
2025年的美国经济喜忧参半,一边是股市以两位数涨幅收官,另一边则是通胀居高不下,米面粮油、水电杂费等日常开销持续走高,不少家庭背负沉重经济压力。尽管如此,仍有许多美国民众留出了一些钱用于捐赠他人。
印第安纳大学礼来家族慈善学院(Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy)调研撰写、美国捐赠基金会(Giving USA Foundation)发布的最新报告显示,2025年全美慈善捐赠规模达6172亿美元,创下历史新高。
其中,个人捐赠约3940亿美元,占全部捐赠的64%,剔除通胀因素后,同比增加 1.4%。基金会捐赠(常被视为亿万富翁慈善风向标)规模增至1170亿美元,增加近3%。而遗产捐赠在扣除通胀影响后更是同比大增近17%。礼来家族慈善学院院长阿米尔・帕西奇表示,捐赠规模之所以能有如此大幅增长,也与近几年金融市场表现亮眼、推高资产估值有关。
整体来看,虽然全美慈善捐赠总额创下历史新高,但增速仍远远落后于亿万富豪财富膨胀的速度,2025年,该群体掌控的财富激增16%。
尤为值得注意的是,作为报告中增速最快的类别,遗产捐赠的大幅增长预示着慈善事业可能即将步入新时代,也标志着备受瞩目的“财富大转移”可能已拉开序幕。瑞银(UBS)数据显示,到2048年,约124万亿美元资产将转移到千禧一代及X世代手中,如此规模的财富交接或将彻底重塑未来的捐赠格局。
新一代财富继承者重新定义慈善规则
随着年轻一代陆续继承巨额财富,要求加快善款发放、优化捐赠方与非营利机构间资金流转机制的压力也越来越大。
米尔肯研究院战略慈善项目(Milken Institute Strategic Philanthropy)执行副总裁梅利莎・史蒂文斯称,许多家族已在内部探讨相关事宜,而其讨论走向往往又会受到社会公众对财富分配不均、慈善如何在更两极分化的世界中发挥作用等议题的关注所影响。
她此前接受《财富》采访时表示,年轻捐赠人愈发倾向于通过影响力投资、政策倡导及风险慈善等方式投身慈善事业,而非单纯依赖“一捐了之”的传统模式。他们还愈发推崇信任式捐赠,不再硬性限定受赠方资金用途,而是提供无条件赠款,相信非营利组织比捐赠人更清楚如何分配资金才能实现社会效益最大化。
老一辈捐赠人大多将资金投向医疗、教育领域,而年轻捐赠人则更关注气候变化、种族公平、性别平权等系统性社会难题。
埃隆・马斯克等亿万富豪认为,慈善捐赠有其固有局限
慈善格局的转变在财富金字塔顶端体现得最为明显,不少全球顶级富豪正在大幅增加慈善投入,麦肯齐・斯科特便是其中典型代表。仅2025年一年,这位56岁的慈善家、亚马逊创始人杰夫・贝佐斯的前妻,就捐出了192亿美元,约占当年大额捐赠总额的三分之一。多元化、公平与包容(DEI)是她慈善布局的核心方向,比如她曾向霍华德大学(Howard University)捐赠8000万美元无限制善款,还为非裔美国人文化遗产行动基金(African American Cultural Heritage Action Fund)捐资4000万美元。
但也有不少富豪直言对大额捐赠的运作模式心存疑虑。
就在上月,身家因SpaceX上市而于今年早些时候突破万亿美元的埃隆・马斯克就将抨击炮火直接对准了斯科特,称后者的所谓慈善行为实际让世界陷入更大困境之中。
此番批评折射出马斯克一贯的观点,想把善款用到实处,难度极大。
马斯克去年做客《WTF》播客时说:“运营基金会最大的难题,是如何让善款真正造福大众,捐款换个慈善的虚名轻而易举,可想要做出实实在在的善举,却格外艰难,真的太难了。”
全球性非营利机构大善基金会(Greater Good Charities)首席执行官莉兹・贝克说,人们往往低估了推进大额慈善项目落地的实际困难。
贝克此前接受《财富》采访时表示:“倘若我有十亿美元可供捐赠,那自然再好不过。但身为经手分配善款的负责人,我深知其中难处,这份责任实在太过重大。”
她补充说,想要把慈善做出实效,需要在多方复杂利弊间权衡取舍,绝非单纯开具捐款支票那么简单。
“哪怕你只给我一美元,我也得按你的意愿用好这些钱。但这件事牵扯到许多方面,比如地缘局势,还要避免让当地社区形成帮扶依赖,这又涉及到如何选择合适的帮扶渠道、分辨真实刚需等等,全都要仔细考量。”(财富中文网)
译者:梁宇
审校:夏林
2025年的美国经济喜忧参半,一边是股市以两位数涨幅收官,另一边则是通胀居高不下,米面粮油、水电杂费等日常开销持续走高,不少家庭背负沉重经济压力。尽管如此,仍有许多美国民众留出了一些钱用于捐赠他人。
印第安纳大学礼来家族慈善学院(Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy)调研撰写、美国捐赠基金会(Giving USA Foundation)发布的最新报告显示,2025年全美慈善捐赠规模达6172亿美元,创下历史新高。
其中,个人捐赠约3940亿美元,占全部捐赠的64%,剔除通胀因素后,同比增加 1.4%。基金会捐赠(常被视为亿万富翁慈善风向标)规模增至1170亿美元,增加近3%。而遗产捐赠在扣除通胀影响后更是同比大增近17%。礼来家族慈善学院院长阿米尔・帕西奇表示,捐赠规模之所以能有如此大幅增长,也与近几年金融市场表现亮眼、推高资产估值有关。
整体来看,虽然全美慈善捐赠总额创下历史新高,但增速仍远远落后于亿万富豪财富膨胀的速度,2025年,该群体掌控的财富激增16%。
尤为值得注意的是,作为报告中增速最快的类别,遗产捐赠的大幅增长预示着慈善事业可能即将步入新时代,也标志着备受瞩目的“财富大转移”可能已拉开序幕。瑞银(UBS)数据显示,到2048年,约124万亿美元资产将转移到千禧一代及X世代手中,如此规模的财富交接或将彻底重塑未来的捐赠格局。
新一代财富继承者重新定义慈善规则
随着年轻一代陆续继承巨额财富,要求加快善款发放、优化捐赠方与非营利机构间资金流转机制的压力也越来越大。
米尔肯研究院战略慈善项目(Milken Institute Strategic Philanthropy)执行副总裁梅利莎・史蒂文斯称,许多家族已在内部探讨相关事宜,而其讨论走向往往又会受到社会公众对财富分配不均、慈善如何在更两极分化的世界中发挥作用等议题的关注所影响。
她此前接受《财富》采访时表示,年轻捐赠人愈发倾向于通过影响力投资、政策倡导及风险慈善等方式投身慈善事业,而非单纯依赖“一捐了之”的传统模式。他们还愈发推崇信任式捐赠,不再硬性限定受赠方资金用途,而是提供无条件赠款,相信非营利组织比捐赠人更清楚如何分配资金才能实现社会效益最大化。
老一辈捐赠人大多将资金投向医疗、教育领域,而年轻捐赠人则更关注气候变化、种族公平、性别平权等系统性社会难题。
埃隆・马斯克等亿万富豪认为,慈善捐赠有其固有局限
慈善格局的转变在财富金字塔顶端体现得最为明显,不少全球顶级富豪正在大幅增加慈善投入,麦肯齐・斯科特便是其中典型代表。仅2025年一年,这位56岁的慈善家、亚马逊创始人杰夫・贝佐斯的前妻,就捐出了192亿美元,约占当年大额捐赠总额的三分之一。多元化、公平与包容(DEI)是她慈善布局的核心方向,比如她曾向霍华德大学(Howard University)捐赠8000万美元无限制善款,还为非裔美国人文化遗产行动基金(African American Cultural Heritage Action Fund)捐资4000万美元。
但也有不少富豪直言对大额捐赠的运作模式心存疑虑。
就在上月,身家因SpaceX上市而于今年早些时候突破万亿美元的埃隆・马斯克就将抨击炮火直接对准了斯科特,称后者的所谓慈善行为实际让世界陷入更大困境之中。
此番批评折射出马斯克一贯的观点,想把善款用到实处,难度极大。
马斯克去年做客《WTF》播客时说:“运营基金会最大的难题,是如何让善款真正造福大众,捐款换个慈善的虚名轻而易举,可想要做出实实在在的善举,却格外艰难,真的太难了。”
全球性非营利机构大善基金会(Greater Good Charities)首席执行官莉兹・贝克说,人们往往低估了推进大额慈善项目落地的实际困难。
贝克此前接受《财富》采访时表示:“倘若我有十亿美元可供捐赠,那自然再好不过。但身为经手分配善款的负责人,我深知其中难处,这份责任实在太过重大。”
她补充说,想要把慈善做出实效,需要在多方复杂利弊间权衡取舍,绝非单纯开具捐款支票那么简单。
“哪怕你只给我一美元,我也得按你的意愿用好这些钱。但这件事牵扯到许多方面,比如地缘局势,还要避免让当地社区形成帮扶依赖,这又涉及到如何选择合适的帮扶渠道、分辨真实刚需等等,全都要仔细考量。”(财富中文网)
译者:梁宇
审校:夏林
2025 brought a mixed picture for the U.S. economy. The stock market ended the year with double-digit gains, but inflation had not fully faded—leaving prices for everyday essentials like groceries and utilities elevated and many households still feeling squeezed. Still, many Americans found room in their budget to give to others.
U.S. charitable giving reached a record $617.2 billion in 2025, according to a new report from Giving USA Foundation, researched and written by Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.
About $394 billion, or 64%, of total contributions, came from individuals—up 1.4% when adjusted for inflation compared with the year prior. Foundation giving, which often reflects billionaire philanthropy, climbed nearly 3% to $117 billion. Giving through bequests jumped nearly 17% after adjusting for inflation. The increase likely reflects, in part, the strong performance of financial markets in recent years, which boosted the value of estates, said Amir Pasic, dean of the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.
Overall, while charitable giving set a new high, it still lagged the explosive growth in billionaire wealth, which surged 16% in 2025.
The rise in bequests in particular—the report’s fastest-growing category—suggests philanthropy may be entering a new era and mark the beginning of the long-anticipated Great Wealth Transfer. Roughly $124 trillion is expected to change hands to Millennials and Gen Xers by 2048, according to UBS, and that shift could dramatically reshape the future of giving.
Younger heirs are beginning to rewrite the rules of giving
As younger generations inherit more wealth, pressure to accelerate payouts and rethink how quickly charitable dollars move from donors to nonprofits is beginning to emerge.
In some cases, those conversations are already underway inside families—often shaped by a growing focus on wealth inequality and how philanthropy should function in a more polarized world, said Melissa Stevens, executive vice president of Milken Institute Strategic Philanthropy.
She previously told Fortune younger donors are increasingly interested in deploying capital through impact investing, advocacy, and venture-style philanthropy, rather than traditional grantmaking alone. Donors are also prioritizing trust-based giving, meaning that instead of telling recipients exactly how to spend their donations, they give unrestricted gifts, trusting nonprofits to know better than donors where the money will have the greatest impact.
Their priorities also tend to skew toward systemic issues such as climate change, racial justice, and gender equity, compared with older generations’ broader focus on health and education.
Billionaires like Elon Musk believe giving has its limitations
The shifting landscape is playing out most visibly at the top of the wealth pyramid, where some of the world’s richest individuals are dramatically scaling up their philanthropy. MacKenzie Scott has become one of the most prominent examples. In 2025 alone, the 56-year-old philanthropist and ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos gave away $19.2 billion, accounting for roughly one-third of all megagifts tracked that year. DEI has been a major focus of her philanthropy, including an $80 million unrestricted gift to Howard University and a $40 million donation to the African American Cultural Heritage Action Fund.
Others, however, have been more openly skeptical about the mechanics of giving at scale.
Just last month, Elon Musk, whose net worth surged past $1 trillion earlier this year following the SpaceX IPO, attacked Scott directly—arguing her philanthropy is actually making the world “worse off.”
The criticism reflects a belief Musk has expressed repeatedly: that donating money wisely is “very hard.”
“The biggest challenge I find with my foundation is trying to give money away in a way that is truly beneficial to people,” Musk said on the WTF podcast last year. “It’s very easy to give money away to get the appearance of goodness. It is very difficult to give money away for the reality of goodness. Very difficult.”
Liz Baker, CEO of global nonprofit Greater Good Charities, said the challenge of deploying large-scale philanthropy is often underestimated.
“I wish I had a billion dollars to give away,” Baker previously told Fortune. “But as somebody who’s responsible for giving away money, yeah, it’s hard, because there’s a really big responsibility that goes with that.”
She added that effective philanthropy requires navigating complex tradeoffs that go far beyond simply writing checks.
“If you give me $1, I’m going to spend it the way that you want it spent. But there’s all this stuff that goes into it—geopolitical stuff, you don’t want to create dependencies in communities—like, what is the right avenue, and what are things that are really needed?”