2月13日，在斯坦福大学商学研究生院（Stanford's Graduate School of Business）举办的关于未来媒体的大会上，《财富》杂志（Fortune）的亚当•拉辛斯基对Facebook商务及营销合作副总裁大卫•费舍尔进行了采访。以下是两人对话内容以及观众提问（略有编辑）的文字记录。
大卫•费舍尔：好，我来谈谈这两件事。不过我认为，不论是在硅谷还是其他地方，许多公司明确商业模式的时候都会碰到这种情况。当初我在【斯坦福大学商学研究院（Stanford Graduate School of Business）】以及后来加盟谷歌时，有一件很有趣的事让我很震撼。你知道的，说到开办一家公司的时候，总是先从商业模式和货币化方案谈起。而在谷歌，在Facebook，以及其他许多公司，最开始考虑的却是消费者计划——什么样的产品会成为消费者认为是了不起的产品，然后才是货币化计划。而且这并不是一个直线过程，中间会有许多曲折。
At the beginning of 2012, Facebook's mobile ad revenues were literally non-existent. By the end of the year, they generated 23% of Facebook's total advertising revenue. With more users logging onto Facebook from mobile devices than ever before, a new search feature that competes with Google, and increased scrutiny from Wall Street, Facebook's ad strategy has received considerable attention both inside and outside the company. Can ads exist on the site without harming user experience? What about Facebook's (future) video ad strategy? How many mobile ads are clicked accidentally – as a result of the "big thumb theory"? Is Facebook selling user information?
On Feb. 13, Fortune's Adam Lashinsky interviewed David Fischer, Facebook's vice president of business and marketing partnerships, at a conference on the future of media hosted by Stanford's Graduate School of Business. A lightly edited transcript of their conversation, as well as questions from the audience, follows.
ADAM LASHINS KY: Good morning, David. Good morning, everybody.
DAVID FISCHER: Good morning, Adam.
ADAM LASHINSKY: I'm going to start with some history. An interesting comparison between Google and Facebook is that -- Google and Facebook did not start as advertising platforms. [The founders] didn't have that in mind at all, presumably. And you came into both companies at a time when there was no revenue or no infrastructure for revenue, and said, "All right. Let's build one." Explain how you started from really I think from a business perspective a blank sheet of paper.
DAVID FISCHER: Yeah, I think -- I'll take these two cases, but I think it's true for a lot of companies, successful companies in the Valley and beyond, about defining a business model and where that comes in the process of it. One of the things that was interesting when I was at the [Stanford Graduate School of Business] and then went to Google that struck me is, you know, when you talked about building a company there it always started with the business plan and monetization plan. And for Google, for Facebook, for lots of companies, it started with a consumer plan and what was going to be a great product for consumers, and monetization came later and not in a straight line. It was not linear, it was sort of bumpy to get there and figure it out.
Now, it turns out that the companies -- these two companies that I've been at and I'd say for a lot of companies, advertising is a phenomenally good, efficient model that works really well. When I was at Google we got this question a lot, and at Facebook we get this question is "When are you going to diversify in your revenues?" But when you're talking about companies that have hundreds and thousands of advertisers, that [are] around the world, that's a fairly diversified stream, and it actually is quite efficient to -- you know, as margins or other things you care about on the business side goes -- it's a good business to be in. So that's sort of the starting point. So there's lots of ways you can think about monetizing those companies or other companies. I just happen to like the advertising model.