最新发布的全球15岁学生标准化测试结果显示,许多高收入国家家庭对子女教育的关注度正在下降,而各国学校系统也面临学生考试成绩急剧下滑的困境。
去年,数十个国家超过76万名青少年参加了国际学生评估项目(PISA)测试。上周二公布的结果显示,在高度发达经济体中,数学、阅读和科学三科平均分均跌至PISA测试历史最低水平,美国的阅读与数学成绩持续下滑。
中国、新加坡、日本和韩国得分最高,爱沙尼亚、英国和新西兰同样表现优异。
成绩为何普遍下滑,答案或许就藏在学生填写的配套调查问卷中。
与2022年相比,几乎所有国家家庭对子女教育的支持度都有所下降,男孩尤其明显。该指标通过统计家长和孩子聊课业、关心学习状况的频率得出。
“家长越来越把自己当成学校的客户,而非发自内心关心孩子学业的人。”负责组织PISA测试的经济合作与发展组织(OECD)教育与技能司司长安德烈亚斯·施莱歇尔(Andreas Schleicher)表示。
在控制社会经济差异变量后,数据显示:家庭成员至少每周询问一次当天在校情况的学生,PISA科学测试得分比家庭关注度较低的学生高出约35分,相当于一年半以上的学习量。
电子设备带来的分心问题是另一大诱因。高收入国家超过四分之一的学生抱怨,在大部分甚至每节科学课上,都会有同学因电子设备而走神。在严格管控校园手机使用的国家,课堂分心情况更少。
施莱歇尔表示,学生在课余使用电子设备与考试分数偏低之间存在显著关联。不过,如果将技术用于课堂学习,情况则复杂得多。
调查显示,在高中生自述每天在校使用电子设备约2到3小时的国家,学生考试成绩更高;一旦在校使用时长超过这一范围,成绩就会下降。
亚洲国家测试成绩遥遥领先
亚洲似乎找到了让技术真正惠及学生的办法。在日本、韩国和中国大陆,不到10%的受测学生抱怨课堂受电子设备干扰。(中国内地只有四个省份参加测试,另有中国香港和中国澳门。)
与此同时,亚洲拥有全球顶尖的学校:日本、韩国、中国台湾、新加坡以及参与本次测试的中国内地省份,数学、科学、阅读三科成绩均跻身全球前十。
参与测试的中国内地省份,几乎所有学生的数学、阅读成绩都达到或超过基准线;而美国仅有65%的学生数学达标,74%的学生阅读达标。
专家认为,中国在教育领域相对美国的领先优势,或将在政治层面产生深远影响。
“要赢得技术竞赛,就需要具备科学、技术和阅读能力的人。”美国国家教育与经济研究中心(National Center for Education and the Economy)全球战略与研究主管特蕾西·伯恩斯(Tracey Burns)表示。该机构专门研究办学成效突出的教育体系。
在此次PISA测试中,美国学生数学成绩与经合组织(OECD)成员国平均水平持平,科学、阅读和新增的计算问题解决能力三项则均跻身全球前15。不过,这一排名得益于其他国家成绩下滑。归根结底,美国青少年的阅读和数学成绩已跌至21世纪初PISA开考以来的最低点。
研究人员警告称,美国参与测试的学校和学生样本量未达标,对这些结果应持保留态度。
AI用得越多,学得越少
总体而言,AI用得越多,考试成绩越低。自称从未使用聊天机器人的学生,成绩优于使用过这类工具的学生。发达经济体中,近半数学生表示每周至少用一次AI聊天机器人辅助学习。
施莱歇尔指出,中国、日本、新加坡和爱沙尼亚已利用AI助力学习,同时避免过度依赖这项技术。他特别提到,在亚洲,教师拥有更大自主权,能给主导设计适配课堂的AI系统。
“在美国,教师大多按既定教案授课;而在亚洲,教师拥有很强的主导权。”他说。
他记得在中国的一间教室里,小学生正用笔墨练习书法。教师扫描学生的习作,并利用AI分析如何改进字迹。
“如果给那间教室拍张照片,看起来会像20世纪50年代——学生们用毛笔练字,”施莱歇尔说,“但这一切都是AI驱动的。”(财富中文网)
美联社的教育报道由多家私人基金会提供资金支持。美联社对所有内容负全责。有关美联社与慈善机构合作的标准、资助方名单及受资助的报道领域,请访问美联社官网AP.org查询。
译者:中慧言-王芳
最新发布的全球15岁学生标准化测试结果显示,许多高收入国家家庭对子女教育的关注度正在下降,而各国学校系统也面临学生考试成绩急剧下滑的困境。
去年,数十个国家超过76万名青少年参加了国际学生评估项目(PISA)测试。上周二公布的结果显示,在高度发达经济体中,数学、阅读和科学三科平均分均跌至PISA测试历史最低水平,美国的阅读与数学成绩持续下滑。
中国、新加坡、日本和韩国得分最高,爱沙尼亚、英国和新西兰同样表现优异。
成绩为何普遍下滑,答案或许就藏在学生填写的配套调查问卷中。
与2022年相比,几乎所有国家家庭对子女教育的支持度都有所下降,男孩尤其明显。该指标通过统计家长和孩子聊课业、关心学习状况的频率得出。
“家长越来越把自己当成学校的客户,而非发自内心关心孩子学业的人。”负责组织PISA测试的经济合作与发展组织(OECD)教育与技能司司长安德烈亚斯·施莱歇尔(Andreas Schleicher)表示。
在控制社会经济差异变量后,数据显示:家庭成员至少每周询问一次当天在校情况的学生,PISA科学测试得分比家庭关注度较低的学生高出约35分,相当于一年半以上的学习量。
电子设备带来的分心问题是另一大诱因。高收入国家超过四分之一的学生抱怨,在大部分甚至每节科学课上,都会有同学因电子设备而走神。在严格管控校园手机使用的国家,课堂分心情况更少。
施莱歇尔表示,学生在课余使用电子设备与考试分数偏低之间存在显著关联。不过,如果将技术用于课堂学习,情况则复杂得多。
调查显示,在高中生自述每天在校使用电子设备约2到3小时的国家,学生考试成绩更高;一旦在校使用时长超过这一范围,成绩就会下降。
亚洲国家测试成绩遥遥领先
亚洲似乎找到了让技术真正惠及学生的办法。在日本、韩国和中国大陆,不到10%的受测学生抱怨课堂受电子设备干扰。(中国内地只有四个省份参加测试,另有中国香港和中国澳门。)
与此同时,亚洲拥有全球顶尖的学校:日本、韩国、中国台湾、新加坡以及参与本次测试的中国内地省份,数学、科学、阅读三科成绩均跻身全球前十。
参与测试的中国内地省份,几乎所有学生的数学、阅读成绩都达到或超过基准线;而美国仅有65%的学生数学达标,74%的学生阅读达标。
专家认为,中国在教育领域相对美国的领先优势,或将在政治层面产生深远影响。
“要赢得技术竞赛,就需要具备科学、技术和阅读能力的人。”美国国家教育与经济研究中心(National Center for Education and the Economy)全球战略与研究主管特蕾西·伯恩斯(Tracey Burns)表示。该机构专门研究办学成效突出的教育体系。
在此次PISA测试中,美国学生数学成绩与经合组织(OECD)成员国平均水平持平,科学、阅读和新增的计算问题解决能力三项则均跻身全球前15。不过,这一排名得益于其他国家成绩下滑。归根结底,美国青少年的阅读和数学成绩已跌至21世纪初PISA开考以来的最低点。
研究人员警告称,美国参与测试的学校和学生样本量未达标,对这些结果应持保留态度。
AI用得越多,学得越少
总体而言,AI用得越多,考试成绩越低。自称从未使用聊天机器人的学生,成绩优于使用过这类工具的学生。发达经济体中,近半数学生表示每周至少用一次AI聊天机器人辅助学习。
施莱歇尔指出,中国、日本、新加坡和爱沙尼亚已利用AI助力学习,同时避免过度依赖这项技术。他特别提到,在亚洲,教师拥有更大自主权,能给主导设计适配课堂的AI系统。
“在美国,教师大多按既定教案授课;而在亚洲,教师拥有很强的主导权。”他说。
他记得在中国的一间教室里,小学生正用笔墨练习书法。教师扫描学生的习作,并利用AI分析如何改进字迹。
“如果给那间教室拍张照片,看起来会像20世纪50年代——学生们用毛笔练字,”施莱歇尔说,“但这一切都是AI驱动的。”(财富中文网)
美联社的教育报道由多家私人基金会提供资金支持。美联社对所有内容负全责。有关美联社与慈善机构合作的标准、资助方名单及受资助的报道领域,请访问美联社官网AP.org查询。
译者:中慧言-王芳
Families’ interest in their kids’ education is falling in many high-income countries as school systems struggle with plunging test scores, according to newly released results from a standardized test taken by 15-year-olds around the world.
Over 760,000 teenagers in dozens of countries took the Programme for International Student Assessment last year. Results released Tuesday show average scores in math, reading and science are all at their lowest point in PISA history among highly developed economies. That includes continued declines in reading and math scores in the U.S.
China, Singapore, Japan and South Korea scored the highest marks on the test. Estonia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand also did well.
The key to why scores are falling so widely may be found in an accompanying survey taken by students.
Compared with the 2022 results, almost every country saw a drop in families’ support for their kids’ education, especially for boys, as measured by questions about how often parents talk to their kids about their schoolwork or take an interest in their learning.
“Parents see themselves more as a client of the school, not as someone who takes personal interest,” said Andreas Schleicher, director for education and skills for the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which runs the PISA test.
Students who said a family member asks them at least weekly what they did in school that day scored around 35 points higher on the PISA science test — equivalent to over a year and a half of learning — compared with students whose families take less interest. That number includes adjustments for socioeconomic differences.
Digital distraction is another factor. Over a quarter of students in high-income countries complained their classmates got distracted by digital devices in most or every science class. In countries with strong policies controlling the use of cellphones in schools, distraction rates were lower.
There’s undoubtedly a strong association between students using digital devices for leisure and lower test scores, Schleicher said. When tech is used for learning, however, the results are more nuanced.
Countries where high schoolers reported using digital devices for around two to three hours per day in school saw higher test scores, but scores fell once tech use climbed beyond that.
Asian nations dominate in test scores
Asia seems to have found the key to using technology in a way that benefits students. Fewer than 10% of tested students in Japan, Korea and mainland China complained of digital distraction in the classroom. (Only four provinces in China participated in testing, plus Hong Kong and Macao.)
At the same time, Asia had some of the strongest schools in the world, with Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and the Chinese provinces ranking among the top 10 regions for math, science and reading.
Almost 100% of all children in the Chinese provinces scored at or above baseline for math and reading. In the U.S., it was only 65% in math and 74% in reading.
Experts worry China’s educational dominance over the U.S. has serious political implications.
“To win a technological race, you need the people with the science and the technology and the reading capabilities,” said Tracey Burns, chief of global strategy and research at the National Center for Education and the Economy, a group that researches high-performing education systems.
The U.S. scores for math were equal to the average among OECD countries that administered the test, and the U.S. was ranked in the top 15 countries in the world for science, reading and computational problem-solving, a new category. However, those rankings benefited from other countries’ declines. After all, U.S. teens’ reading and math scores slid to the lowest point since the PISA test was first administered in the early 2000s.
Researchers warned the results must be taken with a grain of salt because the U.S. did not meet standards for having a large enough sample of schools and students that participated in the test.
More AI usage, less learning
Generally, higher use of artificial intelligence was associated with lower test scores. Students who said they never use chatbots performed better than students who did. Almost half of students in developed economies say they use AI chatbots to help them learn at least weekly.
Schleicher pointed to China, Japan, Singapore and Estonia as countries that have succeeded in using AI to support learning without overusing it. He noted that in Asia, in particular, teachers are more empowered to take the lead in designing AI systems for the classroom.
“In the United States, teachers largely implement lessons. In Asia, teachers have a very strong role,” he said.
He remembers seeing one classroom in China where elementary schoolers practiced calligraphy with ink and brushes. The teachers scanned their work and used AI to analyze how their handwriting could improve.
“The classroom, if you made a photograph, would have looked like the 1950’s — students doing calligraphy with ink,” Schleicher said. “But everything was powered by AI.”
The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.