
“主权AI”是眼下全球科技界最热门的词,至少在美国和中国以外的地区如此。各国政府和企业正日益担忧,过度依赖某一国家的AI系统会带来风险。
不过“主权”要守护的核心因地域而异。欧洲的重点是数据,也就是将个人信息留在本地。中东和亚洲大部分地区重视本土产业,寄望于本土AI产业带来经济回报。对小型经济体来说则关乎自主权,即避免被其他国家供应商“断供”。
“AI已变得不可或缺,所以肯定不希望受制于随时可以关停服务的外部方,”香港Votee AI创始人丁柏生表示。(9月8日丁柏生参加了在澳门举办的《财富》领军者论坛,参与专题圆桌,探讨企业如何思考AI应用及跳出“烧Token”误区。)
Votee AI的核心产品是以粤语运行的AI模型,粤语是香港及周边广东省通行的方言。“整个AI革命都围绕英语和普通话展开,”他告诉我,“粤语广泛用于教育、医疗和警务通讯场景。如果相关领域做不到覆盖,那么AI基本上无用。”
越来越多开发者、创业者和大型企业正为其他语言打造AI大模型,Votee AI便是其中之一。印尼最大的电信公司之一Indosat正开发主打印尼语等语言的模型Sahabat AI。韩国企业纷纷参与政府主办的“AI鱿鱼游戏”,努力打造最佳本土AI模型。就在近日,沙特阿拉伯公共投资基金支持的AI公司Humain发布了阿拉伯语模型,由中国AI企业稀宇科技负责开发。
需要指出,这些语言的使用规模都不小。韩语和粤语各有约8000万使用者,印尼语使用者超2亿。只不过,这些“低资源语言”并不像英语和普通话一样拥有庞大的文本训练语料。
要实现主权AI,光靠政治意愿可不够。采购AI处理器成本高昂,运营数据中心成本,聘请技术人才同样耗资巨大。
丁柏生指出,主权AI模型最主要的客户是政府,其实政府并不需要最强大的模型。更克制的目标有助于降低成本。丁柏生表示,Votee训练模型的成本约为25万美元,数目并不小,但与Anthropic和OpenAI等AI开发商动辄数百亿美元相比仍然少得多。
各国(和各公司)可以从多方采购模型、芯片和算力资源,再结合本地需求对AI输出内容加以调整,以获得更好的结果。功能强大的中国开源模型不断涌现,任何人都可以免费下载部署,也可为此提供助力。
可以说,AI领域的“主权”核心不在于掌控,而在于拥有选择权。(财富中文网)
译者:梁宇
审校:夏林
“主权AI”是眼下全球科技界最热门的词,至少在美国和中国以外的地区如此。各国政府和企业正日益担忧,过度依赖某一国家的AI系统会带来风险。
不过“主权”要守护的核心因地域而异。欧洲的重点是数据,也就是将个人信息留在本地。中东和亚洲大部分地区重视本土产业,寄望于本土AI产业带来经济回报。对小型经济体来说则关乎自主权,即避免被其他国家供应商“断供”。
“AI已变得不可或缺,所以肯定不希望受制于随时可以关停服务的外部方,”香港Votee AI创始人丁柏生表示。(9月8日丁柏生参加了在澳门举办的《财富》领军者论坛,参与专题圆桌,探讨企业如何思考AI应用及跳出“烧Token”误区。)
Votee AI的核心产品是以粤语运行的AI模型,粤语是香港及周边广东省通行的方言。“整个AI革命都围绕英语和普通话展开,”他告诉我,“粤语广泛用于教育、医疗和警务通讯场景。如果相关领域做不到覆盖,那么AI基本上无用。”
越来越多开发者、创业者和大型企业正为其他语言打造AI大模型,Votee AI便是其中之一。印尼最大的电信公司之一Indosat正开发主打印尼语等语言的模型Sahabat AI。韩国企业纷纷参与政府主办的“AI鱿鱼游戏”,努力打造最佳本土AI模型。就在近日,沙特阿拉伯公共投资基金支持的AI公司Humain发布了阿拉伯语模型,由中国AI企业稀宇科技负责开发。
需要指出,这些语言的使用规模都不小。韩语和粤语各有约8000万使用者,印尼语使用者超2亿。只不过,这些“低资源语言”并不像英语和普通话一样拥有庞大的文本训练语料。
要实现主权AI,光靠政治意愿可不够。采购AI处理器成本高昂,运营数据中心成本,聘请技术人才同样耗资巨大。
丁柏生指出,主权AI模型最主要的客户是政府,其实政府并不需要最强大的模型。更克制的目标有助于降低成本。丁柏生表示,Votee训练模型的成本约为25万美元,数目并不小,但与Anthropic和OpenAI等AI开发商动辄数百亿美元相比仍然少得多。
各国(和各公司)可以从多方采购模型、芯片和算力资源,再结合本地需求对AI输出内容加以调整,以获得更好的结果。功能强大的中国开源模型不断涌现,任何人都可以免费下载部署,也可为此提供助力。
可以说,AI领域的“主权”核心不在于掌控,而在于拥有选择权。(财富中文网)
译者:梁宇
审校:夏林
Good morning. Nicholas Gordon here, reporting from Hong Kong. “Sovereign AI” is the buzzword of choice in the global tech sector—at least if you’re based anywhere other than the U.S. and China. Government officials and companies are increasingly worried about tying themselves too closely to one country’s AI systems.
But what “sovereignty” is meant to protect varies by geography. In Europe, it’s data, keeping personal information at home. In the Middle East and much of Asia, it’s local industry, part of a bet that a homegrown AI sector will pay economic dividends. And for smaller economies, it’s autonomy to ward off the fear of being cut off by a supplier in another country.
“AI has become such an essential need, and so you don’t want to be tethered to anybody else who can turn it off,” Pak-Sun Ting, the founder of Hong Kong-based Votee AI, recently told me. (Ting is joining our Fortune Leaders Forum in Macau on Sep. 8, where he’ll join a panel on how businesses can think about AI adoption and move beyond “tokenmaxxing.”)
Votee AI’s main product is an AI model that operates in Cantonese, the Chinese dialect spoken in Hong Kong and the surrounding Guangdong province. “The whole AI revolution is in English and Mandarin,” he told me. “Cantonese is used in education, health care, and police communications. If those don’t get covered, then AI is essentially useless.”
Votee AI is part of a growing group of developers, startup founders, and major companies trying to build AI models for the rest of the world. Indosat, one of Indonesia’s largest telecoms companies, is building Sahabat AI, a model that focuses on Indonesian languages like Bahasa. South Korean companies are currently taking part in the “AI Squid Game,” a government-sponsored competition to build the best homegrown AI model. And just yesterday, Humain, an AI company backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, debuted an Arabic-language model, built by the Chinese AI developer MiniMax.
It’s important to remember that none of these languages are small. Korean and Cantonese each have around 80 million speakers. More than 200 million people speak Bahasa Indonesia. Yet these ‘low-resource languages’ don’t have the large text corpora that English and Mandarin Chinese do.
But sovereign AI takes more than political will. AI processors are expensive to buy, data centers are expensive to run, and tech talent is expensive to hire.
Ting pointed out that governments, the most likely customers for a sovereign AI model, don’t need the most powerful models. Those more restrained ambitions help to lower cost. Ting said that Votee trained its model for around $250,000—not a small amount but still significantly less than the tens of billions of dollars spent by AI developers like Anthropic and OpenAI.
Countries (and companies) can get their models, semiconductors, and processing power from different sources, then add their own local spin on the AI’s output to get a better result. They’ll be helped by a growing number of powerful Chinese open-source models that anyone can download and run for free.
It could be that “sovereignty” in AI is less about control and more about choice.