首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

特朗普在电力领域推出“史上最大规模的放松监管举措”

Jordan Blum
2026-09-17

环保人士认为,特朗普政府的这项举措危害极大。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

美国环境保护署(EPA)署长李·泽尔丁(Lee Zeldin)9月14日在休斯敦举行的二十国集团能源富足部长级会议上发表讲话。图片来源:GETTY IMAGES

专家表示,特朗普政府废除拜登时期的电厂排放标准,最直接的后果在于:大量老旧燃煤与燃气电厂将延长运营年限,为数据中心和人工智能热潮提供额外电力支撑。

美国环境保护署周一宣布,正式废除旨在应对气候变化的电厂强制减排规定。就在该公告发布前不久,美国国家海洋和大气管理局(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)报告称,2026年夏季是美国有记录以来最热的夏天,气温较常年均值高出约3华氏度。

美国环境保护署周一表示,“电厂排放对全球气候变化没有实质性影响。”环保人士驳斥这一说法不实,认为此举将造成数千例本可避免的污染致死案例,并带来数十亿美元的额外医疗保健成本。

不过有观点认为,此举旨在气候目标与经济发展之间寻求平衡。Opportune公司可持续发展事务常务董事丹·罗米托(Dan Romito)表示,“退一步,是为了前进两步”。可再生能源仍可继续扩张,能源行业也有望迎来新一代更清洁核电与地热能源的跨越式发展。

罗米托在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“这相当于给众多数据中心留出缓冲期,以便它们寻找替代或配套电源。眼下我们需要临时过渡方案,这虽非理想之选,但煤炭发电可以在未来三、四甚至五年内满足这一需求。这样市场才有充足时间,将地热、核电方案高效地纳入能源结构。”

与此同时,人工智能竞赛仍在持续,大量电力项目对外公布,但真正启动的寥寥无几;旨在加快清洁及化石燃料发电项目审批进程的许可制度改革,今年获得国会通过的可能性也很低。罗米托认为,必须做出取舍。“电力不会凭空产生。延长燃煤、燃气电厂服役年限,不一定是为了满足预期用电需求,而是保障当下的用电需求。我们不能将可负担性与供电可靠性抛诸脑后。”

这一举措也为超大规模企业带来更多确定性,方便其推进项目。“这打消了投资者在新建现代化电厂项目上的顾虑,这类电厂的减排效率更高。”罗米托表示,并指出新建燃气电厂的污染排放会远低于老旧燃煤电厂。

未来的斗争

拜登政府2024年出台的电厂碳排放标准,要求电厂要么削减排放,要么通过技术捕获90%的温室气体。美国环境保护署不仅废除了这套标准,还提议收回自身对电厂气候污染物的监管权限,宣称环保署依法无权管控气候变化相关排放。一旦该提议落地,未来政府都无法监管此类排放。

美国环境保护署署长李·泽尔丁周一在休斯敦二十国集团能源部长会议上表示:“我们正在削减繁文缛节,推出电力行业史上最大规模的放松监管举措。”

他补充道:“我们不仅叫停拜登政府的越权监管,还提议撤销所有剩余电厂温室气体排放标准,一项不留。”

环保人士认为,特朗普政府的这项举措危害极大。

塞拉俱乐部(Sierra Club)首席项目官霍莉·本德(Holly Bender)表示:“当野火肆虐、洪水摧毁社区,民众难以承受飞涨的电费与保险费时,特朗普政府却给化石能源行业开绿灯,允许其持续排污。气候危机已近在眼前,政府却公然否认气候问题,这是对美国民众的背叛,令人震惊。”

化石能源电厂排放的温室气体占美国温室气体总排放量近25%,仅次于交通运输部门。今年年初,美国环境保护署推翻了2009年发布的“危害认定”,该认定曾判定二氧化碳等温室气体对公众健康构成威胁。美国环境保护署还废除了机动车排放相关监管规定。

特朗普政府主张,联邦《清洁空气法》并未明确提及气候变化,因此美国环境保护署无权对此类排放进行监管,并称奥巴马、拜登政府时期的“气候激进主义”不利于商业发展,还会增加能源成本。正如此前撤销机动车排放标准一样,法律诉讼在所难免。

泽尔丁称:“如果对法律有异议,那就修改法律。”

他补充道:“会有更多数据中心使用煤炭供电?这不是环保署能决定的。我们要确保恪守法律,将选择权交还市场,并做出最明智的决策,从而释放美国各类能源的潜力。”(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

专家表示,特朗普政府废除拜登时期的电厂排放标准,最直接的后果在于:大量老旧燃煤与燃气电厂将延长运营年限,为数据中心和人工智能热潮提供额外电力支撑。

美国环境保护署周一宣布,正式废除旨在应对气候变化的电厂强制减排规定。就在该公告发布前不久,美国国家海洋和大气管理局(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)报告称,2026年夏季是美国有记录以来最热的夏天,气温较常年均值高出约3华氏度。

美国环境保护署周一表示,“电厂排放对全球气候变化没有实质性影响。”环保人士驳斥这一说法不实,认为此举将造成数千例本可避免的污染致死案例,并带来数十亿美元的额外医疗保健成本。

不过有观点认为,此举旨在气候目标与经济发展之间寻求平衡。Opportune公司可持续发展事务常务董事丹·罗米托(Dan Romito)表示,“退一步,是为了前进两步”。可再生能源仍可继续扩张,能源行业也有望迎来新一代更清洁核电与地热能源的跨越式发展。

罗米托在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“这相当于给众多数据中心留出缓冲期,以便它们寻找替代或配套电源。眼下我们需要临时过渡方案,这虽非理想之选,但煤炭发电可以在未来三、四甚至五年内满足这一需求。这样市场才有充足时间,将地热、核电方案高效地纳入能源结构。”

与此同时,人工智能竞赛仍在持续,大量电力项目对外公布,但真正启动的寥寥无几;旨在加快清洁及化石燃料发电项目审批进程的许可制度改革,今年获得国会通过的可能性也很低。罗米托认为,必须做出取舍。“电力不会凭空产生。延长燃煤、燃气电厂服役年限,不一定是为了满足预期用电需求,而是保障当下的用电需求。我们不能将可负担性与供电可靠性抛诸脑后。”

这一举措也为超大规模企业带来更多确定性,方便其推进项目。“这打消了投资者在新建现代化电厂项目上的顾虑,这类电厂的减排效率更高。”罗米托表示,并指出新建燃气电厂的污染排放会远低于老旧燃煤电厂。

未来的斗争

拜登政府2024年出台的电厂碳排放标准,要求电厂要么削减排放,要么通过技术捕获90%的温室气体。美国环境保护署不仅废除了这套标准,还提议收回自身对电厂气候污染物的监管权限,宣称环保署依法无权管控气候变化相关排放。一旦该提议落地,未来政府都无法监管此类排放。

美国环境保护署署长李·泽尔丁周一在休斯敦二十国集团能源部长会议上表示:“我们正在削减繁文缛节,推出电力行业史上最大规模的放松监管举措。”

他补充道:“我们不仅叫停拜登政府的越权监管,还提议撤销所有剩余电厂温室气体排放标准,一项不留。”

环保人士认为,特朗普政府的这项举措危害极大。

塞拉俱乐部(Sierra Club)首席项目官霍莉·本德(Holly Bender)表示:“当野火肆虐、洪水摧毁社区,民众难以承受飞涨的电费与保险费时,特朗普政府却给化石能源行业开绿灯,允许其持续排污。气候危机已近在眼前,政府却公然否认气候问题,这是对美国民众的背叛,令人震惊。”

化石能源电厂排放的温室气体占美国温室气体总排放量近25%,仅次于交通运输部门。今年年初,美国环境保护署推翻了2009年发布的“危害认定”,该认定曾判定二氧化碳等温室气体对公众健康构成威胁。美国环境保护署还废除了机动车排放相关监管规定。

特朗普政府主张,联邦《清洁空气法》并未明确提及气候变化,因此美国环境保护署无权对此类排放进行监管,并称奥巴马、拜登政府时期的“气候激进主义”不利于商业发展,还会增加能源成本。正如此前撤销机动车排放标准一样,法律诉讼在所难免。

泽尔丁称:“如果对法律有异议,那就修改法律。”

他补充道:“会有更多数据中心使用煤炭供电?这不是环保署能决定的。我们要确保恪守法律,将选择权交还市场,并做出最明智的决策,从而释放美国各类能源的潜力。”(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

The biggest immediate impact of the Trump administration’s rollback of Biden-era emissions standards on power plants is that it will keep more old coal and gas-fired plants viable for longer to help provide additional energy for data centers and the AI boom, experts said.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said Monday it finalized the repeal of emission-reduction mandates for power plants that were intended to combat climate change. The announcement came shortly after the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported that the summer of 2026 was the warmest in U.S. history—about 3 degrees Fahrenheit above average.

Trump’s EPA said Monday that “emissions from power plants have no material impact on global climate change.” Environmental critics called that assertion a lie, arguing the rollback will cause thousands of unnecessary deaths from pollution and trigger billions of dollars in additional health care costs.

But there is an argument that this strikes a balance between climate and the economy—“step back in order to take two steps forward,” said Dan Romito, managing director at Opportune overseeing sustainability. While renewable power can continue to expand, the energy sector is on the verge of leaps in cleaner, next-gen nuclear power and geothermal energy.

“It’s a Band-Aid for a lot of these data centers to figure out how to get replacement or complementary power,” Romito told Fortune. “We need a little bit of a stopgap here. It’s not an ideal choice. But coal can fill that bill for three, four, maybe five years. And that will allow the market to efficiently incorporate geothermal and nuclear solutions into the mix.”

In the meantime, the AI race is continuing, power projects are being announced without many getting off the starting line, and congressional permitting reform to expedite power—both clean and fossil fuel—appears unlikely to come to fruition this year. So something had to give, Romito argued. “This power is not going to magically come out of nowhere. You’re going to have to keep coal-fired power plants and gas-fired power plants online longer, not necessarily to fulfill the anticipated demand, but to meet what demand is currently today,” he said. “And you just can’t throw affordability and reliability out the window.”

The idea is that this also will provide more certainty to hyperscalers that they can move forward. “It relieves a lot of the anxiety and the investor apprehension to invest in new modernized plants that are probably much more efficient as it relates to emissions,” Romito said, arguing that new gas-fired coal plants would be much cleaner than old coal plants.

The fight ahead

The 2024 Biden carbon standards for power plants aimed to require plants to either cut their emissions or use technology to capture 90% of their climate pollution. In addition to undoing those standards, Trump’s EPA is proposing to roll back its authority to regulate climate pollution from power plants, arguing that the EPA is not legally allowed to combat climate change. If successful, this could prevent future administrations from being able to regulate these emissions.

“We are cutting the red tape to deliver the largest power sector deregulatory action ever,” said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin on Monday at the G20 energy ministerial in Houston.

“But we aren’t just stopping with the Biden administration’s overreach,” he added. “We also are proposing to rescind all remaining greenhouse gas emissions standards for power plants—all of them.”

Environmentalists called the Trump administration’s actions incredibly damaging.

“While wildfires rage, floods devastate communities, and families struggle to afford skyrocketing electricity bills and insurance premiums, the Trump administration is handing the fossil fuel industry a license to keep polluting,” said Sierra Club chief program officer Holly Bender. “This is full-throated climate denial while the climate crisis happens in real time and a shocking betrayal of the American public.”

Fossil fuel power plants are responsible for almost 25% of the nation’s total climate pollution, second only to the transportation sector. Early this year, the EPA overturned its own so-called endangerment finding from 2009, which determined that carbon dioxide and other planet-warming gases are a threat to public health. The EPA also repealed rules regulating emissions from motor vehicles.

The Trump administration contends the federal Clean Air Act does not specifically mention climate change and that the EPA should have no authority to regulate it, arguing that the “climate radicalism” of the Biden and Obama administrations was bad for business and energy affordability. Legal challenges are inevitable, just as with the earlier vehicle rollback.

“If you have a problem with the law, change the law,” Zeldin said.

“Will more data centers be using coal? That’s not something the EPA is going to dictate,” Zeldin added. “What we are going to make sure is that we’re following the law, that we are empowering that choice, and that we’re making sure the smartest decisions are made to unleash energy dominance in this country in every form.”

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开