首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

Meta发布新一代开放权重AI模型

Beatrice Nolan
2026-08-12

此番战略转向并重新聚焦开源路线,或许也折射出Meta在近期模型落后于OpenAI和Anthropic后,急于重振声势。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

Meta于周一发布最新AI模型系列Muse Glimmer。这是一组可在笔记本电脑上运行的开源模型。与此同时,马克·扎克伯格发表了一篇6,500字的长文,为美国开源AI路线强力辩护。

扎克伯格在文中指出,强大的AI不应由少数几家公司垄断,这番言论矛头似乎直指OpenAI和Anthropic等竞争对手。他将Meta对开源路线的坚守,视作抗衡中国开源模型的关键筹码。来自深度求索(DeepSeek)和月之暗面(Moonshot)的中国开源模型,正迅速逼近美国前沿水平,赶超之势已令人不安。他同时呼吁华盛顿当局为美国企业的开源AI探索提供政策支持。

作为这项新举措的一部分,Meta计划开放Muse Spark 1.2的模型权重。这意味着公司将公开该模型训练后的底层参数,允许任何人下载、审查和修改,而非只能通过Meta自家产品或API访问。Muse Spark 1.2也是目前Meta推向市场的最先进AI模型。

扎克伯格在文章中写道:“我认为限制外国开放源代码模型的访问并非有效对策。我们的目标应该是让美国开源模型领跑全球,为此必须清除那些阻碍美国开源模型参与竞争的障碍。”这篇文章也是Meta近期系列媒体攻势的一环。扎克伯格已于上月在《华尔街日报》发表过同一主题的评论文章,Meta还安排了部分媒体专访。

Muse Glimmer发布之际,美国AI市场正日益被闭源公司主导。这些公司仅以受控方式出售其最先进模型的服务。

OpenAI、Anthropic和谷歌(Google)通常会将其最先进的“前沿”模型封闭管控,严格掌握模型权重和基础设施的控制权。Meta最初试图以开源战略打造差异化优势,并于2023年2月推出开放权重的Llama系列模型。Llama系列历经多个版本迭代,让外部开发者得以下载和修改高性能模型。即便竞争对手靠出售专有模型访问权限获得了更多收入,Meta也借此扩大了在整个AI生态系统中的影响力。但过去一年,由于Meta同时发布开源与专有模型,其对“开放权重”的承诺一度变得模糊。

Meta已在其全新的“超级智能实验室”(Superintelligence Labs)投入重金,并招揽了前Scale AI首席执行官汪滔加盟。公司一直试图将Muse系列打造为更强大的Meta AI助手的基础,适配Facebook、Instagram、WhatsApp以及Ray-Ban Meta AI智能眼镜等产品,同时力求在性能上对标Anthropic和OpenAI的模型。

此番战略转向并重新聚焦开源路线,或许也折射出Meta在近期模型落后于OpenAI和Anthropic后,急于重振声势。公司也亟需向投资者证明,自己仍具备与前沿AI实验室较量的实力。

Meta表示,其全新Glimmer系列模型采用了“蒸馏”技术进行训练,即让较小模型从大型专有系统Muse Spark中学习。扎克伯格在文中写道,美国AI开发者在与中国对手竞争时处于劣势,训练数据便是其中一环,并主张政策层面应着力消除此类障碍。

通过战略调整,Meta显然希望凭借坚守开源路线,与那些将最强大AI系统封闭在内部的竞争对手区分开来,同时为争取用户和政府支持增添政策依据。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

Meta于周一发布最新AI模型系列Muse Glimmer。这是一组可在笔记本电脑上运行的开源模型。与此同时,马克·扎克伯格发表了一篇6,500字的长文,为美国开源AI路线强力辩护。

扎克伯格在文中指出,强大的AI不应由少数几家公司垄断,这番言论矛头似乎直指OpenAI和Anthropic等竞争对手。他将Meta对开源路线的坚守,视作抗衡中国开源模型的关键筹码。来自深度求索(DeepSeek)和月之暗面(Moonshot)的中国开源模型,正迅速逼近美国前沿水平,赶超之势已令人不安。他同时呼吁华盛顿当局为美国企业的开源AI探索提供政策支持。

作为这项新举措的一部分,Meta计划开放Muse Spark 1.2的模型权重。这意味着公司将公开该模型训练后的底层参数,允许任何人下载、审查和修改,而非只能通过Meta自家产品或API访问。Muse Spark 1.2也是目前Meta推向市场的最先进AI模型。

扎克伯格在文章中写道:“我认为限制外国开放源代码模型的访问并非有效对策。我们的目标应该是让美国开源模型领跑全球,为此必须清除那些阻碍美国开源模型参与竞争的障碍。”这篇文章也是Meta近期系列媒体攻势的一环。扎克伯格已于上月在《华尔街日报》发表过同一主题的评论文章,Meta还安排了部分媒体专访。

Muse Glimmer发布之际,美国AI市场正日益被闭源公司主导。这些公司仅以受控方式出售其最先进模型的服务。

OpenAI、Anthropic和谷歌(Google)通常会将其最先进的“前沿”模型封闭管控,严格掌握模型权重和基础设施的控制权。Meta最初试图以开源战略打造差异化优势,并于2023年2月推出开放权重的Llama系列模型。Llama系列历经多个版本迭代,让外部开发者得以下载和修改高性能模型。即便竞争对手靠出售专有模型访问权限获得了更多收入,Meta也借此扩大了在整个AI生态系统中的影响力。但过去一年,由于Meta同时发布开源与专有模型,其对“开放权重”的承诺一度变得模糊。

Meta已在其全新的“超级智能实验室”(Superintelligence Labs)投入重金,并招揽了前Scale AI首席执行官汪滔加盟。公司一直试图将Muse系列打造为更强大的Meta AI助手的基础,适配Facebook、Instagram、WhatsApp以及Ray-Ban Meta AI智能眼镜等产品,同时力求在性能上对标Anthropic和OpenAI的模型。

此番战略转向并重新聚焦开源路线,或许也折射出Meta在近期模型落后于OpenAI和Anthropic后,急于重振声势。公司也亟需向投资者证明,自己仍具备与前沿AI实验室较量的实力。

Meta表示,其全新Glimmer系列模型采用了“蒸馏”技术进行训练,即让较小模型从大型专有系统Muse Spark中学习。扎克伯格在文中写道,美国AI开发者在与中国对手竞争时处于劣势,训练数据便是其中一环,并主张政策层面应着力消除此类障碍。

通过战略调整,Meta显然希望凭借坚守开源路线,与那些将最强大AI系统封闭在内部的竞争对手区分开来,同时为争取用户和政府支持增添政策依据。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

Meta launched its newest family of AI models—Muse Glimmer, a group of open-source models designed to run on a laptop—on Monday, alongside a 6,500-word essay from Mark Zuckerberg making the argument for American open-source AI.

In the essay, Zuckerberg argues that powerful AI should not be controlled by a handful of companies, a seeming jab at competitors like OpenAI and Anthropic. Zuckerberg positions Meta’s commitment to open-source as critical to challenging Chinese open-source models from DeepSeek and Moonshot which have been getting uncomfortably close to the American frontier. He also urged Washington to support American efforts.

As part of this new commitment, Meta says it plans to open the weights for Muse Spark 1.2—meaning it will publicly release the underlying trained parameters of the model, letting anyone download, inspect, and modify it rather than access it only through Meta’s own products or API—its most advanced AI model on the market.

“I do not believe restricting access to foreign open source models is an effective solution. Our goal should be for American open source models to be the best globally. This requires removing the hurdles that make it harder for American open source models to compete,” Zuckerberg wrote in the essay, part of a coordinated media blitz by Meta that included a Zuckerberg-penned opinion piece on the same themes in the Wall Street Journal last month and interviews with select media outlets.

The Muse Glimmer release lands in an American market increasingly dominated by closed-sourced AI companies, those that sell controlled access to their best models.

OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google generally keep their most advanced “frontier” models locked behind closed doors, retaining tight control of the weights and infrastructure. Meta initially sought to differentiate itself by embracing open source, launching the open-weight Llama family of models in February 2023. The Llama family, which expanded through several versions, helped make high-performing models available for outside developers to download and modify, and gave Meta influence over the wider AI ecosystem even as rivals captured more revenue by selling access to their proprietary models. Over the past year however, Meta’s commitment to open-weight has blurred, as the company mixed open releases with proprietary ones.

Meta has spent heavily on its new Superintelligence Labs, including bringing in former Scale AI CEO Alexander Wang. The company has been trying to position the Muse family as the foundation for a more capable Meta AI assistant across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and its Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses, while also being competitive with models from Anthropic and OpenAI.

The shift and refocus on open-source may also reflect an attempt by Meta to try to regain momentum after recent models have fallen short of systems from OpenAI and Anthropic. Meta is also looking to reassure investors that it is still competitive with frontier labs.

Meta said it trained its new Glimmer series using distillation, a process in which a smaller model learns from Muse Spark, its larger proprietary system. In his essay, Zuckerberg wrote that American AI developers face disadvantages against Chinese rivals, including in training data, and argued that policy should reduce those barriers.

With the strategy shift, Meta will likely be hoping its commitment to open-source will set it apart from rivals that keep their most capable systems behind closed doors and give it a political argument for user and government support.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开