较为理想的结果,但现在已经太迟了。

“今年3月我们本有机会更好地控制住疫情发展,但我们没有把握住。如果当时我们把握住了机会,疫情防控局面可能也会大不相同。” 奥尔森说。(财富中文网)

译者:Feb

Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said he’s in no doubt his country’s highly controversial strategy for fighting Covid-19 remains appropriate.

Lofven, who has seen his popularity flag as Sweden’s decision not to impose a proper lockdown was followed by a spike in deaths, said he still thinks “the strategy is right, I’m completely convinced of that,” according to an interview with Aftonbladet.

The comments follow signs that, despite much higher rates of exposure to the coronavirus in Sweden than in many other places, immunity remains elusive. Meanwhile, Sweden’s mortality rate per 100,000 is higher than that in the U.S.

Immunity Puzzle

Far greater numbers of Swedes have tested positive for Covid-19 than elsewhere in the Nordic region. But Sweden remains a long way off achieving so-called herd immunity, according to the latest data.

“We know that large parts of the population are unprotected, as they haven’t been infected,” Karin Tegmark Wisell, head of the Public Health Agency’s microbiology department, said on July 14. That means there remains a “large susceptibility in the population,” she said.

Data published by the agency in June indicated that about 10% of people in Stockholm—Sweden’s worst affected area—had developed antibodies to Covid-19. In the past four weeks, 17.6% of the more than 140,000 who signed up for free antibody tests in the capital region returned a positive result.

But there are plenty of caveats to figuring out how immunity works when it comes to Covid-19. Data from other coronaviruses suggest that an infected person would have some degree of immunity after recovering, though it’s hard to be sure, according to Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization’s technical lead officer on Covid-19.

“We do expect people infected would mount some level of immune response,” Kerkhove said at a briefing on July 13. “But we don’t know how strong the protection is or how long it may last.”

In a recent study, researchers at King’s College found that levels of immunity dropped drastically only three months after infection.

Unfortunate Outcome

“Of course, it is unfortunate,” Tegmark Wisell said of the study’s results. “It indicates that the protection from antibodies doesn’t last very long, but there are other parts of the immune system that give protection, for example T-cell response and cellular immunity.”

The concept of herd immunity is a controversial one, and Swedish public health experts have consistently denied that achieving it was ever a stated goal.

Last week, 23 academics who have emerged as the most vocal local critics of Sweden’s Covid-19 strategy, wrote an opinion piece lambasting the country’s approach. They questioned the idea that herd immunity was never a goal, calling it a “stealth strategy,” whereby authorities deliberately sought to expose large numbers of the population to the virus.

Sweden had the highest rate of new cases of all European Union states, barring Luxembourg, in the past couple of weeks. That partly reflects that the country finally, after many false starts, has been able to ramp up testing. However, it also indicates that the the virus remains more widespread than in most countries that have implemented more stringent measures.

The group of 23 critics, many of whom have advocated for a stricter lockdown, say Sweden should now consider a range of measures to save lives. These include quarantines for asymptomatic people who have been in contact with an infected person, and recommendations that face masks be used in public.

Face Masks

The question of face masks has proved particularly thorny in Sweden, with the chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, publicly dismissing their effectiveness early on during the pandemic. More recently, he seemed to backtrack somewhat, but stopped short of recommending their use.

Masks are now recommended by the WHO, and authorities in the U.S. and the U.K. advise that people use them when social distancing is difficult to do.

“Asymptomatic spread and face masks are terms that have been stigmatized, and we need to remove that stigma,” said Bjorn Olsen, a professor of infectious diseases, who is part of the group of 23. He says seeing Anthony Fauci, the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, wearing a face mask sends “a very clear signal, and Sweden shouldn’t believe we have better information than he has.”

Tegnell has argued that the evidence on masks is thin, and says that using them might even create a false sense of security, leading people to neglect essential measures such as hand-washing and social distancing. But a review of 172 studies funded by the WHO concluded that mask-wearing protects against Covid-19 transmission.

Tegmark Wisell said distancing remains the most effective way to prevent infection. But she also said her agency plans to review how to tackle situations in which distancing isn’t an option, “and whether face masks can be of any help.”

Olsen, an early critic of Sweden’s Covid-19 strategy, fears that regardless of immunity levels, it will take a long time for the pandemic to run its course in the country. Though a lockdown would have been the right thing to do when the virus broke out, he says it’s too late now to impose one.

“That train left the station in March, and we dropped the ticket on the platform,” Olsen said. “If we had done it then we would have come out of this very differently.”

热读文章
热门视频
扫描二维码下载财富APP