立即打开
教皇提了一个令人意想不到的建议:施行全民基本收入制度

教皇提了一个令人意想不到的建议:施行全民基本收入制度

Bernhard Warner 2020-05-19
教皇方济各在一封信中呼吁,要为面临最大经济风险的人们提供基本收入,这在复活节期间引起了轰动。

复活节这天,教皇方济各对疫情期间的封锁深感忧虑。在圣彼得广场上,没有朝圣者聚集在他的窗户下面,梵蒂冈城内也没有举办任何隆重的庆祝活动。

但教皇的忧虑显然不止于此。各国政府帮助失业者在新冠疫情期间生存下去的行动迟缓,这令教皇感到不满,于是他写了一封信。而他写这样一封信并不令人意外,因为他在教皇任职期间,一直都把社会正义放在第一位。但他所提出的建议却让经济学家们感到意外。

他在信中写道,现在是时候施行全民基本收入(UBI)制度了。他的措辞似乎非常谨慎,貌似是在专门针对零工经济。

他写道:“你们可能是地下经济的劳工、自由业者或者来自草根经济,你们没有一份稳定的薪资来度过这个难关。隔离防疫让你们处于难以忍受的处境。或许,此刻正是考虑全民基本收入的时机,以承认你们高尚又不可取代的工作,并赋予你们尊严。”

教皇方济各在一封信中呼吁,要为在新冠疫情导致的经济破坏中面临最大风险的人们提供一份基本收入,这在复活节期间引起了轰动。图片来源:Wire photography: Vatican Media/Vatican Pool via Getty Images

“需要有更大胆的想法”

各国政府为了应对新冠疫情所采取的措施,使全球经济停摆,因此从巴西到英国,人们对基本收入制度的呼声日渐高涨。原因不难猜测,因为企业裁员导致数千万人下岗或临时失业。与此同时,政策制定者所执行的财政救济措施,大部分都是杯水车薪,并且行动迟缓。救援组织警告称,这次疫情可能会导致全球有5亿人陷入贫困。

联合国开发计划署亚洲及太平洋区域局的主任坎尼·维格纳拉贾呼吁,将全民基本收入作为“财政刺激计划的核心”。他写道:“新冠疫情的传播动摇了全球经济的根本,人们开始对现行的经济模式提出质疑:疫情加剧了全球的不公平和不平等。所以现在需要有一些更大胆的想法,包括之前被抛弃的做法。”

越来越多的政治人物、经济学家和社会学家表示,全民基本收入作为一种社会保障制度,可能足以帮助单亲妈妈、需要照顾成年子女的老年人,以及需要养家糊口的失业者们维持生计。

社会学家敏娜·伊丽卡诺在回答《财富》杂志的问题时写道:“如果有这种平台,就可以用来执行‘直升机撒钱’政策。而且这种一次性发放现金的做法,很有可能会增加经济活力。”

伊丽卡诺补充道:“全民基本收入制度在欧盟是否有讨论的价值?”她是芬兰社会保险机构的研究员。该机构赞助了全球规模最大的全民基本收入试点。

芬兰在去年结束了为期两年的全民基本收入试点。在讨论这次试点的网络直播中,伊丽卡诺表示,她认为疫情将成为决定这种措施成败的关键时刻。她说:“我认为全民基本收入能够在极其动荡的情况下,为人们带来保障。”

从自由主义者到左派

过去几年,全民基本收入制度出人意料地得到了许多人的支持。“债券之王”比尔·格罗斯和资深自由主义经济学家米尔顿·弗里德曼都呼吁为美国贫困人群提供某种形式的最低收入。

支持者们认为,全民基本收入可以减少收入不平等,而且就眼前而言,他们认为这种措施能够为全社会大部分因为自动化技术而面临失业威胁的人群提供经济支持。

而批评者指责这种撒钱的做法代价昂贵,很少有政府有能力承担。这种没有附加条件的发钱甚至在芬兰国内也有不同的观点,尽管其全民基本收入项目在参与者中很受欢迎。芬兰政府正在讨论是否要在已经非常慷慨的社会保障制度以外,把全民基本收入作为一项永久政策。

但这种制度在新冠疫情期间是否有效?

尽管决策者们匆忙制定了数万亿美元的疫情救助计划,使财政赤字日益膨胀到前所未有的程度,但全民基本收入制度正在获得更多人的支持。

英国有100名议员最近呼吁紧急通过“经济复苏全民基本收入”项目。在《金融时报》4月27日发表的一封公开信中,议员们写道:“我们需要执行全民基本收入制度,向所有人发放现金。”(哪些人有资格领取?可以领取多少现金?该项目将持续多长时间?信中对于这些重要问题都没有给出答案。)

近日,西班牙中左翼政府接近通过所谓的“ingreso mínimo vital”(基本生活收入)措施,向每对夫妇每月发放1,015欧元(约合1,103美元),单身成年人每人每月462欧元。该计划有许多条件:只有23至65岁的低收入成年人符合要求。政府将尽快通过该措施,因为据政府计算,目前西班牙有100万个家庭全家失业,如果疫情恶化引发经济危机,这个数字会增加两倍。

西班牙正在努力成为继意大利之后,欧洲第二个通过最低收入措施的国家。去年,意大利民粹政府通过了“reddito di cittadinanza”(全民基本收入或称国民补贴)计划。根据该计划,通过政府专门发放的预付借记卡,受益人的收入将自动补足到780欧元。受益人如果有工作但收入低于780欧元,可以获得工资与780欧元之间的差额。失业或退休人员则可以全额领取780欧元。

正如伊丽卡诺所说,西班牙和意大利的计划并不是全民基本收入,因为它们并非是面向全民发放;每月发放的补贴只是针对贫困线以下的群体。

真正的全民基本收入应该像杨安泽所说的那样,是“自由红利”。美国前民主党总统候选人杨安泽在竞选时曾承诺每个月向每个美国成年人发放1,000美元,没有任何附加条件,这本有可能成为全世界第一个真正的全民基本收入计划。

杨安泽最旗帜鲜明地把全民基本收入,作为一项解决不平等、缓解类似疫情这种冲击导致的经济崩溃甚至刺激创业精神的潜在政策解决方案,并将其推到了全国大讨论的高度。

杨安泽给美国政治留下的启示之一是:事实证明,全民基本收入比他几乎没有胜算的参选,更受人们欢迎。

截至复活节后的星期一,教皇有关全民基本收入的信息在Reddit上走红,标签#popeforUBI也在新冠疫情死亡人数的阴影中带来了一丝光明。

有人说,现在是要问问上帝会怎么做的时候了。

不开玩笑,基督教人士确实应该推广全民基本收入。请记住《马太福音》第二十五章。(财富中文网)

译者:Biz

复活节这天,教皇方济各对疫情期间的封锁深感忧虑。在圣彼得广场上,没有朝圣者聚集在他的窗户下面,梵蒂冈城内也没有举办任何隆重的庆祝活动。

但教皇的忧虑显然不止于此。各国政府帮助失业者在新冠疫情期间生存下去的行动迟缓,这令教皇感到不满,于是他写了一封信。而他写这样一封信并不令人意外,因为他在教皇任职期间,一直都把社会正义放在第一位。但他所提出的建议却让经济学家们感到意外。

他在信中写道,现在是时候施行全民基本收入(UBI)制度了。他的措辞似乎非常谨慎,貌似是在专门针对零工经济。

他写道:“你们可能是地下经济的劳工、自由业者或者来自草根经济,你们没有一份稳定的薪资来度过这个难关。隔离防疫让你们处于难以忍受的处境。或许,此刻正是考虑全民基本收入的时机,以承认你们高尚又不可取代的工作,并赋予你们尊严。”

“需要有更大胆的想法”

各国政府为了应对新冠疫情所采取的措施,使全球经济停摆,因此从巴西到英国,人们对基本收入制度的呼声日渐高涨。原因不难猜测,因为企业裁员导致数千万人下岗或临时失业。与此同时,政策制定者所执行的财政救济措施,大部分都是杯水车薪,并且行动迟缓。救援组织警告称,这次疫情可能会导致全球有5亿人陷入贫困。

联合国开发计划署亚洲及太平洋区域局的主任坎尼·维格纳拉贾呼吁,将全民基本收入作为“财政刺激计划的核心”。他写道:“新冠疫情的传播动摇了全球经济的根本,人们开始对现行的经济模式提出质疑:疫情加剧了全球的不公平和不平等。所以现在需要有一些更大胆的想法,包括之前被抛弃的做法。”

越来越多的政治人物、经济学家和社会学家表示,全民基本收入作为一种社会保障制度,可能足以帮助单亲妈妈、需要照顾成年子女的老年人,以及需要养家糊口的失业者们维持生计。

社会学家敏娜·伊丽卡诺在回答《财富》杂志的问题时写道:“如果有这种平台,就可以用来执行‘直升机撒钱’政策。而且这种一次性发放现金的做法,很有可能会增加经济活力。”

伊丽卡诺补充道:“全民基本收入制度在欧盟是否有讨论的价值?”她是芬兰社会保险机构的研究员。该机构赞助了全球规模最大的全民基本收入试点。

芬兰在去年结束了为期两年的全民基本收入试点。在讨论这次试点的网络直播中,伊丽卡诺表示,她认为疫情将成为决定这种措施成败的关键时刻。她说:“我认为全民基本收入能够在极其动荡的情况下,为人们带来保障。”

从自由主义者到左派

过去几年,全民基本收入制度出人意料地得到了许多人的支持。“债券之王”比尔·格罗斯和资深自由主义经济学家米尔顿·弗里德曼都呼吁为美国贫困人群提供某种形式的最低收入。

支持者们认为,全民基本收入可以减少收入不平等,而且就眼前而言,他们认为这种措施能够为全社会大部分因为自动化技术而面临失业威胁的人群提供经济支持。

而批评者指责这种撒钱的做法代价昂贵,很少有政府有能力承担。这种没有附加条件的发钱甚至在芬兰国内也有不同的观点,尽管其全民基本收入项目在参与者中很受欢迎。芬兰政府正在讨论是否要在已经非常慷慨的社会保障制度以外,把全民基本收入作为一项永久政策。

但这种制度在新冠疫情期间是否有效?

尽管决策者们匆忙制定了数万亿美元的疫情救助计划,使财政赤字日益膨胀到前所未有的程度,但全民基本收入制度正在获得更多人的支持。

英国有100名议员最近呼吁紧急通过“经济复苏全民基本收入”项目。在《金融时报》4月27日发表的一封公开信中,议员们写道:“我们需要执行全民基本收入制度,向所有人发放现金。”(哪些人有资格领取?可以领取多少现金?该项目将持续多长时间?信中对于这些重要问题都没有给出答案。)

近日,西班牙中左翼政府接近通过所谓的“ingreso mínimo vital”(基本生活收入)措施,向每对夫妇每月发放1,015欧元(约合1,103美元),单身成年人每人每月462欧元。该计划有许多条件:只有23至65岁的低收入成年人符合要求。政府将尽快通过该措施,因为据政府计算,目前西班牙有100万个家庭全家失业,如果疫情恶化引发经济危机,这个数字会增加两倍。

西班牙正在努力成为继意大利之后,欧洲第二个通过最低收入措施的国家。去年,意大利民粹政府通过了“reddito di cittadinanza”(全民基本收入或称国民补贴)计划。根据该计划,通过政府专门发放的预付借记卡,受益人的收入将自动补足到780欧元。受益人如果有工作但收入低于780欧元,可以获得工资与780欧元之间的差额。失业或退休人员则可以全额领取780欧元。

正如伊丽卡诺所说,西班牙和意大利的计划并不是全民基本收入,因为它们并非是面向全民发放;每月发放的补贴只是针对贫困线以下的群体。

真正的全民基本收入应该像杨安泽所说的那样,是“自由红利”。美国前民主党总统候选人杨安泽在竞选时曾承诺每个月向每个美国成年人发放1,000美元,没有任何附加条件,这本有可能成为全世界第一个真正的全民基本收入计划。

杨安泽最旗帜鲜明地把全民基本收入,作为一项解决不平等、缓解类似疫情这种冲击导致的经济崩溃甚至刺激创业精神的潜在政策解决方案,并将其推到了全国大讨论的高度。

杨安泽给美国政治留下的启示之一是:事实证明,全民基本收入比他几乎没有胜算的参选,更受人们欢迎。

截至复活节后的星期一,教皇有关全民基本收入的信息在Reddit上走红,标签#popeforUBI也在新冠疫情死亡人数的阴影中带来了一丝光明。

有人说,现在是要问问上帝会怎么做的时候了。

不开玩笑,基督教人士确实应该推广全民基本收入。请记住《马太福音》第二十五章。(财富中文网)

译者:Biz

On Easter Sunday, the lockdown was weighing heavily on Pope Francis. There were no throngs of pilgrims below his window in Saint Peter’s Square, no visible celebration of any kind to be found inside the walls of Vatican City.

The pope’s mind was far from all that, anyhow. Frustrated by the slow-footed response of governments around the world to help the out-of-work survive the coronavirus pandemic, the pontiff sat down and drafted a letter. He wanted to rouse the spirits of the global army of grassroots activists who’d been mobilizing to manage the food banks and soup kitchens that are overflowing these days. Such a letter was hardly extraordinary for Francis, a pope who's put social justice at the forefront of his papacy. But what he called for surprised economists.

Now, he wrote, is the time for a kind of universal basic income (UBI) scheme. His words seemed carefully chosen, as if he were singling out the gig economy.

“You who are informal, working on your own or in the grassroots economy, you have no steady income to get you through this hard time ... and the lockdowns are becoming unbearable,” he wrote. “This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out.”

"Bolder ideas are needed"

Since governments started shutting down the global economy to fight the coronavirus pandemic, calls for basic income programs have rung out from Brazil to Britain. The reasons are easy to spot. Downsizing company have laid off or furloughed tens of millions. At the same time, policymakers’ fiscal fixes have mostly been a case of too little too late. The crisis could plunge a half-billion people into poverty around the world, aid organizations warn.

“The spread of COVID-19 has fundamentally shaken economies, and people are beginning to question existing economic models: this pandemic has really thrown up the existing levels of both injustice and inequality worldwide. So bolder ideas are needed, including some, that previously, were pushed aside,” writes Kanni Wignaraja, who runs the United Nations Development Programme in the Asia-Pacific, in calling for UBI to be "a central part of the fiscal stimulus packages."

UBI just may be the kind of social safety net scheme grand enough to cover the single moms, the adult child caring for an elderly parent, and the out-of-work breadwinner, a growing number of politicians, economists and social scientists say.

“If we had this kind of platform, it could be used e.g. for delivering helicopter money. And most probably this kind of one-off payment would increase economic activity,” Minna Ylikännö, a social scientist, wrote in response to a question from Fortune.

“Worth discussing at the EU level?” added Ylikännö, a researcher at the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, which sponsored the world’s biggest UBI trial.

In a webcast discussing the Finns’ two-year UBI experiment, which wrapped up last year, Ylikännö said she saw the pandemic as a kind of make or break moment for such measures. “I think it would bring people security in a very insecure situation,” she said.

From Libertarians to Lefties

UBI has earned support over the years from surprising places. Bond king Bill Gross and über free-markets economist Milton Friedman have both argued for some form of a minimum income aimed at indigent Americans.

Supporters see such measures as a possible lever to reduce income inequality, and, more recently, to provide financial support to vast segments of society under threat by a wave of automation-driven job loss.

Critics call it nothing more than an expensive give-away that few governments can afford. The no-strings-attached handouts has even divided the Finns—that’s despite their UBI program becoming hugely popular among participants. The Finnish government is discussing whether to make it a permanent part of the country's already generous social security regime.

But would it work in a pandemic?

Even as policymakers rush out trillion-dollar COVID-19 rescue plans, swelling deficits to record proportions, UBIs are getting another look.

In the United Kingdom, a group of 100 British MPs recently called for the urgent adoption of “a recovery universal basic income.” In an open letter published in the Financial Times on April 27, the lawmakers wrote, “we need to put in place the mechanism to distribute cash to everyone.” (The big questions— who qualifies? how much they get? how long would the program run?—went unanswered.)

And, in recent days, Spain’s center-left government moved closer to creating what it’s calling ingreso mínimo vital, a monthly payment of up to €1,015 ($1,103) per couple, and up to €462 per single adult. There are plenty of conditions: only adults between 23 and 65 from lower income brackets qualify. The government is moving as quickly as it can to pass the measure as it now calculates there are 1 million Spanish households in which all members are unemployed, a figure that could triple in size should the economic crisis triggered by the pandemic deepen.

Spain is trying to become the second country in Europe, behind Italy, to pass a minimum income measure. Last year, Italy’s populist government passed into law the reddito di cittadinanza (or, citizen’s income) plan. Under the Italian scheme, a beneficiary’s income is automatically topped up to €780 via a special government-issued prepaid debit card. If you work, and earn less than that, you get the difference between your wage and €780. If you are unemployed or retired, you get the full €780.

As Ylikännö points out, the Spanish and Italian plans are not UBI as they are not universally distributed; the monthly payments are designed as a top-up for those who slip under the poverty line.

A true UBI would be something like Andrew Yang’s “freedom dividend.” The former Democratic presidential candidate campaigned on the promise to give $1,000 per month to every American adult—no questions asked—in what would have been the planet’s first truly universal basic income plan.

Yang has probably done more than anyone to thrust UBI into the national conversation as a potential policy solution to address inequality, cushion economic collapse brought on by a pandemic-sized shock, and even spur entrepreneurialism.

One of Yang's legacy to American politics: UBI is proving more popular than his longshot candidacy.

By Easter Monday, the pope’s UBI message was trending on Reddit and the hashtag #popeforUBI was cutting through the gloom of COVID-19 death numbers.

Some saw it as a what-would-Jesus-do moment.

All jokes aside, UBI should be something that those involved in Christianity should be promoting. Matthew 25 comes to mind. #PopeForUBI

热读文章
热门视频
扫描二维码下载财富APP