
很多人都想知道,作为世界首富,手握上万亿美元的马斯克到底打算怎么花这笔钱?他会去搞慈善吗?毕竟美国可是有不少富豪把大部分身家都捐了出去——比如麦肯齐・斯科特,累计捐款已超260亿美元,不过即便如此,他的个人身家仍有近350亿美元。
在社交平台上,也不少人反复呼吁马斯克就算不把财产全捐了,至少也应该捐出一部分。但是马斯克对慈善的态度向来很直白。
在2025年12月做客播客节目《WTF》时,马斯克对主持人尼基尔・卡马特表示:“我认同人要心怀慈善,我们应该为人类做些实事。但是这件事做起来是很难的。”
有意思的是,马斯克还曾提出另一个观点——AI的发展会让货币在未来失去意义。本周一,诺贝尔经济学奖得主达龙・阿西莫格鲁便以此为由,在网上公开喊话马斯克。
“我给马斯克提一个建议,也算是给你知行合一的机会。”阿西莫格鲁本周一在X平台发帖道:“既然你都说了,到2036年货币就不再重要了,那你为什么不作出承诺,最晚到2036年,将你的1万亿美元身家全部都捐给慈善事业呢?这才能最有说服力地证明,你真的相信AI与科技的力量。”
阿西莫格鲁同时表示,这样做也能缓解全球民众对万亿级富豪掌控政治与社会权力的担忧。
他表示:“最终选定的慈善机构,应该经过中立机构审核,确保务实有效、不带有意识形态偏向。”
出乎不少人意料的是,马斯克直接回复了阿西莫格鲁:“我确实有类似的打算!”
尽管马斯克并未透露具体细节,但这番表态跟马斯克过去的态度已经有了些许不同。以前马斯克甚至曾公开批评过斯科特这种大慈善家,近期甚至还曾公开表示,斯特科的慈善捐赠反而让世界变得更糟。
马斯克的慈善史
6月27日,一个名叫Pubity的流量媒体咨讯品牌在X上发帖谈及斯科特的慈善行为,称她累计已捐款260亿美元,是“历史上最大的个人慈善家之一”。斯科特是亚马逊创始人杰夫・贝佐斯的前妻,也是2025年全球捐款额最高的慈善家。
随后,一名拥有2.25万粉丝、账户名为@FrenlyOfficer的用户在帖子下面评论道:“可惜她把钱都花在了让世界变糟的地方。”马斯克转发并认同了这条评论,还写道:“很遗憾,确实如此。”
据《纽约时报》获取的文件显示,截至2025年年底,马斯克名下基金会的规模约为140亿美元。但他的捐款大多流向了与自身商业利益高度绑定的机构。比如2024年,马斯克总计捐款3.7亿美元,其中四分之三都流向了得克萨斯州的一家非营利组织,而该组织的负责人是他的核心幕僚。
《纽约时报》指出:“这家非营利组织实际上是在为马斯克的商业帝国提供配套支持。它在一个乡村区域运营了一所小学,周边聚集了多家马斯克旗下企业,那里住着大量马斯克的员工。”
一边是马斯克曾坦言慈善难做,一边是过往捐款多围绕自身商业布局。这位世界首富究竟会不会兑现他本周的承诺,我们仍需拭目以待。(财富中文网)
译者:朴成奎
很多人都想知道,作为世界首富,手握上万亿美元的马斯克到底打算怎么花这笔钱?他会去搞慈善吗?毕竟美国可是有不少富豪把大部分身家都捐了出去——比如麦肯齐・斯科特,累计捐款已超260亿美元,不过即便如此,他的个人身家仍有近350亿美元。
在社交平台上,也不少人反复呼吁马斯克就算不把财产全捐了,至少也应该捐出一部分。但是马斯克对慈善的态度向来很直白。
在2025年12月做客播客节目《WTF》时,马斯克对主持人尼基尔・卡马特表示:“我认同人要心怀慈善,我们应该为人类做些实事。但是这件事做起来是很难的。”
有意思的是,马斯克还曾提出另一个观点——AI的发展会让货币在未来失去意义。本周一,诺贝尔经济学奖得主达龙・阿西莫格鲁便以此为由,在网上公开喊话马斯克。
“我给马斯克提一个建议,也算是给你知行合一的机会。”阿西莫格鲁本周一在X平台发帖道:“既然你都说了,到2036年货币就不再重要了,那你为什么不作出承诺,最晚到2036年,将你的1万亿美元身家全部都捐给慈善事业呢?这才能最有说服力地证明,你真的相信AI与科技的力量。”
阿西莫格鲁同时表示,这样做也能缓解全球民众对万亿级富豪掌控政治与社会权力的担忧。
他表示:“最终选定的慈善机构,应该经过中立机构审核,确保务实有效、不带有意识形态偏向。”
出乎不少人意料的是,马斯克直接回复了阿西莫格鲁:“我确实有类似的打算!”
尽管马斯克并未透露具体细节,但这番表态跟马斯克过去的态度已经有了些许不同。以前马斯克甚至曾公开批评过斯科特这种大慈善家,近期甚至还曾公开表示,斯特科的慈善捐赠反而让世界变得更糟。
马斯克的慈善史
6月27日,一个名叫Pubity的流量媒体咨讯品牌在X上发帖谈及斯科特的慈善行为,称她累计已捐款260亿美元,是“历史上最大的个人慈善家之一”。斯科特是亚马逊创始人杰夫・贝佐斯的前妻,也是2025年全球捐款额最高的慈善家。
随后,一名拥有2.25万粉丝、账户名为@FrenlyOfficer的用户在帖子下面评论道:“可惜她把钱都花在了让世界变糟的地方。”马斯克转发并认同了这条评论,还写道:“很遗憾,确实如此。”
据《纽约时报》获取的文件显示,截至2025年年底,马斯克名下基金会的规模约为140亿美元。但他的捐款大多流向了与自身商业利益高度绑定的机构。比如2024年,马斯克总计捐款3.7亿美元,其中四分之三都流向了得克萨斯州的一家非营利组织,而该组织的负责人是他的核心幕僚。
《纽约时报》指出:“这家非营利组织实际上是在为马斯克的商业帝国提供配套支持。它在一个乡村区域运营了一所小学,周边聚集了多家马斯克旗下企业,那里住着大量马斯克的员工。”
一边是马斯克曾坦言慈善难做,一边是过往捐款多围绕自身商业布局。这位世界首富究竟会不会兑现他本周的承诺,我们仍需拭目以待。(财富中文网)
译者:朴成奎
The public has long questioned the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, about what he’s doing sitting on a trillion-dollar fortune. After all, other billionaires give away vast amounts of their wealth (take MacKenzie Scott, who’s donated more than $26 billion and is still worth nearly $35 billion).
On social media, some have begged and pleaded for him to give at least some of his wealth away, or even all of it, but Musk has been pretty direct about his relationship with philanthropy.
“I agree with love of humanity, and I think we should try to do things that help our fellow human beings,” Musk told Nikhil Kamath for the WTF podcast in an episode published in December 2025. “But it’s very hard.”
That’s an interesting conception from a person who also believes money won’t matter anymore because of AI, so Nobel Prize–winning economist Daron Acemoglu called Musk out for it on Monday.
“A proposed pledge for Elon Musk,” wrote Acemoglu in an X post on Monday. “An opportunity to put your money where your mouth is. If money won’t matter in 2036, why don’t you pledge to donate your current wealth of approximately $1 trillion to charity no later than 2036. This would establish with great credibility your belief in the powers of AI and technology.”
Acemoglu also argued it would assuage people around the world who are concerned about the political and social power of billionaires and trillionaires.
“The charities chosen for this should be approved as effective and non-ideological by an impartial body,” he added.
And in somewhat of a shocking response, Musk replied to Acemoglu and said: “I am actually going to do something along these lines!”
While Musk didn’t elaborate on what this means, it’s a complete 180 of how the Tesla and SpaceX CEO has historically approached philanthropy. He’s also been openly critical of other major philanthropists like Scott, having recently said her efforts make the world worse off.
Musk’s history with philanthropy
On June 27, Pubity, a major viral media and social news brand, posted on X about Scott’s giving, saying her $26 billion in donations has made her one of the “biggest individual donors in history,” and the ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos indeed confirmed as the biggest megadonor in 2025.
Then, an account with 22,500 followers with the name @FrenlyOfficer, whose bio describes them as a “Heterosexual Alpha Male,” replied to Pubity’s post about Scott, saying, “Unfortunately, she’s spending it making the world a worse place.” Musk responded to @FrenlyOfficer agreeing with the sentiment, saying: “Sadly, yes.”
While Musk’s foundation stood at about $14 billion as of the end of 2025, according to files obtained by the New York Times, he’s only largely given to organizations that “narrowly track” with the interests of his own businesses. For example, three-quarters of Musk’s total giving in 2024, $370 million, went to a nonprofit in Texas led by his top aide.
“That nonprofit appears to provide a benefit to Mr. Musk’s business empire,” according to the NYT. “It operates an elementary school in a rural area where many of his employees live, near a cluster of Mr. Musk’s companies.”
So with Musk saying in the past that philanthropy is hard and that his track record shows he’s only given to things within his own interest, it will be interesting to see whether the world’s richest man will live up to what he wrote on his own platform, X, this week.