
在经历一轮历史性抛售后,美国政府即将以25年来的最高利率发行30年期国债。此次抛售还引发市场猜测:美国政府或将进一步把发债重心转向短期债务。
上周四,美国财政部完成250亿美元30年期国债标售,得标利率报5.216%,创2001年以来最高水平。
距离11月中期选举日益临近,对于美国总统唐纳德·特朗普和财政部长斯科特·贝森特而言,这无疑是个棘手的难题。在经历多年高通胀和财政支出扩张后,居高不下的政府融资成本正向更广泛的宏观经济领域渗透。
美国财政部的担忧已显露无遗。财政部调整了发债指引,为未来削减长期国债供给留下了空间。与此同时,即便收益率攀升至数十年来的高位,投资者并未大举入场锁定收益率,这表明市场普遍担心本轮抛售可能尚未结束。
BTG Pactual Asset Management US LLC管理合伙人约翰·法思表示:“当前的收益率水平显然还没有高到让投资者趋之若鹜、疯狂抢购30年期国债的地步,这本身就是一个警示信号。贝森特可能会尝试通过减少供应来缓解压力,但市场存量30年期国债规模本就十分庞大,因此推动价格走势的未必只是新增供应,而是出现了新的卖家。”
今年以来,受多重因素推动,美国长期国债收益率一度突破5%大关。首先,投资者担心能源价格上涨会加剧成本压力,迫使美联储在未来数年维持高利率。其次,多年财政赤字推高了美国国债供应,加之企业为人工智能热潮大规模举债,以及长期国债传统买家的需求持续萎缩,多方因素共同推高了长期收益率。
上周四,美国各期限国债收益率下跌2至3个基点,当日公布的美国生产者价格指数进一步印证通胀压力有所缓和。交易员据此下调了对美联储9月加息的预期,市场隐含的加息概率已由早些时候的约50%降至35%左右。
公共债务利息支出仍是推动美国预算赤字扩大的核心因素。本财年至今,美债利息支出已累计达1.17万亿美元,同比增长15%,国债收益率走高是主要诱因。上周三举行的10年期国债拍卖中,发行收益率已创下2007年以来的同期限最高纪录。
Allspring Global Investments全球固定收益团队投资组合经理米哈尔·斯坦奇克在一份报告中写道:“我们预计今天的30年期国债拍卖能够顺利出清,但拍卖成功并不意味着市场对长期资产具备强劲的结构性需求。”
2001年,美国财政部曾暂停发行长期国债。当年,这一重大决定在正式公布前曾泄露给高盛(Goldman Sachs)的交易员,一度引发剧烈震荡。该政策随后于2005年被废除,恢复发债。
但今天的情况则截然不同。
当时,债券投资者正享受着长达数十年的债券牛市。连续多年的联邦预算盈余甚至引发了国债供给不足的市场忧虑。如今,未偿美国国债规模已经是当年的10倍,而且仍在快速膨胀,自2018年至今规模直接翻倍,攀升至约31万亿美元的高位。
随着传统需求来源逐步撤离美债市场,私人部门投资者开始填补缺口,但他们也要求获得更高的收益率作为回报。
黛米·胡牵头的巴克莱(Barclays Plc)团队写道:“随着市场越发依赖价格敏感型投资者,即便维持同等规模的国债供给,可能也要提供更高的收益率溢价,才能被市场消化。”
调整发债指引
近日,长期国债的未来发行规模成为市场讨论焦点。此前,美国财政部官员在最新的季度融资政策声明中出人意料地调整了措辞。过去,财政部一直表示将继续评估未来是否可能“增加”附息国债和浮息票据的发行规模,而这一次则改成正在考虑未来可能作出的“调整”。
债券投资者认为,这一措辞变化意味着财政部可能削减目前压力最大的长期国债供应。即便最终并未削减供应规模,市场普遍预计,未来财政部扩大固定收益证券拍卖规模时,可能将重点放在2至7年期等较短期限的国债上。
这将延续财政部目前缩短债务期限的策略。眼下,官方已将更多发债配额转向一年期以内的短期国库券。这种做法虽然暂时规避了长期国债的高收益率成本,却也显著推高了后续的再融资风险。
谈到如何降低长期融资成本时,法思表示:“在我看来,唯一明确的解决办法就是美国政府收紧财政预算。至于试图把更多国债发行转向短期的套路,其操作空间终究是有限的。如果继续过度依赖这种做法,在我看来属于不负责任的财政行为。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
在经历一轮历史性抛售后,美国政府即将以25年来的最高利率发行30年期国债。此次抛售还引发市场猜测:美国政府或将进一步把发债重心转向短期债务。
上周四,美国财政部完成250亿美元30年期国债标售,得标利率报5.216%,创2001年以来最高水平。
距离11月中期选举日益临近,对于美国总统唐纳德·特朗普和财政部长斯科特·贝森特而言,这无疑是个棘手的难题。在经历多年高通胀和财政支出扩张后,居高不下的政府融资成本正向更广泛的宏观经济领域渗透。
美国财政部的担忧已显露无遗。财政部调整了发债指引,为未来削减长期国债供给留下了空间。与此同时,即便收益率攀升至数十年来的高位,投资者并未大举入场锁定收益率,这表明市场普遍担心本轮抛售可能尚未结束。
BTG Pactual Asset Management US LLC管理合伙人约翰·法思表示:“当前的收益率水平显然还没有高到让投资者趋之若鹜、疯狂抢购30年期国债的地步,这本身就是一个警示信号。贝森特可能会尝试通过减少供应来缓解压力,但市场存量30年期国债规模本就十分庞大,因此推动价格走势的未必只是新增供应,而是出现了新的卖家。”
今年以来,受多重因素推动,美国长期国债收益率一度突破5%大关。首先,投资者担心能源价格上涨会加剧成本压力,迫使美联储在未来数年维持高利率。其次,多年财政赤字推高了美国国债供应,加之企业为人工智能热潮大规模举债,以及长期国债传统买家的需求持续萎缩,多方因素共同推高了长期收益率。
上周四,美国各期限国债收益率下跌2至3个基点,当日公布的美国生产者价格指数进一步印证通胀压力有所缓和。交易员据此下调了对美联储9月加息的预期,市场隐含的加息概率已由早些时候的约50%降至35%左右。
公共债务利息支出仍是推动美国预算赤字扩大的核心因素。本财年至今,美债利息支出已累计达1.17万亿美元,同比增长15%,国债收益率走高是主要诱因。上周三举行的10年期国债拍卖中,发行收益率已创下2007年以来的同期限最高纪录。
Allspring Global Investments全球固定收益团队投资组合经理米哈尔·斯坦奇克在一份报告中写道:“我们预计今天的30年期国债拍卖能够顺利出清,但拍卖成功并不意味着市场对长期资产具备强劲的结构性需求。”
2001年,美国财政部曾暂停发行长期国债。当年,这一重大决定在正式公布前曾泄露给高盛(Goldman Sachs)的交易员,一度引发剧烈震荡。该政策随后于2005年被废除,恢复发债。
但今天的情况则截然不同。
当时,债券投资者正享受着长达数十年的债券牛市。连续多年的联邦预算盈余甚至引发了国债供给不足的市场忧虑。如今,未偿美国国债规模已经是当年的10倍,而且仍在快速膨胀,自2018年至今规模直接翻倍,攀升至约31万亿美元的高位。
随着传统需求来源逐步撤离美债市场,私人部门投资者开始填补缺口,但他们也要求获得更高的收益率作为回报。
黛米·胡牵头的巴克莱(Barclays Plc)团队写道:“随着市场越发依赖价格敏感型投资者,即便维持同等规模的国债供给,可能也要提供更高的收益率溢价,才能被市场消化。”
调整发债指引
近日,长期国债的未来发行规模成为市场讨论焦点。此前,美国财政部官员在最新的季度融资政策声明中出人意料地调整了措辞。过去,财政部一直表示将继续评估未来是否可能“增加”附息国债和浮息票据的发行规模,而这一次则改成正在考虑未来可能作出的“调整”。
债券投资者认为,这一措辞变化意味着财政部可能削减目前压力最大的长期国债供应。即便最终并未削减供应规模,市场普遍预计,未来财政部扩大固定收益证券拍卖规模时,可能将重点放在2至7年期等较短期限的国债上。
这将延续财政部目前缩短债务期限的策略。眼下,官方已将更多发债配额转向一年期以内的短期国库券。这种做法虽然暂时规避了长期国债的高收益率成本,却也显著推高了后续的再融资风险。
谈到如何降低长期融资成本时,法思表示:“在我看来,唯一明确的解决办法就是美国政府收紧财政预算。至于试图把更多国债发行转向短期的套路,其操作空间终究是有限的。如果继续过度依赖这种做法,在我看来属于不负责任的财政行为。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
The US government is about to sell 30-year bonds at the highest interest rate in a quarter of a century, after a historic selloff that has stirred speculation the nation will tilt borrowing further toward short-dated maturities.
The Treasury will offer $25 billion of 30-year debt at its monthly auction later on Thursday. In the when-¬issued market, where securities are traded before they are actually sold, the new bond has a projected yield of around 5.23% — which would be the highest borrowing cost since 2001.
It’s a headache for President Donald Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent ahead of midterm elections in November. Lofty government financing costs are already feeding through to the broader economy, after years of elevated inflation and government spending.
The Treasury’s concern appeared to be on show last week when it tweaked its debt-sales guidance in a way that opened the door to potential cuts to long bond supply. Meanwhile, investors are still not rushing to lock in yields at multi-decade highs, signaling a collective wariness that the selloff may not be over.
“We’re not really at a level where people seem to be going crazy, saying ‘I want to buy the 30-year,’ and that should be a warning,” said John Fath, a managing partner at BTG Pactual Asset Management US LLC. “Bessent may try to address it by decreasing supply, but there’s already a lot of 30-year paper issued, so it’s not necessarily just new supply driving price action. It’s new sellers.”
Long-term yields surged past 5% this year on investor concerns that a rise in energy prices will boost cost pressures, forcing the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates elevated for years to come. That’s on top of heightened Treasury supply from years of fiscal deficits, a sudden ramp-up of corporate borrowing to fund the artificial-intelligence boom, and waning demand from traditional buyers of long-dated bonds.
On Thursday, yields were lower by two to three basis points across maturities as a reading of US producer prices offered further evidence that inflationary pressures are easing. Traders pared back their expectations for a Fed rate hike in September to reflect about a 35% of a move, from roughly 50% earlier this week.
Interest on the public debt continues to be a key driver of the nation’s budget deficit. For the fiscal year to date, the tally is $1.17 trillion — a 15% increase, thanks in part to higher yields on Treasuries. On Wednesday, a 10-year sale drew the highest yield for that tenor since 2007.
“We expect today’s 30-year auction to clear without difficulty, but a successful auction shouldn’t be confused with strong structural demand for long-duration assets,” Michal Stanczyk, a portfolio manager for the Global Fixed Income team at Allspring Global Investments, wrote in a note.
If prices remain around current levels for the 30-year auction scheduled for 1 p.m. in New York, it would be the highest borrowing rate since the Treasury axed the long bond in 2001. The decision, which was infamously leaked to Goldman Sachs traders before the public announcement, was reversed in 2005.
Today’s circumstances could scarcely be more different.
Back then, bond investors were enjoying the spoils of a multi-decade bull market. A series of federal budget surpluses had even fueled market concern that the supply of US government debt was too low. Nowadays, the amount of Treasuries outstanding is ten times larger and growing fast, having doubled since 2018 to around $31 trillion.
And as traditional sources of demand have moved away from Treasuries, private market participants have stepped in — demanding juicier yields in the process.
“As the market becomes increasingly reliant on price-sensitive investors, the same amount of Treasury supply may require a larger yield concession to clear,” wrote a Barclays Plc team led by Demi Hu.
Guidance Tweak
The future size of long-bond sales has been the subject of debate over the last week, after Treasury officials made an unanticipated tweak to their latest quarterly borrowing policy statement. Instead of saying they are continuing to evaluate potential future “increases” in coupon and floating-rate note sales, as was the case previously, they said they are mulling potential “changes.”
Bond investors saw that as raising the possibility that officials will trim sales of the long bonds most under pressure. Even if such a downsizing does not materialize, the market consensus is that when the Treasury does move to bigger fixed-income auctions, it will likely focus on shorter-maturity notes that mature in two- to seven-years.
That would be an extension of its current maturity-shortening strategy, where officials have adjusted issuance toward bills which mature in a year or less. Doing so sidesteps the higher yields on longer tenors but increases refinancing risks.
“The only clear solution I see, is the US government tightening its budget,” Fath said, on how to bring down long-term borrowing costs. “The whole game plan of trying to move issuance up to the front end: You can only do that so much, right? Then it becomes what I would call irresponsible.”