
欧盟正为与中国发生贸易摩擦做准备。欧盟每日超过10亿美元的对华贸易逆差,加剧了人们对潜在就业岗位流失的担忧,也促使欧盟政治领导人对其第二大贸易伙伴采取更强硬的立场。
欧盟委员会首席贸易谈判代表马罗什·谢夫乔维奇将于周四抵达北京,与中国商务部长王文涛举行为期两天的会谈。此次会谈的目标是缩小欧盟高达3,600亿欧元(约合4,100亿美元)的对华贸易逆差。今年早些时候,他曾将10月定为对华贸易谈判的最后期限,要求中方在此之前取得缩小逆差的切实成果。
在由27个成员国组成的欧盟内部,许多政治人士和经济学家普遍认为,中国的大规模补贴和出口,对从钢铁冶炼到汽车制造等核心工业部门构成威胁。在美国提高关税后,中国将大量出口商品转向欧盟及其他市场。
周二,在斯特拉斯堡举行的欧洲议会辩论中,绝大多数议员在对中欧贸易表达担忧的同时,也表现出强硬态度。周三,议员们以454票赞成、86票反对的表决结果通过了一项决议,主张对中国采取更强硬的立场,其核心诉求是呼吁实现“经济互惠;如果中国不开放市场,欧盟应作出对等回应”。
在表决前,牵头推动该决议的比利时议员希尔德·沃特曼斯表示:“欧洲拥有经济实力,是时候让其发挥作用了。”
欧盟的政策工具箱:从加征关税到“贸易重炮”
尽管本周欧洲看似立场一致,但欧盟究竟能够或愿意采取哪些行动,目前仍是未知数。此前,欧盟已针对中国进口钢材和电商小包裹出台了相关贸易措施。
法国战略与规划高级委员会(High Commission for Strategy and Planning)今年2月呼吁迅速采取行动,例如对中国的多项出口商品征收30%的关税,并推动欧元兑人民币贬值。与此同时,德国汽车在华销量正大幅下滑;另一方面,凭借高额政府补贴带来的价格优势,中国车企正蓄势在欧洲市场大举吞噬份额。大众汽车(Volkswagen)等大型制造商已经出现大规模裁员。
美联社获取的一封法德联名信呼吁,全面重新评估欧盟的对华政策。除其他措施外,信中还提议,降低欧盟委员会动用‘反胁迫工具’这一‘贸易重炮’的门槛。这套此前从未动用过的措施,特别针对被认定对欧盟成员国或企业施加不当压力的国家,旨在阻止或限制与此类国家的贸易和投资活动。
不过,并非所有欧盟国家都赞同如此强硬的措施。作为欧元区第四大经济体,西班牙近年来对华态度一直较为温和。西班牙首相佩德罗·桑切斯过去三年内已四度访华。周三,来自爱尔兰到保加利亚等国的极右翼和左翼议员更组成罕见的政治联盟,投票反对这项主张对华强硬的决议。
总部位于布鲁塞尔的欧洲政策中心(European Policy Centre)今年6月表示,欧洲的电池、太阳能板、钢铁、电动汽车、化工和机械行业,就业岗位与产能正大量流失。该中心呼吁设立一个仿照美国《贸易法》第301条机制的贸易调查机构。
欧盟委员会主席乌尔苏拉·冯德莱恩指出,这与21世纪初美国经历的情况如出一辙,当时美国腹地数十万个制造业岗位已不复存在。
欧盟内部智库——欧盟安全研究所(European Union Institute for Security Studies)的中国问题分析师蒂姆·吕利希表示,欧盟目前疲弱不堪的经济既需要大刀阔斧的内部改革,也需要更具攻击性的对外贸易政策。
吕利希还补充道,欧洲企业和政治领导层也难辞其咎。
他表示:“显而易见,仅仅对华采取防御姿态,并非长久之计。但如果想让自己有机会为未来技术做好准备,并在未来15至20年保持竞争力,那么你就必须保护自己。”
吕利希问道:“我们在哪些领域需要实现自主,或至少实现来源多元化?又在哪些领域需要继续同中国合作?”
周三,美国国务卿马尔科·鲁比奥访问希腊期间,呼吁欧洲加强与美国的联盟关系,并敦促欧洲“从长久的沉睡中醒来”。
中国已做好应对持久贸易争端的准备
本周在北京,当被问及法德联名信一事时,中国商务部新闻发言人表示,希望法国和德国不要鼓动欧盟动辄使用保护主义工具。
中国商务部在一份声明中强调:“保护主义提升不了竞争力,脱钩断链只会损人不利己。”
根据欧盟委员会的数据,中国是欧盟仅次于美国的第二大货物贸易伙伴。中国海关总署的数据显示,今年前八个月,中国对欧盟出口增长15.3%,而从欧盟进口增长6.2%。
《环球时报》上月发表的一篇社论写道:“欧盟也并不具备与中国进行贸易战的能力。如果它真铁了心要打,那就试试吧。”
去年美国加征关税后,中国对欧洲、东南亚、拉丁美洲和非洲的出口均有所增长,但中国在2025年全球贸易中仍录得1.2万亿美元的贸易顺差。世界大型企业联合会(The Conference Board)亚太地区高级经济学家马克斯·曾格莱因表示,到目前为止,尽管面临美国关税和其他贸易限制,中国的出口机器仍表现出很强的韧性。
就在谢夫乔维奇与王文涛举行会谈前的这个周末,中国对原产于欧盟的进口对硝基甲苯发起反倾销调查。对硝基甲苯被用于染料和制药行业。中方上个月曾警告称,如果欧盟执意推进更严厉的贸易保护主义措施,中方必将予以反制。
曾格莱因表示:“中国已经历过数轮外部压力的考验,迄今为止,基本上顶住了迫使其改变贸易政策的企图。”
由于内需持续疲软,当前中国经济很大程度上仍倚重出口拉动。欧盟大量进口中国的锂离子电池和混合动力汽车,中国汽车制造商也在欧洲扩大产能。
美国银行(Bank of America)的经济学家写道,虽然中国的贸易顺差加剧了其主要贸易伙伴的担忧,但在中美元首在华盛顿举行峰会后,中美贸易关系看起来相对稳定,中欧贸易关系因而成为了各方瞩目的焦点。
曾格莱因还表示,在中欧贸易谈判中,尤其是在欧盟成员国竞相吸引资本、就业和新制造业项目之际,中国在欧洲的投资很可能会成为北京手中的重要筹码。
Chan从香港发回报道。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
欧盟正为与中国发生贸易摩擦做准备。欧盟每日超过10亿美元的对华贸易逆差,加剧了人们对潜在就业岗位流失的担忧,也促使欧盟政治领导人对其第二大贸易伙伴采取更强硬的立场。
欧盟委员会首席贸易谈判代表马罗什·谢夫乔维奇将于周四抵达北京,与中国商务部长王文涛举行为期两天的会谈。此次会谈的目标是缩小欧盟高达3,600亿欧元(约合4,100亿美元)的对华贸易逆差。今年早些时候,他曾将10月定为对华贸易谈判的最后期限,要求中方在此之前取得缩小逆差的切实成果。
在由27个成员国组成的欧盟内部,许多政治人士和经济学家普遍认为,中国的大规模补贴和出口,对从钢铁冶炼到汽车制造等核心工业部门构成威胁。在美国提高关税后,中国将大量出口商品转向欧盟及其他市场。
周二,在斯特拉斯堡举行的欧洲议会辩论中,绝大多数议员在对中欧贸易表达担忧的同时,也表现出强硬态度。周三,议员们以454票赞成、86票反对的表决结果通过了一项决议,主张对中国采取更强硬的立场,其核心诉求是呼吁实现“经济互惠;如果中国不开放市场,欧盟应作出对等回应”。
在表决前,牵头推动该决议的比利时议员希尔德·沃特曼斯表示:“欧洲拥有经济实力,是时候让其发挥作用了。”
欧盟的政策工具箱:从加征关税到“贸易重炮”
尽管本周欧洲看似立场一致,但欧盟究竟能够或愿意采取哪些行动,目前仍是未知数。此前,欧盟已针对中国进口钢材和电商小包裹出台了相关贸易措施。
法国战略与规划高级委员会(High Commission for Strategy and Planning)今年2月呼吁迅速采取行动,例如对中国的多项出口商品征收30%的关税,并推动欧元兑人民币贬值。与此同时,德国汽车在华销量正大幅下滑;另一方面,凭借高额政府补贴带来的价格优势,中国车企正蓄势在欧洲市场大举吞噬份额。大众汽车(Volkswagen)等大型制造商已经出现大规模裁员。
美联社获取的一封法德联名信呼吁,全面重新评估欧盟的对华政策。除其他措施外,信中还提议,降低欧盟委员会动用‘反胁迫工具’这一‘贸易重炮’的门槛。这套此前从未动用过的措施,特别针对被认定对欧盟成员国或企业施加不当压力的国家,旨在阻止或限制与此类国家的贸易和投资活动。
不过,并非所有欧盟国家都赞同如此强硬的措施。作为欧元区第四大经济体,西班牙近年来对华态度一直较为温和。西班牙首相佩德罗·桑切斯过去三年内已四度访华。周三,来自爱尔兰到保加利亚等国的极右翼和左翼议员更组成罕见的政治联盟,投票反对这项主张对华强硬的决议。
总部位于布鲁塞尔的欧洲政策中心(European Policy Centre)今年6月表示,欧洲的电池、太阳能板、钢铁、电动汽车、化工和机械行业,就业岗位与产能正大量流失。该中心呼吁设立一个仿照美国《贸易法》第301条机制的贸易调查机构。
欧盟委员会主席乌尔苏拉·冯德莱恩指出,这与21世纪初美国经历的情况如出一辙,当时美国腹地数十万个制造业岗位已不复存在。
欧盟内部智库——欧盟安全研究所(European Union Institute for Security Studies)的中国问题分析师蒂姆·吕利希表示,欧盟目前疲弱不堪的经济既需要大刀阔斧的内部改革,也需要更具攻击性的对外贸易政策。
吕利希还补充道,欧洲企业和政治领导层也难辞其咎。
他表示:“显而易见,仅仅对华采取防御姿态,并非长久之计。但如果想让自己有机会为未来技术做好准备,并在未来15至20年保持竞争力,那么你就必须保护自己。”
吕利希问道:“我们在哪些领域需要实现自主,或至少实现来源多元化?又在哪些领域需要继续同中国合作?”
周三,美国国务卿马尔科·鲁比奥访问希腊期间,呼吁欧洲加强与美国的联盟关系,并敦促欧洲“从长久的沉睡中醒来”。
中国已做好应对持久贸易争端的准备
本周在北京,当被问及法德联名信一事时,中国商务部新闻发言人表示,希望法国和德国不要鼓动欧盟动辄使用保护主义工具。
中国商务部在一份声明中强调:“保护主义提升不了竞争力,脱钩断链只会损人不利己。”
根据欧盟委员会的数据,中国是欧盟仅次于美国的第二大货物贸易伙伴。中国海关总署的数据显示,今年前八个月,中国对欧盟出口增长15.3%,而从欧盟进口增长6.2%。
《环球时报》上月发表的一篇社论写道:“欧盟也并不具备与中国进行贸易战的能力。如果它真铁了心要打,那就试试吧。”
去年美国加征关税后,中国对欧洲、东南亚、拉丁美洲和非洲的出口均有所增长,但中国在2025年全球贸易中仍录得1.2万亿美元的贸易顺差。世界大型企业联合会(The Conference Board)亚太地区高级经济学家马克斯·曾格莱因表示,到目前为止,尽管面临美国关税和其他贸易限制,中国的出口机器仍表现出很强的韧性。
就在谢夫乔维奇与王文涛举行会谈前的这个周末,中国对原产于欧盟的进口对硝基甲苯发起反倾销调查。对硝基甲苯被用于染料和制药行业。中方上个月曾警告称,如果欧盟执意推进更严厉的贸易保护主义措施,中方必将予以反制。
曾格莱因表示:“中国已经历过数轮外部压力的考验,迄今为止,基本上顶住了迫使其改变贸易政策的企图。”
由于内需持续疲软,当前中国经济很大程度上仍倚重出口拉动。欧盟大量进口中国的锂离子电池和混合动力汽车,中国汽车制造商也在欧洲扩大产能。
美国银行(Bank of America)的经济学家写道,虽然中国的贸易顺差加剧了其主要贸易伙伴的担忧,但在中美元首在华盛顿举行峰会后,中美贸易关系看起来相对稳定,中欧贸易关系因而成为了各方瞩目的焦点。
曾格莱因还表示,在中欧贸易谈判中,尤其是在欧盟成员国竞相吸引资本、就业和新制造业项目之际,中国在欧洲的投资很可能会成为北京手中的重要筹码。
Chan从香港发回报道。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
The European Union is bracing for a confrontation with China as a trade deficit exceeding $1 billion a day heightens anxiety over potential job losses and pushes the bloc’s political leaders to take a more aggressive approach toward its second-largest trading partner.
The European Commission’s top trade envoy, Maroš Šefčovič, will be in Beijing Thursday for a two-day meeting with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao. The goal is narrowing the EU’s 360 billion euro ($410 billion) trade deficit with China. Earlier this year, he gave Beijing a deadline of October to provide meaningful results in doing so.
Politicians and economists across the 27-nation bloc consider China’s massive subsidies and exports a major threat to core industrial sectors from steel foundries to car factories. China diverted many of its exports to the EU and other markets after the U.S. raised tariffs.
In a debate Tuesday in European Parliament in Strasbourg, lawmakers overwhelmingly expressed anxiety alongside defiance over trade with China. On Wednesday, they voted 454 to 86 on a resolution to toughen up on China that centered on a call for “economic reciprocity and a proportionate EU response if China does not open its markets.”
Ahead of the vote, Hilde Vautmans, the Belgian lawmaker who led the resolution, said that “Europe has economic power, it’s time we used it.”
EU options range from tariffs to a “trade bazooka”
Despite the seeming European unity this week, it remains unclear what the EU can or is willing to do. It has already rolled out trade measures against Chinese steel imports and e-commerce small parcels.
France’s High Commission for Strategy and Planning in February called for swift action, like 30% tariffs on many of China’s exports, and a devaluation of the euro against the Chinese currency. Sales of German autos are plummeting in China, but China is also poised to gobble up market share in Europe by undercutting European automakers on price thanks to heavy state subsidies. There have already been mass layoffs at major manufacturers like Volkswagen.
A letter by France and Germany, a copy of which was seen by The Associated Press, called for a sweeping rethink of the EU’s China policy. Among other actions, it proposed making it easier for the European Commission to use the bloc’s so-called “trade bazooka,” the Anti-Coercion Instrument. This is a never-used-before raft of measures for blocking or restricting trade and investment from countries found to be putting undue pressure on EU member nations or corporations.
Yet not all EU nations agree on such tough measures. Spain, the eurozone’s fourth-largest economy, has been less adversarial toward China in recent years. Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has visited Beijing four times in three years. Far-right and left-wing lawmakers from Ireland to Bulgaria formed an unusual coalition on Wednesday to vote against resolution calling for tougher China policies.
The European Policy Centre in Brussels said in June that European battery producers, solar panels, steel, electric vehicles, chemicals and machinery are already hemorrhaging jobs and capacity and called for a trade investigative body modelled on Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called the phenomenon another “ China shock ” for Europe, similar to what happened in the U.S. in the early 2000s when hundreds of thousands of factory jobs in the American heartland were wiped out.
The EU’s ailing economy requires both a domestic overhaul and a more aggressive foreign trade policy, especially with China, said Tim Rühlig, a China analyst at the European Union Institute for Security Studies, the bloc’s internal think tank.
Rühlig also said that European businesses and political leadership bear some blame.
“It’s clear that just protecting yourself from China is not the future,” Rühlig said. “But to have a chance of making yourself ready for future technologies and to remain competitive in the coming 15-20 years, you have to protect yourself.”
“Where do we make ourselves independent or at least more diverse? And where do we still work with the Chinese?” Rühlig asked.
On Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio during his Greece visit called for Europe to strengthen its alliance with the U.S. as he urged Europe to “awaken from its long slumber.”
China is ready for a long trade dispute
This week in Beijing, when asked about the letter penned by France and Germany, a spokesperson at China’s Ministry of Commerce said that the countries should refrain from encouraging the EU to resort to protectionist measures.
“Protectionism cannot enhance competitiveness, and decoupling or cutting off supply chains will only harm others without benefiting oneself,” the commerce ministry said in a statement.
China is the EU’s second-largest goods trading partner after the U.S., according to European Commission data. Chinese exports to the EU rose 15.3% in the first eight months of this year, according to China’s customs agency, while its imports from the EU rose 6.2%.
“The EU does not have the capacity to wage a trade war against China,” read an editorial last month in China’s state-run Global Times newspaper. “If it is truly determined to do so, then let it try.”
China’s exports to Europe, as well as Southeast Asia, Latin America and Africa, expanded after U.S. tariffs went into effect last year, but it still booked a $1.2 trillion trade surplus globally in 2025. So far, China’s export machine has remained remarkably resilient despite U.S. tariffs and other trade restrictions, said Max Zenglein, Asia Pacific senior economist at The Conference Board.
This past weekend, ahead of the meeting between Šefčovič and Wang, China launched an anti-dumping probe on EU exports of p-nitrotoluene, which is used in dyes and pharmaceuticals. The probe was initiated after Beijing warned last month that it would take retaliatory actions if the EU instituted tougher protectionist trade measures.
“China has been battle-tested by successive rounds of external pressure and, so far, has largely stared down attempts to force a change in course,” said Zenglein.
China’s economy has been largely driven by exports as domestic demand remains sluggish. The EU imports sizable amounts of Chinese lithium-ion batteries and hybrid electric vehicles, and Chinese carmakers are also expanding production capacity in Europe.
While China’s trade surplus has intensified concerns among its major trading partners, trade ties between the U.S. and China appear relatively stable following a summit between Chinese President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump in Washington, wrote Bank of America economists, turning the attention to China-EU relations.
When it comes to negotiations with the EU, Chinese investment in Europe is likely to be among Beijing’s bargaining chips, Zenglein added, particularly as EU member states compete to attract capital, jobs, and new manufacturing projects.
Chan reported from Hong Kong.