
马斯克麾下的政府效率部裁减了美国国税局10万名员工中的超四分之一后,该机构共收到1.402亿份个人报税表,发放逾9040万笔退税,两项数据均较上年略有下降。
尽管美国国税局称2026年报税季取得成功,但前代理局长道格拉斯·奥唐奈(Douglas O'Donnell)表示,政府效率部大规模裁员带来的后果更可能在数年后才充分显现,而机构预算持续缩减将令局面进一步恶化。
他在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“我十分担忧该机构履行使命的能力,无论是纳税服务层面、税收执法层面,还是作为联邦政府机构整体能否正常运转。”
美国国税局方面则称,人员规模将保持相对稳定,预计2026年底员工数量为7.4万人,与2025年底人员规模大致持平。
该局发言人在一份声明中对《财富》杂志表示:“与批评者的说法相反,美国国税局圆满完成了2026年报税季工作,取得历史性成效,高效处理报税表并发放退税。受益于总统推出的‘工薪家庭减税计划’,本年度平均退税金额较去年高出11%。美国国税局局长弗兰克·比西尼亚诺(Frank Bisignano)仍致力于维持合理的人员配置,为美国纳税人提供应有的世界一流服务。”
美国国税局的短板
奥唐奈于1986年至2025年供职于美国国税局。他曾于2022年11月至2023年3月担任代理局长,2025年1月至2月再度出任该职,随后卸任。如今他担任毕马威(KPMG)华盛顿国家税务业务部高级董事总经理。
尽管奥唐奈提出诸多批评,但他希望明确一点:美国国税局的问题并非始于政府效率部,也并非特朗普政府一手造成。他表示,在裁员之前,该机构的现代化建设就已多年落后于其他国家,而推进现代化本可节约大量成本。
举例而言,近四十年来美国国税局一直尝试推进报税无纸化。美国财政部税务管理监察长2月发布的一份报告显示,纸质报税表仅占全部申报表的6%,却消耗72%的处理成本。美国国税局计划到2029年将纸质流程开支从4.5亿美元压缩至不足2000万美元。不过,以往的相关计划大多推进受阻。
奥唐奈称:“显而易见的是,多届政府执政期间,美国国税局始终存在投入不足的问题。因此,我并不是要指责任何一方。”
2022年《通胀削减法案》包含一项战略计划,拟投入800亿美元,将美国国税局转变为“现代化税务管理机构”。该计划包括技术升级、保障员工与纳税人的数据访问安全,并开展招聘行动,吸纳并留住更多高技能人才,同时提供更灵活的工作机会。
然而,奥唐奈表示,自去年2月政府效率部开启首轮裁员以来,改革进程不仅陷入停滞,甚至出现倒退。
不过,比西尼亚诺4月在参议院财政委员会作证时表示,国税局已实现运营效率提升。
“我们已成功从国税局信息技术预算中削减20亿美元,且未造成任何运营中断,”他表示,“这些成本节约是通过重新谈判、缩减规模,甚至在某些情况下终止浪费性的信息技术及专业服务合同实现的。”
政府效率部裁员带来的影响
在奥唐奈看来,政府效率部当初推行裁员时的真实意图令人费解:“很难确切知道政府效率部的目标究竟是什么。我只能这么说。我并不完全确定,因为确实没有公开的战略文件。其工作重心似乎放在削减执法领域和技术领域的开支,同时尽可能维持服务水平。”
美国国税局一直试图利用技术提升服务水平,最终缩减员工规模。但奥唐奈指出,在人员大幅缩减的情况下,这一持续数十年的目标反而首当其冲。
正如任何可能被人工智能重塑的行业一样,自动化起初会增加对劳动力的需求,一方面是因为人员需要解决新技术应用过程中的各类问题,另一方面也因为自动化会提升生产效率并扩大业务规模。
奥唐奈表示:“如果想依靠数字化手段提升服务质量,就需要小幅增加预算,用于系统与数字化能力建设,待时机成熟后方可精简人员。人员缩减本身并非坏事,前提是要有替代方案。但问题在于,目前并没有现成的替代方案,至少没有能够立刻落地、维持原有服务水平的方案。”
奥唐奈指出,美国国税局今年勉强维持了服务水平,但这种局面未必能够持续。随着系统承压加剧,裁员带来的隐患将使纳税人难以安心确认自己每年的报税操作准确无误。没人愿意接受税务稽查,但适度监管能够维护税务管理体系的公信力。
“就大型企业税务征管而言,人员持续流失将导致机构可核查范围不断收窄,覆盖的业务也日益减少,”他表示,“长此以往,由于可核查的纳税主体数量不足,国税局管理层将难以对纳税人是否合规纳税作出可靠判断。”
重建美国国税局
乍看之下,美国国税局面临的挑战很可能进一步加剧。该局2025财年年度可支配预算为122亿美元,2026财年降至112亿美元,2027财年预计将进一步下滑至98亿美元。预算缩减意味着税务执法工作将被压缩,同时“直接报税”项目也将被取消。该项目于2024年推出,允许美国民众直接向国税局免费申报联邦所得税。
不过,局面并非毫无转机。比西尼亚诺领导下的国税局管理层大概率将与财政部、行政管理和预算局展开磋商,争取追加拨款,至少也会探讨在不同预算水平下可完成的工作范围。国会拨款部门工作人员就资金需求与国税局沟通协商,这种情况也并非没有先例。
但奥唐奈解释称,美国国税局未来面临的挑战不仅局限于技术升级和人员重新扩充——据报道计划新招聘8000名员工。若该机构想要实现技术升级,就必须紧跟人工智能飞速发展浪潮,找到兼顾成本、实效与数据安全的工具。
“如果国税局的目标是为纳税人提供全年无休的全天候服务,就必须保障系统稳定运行。而搭建这套系统,不仅要完成开发,后续还要持续维护,”他表示,“但在预算支持不断缩减的大环境下,要推进上述工作、落实相关举措,我实在想不出该如何实现。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
马斯克麾下的政府效率部裁减了美国国税局10万名员工中的超四分之一后,该机构共收到1.402亿份个人报税表,发放逾9040万笔退税,两项数据均较上年略有下降。
尽管美国国税局称2026年报税季取得成功,但前代理局长道格拉斯·奥唐奈(Douglas O'Donnell)表示,政府效率部大规模裁员带来的后果更可能在数年后才充分显现,而机构预算持续缩减将令局面进一步恶化。
他在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“我十分担忧该机构履行使命的能力,无论是纳税服务层面、税收执法层面,还是作为联邦政府机构整体能否正常运转。”
美国国税局方面则称,人员规模将保持相对稳定,预计2026年底员工数量为7.4万人,与2025年底人员规模大致持平。
该局发言人在一份声明中对《财富》杂志表示:“与批评者的说法相反,美国国税局圆满完成了2026年报税季工作,取得历史性成效,高效处理报税表并发放退税。受益于总统推出的‘工薪家庭减税计划’,本年度平均退税金额较去年高出11%。美国国税局局长弗兰克·比西尼亚诺(Frank Bisignano)仍致力于维持合理的人员配置,为美国纳税人提供应有的世界一流服务。”
美国国税局的短板
奥唐奈于1986年至2025年供职于美国国税局。他曾于2022年11月至2023年3月担任代理局长,2025年1月至2月再度出任该职,随后卸任。如今他担任毕马威(KPMG)华盛顿国家税务业务部高级董事总经理。
尽管奥唐奈提出诸多批评,但他希望明确一点:美国国税局的问题并非始于政府效率部,也并非特朗普政府一手造成。他表示,在裁员之前,该机构的现代化建设就已多年落后于其他国家,而推进现代化本可节约大量成本。
举例而言,近四十年来美国国税局一直尝试推进报税无纸化。美国财政部税务管理监察长2月发布的一份报告显示,纸质报税表仅占全部申报表的6%,却消耗72%的处理成本。美国国税局计划到2029年将纸质流程开支从4.5亿美元压缩至不足2000万美元。不过,以往的相关计划大多推进受阻。
奥唐奈称:“显而易见的是,多届政府执政期间,美国国税局始终存在投入不足的问题。因此,我并不是要指责任何一方。”
2022年《通胀削减法案》包含一项战略计划,拟投入800亿美元,将美国国税局转变为“现代化税务管理机构”。该计划包括技术升级、保障员工与纳税人的数据访问安全,并开展招聘行动,吸纳并留住更多高技能人才,同时提供更灵活的工作机会。
然而,奥唐奈表示,自去年2月政府效率部开启首轮裁员以来,改革进程不仅陷入停滞,甚至出现倒退。
不过,比西尼亚诺4月在参议院财政委员会作证时表示,国税局已实现运营效率提升。
“我们已成功从国税局信息技术预算中削减20亿美元,且未造成任何运营中断,”他表示,“这些成本节约是通过重新谈判、缩减规模,甚至在某些情况下终止浪费性的信息技术及专业服务合同实现的。”
政府效率部裁员带来的影响
在奥唐奈看来,政府效率部当初推行裁员时的真实意图令人费解:“很难确切知道政府效率部的目标究竟是什么。我只能这么说。我并不完全确定,因为确实没有公开的战略文件。其工作重心似乎放在削减执法领域和技术领域的开支,同时尽可能维持服务水平。”
美国国税局一直试图利用技术提升服务水平,最终缩减员工规模。但奥唐奈指出,在人员大幅缩减的情况下,这一持续数十年的目标反而首当其冲。
正如任何可能被人工智能重塑的行业一样,自动化起初会增加对劳动力的需求,一方面是因为人员需要解决新技术应用过程中的各类问题,另一方面也因为自动化会提升生产效率并扩大业务规模。
奥唐奈表示:“如果想依靠数字化手段提升服务质量,就需要小幅增加预算,用于系统与数字化能力建设,待时机成熟后方可精简人员。人员缩减本身并非坏事,前提是要有替代方案。但问题在于,目前并没有现成的替代方案,至少没有能够立刻落地、维持原有服务水平的方案。”
奥唐奈指出,美国国税局今年勉强维持了服务水平,但这种局面未必能够持续。随着系统承压加剧,裁员带来的隐患将使纳税人难以安心确认自己每年的报税操作准确无误。没人愿意接受税务稽查,但适度监管能够维护税务管理体系的公信力。
“就大型企业税务征管而言,人员持续流失将导致机构可核查范围不断收窄,覆盖的业务也日益减少,”他表示,“长此以往,由于可核查的纳税主体数量不足,国税局管理层将难以对纳税人是否合规纳税作出可靠判断。”
重建美国国税局
乍看之下,美国国税局面临的挑战很可能进一步加剧。该局2025财年年度可支配预算为122亿美元,2026财年降至112亿美元,2027财年预计将进一步下滑至98亿美元。预算缩减意味着税务执法工作将被压缩,同时“直接报税”项目也将被取消。该项目于2024年推出,允许美国民众直接向国税局免费申报联邦所得税。
不过,局面并非毫无转机。比西尼亚诺领导下的国税局管理层大概率将与财政部、行政管理和预算局展开磋商,争取追加拨款,至少也会探讨在不同预算水平下可完成的工作范围。国会拨款部门工作人员就资金需求与国税局沟通协商,这种情况也并非没有先例。
但奥唐奈解释称,美国国税局未来面临的挑战不仅局限于技术升级和人员重新扩充——据报道计划新招聘8000名员工。若该机构想要实现技术升级,就必须紧跟人工智能飞速发展浪潮,找到兼顾成本、实效与数据安全的工具。
“如果国税局的目标是为纳税人提供全年无休的全天候服务,就必须保障系统稳定运行。而搭建这套系统,不仅要完成开发,后续还要持续维护,”他表示,“但在预算支持不断缩减的大环境下,要推进上述工作、落实相关举措,我实在想不出该如何实现。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
After Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) slashed more than a quarter of the 100,000-person workforce at the IRS, the agency received 140.2 million individual returns and issued more than 90.4 million refunds, slightly down from the year before.
While the IRS described the 2026 tax season as successful, former acting Commissioner Douglas O’Donnell said DOGE’s extensive cuts will more likely be felt years down the line and made worse by an ever-shrinking agency budget.
“I’ve been very concerned with the ability of the agency to carry out on its mission, whether it’s at the services level or enforcement level, but also just in general to be a functioning federal government agency going forward,” he told Fortune.
For its part, the IRS said its headcount should be relatively stable, expecting to end 2026 with 74,000 employees, about the same as the end-of-2025 staff level.
“Contrary to claims from critics, the IRS delivered a historic, successful 2026 filing season efficiently processing returns and issuing average refunds that were 11 percent higher than last year as Americans benefited from the President’s Working Families Tax Cuts,” an agency spokesperson told Fortune in a statement. “IRS Chief Executive Officer Frank Bisignano remains committed to maintaining the right workforce to deliver the world-class service American taxpayers deserve.”
The IRS’s weak points
O’Donnell’s career at the IRS spanned from 1986 until 2025. He served as acting commissioner from November 2022 to March 2023 and again from January to February 2025, at which point he stepped down from the role. He now serves as the senior managing director in the KPMG Washington National Tax practice.
Despite his criticism, O’Donnell wants to be clear: The IRS’s problems did not begin with DOGE nor the Trump administration. Before the staff cuts, the agency had lagged behind other countries for years on modernization that would have produced savings, he said.
For example, the IRS has tried to go paperless for nearly four decades. Paper tax returns make up just 6% of all returns but 72% of processing costs, according to a February report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. The IRS plans to reduce the expense of paper processes from $450 million to less than $20 million by 2029. Still, previous plans often sputtered.
“It was clear that there had been underinvestment for a number of years across multiple administrations,” O’Donnell said. “So it’s not pointing any fingers here.”
The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act included a strategic plan to transform the IRS into a “modern tax administration” with an $80 billion infusion. The IRS was to modernize its technology and securely increase employee and taxpayer access to data, as well as hire and retain more high-skilled workers through recruitment campaigning, and offer more flexible work opportunities.
But after the DOGE cuts that began in February of last year with the first wave of personnel reductions, progress didn’t just stall, O’Donnell said, it reversed.
In a testimony before the Senate Finance Committee in April, however, Bisignano said the IRS has already made efficiency gains.
“We have successfully cut $2 billion from the IRS information technology budget without any operational disruptions,” he said. “We achieved these cost savings by renegotiating, scaling back, and in some cases eliminating, wasteful IT and professional services contracts.”
The impact of DOGE cuts
What was unclear to O’Donnell was what DOGE had originally intended when it made those cuts: “It’s hard to know exactly what the objective of DOGE was. I’ll just say that. I’m not completely sure because there’s really no strategic document that’s out there. The focus seemed to be cutting in the enforcement space and the technology space, but maintaining the service levels as much as possible,” he said.
The IRS has long tried to use technology to bolster those services and eventually reduce the size of the workforce. But O’Donnell argued that decades-long goal was actually hurt at first by having fewer workers.
Just like in any sector being potentially transformed by AI, automation initially increases demand for labor, both because human workers need to smooth out kinks associated with adopting new technologies, and because it can lead to greater productivity and expansion of operations.
“If you’re going to improve services through digital means, you’re going to need to have a bit of a bump in the budget to be able to invest in the systems and the digital capabilities, and at some point, then you can reduce the number of people,” O’Donnell said. “The loss of people…that’s not the worst thing in the world, so long as there’s a replacement. The concern was that there was not a replacement, at least not an immediate one, that could step in and provide the level of service.”
The IRS managed to maintain its services this year, but that trend may not continue. At risk from these reductions is the peace of mind that taxpayers are indeed filing their taxes correctly every year as systems become more strained, O’Donnell noted. Nobody likes an audit, but some oversight of activity creates confidence in the tax administration system.
“In the large corporate space, just over time, losing employees, you just basically reduce what you can get to, and you cover less of it,” he said. “Over time, that diminishes the ability of leaders in the IRS to have confidence that taxpayers are complying because you’re not getting to a large enough number of them to be sure about that.”
Rebuilding the IRS
At first glance, the challenges the IRS faces are likely to grow. The IRS’s annual discretionary budget for fiscal 2025 was $12.2 billion, a total that fell to $11.2 billion for fiscal 2026, and which is poised to drop even more to $9.8 billion for fiscal 2027. It would mean a reduction in enforcement operations, as well as the scrapping of the Direct File program, a 2024 effort that allowed Americans to file their federal income taxes directly to the IRS for free.
Not all hope is lost, though. IRS leadership under Bisignano will likely meet with the Treasury Department and with the Office of Management and Budget to negotiate for additional funding, or at the very least discuss what is possible to complete with different levels of funding. It’s also not unheard-of for congressional appropriations staff to consult with the IRS about their needs.
But the IRS’s future challenges involve not just making technological improvement and regrowing its workforce, reportedly through hiring 8,000 new employees. It’s that the agency will have to keep up with the rapidly advancing world of AI to find tools both affordable, effective, and secure if it wants to technologically advance, O’Donnell explained.
“If the objective of the IRS is to be able to improve service to taxpayers, 24/7, 365, you’re going to need to have systems availability to do that, and in order to have the systems, you have to build them, and then you have to maintain them,” he said. “And I don’t know how that happens in an environment where you’ve got reduced budgetary support to perform those actions to take those steps.”