
如果亿万富翁、亚马逊创始人杰夫·贝佐斯的这一提议最终实现,约7600万美国家庭将不再需要缴纳联邦所得税。
如今执掌蓝色起源公司(Blue Origin)的贝佐斯最近在接受美国消费者新闻与商业频道(CNBC)采访时主张,美国收入最低的半数人群应免缴联邦所得税。他表示,考虑到这些劳动者对联邦税收总额的贡献本就十分有限,不应让他们承受更大的经济压力。
贝佐斯称:“美国收入最低的半数人群仅缴纳了3%的联邦所得税,我认为这个比例应该是零。”
为佐证这一观点,贝佐斯以一名虚构的医护人员为例提出质疑:“为什么纽约皇后区一名年薪7.5万美元的护士,每月要缴纳超过1000美元的税款?”
贝佐斯补充道:“在我看来,这样做有些荒谬。我们不该要求这位皇后区的护士缴税,相反,联邦政府应该向她道歉。这完全不合乎情理。”
尽管贝佐斯并未详细说明其计算依据,但美国劳动者通常需要缴纳联邦所得税、社会保障税和医疗保险税,且美国大多数州还会征收州所得税。这些税费加起来,每年可达数千美元。
美国实行累进税制,因此高收入人群税负占收入比重普遍更高。根据美国税收基金会(Tax Foundation)对美国国税局(IRS)数据的分析,2023年,美国收入最低的半数纳税人(年收入低于5.4万美元)的收入约占全美调整后总收入的12%,仅缴纳3%的联邦所得税,平均每户缴税约913美元。不过,据美国消费者新闻与商业频道报道,若计入可退还税收抵免,美国收入最低的40%纳税人实际上无需缴纳联邦所得税。
与唐纳德·特朗普关系密切的贝佐斯表示,他计划向政界领导人游说这一主张,并称免除低收入人群的联邦所得税对政府而言不过是“九牛一毛”。
贝佐斯表示:“分享我们的想法是公民和商界领袖的职责之一,而这个想法能够切实惠及普通民众。”
身家2800亿美元的贝佐斯表示,即使他的税单翻倍,也无济于事
考虑到贝佐斯净资产超2800亿美元,位居全球第四,他对民众负担能力的担忧可能出人意料。尽管他自称已纳税“数十亿美元”,但其纳税记录长期以来一直备受争议。
ProPublica于2021年发布的一项调查显示,贝佐斯与美国其他几位顶级亿万富翁一样,利用税务策略大幅缩减特定年份的纳税额。例如,2007年和2011年,他完全没有缴纳联邦所得税,部分原因在于投资亏损额超过了申报收入。通过分析贝佐斯2014年至2018年间的财富增长、申报收入及纳税情况,ProPublica计算得出其所谓的“实际税率”仅为0.98%。
尽管如此,贝佐斯表示他愿意就富人合理税负这一政策议题展开讨论。2023年,美国收入前1%的纳税人收入占全美调整后总收入的近21%,但缴纳了约38%的联邦所得税。
贝佐斯说:“我们可以就公平的税负份额展开争论,这是正常的政策辩论。但恶意诋毁只是转移注意力的手段。”
但贝佐斯认为,即便堵住税收漏洞或提高富人税率,也无法解决他眼中严重的政府支出问题。他以纽约市公立学校系统的低效运营为例进行了说明。
“如果我们像纽约市管理学校系统那样运营亚马逊,你的包裹要六周才能送达。我们还得向你收取100美元的配送费。而且当包裹最终送达时,里面装的也不是你选购的物品。”
他补充道:“就算把我的税款翻倍,对皇后区的那位老师也毫无帮助,我向你保证。”
纽约市市长佐赫兰·马姆达尼(Zohran Mamdani)在X平台上反驳称:“我认识几位皇后区的老师,他们可不会认同你的观点。”
贝佐斯计划生前捐出“大部分财富”,但前妻麦肯齐·斯科特已抢先一步
尽管贝佐斯尚未签署“捐赠誓言”(由沃伦·巴菲特、比尔·盖茨和梅琳达·弗兰奇·盖茨发起的慈善倡议,鼓励亿万富翁在生前或通过遗嘱捐出大部分财富),但这位亚马逊创始人表示,他承诺将在生前捐出自己的大部分财富。
与此同时,他承认高效开展慈善事业面临挑战,这与巴菲特、埃隆·马斯克等亿万富翁的观点不谋而合——他们曾表示,妥善捐赠巨额资金往往比表面看起来更难。
但贝佐斯的前妻麦肯齐·斯科特早已大幅领先。自2020年以来,她已向致力于多元化、公平与包容(DEI)、教育和灾后重建的机构捐赠了超过260亿美元。与此同时,据《福布斯》估算,目前贝佐斯与现任妻子劳伦·桑切斯·贝佐斯累计捐赠约47亿美元。
贝佐斯在接受美国消费者新闻与商业频道采访时指出,亚马逊和蓝色起源等企业对社会的长期影响,最终可能比单纯的慈善捐赠更有价值。他表示,创造能改善人们生活的产品和服务,才是有志创业者应优先考虑的影响方式。
贝佐斯说:“所有有志于创业的人,务必专注于这一点。只要你能成功取悦客户,你就是在为社会创造价值。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
如果亿万富翁、亚马逊创始人杰夫·贝佐斯的这一提议最终实现,约7600万美国家庭将不再需要缴纳联邦所得税。
如今执掌蓝色起源公司(Blue Origin)的贝佐斯最近在接受美国消费者新闻与商业频道(CNBC)采访时主张,美国收入最低的半数人群应免缴联邦所得税。他表示,考虑到这些劳动者对联邦税收总额的贡献本就十分有限,不应让他们承受更大的经济压力。
贝佐斯称:“美国收入最低的半数人群仅缴纳了3%的联邦所得税,我认为这个比例应该是零。”
为佐证这一观点,贝佐斯以一名虚构的医护人员为例提出质疑:“为什么纽约皇后区一名年薪7.5万美元的护士,每月要缴纳超过1000美元的税款?”
贝佐斯补充道:“在我看来,这样做有些荒谬。我们不该要求这位皇后区的护士缴税,相反,联邦政府应该向她道歉。这完全不合乎情理。”
尽管贝佐斯并未详细说明其计算依据,但美国劳动者通常需要缴纳联邦所得税、社会保障税和医疗保险税,且美国大多数州还会征收州所得税。这些税费加起来,每年可达数千美元。
美国实行累进税制,因此高收入人群税负占收入比重普遍更高。根据美国税收基金会(Tax Foundation)对美国国税局(IRS)数据的分析,2023年,美国收入最低的半数纳税人(年收入低于5.4万美元)的收入约占全美调整后总收入的12%,仅缴纳3%的联邦所得税,平均每户缴税约913美元。不过,据美国消费者新闻与商业频道报道,若计入可退还税收抵免,美国收入最低的40%纳税人实际上无需缴纳联邦所得税。
与唐纳德·特朗普关系密切的贝佐斯表示,他计划向政界领导人游说这一主张,并称免除低收入人群的联邦所得税对政府而言不过是“九牛一毛”。
贝佐斯表示:“分享我们的想法是公民和商界领袖的职责之一,而这个想法能够切实惠及普通民众。”
身家2800亿美元的贝佐斯表示,即使他的税单翻倍,也无济于事
考虑到贝佐斯净资产超2800亿美元,位居全球第四,他对民众负担能力的担忧可能出人意料。尽管他自称已纳税“数十亿美元”,但其纳税记录长期以来一直备受争议。
ProPublica于2021年发布的一项调查显示,贝佐斯与美国其他几位顶级亿万富翁一样,利用税务策略大幅缩减特定年份的纳税额。例如,2007年和2011年,他完全没有缴纳联邦所得税,部分原因在于投资亏损额超过了申报收入。通过分析贝佐斯2014年至2018年间的财富增长、申报收入及纳税情况,ProPublica计算得出其所谓的“实际税率”仅为0.98%。
尽管如此,贝佐斯表示他愿意就富人合理税负这一政策议题展开讨论。2023年,美国收入前1%的纳税人收入占全美调整后总收入的近21%,但缴纳了约38%的联邦所得税。
贝佐斯说:“我们可以就公平的税负份额展开争论,这是正常的政策辩论。但恶意诋毁只是转移注意力的手段。”
但贝佐斯认为,即便堵住税收漏洞或提高富人税率,也无法解决他眼中严重的政府支出问题。他以纽约市公立学校系统的低效运营为例进行了说明。
“如果我们像纽约市管理学校系统那样运营亚马逊,你的包裹要六周才能送达。我们还得向你收取100美元的配送费。而且当包裹最终送达时,里面装的也不是你选购的物品。”
他补充道:“就算把我的税款翻倍,对皇后区的那位老师也毫无帮助,我向你保证。”
纽约市市长佐赫兰·马姆达尼(Zohran Mamdani)在X平台上反驳称:“我认识几位皇后区的老师,他们可不会认同你的观点。”
贝佐斯计划生前捐出“大部分财富”,但前妻麦肯齐·斯科特已抢先一步
尽管贝佐斯尚未签署“捐赠誓言”(由沃伦·巴菲特、比尔·盖茨和梅琳达·弗兰奇·盖茨发起的慈善倡议,鼓励亿万富翁在生前或通过遗嘱捐出大部分财富),但这位亚马逊创始人表示,他承诺将在生前捐出自己的大部分财富。
与此同时,他承认高效开展慈善事业面临挑战,这与巴菲特、埃隆·马斯克等亿万富翁的观点不谋而合——他们曾表示,妥善捐赠巨额资金往往比表面看起来更难。
但贝佐斯的前妻麦肯齐·斯科特早已大幅领先。自2020年以来,她已向致力于多元化、公平与包容(DEI)、教育和灾后重建的机构捐赠了超过260亿美元。与此同时,据《福布斯》估算,目前贝佐斯与现任妻子劳伦·桑切斯·贝佐斯累计捐赠约47亿美元。
贝佐斯在接受美国消费者新闻与商业频道采访时指出,亚马逊和蓝色起源等企业对社会的长期影响,最终可能比单纯的慈善捐赠更有价值。他表示,创造能改善人们生活的产品和服务,才是有志创业者应优先考虑的影响方式。
贝佐斯说:“所有有志于创业的人,务必专注于这一点。只要你能成功取悦客户,你就是在为社会创造价值。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
For roughly 76 million American households, federal income taxes could eventually disappear—if a proposal by billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos ever becomes reality.
The now Blue Origin owner argued in a recent interview with CNBC that the bottom half of U.S. earners should pay no income tax, saying that working Americans shouldn’t be placed under increased financial pressure, considering they contribute a relatively small share of total tax revenue anyway.
“The bottom half of income earners in this country pay only 3% of the taxes,” Bezos said. “I think it should be zero.”
To make his case, Bezos questioned why a hypothetical healthcare worker as an example: “Why is a nurse in Queens who makes $75,000 a year paying more than $1,000 a month in taxes?”
“To me, it’s kind of absurd that we’re doing this. We shouldn’t be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington,” Bezos added. “They should be sending her an apology. It really makes no sense.”
While Bezos did not elaborate on his exact calculations, workers in the U.S. are generally required to pay federal income, Social Security, Medicare—and in most states, state income—taxes. Combined together, it can stretch into the thousands of dollars.
Because the U.S. tax system is progressive, higher earners generally pay a larger share of their income in federal taxes. In 2023, the bottom half of taxpayers (those making roughly under $54,000) accounted for roughly 12% of total adjusted gross income—but they paid just 3% of all federal income taxes, according to IRS data analyzed by the Tax Foundation. The average household in that group paid about $913 in federal income tax. However, when refundable tax credits are factored in, the bottom 40% of taxpayers already pay effectively no federal income tax on average, reported CNBC.
Bezos, who has maintained a warm relationship with President Donald Trump, said he plans to advocate for the idea with political leaders, arguing that exempting lower earners from federal income taxes would represent only “a small amount of money for the government.”
“It is part of our job as citizens and as business leaders to share our ideas,” Bezos said. “And this one would actually help people.”
Bezos—with a net worth of $280 billion—says even if his tax bill was doubled, it wouldn’t help
Bezos’s concern for affordability may come as a surprise considering his estimated net worth north of $280 billion—the fourth highest of any person in the world. And while he said he personally pays “billions of dollars” in taxes, his tax history has long drawn scrutiny.
A ProPublica investigation released in 2021 found that Bezos—like several of America’s wealthiest billionaires—used tax strategies that have dramatically reduced his tax burden in certain years. In 2007 and 2011, for example, he paid no federal income tax at all, in part because investment losses outweighed reported income. Analyzing Bezos’ wealth growth alongside his reported income and taxes paid between 2014 and 2018, ProPublica calculated his so-called ‘true tax rate’ at 0.98%.
Still, Bezos said he is open to a policy debate over what constitutes a fair tax burden for the wealthy. The top 1% of taxpayers accounted for nearly 21% of total adjusted gross income in 2023, but paid roughly 38% of all federal income taxes that year.
“We can argue about what the fair share is. That’s a policy debate, that’s okay,” Bezos said. “But the vilification is the thing that’s just the distraction.”
But even after fixing tax loopholes or increasing taxes on the wealthy would not address what Bezos sees as a larger government spending problem. He pointed to inefficiencies in New York City’s public school system as an example.
“If we ran Amazon the way New York City runs their school system, your packages would take six weeks to arrive. We’d have to charge you a $100 delivery fee. And then when the package did finally arrive, it’d have the wrong item in it anyway.”
“You could double the taxes I pay, and it’s not gonna help that teacher in Queens. I promise you,” he added.
New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani pushed back on X, writing: “I know a few teachers in Queens who would beg to differ.”
Bezos plans to give away ‘most of his wealth’ in his lifetime—but his ex-wife MacKenzie Scott already has a head start
While Bezos has not signed The Giving Pledge—the philanthropic initiative created by Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, and Melinda French Gates encouraging billionaires to give away a majority of their fortunes in their lifetime or wills—the Amazon founder said he’s committed to giving away most of his wealth in his lifetime.
At the same time, he acknowledged the challenge of doing philanthropy effectively, echoing comments from billionaires including Buffett and Elon Musk, who have said giving away massive sums of money well is often harder than it appears.
But Bezos’ former wife, MacKenzie Scott, already has a sizable head start. Since 2020, she has donated more than $26 billion to organizations focused on DEI, education, and disaster recovery. Meanwhile, Forbes estimates that Bezos and his current wife, Lauren Sánchez Bezos, have donated roughly $4.7 billion over their lifetimes.
Bezos argued to CNBC that the long-term societal impact of companies like Amazon and Blue Origin may ultimately prove even more valuable than philanthropy alone. Creating products and services that improve people’s lives, he said, is the kind of impact aspiring entrepreneurs should prioritize.
“Everybody out there who’s a potential entrepreneur make sure you focus on that,” Bezos said. “You will be creating value for society if you’re successful at pleasing your customers.”