
自大衰退以来,全美大学和学院都在应对一颗定时炸弹,如今越来越多院校表示,这颗炸弹将在下学期引爆。
过去一个月,美国多所高校管理层发布的一系列公告,宛如高等教育模式的讣告:这套办学体系无论对学生还是授课院校而言,都已难以为继。这篇讣告恰恰反映了过去二十年里持续下降的出生率引发的后果。
雪城大学校长J·迈克尔·海尼(J. Michael Haynie)上周在致全体教职员工的信中写道:“招生波动现象普遍存在、难以预测,即便对实力雄厚、资源充足的高校而言,这也成为‘新常态。’”他同时宣布该校下一财年本科招生未能达成既定目标。
他补充道:“2026年秋季招生缺口将带来实质性财务影响,包括预算赤字——这是该校许久未出现的状况。”
随着入学人数骤降,更多院校被迫进行类似的减值调整。全国学生信息交换研究中心(National Student Clearinghouse Research Center)数据显示,2025 年秋季美国高等院校总入学人数仅增长1%,低于前一年4%的增幅。私立四年制高校去年入学人数下降 1.6%。
明年的整体招生数据数月后才能出炉,但已有多所院校未能完成明年秋季的招生指标。决定大学适龄生源规模的人口时钟早在18年前大衰退后就开始进入倒计时:彼时美国普通家庭收入不稳定,纷纷推迟生育计划。如今这批孩子中年龄最大的已到大学入学年龄,各大高校不得不为近二十年前的家庭生育决策承担后果。正如一位高校校长近期所言,高等教育行业正站在十字路口。
文理学院的衰落
几乎所有院校都面临困境,但入学人数的断崖式下跌对遍布全美、数量庞大的小型私立学院而言,更是关乎存亡的挑战。大型院校正尝试开拓多元收入渠道、吸引新生源,而传统四年制文理学院则因财务约束,面临严重的消亡风险。在文理学院的发源地新英格兰地区,汉普郡学院(Hampshire College)4月宣布秋季学期结束后停办,明确将其归因于招生不足。过去十年,该地区已有32所四年制高校关停或合并,其中超三分之一是在2020年之后关闭的。
美国城市研究所(Urban Institute)高等教育融资领域高级研究员桑迪·鲍姆(Sandy Baum)表示,美国目前约有4000所高校,其中很多都鲜为人知。美联储数据显示,每年约有60所高校关停,关停速度在过去十年显著加快,且受冲击的基本都是学生规模较小的私立院校。美联储预测,在最坏情景下——若2025年至2029年招生人数下滑15%,每年关停院校数量将翻一番以上。
“精英高校不在受冲击之列,”鲍姆在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示,“如果一所学校仅招300名学生,运营将难以为继,部分院校必然会倒闭。”
学生都去哪儿了?
受学费收入缩水影响,即便顶尖公立大学也已启动明年的大幅预算削减计划。佛蒙特大学上月宣布,因本科新生入学人数下降15%,下一财年将出现1200万美元预算赤字。怀俄明大学明年同样面临1500万美元的资金缺口,原因包括入学人数减少、通胀高企以及投资收益下降。
俄勒冈大学校长卡尔·肖尔茨(Karl Scholz)上月在致教职工的信中宣布,该校将削减3000万美元预算,主要原因是州外学生入学人数减少,并警告称,若当前趋势持续,未来几年该校赤字可能攀升至约6500万美元。
肖尔茨写道:“我认为我们正站在十字路口。这些趋势不只影响俄勒冈大学,而是代表着整个高等教育正在发生的变化。”
很多院校指出,州外生源与国际生源减少是重要的财务压力来源。布鲁金斯学会的研究显示,过去几十年,顶尖公立大学投入巨资吸引学费标准更高的州外生源,2002年至2022年间,非本地生源占比平均提升了55%。
但这种模式已开始显现疲软迹象。顶尖大型公立大学的州外生源基本保持稳定,但国际新生却大幅减少。全国学生信息交换中心数据显示,去年秋季本科国际生入学人数仅增长3.2%,增速不足2024年的一半;研究生国际生入学人数则下降近6%。这一趋势在去年春季仍在延续:教育非营利机构国际教育工作者协会(NAFSA)上月发布的报告显示,去年春季美国高校的外国留学生人数同比下降20%。
特朗普政府对外国留学生的强硬政策是原因之一——签证遭撤销的威胁使大量潜在学生放弃赴美求学。高昂的学费和整体生活成本也促使许多美国本土青年重新考量升学选择,越来越多人转而选择社区大学或职业技术院校。
尽管许多大学教务长和校长将问题归咎于地缘政治和政策因素,但鲍姆提醒,不应将入学人数骤降解读为周期性困境,对那些本就难以维持本土生源的小型院校来说尤其如此。
“美国高中毕业生数量在下降,”她说,“这并不意外。我们早就预见到这一趋势,只是现在它真的到来了。”
早在二十年前的大衰退时期,美国家庭生育率持续走低,研究人员便预测美国适龄大学生将出现断崖式下跌。
如今这批孩子中最年长的已年满18岁,高校开始感受到多年前家庭生育决策带来的冲击。美国国家教育统计中心(National Center for Education Statistics)数据显示,2010年至2021年间,美国本科入学人数已下降15%,未来还可能进一步下滑。咨询公司RC Strategy的研究显示,2007年后出生率下降17%,意味着2025年至2029年间,美国适龄大学生将减少57.6万人——这几乎是全美在校生规模最大的亚利桑那州立大学去年总学生人数的四倍。
小型院校面临的困境
鲍姆表示,包括常春藤盟校或加州大学等拥有巨额捐赠基金的公立大学系统在内的名校,或许能免受这场人口危机的冲击。这些院校的入学需求预计将保持高位,校方仍可在申请者中优中选优。
其他院校的发展前景则不容乐观。像雪城大学这样口碑出众、但尚未跻身第一梯队的顶尖州立大学和大型私立院校,未来数年将陷入更激烈的生源争夺战。去年,多所高校为提高入学率,在最后阶段向尚未确认就读意向的申请者追加奖学金,雪城大学便是其中之一。
亚利桑那大学等部分院校正主动缩减班级规模,以提升学术表现与毕业率,同时降低奖学金支出与全国招生成本。还有院校为维持运营,面向中老年群体推出调整后的课程体系——该群体作为日益扩大的潜在生源市场,希望学习新技能或实现职业转型。Council for Adult and Experiential Learning本月早些时候发布的调查显示,25至64岁的美国人中,有4170万人计划在未来两年内接受某种形式的高等教育。
但尽管大型院校,甚至小型特色院校尚能通过创新手段暂时缓解财务困境,但遍布全美各地的小型私立院校却可能迎来更为严峻的考验。它们面临激烈的生源竞争,又无法像大型高校那样储备充足资金、调整受众定位,其中很多院校最终难逃关停命运。
“大多数院校都没有雄厚的捐赠基金。全美有数千所高校——其中多数你可能从未听过——完全依赖学费维持运营,”鲍姆说,“一旦学生人数不足,它们就会陷入财务困境。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
自大衰退以来,全美大学和学院都在应对一颗定时炸弹,如今越来越多院校表示,这颗炸弹将在下学期引爆。
过去一个月,美国多所高校管理层发布的一系列公告,宛如高等教育模式的讣告:这套办学体系无论对学生还是授课院校而言,都已难以为继。这篇讣告恰恰反映了过去二十年里持续下降的出生率引发的后果。
雪城大学校长J·迈克尔·海尼(J. Michael Haynie)上周在致全体教职员工的信中写道:“招生波动现象普遍存在、难以预测,即便对实力雄厚、资源充足的高校而言,这也成为‘新常态。’”他同时宣布该校下一财年本科招生未能达成既定目标。
他补充道:“2026年秋季招生缺口将带来实质性财务影响,包括预算赤字——这是该校许久未出现的状况。”
随着入学人数骤降,更多院校被迫进行类似的减值调整。全国学生信息交换研究中心(National Student Clearinghouse Research Center)数据显示,2025 年秋季美国高等院校总入学人数仅增长1%,低于前一年4%的增幅。私立四年制高校去年入学人数下降 1.6%。
明年的整体招生数据数月后才能出炉,但已有多所院校未能完成明年秋季的招生指标。决定大学适龄生源规模的人口时钟早在18年前大衰退后就开始进入倒计时:彼时美国普通家庭收入不稳定,纷纷推迟生育计划。如今这批孩子中年龄最大的已到大学入学年龄,各大高校不得不为近二十年前的家庭生育决策承担后果。正如一位高校校长近期所言,高等教育行业正站在十字路口。
文理学院的衰落
几乎所有院校都面临困境,但入学人数的断崖式下跌对遍布全美、数量庞大的小型私立学院而言,更是关乎存亡的挑战。大型院校正尝试开拓多元收入渠道、吸引新生源,而传统四年制文理学院则因财务约束,面临严重的消亡风险。在文理学院的发源地新英格兰地区,汉普郡学院(Hampshire College)4月宣布秋季学期结束后停办,明确将其归因于招生不足。过去十年,该地区已有32所四年制高校关停或合并,其中超三分之一是在2020年之后关闭的。
美国城市研究所(Urban Institute)高等教育融资领域高级研究员桑迪·鲍姆(Sandy Baum)表示,美国目前约有4000所高校,其中很多都鲜为人知。美联储数据显示,每年约有60所高校关停,关停速度在过去十年显著加快,且受冲击的基本都是学生规模较小的私立院校。美联储预测,在最坏情景下——若2025年至2029年招生人数下滑15%,每年关停院校数量将翻一番以上。
“精英高校不在受冲击之列,”鲍姆在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示,“如果一所学校仅招300名学生,运营将难以为继,部分院校必然会倒闭。”
学生都去哪儿了?
受学费收入缩水影响,即便顶尖公立大学也已启动明年的大幅预算削减计划。佛蒙特大学上月宣布,因本科新生入学人数下降15%,下一财年将出现1200万美元预算赤字。怀俄明大学明年同样面临1500万美元的资金缺口,原因包括入学人数减少、通胀高企以及投资收益下降。
俄勒冈大学校长卡尔·肖尔茨(Karl Scholz)上月在致教职工的信中宣布,该校将削减3000万美元预算,主要原因是州外学生入学人数减少,并警告称,若当前趋势持续,未来几年该校赤字可能攀升至约6500万美元。
肖尔茨写道:“我认为我们正站在十字路口。这些趋势不只影响俄勒冈大学,而是代表着整个高等教育正在发生的变化。”
很多院校指出,州外生源与国际生源减少是重要的财务压力来源。布鲁金斯学会的研究显示,过去几十年,顶尖公立大学投入巨资吸引学费标准更高的州外生源,2002年至2022年间,非本地生源占比平均提升了55%。
但这种模式已开始显现疲软迹象。顶尖大型公立大学的州外生源基本保持稳定,但国际新生却大幅减少。全国学生信息交换中心数据显示,去年秋季本科国际生入学人数仅增长3.2%,增速不足2024年的一半;研究生国际生入学人数则下降近6%。这一趋势在去年春季仍在延续:教育非营利机构国际教育工作者协会(NAFSA)上月发布的报告显示,去年春季美国高校的外国留学生人数同比下降20%。
特朗普政府对外国留学生的强硬政策是原因之一——签证遭撤销的威胁使大量潜在学生放弃赴美求学。高昂的学费和整体生活成本也促使许多美国本土青年重新考量升学选择,越来越多人转而选择社区大学或职业技术院校。
尽管许多大学教务长和校长将问题归咎于地缘政治和政策因素,但鲍姆提醒,不应将入学人数骤降解读为周期性困境,对那些本就难以维持本土生源的小型院校来说尤其如此。
“美国高中毕业生数量在下降,”她说,“这并不意外。我们早就预见到这一趋势,只是现在它真的到来了。”
早在二十年前的大衰退时期,美国家庭生育率持续走低,研究人员便预测美国适龄大学生将出现断崖式下跌。
如今这批孩子中最年长的已年满18岁,高校开始感受到多年前家庭生育决策带来的冲击。美国国家教育统计中心(National Center for Education Statistics)数据显示,2010年至2021年间,美国本科入学人数已下降15%,未来还可能进一步下滑。咨询公司RC Strategy的研究显示,2007年后出生率下降17%,意味着2025年至2029年间,美国适龄大学生将减少57.6万人——这几乎是全美在校生规模最大的亚利桑那州立大学去年总学生人数的四倍。
小型院校面临的困境
鲍姆表示,包括常春藤盟校或加州大学等拥有巨额捐赠基金的公立大学系统在内的名校,或许能免受这场人口危机的冲击。这些院校的入学需求预计将保持高位,校方仍可在申请者中优中选优。
其他院校的发展前景则不容乐观。像雪城大学这样口碑出众、但尚未跻身第一梯队的顶尖州立大学和大型私立院校,未来数年将陷入更激烈的生源争夺战。去年,多所高校为提高入学率,在最后阶段向尚未确认就读意向的申请者追加奖学金,雪城大学便是其中之一。
亚利桑那大学等部分院校正主动缩减班级规模,以提升学术表现与毕业率,同时降低奖学金支出与全国招生成本。还有院校为维持运营,面向中老年群体推出调整后的课程体系——该群体作为日益扩大的潜在生源市场,希望学习新技能或实现职业转型。Council for Adult and Experiential Learning本月早些时候发布的调查显示,25至64岁的美国人中,有4170万人计划在未来两年内接受某种形式的高等教育。
但尽管大型院校,甚至小型特色院校尚能通过创新手段暂时缓解财务困境,但遍布全美各地的小型私立院校却可能迎来更为严峻的考验。它们面临激烈的生源竞争,又无法像大型高校那样储备充足资金、调整受众定位,其中很多院校最终难逃关停命运。
“大多数院校都没有雄厚的捐赠基金。全美有数千所高校——其中多数你可能从未听过——完全依赖学费维持运营,”鲍姆说,“一旦学生人数不足,它们就会陷入财务困境。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
Universities and colleges across the country have been dealing with a ticking time bomb since the Great Recession, and a growing number of them are saying that it’s about to go off, next semester.
A series of announcements over the past month by the highest offices of U.S. universities read like an obituary to a higher learning model that no longer works for either students or the institutions tasked with teaching. And that obituary has been authored in slow motion by the declining birth rate of the last two decades.
“Enrollment volatility is widespread, unpredictable and the ‘new normal’ for even strong, well-resourced universities,” J. Michael Haynie, Syracuse University’s chancellor, wrote in a note to faculty and staff last week, announcing the school had missed its undergraduate enrollment target for the next fiscal year.
“The fall 2026 enrollment shortfall carries real financial consequences—including a budget deficit, something the University has not experienced in quite some time,” he continued.
Many more schools are being forced into similar write-downs as enrollment plummets. In fall 2025, total post-secondary enrollment in the U.S. rose 1%, down from a 4% increase measured the year before, according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. At private four-year institutions, enrollment last year dipped 1.6%.
Aggregate enrollment data for next year won’t be available for months, but several schools have already missed their enrollment targets for next fall. A demographic clock determining college-aged student supply started ticking 18 years ago in the wake of the Great Recession, when insecure American households decided to put off having children. With the eldest of that cohort now of college age, schools are having to pay for those decisions taken almost two decades ago. As one university president put it recently, it has left higher education at a “crossroads.”
The decline of the liberal arts school
Almost every school is struggling, but the enrollment cliff is an existential challenge for the legions of small private schools spread across the country. While larger institutions are experimenting with different revenue streams or trying to attract new demographics of students, the classic four-year, liberal arts college is at serious risk of extinction due to financial constraints. In New England, the cradle of liberal arts schools, Hampshire College announced in April it would close after the fall semester, explicitly citing enrollment issues. The region has seen 32 four-year colleges close down or merge in the last decade, more than a third shutting down since 2020.
The U.S. currently has around 4,000 colleges, many of which you’ve probably never heard of, according to Sandy Baum, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute who researches higher education financing. The Federal Reserve has found around 60 colleges are closing every year, a rate that has ramped up significantly over the past decade and almost exclusively impacted private institutions with small student bodies. In a worst-case scenario where enrollment drops 15% between 2025 and 2029, the Fed projected annual closures would more than double.
“Forget the elite institutions. That’s not part of it,” Baum told Fortune. “If you’re enrolling 300 students, it’s going to be really tough to make it work, and so some of them will have to go out of business.”
Where have all the kids gone?
Universities—even flagship ones—are already pricing in steep budget cuts for next year in response to shrinking tuition revenue. The University of Vermont is planning a $12 million budget deficit next fiscal year, the school announced last month after reporting a 15% drop in freshman undergraduate enrollment. The University of Wyoming is similarly facing a $15 million shortfall next year, due to shrinking enrollment, inflation and falling investment.
At the University of Oregon, President Karl Scholz announced in a note to staff last month that the institution was enacting $30 million in budget cuts, primarily due to declining out-of-state-enrollment, and warned the school’s deficit could rise to some $65 million in the coming years if current trends hold steady.
“I believe we are now at a crossroads,” Scholz wrote. “These dynamics are not affecting just the University of Oregon: they represent a changing reality across higher education.”
Many schools have pointed to falling out-of-state and international enrollment as a significant financial constraint. Over the past few decades, public flagship universities have invested heavily in attracting more transplants who can be charged higher tuition fees, with the share of non-local students rising an average 55% between 2002 and 2022, according to research from the Brookings Institution.
But that model has started to show signs of weakening. Out-of-state domestic enrollment at large flagship universities has held steady, but international freshmen have become a rare breed. Undergraduate international enrollment grew 3.2% last fall, according to the National Student Clearinghouse data, but that was less than half recorded in 2024, while graduate international enrollment declined nearly 6%. Those trends persisted into last spring, when foreign student enrollment at U.S. universities fell 20% year-on-year, according to a report published last month by NAFSA, an education non-profit.
The Trump administration’s hardline approach to foreign-born students is partly to blame, as the threat of revoked visas has discouraged many potential learners from choosing U.S. colleges. High tuition fees and the overall cost of living has also pushed many U.S.-born young adults to reconsider their option, with a rising share opting for community colleges or trade schools.
But though many university provosts and presidents have pointed to geopolitical and policy factors Baum cautioned against interpreting the enrollment cliff as a cyclical struggle, particularly for smaller schools who are struggling to keep domestic enrollment numbers up anyway.
“There’s a decline in the number of high school graduates in this country,” she said. “This is not a surprise. We’ve seen this coming for a long time, but we’re now sort of getting to the point where it’s actually happening.”
Researchers have been predicting a demographic cliff for college-aged Americans ever since families started having fewer babies two decades ago, around the time of the Great Recession.
With the oldest in that cohort now turning 18, universities are starting to feel the sting of household choices made years ago. Undergraduate enrollment already dipped 15% between 2010 and 2021, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, and could spiral further still. A 17% decline in birth rates after 2007 translates to 576,000 fewer college-aged Americans between 2025 and 2029, according to research from RC Strategy, an advisory firm. That’s almost four times more than the entire student body enrolled last year at Arizona State University, the country’s largest education institution by headcount.
Trouble for the little guys
Highly prestigious schools, including the Ivies or public systems with large endowments like the University of California, might be insulated from the demographic crisis, Baum said. Demand for spots in these institutions is likely to stay high, and schools will keep having their picks of students.
The outlook isn’t as rosy elsewhere. Flagship state schools and large private institutions like Syracuse, highly regarded but a step below the elite level, are likely to face much greater competition for students in the years ahead. Last year, Syracuse was one of several schools to offer last-minute scholarships to students who had yet to commit in a bid to boost enrollment.
Some institutions, like the University of Arizona, are intentionally lowering class sizes to improve academic performance and graduation rates, while reducing scholarship expenses and national recruitment burdens. Others, in a bid to stay solvent, are advertising tweaked curricula to older adults, a growing market of prospective learners looking to acquire new skills or change careers. A survey published earlier this month by the Council for Adult and Experiential Learning found 41.7 million Americans between the ages of 25 and 64 intend to enroll in some type of higher education within the next two years
But while larger institutions or even smaller, specialized ones might creatively patch over their financial woes, a greater reckoning is likely coming for small private schools peppered across the country. Dealing with high competition for enrollment and unable to amass the same financial resources as larger universities to pivot towards different audiences, many of these schools will have no option but to shut down.
“Most institutions don’t have significant endowments, but there are thousands of institutions—most of them you may never have heard of—that are tuition-dependent,” Baum said. “When they don’t have enough students, they’re in financial trouble.”