
美国财政部公布的数据证实,如今美国国债规模已达40万亿美元,预计2026财年政府债务利息支出将超过1万亿美元。
长期以来,债务鹰派不断警告政策制定者,美国当前财政路径难以为继。随着今年下半年中期选举临近,债务问题在选民关切事项中的优先级正持续攀升。
世界大型企业联合会(The Conference Board)最新报告从消费者视角重新审视了这一问题:若政策制定者继续以当前速度举债,个人财务将面临潜在冲击。
该机构模拟了一系列情景:基准情景(采用国会预算办公室基于当前趋势的数据)、乐观情景(联邦赤字大致减半,与当前政策目标提案一致),以及悲观情景(赤字占国内生产总值比重从当前的6%-7%攀升至9%)。
该机构还模拟了两种金融危机情景:债务违约与利率冲击,这正是桥水基金(Bridgewater Associates)创始人瑞·达利欧(Ray Dalio)等经济学家长期担忧的问题。
即便不考虑这些极端负面结果,若政策制定者不采取行动削减财政支出,消费者仍将蒙受数千美元损失。
例如,报告构建了一个典型家庭购房情景:该家庭计划于5年或10年后购置一套价值60万美元的住房,首付比例为20%,并申请30年期固定利率抵押贷款。报告未说明2031年与2036年抵押贷款利率的计算方法,但测算得出:若该家庭2031年购房,30年总还款额为289万美元;若推迟至2036年购房,总还款额为280万美元。
上述测算均基于基准情景。在政府缩减举债规模、利率下行的乐观情景中,2031年购房家庭总还款额可减少5.3万美元,2036年购房家庭总还款额降幅则超10万美元。
消费者支出与债务状况密切相关。彼得森研究所的迈克尔·彼得森(Michael Peterson)上周在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“美国大规模举债……将推高利率,进而加重家庭经济负担,原因在于房贷、车贷、信用卡账单上涨,整体通胀加剧。民众或许不会在月底收到国家债务账单,但我们正以更高的税负与日益攀升的生活成本为之买单。”
彼得森还指出,社会保障和联邦医疗保险等项目资金即将耗尽,将在不久的将来给政府预算带来更大压力。据美国负责任联邦预算委员会估算,社会保障信托基金将在不到8年内耗尽,联邦医疗保险信托基金则将在不到7年内耗尽。
世界大型企业联合会补充称,一旦上述基金耗尽,据国会预算办公室估算,美国财政部将需要决定是否从一般财政资金中调拨2.7万亿美元填补缺口,此举将进一步加大预算压力。
若信托基金枯竭引发福利发放规模缩减,临近退休的劳动者将面临预期收入缺口。该机构报告称,2032年月度社会保障福利将减少173美元;到2033年信托基金耗尽时,月度削减额将升至705美元。
2034年,月度削减额将达到721美元;到2036年,月度福利较当前预期减少754美元。
最坏情景
上述情景并不涵盖美国政府债务违约或金融危机爆发这类更悲观的情景。对这一结果持怀疑态度的人有一定依据:依托美联储的政策工具,美国有能力降低债务实际负担。尽管量化宽松可能引发通胀,但可避免债务违约带来的灾难性后果。
同样,尽管当前美国国债收益率处于高位,但这仅在一定程度上源于市场对财政轨迹的担忧,同时也反映了长期通胀预期和交易员对美联储加息的判断。
然而,若上述任一情景最终成为现实,普通家庭将遭受重创。报告测算,在债务违约情景下,2031年购房家庭总还款额将飙升至300万美元以上;在利率冲击情景下,总还款额将超过360万美元。
报告总结道:“对问题视而不见不会让情况好转,赤字恶化只会加剧债务对经济其他领域的负面影响……选民与立法者都应将解决债务问题列为优先事项,以惠及全体美国民众。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
美国财政部公布的数据证实,如今美国国债规模已达40万亿美元,预计2026财年政府债务利息支出将超过1万亿美元。
长期以来,债务鹰派不断警告政策制定者,美国当前财政路径难以为继。随着今年下半年中期选举临近,债务问题在选民关切事项中的优先级正持续攀升。
世界大型企业联合会(The Conference Board)最新报告从消费者视角重新审视了这一问题:若政策制定者继续以当前速度举债,个人财务将面临潜在冲击。
该机构模拟了一系列情景:基准情景(采用国会预算办公室基于当前趋势的数据)、乐观情景(联邦赤字大致减半,与当前政策目标提案一致),以及悲观情景(赤字占国内生产总值比重从当前的6%-7%攀升至9%)。
该机构还模拟了两种金融危机情景:债务违约与利率冲击,这正是桥水基金(Bridgewater Associates)创始人瑞·达利欧(Ray Dalio)等经济学家长期担忧的问题。
即便不考虑这些极端负面结果,若政策制定者不采取行动削减财政支出,消费者仍将蒙受数千美元损失。
例如,报告构建了一个典型家庭购房情景:该家庭计划于5年或10年后购置一套价值60万美元的住房,首付比例为20%,并申请30年期固定利率抵押贷款。报告未说明2031年与2036年抵押贷款利率的计算方法,但测算得出:若该家庭2031年购房,30年总还款额为289万美元;若推迟至2036年购房,总还款额为280万美元。
上述测算均基于基准情景。在政府缩减举债规模、利率下行的乐观情景中,2031年购房家庭总还款额可减少5.3万美元,2036年购房家庭总还款额降幅则超10万美元。
消费者支出与债务状况密切相关。彼得森研究所的迈克尔·彼得森(Michael Peterson)上周在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“美国大规模举债……将推高利率,进而加重家庭经济负担,原因在于房贷、车贷、信用卡账单上涨,整体通胀加剧。民众或许不会在月底收到国家债务账单,但我们正以更高的税负与日益攀升的生活成本为之买单。”
彼得森还指出,社会保障和联邦医疗保险等项目资金即将耗尽,将在不久的将来给政府预算带来更大压力。据美国负责任联邦预算委员会估算,社会保障信托基金将在不到8年内耗尽,联邦医疗保险信托基金则将在不到7年内耗尽。
世界大型企业联合会补充称,一旦上述基金耗尽,据国会预算办公室估算,美国财政部将需要决定是否从一般财政资金中调拨2.7万亿美元填补缺口,此举将进一步加大预算压力。
若信托基金枯竭引发福利发放规模缩减,临近退休的劳动者将面临预期收入缺口。该机构报告称,2032年月度社会保障福利将减少173美元;到2033年信托基金耗尽时,月度削减额将升至705美元。
2034年,月度削减额将达到721美元;到2036年,月度福利较当前预期减少754美元。
最坏情景
上述情景并不涵盖美国政府债务违约或金融危机爆发这类更悲观的情景。对这一结果持怀疑态度的人有一定依据:依托美联储的政策工具,美国有能力降低债务实际负担。尽管量化宽松可能引发通胀,但可避免债务违约带来的灾难性后果。
同样,尽管当前美国国债收益率处于高位,但这仅在一定程度上源于市场对财政轨迹的担忧,同时也反映了长期通胀预期和交易员对美联储加息的判断。
然而,若上述任一情景最终成为现实,普通家庭将遭受重创。报告测算,在债务违约情景下,2031年购房家庭总还款额将飙升至300万美元以上;在利率冲击情景下,总还款额将超过360万美元。
报告总结道:“对问题视而不见不会让情况好转,赤字恶化只会加剧债务对经济其他领域的负面影响……选民与立法者都应将解决债务问题列为优先事项,以惠及全体美国民众。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
Treasury data confirmed last night that U.S. national debt now stands at $40 trillion, with the government now expected to spend more than $1 trillion in interest on the debt in the fiscal year of 2026.
Debt hawks have been warning policymakers for some time that the nation’s fiscal path is unsustainable, and the issue is increasingly rising up voters’ agendas in the run-up to midterms later this year.
A new report from The Conference Board throws the issue into a new light for consumers: The potential impact on their personal finances if policymakers continue borrowing at the current pace.
The Conference Board modeled a series of scenarios: Baseline (using Congressional Budget Office data based on current trends), a good-case (in which federal deficits are cut roughly in half, in line with current targeting proposals), and a bad-case (in which deficit levels grow to 9% of GDP rather than the current 6% to 7%).
The Conference Board also modeled two financial crisis scenarios—a default and an interest rate shock—which economists like Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio have long been concerned about.
Even dismissing the most extreme negative outcomes, consumers still stand to lose thousands if policymakers don’t act to reduce spending.
For example, the report models a family saving to buy a $600,000 house in either 5 or 10 years, with a 20% down payment and a 30-year fixed mortgage. The report does not provide a methodology for calculating rates offered in 2031 and 2036, but concludes that total payments over three decades for a home bought in 2031 come to $2.89m, and $2.8m in 2036.
These are the payments in the baseline scenario. However, under the good-case scenario, in which the government cuts its borrowing and interest is lower, this figure is reduced by $53,000 for buyers in 2031, or by more than $100,000 for buyers in 2036.
Consumers’ spending is closely linked to the debt picture, Michael Peterson of the think tank the Peterson Institute said in a conversation with Fortune this week: “When the U.S. borrows this much … that drives up interest rates, which then increases household expenses because your mortgage goes up, your car loan, your credit card bills, and inflation more generally. So [we] may not get a bill at the end of the month for national debt, but [we] are paying that bill both in the form of taxes as well as an inflated level of expenses.”
Peterson also said programs like Social Security and Medicare are running out of cash, placing further onus on government budgets in the near future. The trust fund for Social Security is due to run dry in a little under eight years, and Medicare in a little under seven years, according to estimates by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
The Conference Board added that when those coffers run dry, the Treasury will need to decide whether to backfill the expenditure from its general fund by $2.7 trillion, per the CBO—a further burden on its budget.
In the event payouts from these trusts are cut, workers approaching retirement face a hole in their expected earnings. The Conference Board reports the reduction in monthly benefits in 2032 would be $173. However, by 2033, when the trust runs dry, this increases to $705 a month.
In 2034, it represents a $721 hole, and by 2036, a $754 shortfall compared to current expectations.
The worst-case scenarios
The above scenarios are not based on a more pessimistic scenario in which the U.S. government defaults or a financial crisis ensues. Skeptics of this outcome have some grounds: The U.S. economy has the means to lower the value of its debt thanks to the Federal Reserve. Quantitative easing, although inflationary, would avoid the extreme fallout of a default.
Likewise, while Treasury yields are elevated at present, this is only in part due to concerns over fiscal trajectories. They also reflect long-term inflation expectations and traders’ guesses on whether the Federal Reserve will increase rates.
However, should either of these realities come to pass, the threat to households is severe. Total payments for the aforementioned home bought in 2031 rocket to more than $3 million in the case of a default, and over $3.6 million in the case of an extreme interest rate shock, per the report.
The report concludes: “Neglecting the problem will not make it better and worsening our deficits will only increase the negative impacts of the debt on the rest of the economy … Addressing the national debt deserves to be a high priority for both voters and lawmakers, to benefit all Americans.”