
美国消费者信心如今已跌至历史最低点。密歇根大学(University of Michigan)公布的4月最终消费者信心指数为49.8,创下该调查74年历史以来最低纪录。历史上最低的四次读数中,有三次都出现在过去9个月内。
客观而言,这项调查并非没有争议。多年来,经济学家一直指出,消费者在调查中表达的感受,与他们的实际行为之间的差距正在扩大。Z世代经济评论人士凯拉·斯坎伦曾创造“情绪衰退”一词,用来形容拜登执政时期“情绪悲观、消费强劲”的现象。
分析人士还指出,这类调查结果容易受到党派立场影响。里士满联储(Richmond Fed)2024年的一项研究发现,如果受访者支持的政党掌权,他们对经济的感受会比实际数据所反映的水平高出31%。
问题在于,消费者信心调查衡量的也许并不是人们真实的感受,而是人们学会了描述自身感受的惯用话术。
美国海军联邦信用合作社(Navy Federal Credit Union)首席经济学家希瑟·朗,因报道新冠疫情引发的经济衰退而广为人知。她认为,消费者信心数据确实反映了现实问题。
她对《财富》杂志表示:“美国人现在确实正被现实一点点榨干。这不只是情绪问题,而是真实的财务压力。”
在过去五年持续高通胀的背景下,美国劳动者表现出惊人的韧性。但今年春季可能成为一个转折点。根据美国劳工统计局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)上周五发布的就业报告,过去一年,美国平均时薪上涨了3.6%。而受美以对伊战争以及全美汽油价格突破每加仑4.55美元的影响,4月通胀率预计将在4%左右。
RSM首席经济学家约瑟夫·布鲁苏埃拉斯表示,一旦中东战争引发的供应冲击波及整体经济,4月美国实际平均时薪很可能持平甚至下滑,5月数据“必定转为负增长”。换言之,劳动者正因为大多数人并不支持的一场战争而变相被降薪。
当然,零售销售额仍在增长。今年3月,美国零售销售额同比增长4%。但美国全国零售联合会(National Retail Federation)首席经济学家马克·马修斯表示,目前消费呈现明显“两极分化”,其中大部分支出实际上来自高收入家庭。
而美国的低收入群体已经感受到了捉襟见肘的窘况。纽约联储(Federal Reserve Bank of New York)上周发布的一份研究报告发现,加油消费已呈现“K型分化”格局:高收入家庭购买的汽油量与战前大致相同,而低收入家庭则大幅削减用油,在条件允许的情况下转而使用公共交通。
美国银行(Bank of America)的另一项研究显示,高收入家庭与中低收入家庭之间的工资增速差距,已经达到2015年以来的最高水平。
朗表示,美国海军联邦信用合作社掌握的会员数据中,也能看到类似的分化趋势。该机构覆盖超过1,400万个家庭,其中不乏大量军人家庭和工薪阶层家庭。
她表示:“对于年收入达到15万美元以上的群体——如果是在纽约,我认为门槛甚至更高——在他们的生活中根本感受不到经济衰退。他们仍然照常预订暑期度假行程。”
她提到,迪士尼(Disney)最近确认,其美国本土主题公园预订情况以及邮轮预订需求,到2026年下半年依然保持强劲。朗表示:“这些消费者,基本上都是年收入超过15万美元的人群。”
与此同时,美国低收入群体的境况则截然不同。朗表示:“低收入群体本就已经承受压力,而现在的情况变得更加艰难。”
她还表示,自己已经注意到越来越多人开始申请个人贷款,或者动用信用卡。“他们不得不举债度日,因为工资已经不足以支撑日常开销。”这种分化现象,正是经济学家口中愈发常见的“K型复苏”:高收入群体不断上升,而其他群体则逐渐下滑。与此同时,股市持续创下历史新高。上周五,标普500指数首次突破7,400点。而随着股市上涨,那些持有大量股票资产的富人财富也在继续增加。
推动这轮股市上涨的同一组数据,也反映出相对于劳动收入,资本的优势正在进一步扩大。安联(Allianz)首席经济顾问穆罕默德·埃尔-埃利安周五指出,4月就业报告中相对疲弱的工资增长(对市场而言是利好消息,因为这有助于缓解市场对“工资-通胀相互推升”风险的担忧)也放大了一个长期存在的问题:劳动收入占GDP的比重正在下降。过去20年来,这一比例持续走低,并在近期跌至美国劳工统计局有记录以来的最低水平。
不过,上周五公布的就业数据,至少缓解了对经济滑向全面衰退的担忧。美国4月新增就业岗位11.5万个,失业率维持在4.3%不变,而且招聘活动的覆盖范围也比过去几个月更为广泛。
但朗所描述的“挤压感”,往往不会第一时间体现在就业数据上。它会先反映在信用卡欠款额度上,然后表现为汽油需求下降,再到那些原本就无力安排旅行的低收入群体取消度假计划。
而在这一切真正显现之前,它首先会体现在消费者信心上。正如一些经济学家所警告的那样,消费者信心也许只是虚假信号;但它也可能是危机出现的第一道裂缝。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
美国消费者信心如今已跌至历史最低点。密歇根大学(University of Michigan)公布的4月最终消费者信心指数为49.8,创下该调查74年历史以来最低纪录。历史上最低的四次读数中,有三次都出现在过去9个月内。
客观而言,这项调查并非没有争议。多年来,经济学家一直指出,消费者在调查中表达的感受,与他们的实际行为之间的差距正在扩大。Z世代经济评论人士凯拉·斯坎伦曾创造“情绪衰退”一词,用来形容拜登执政时期“情绪悲观、消费强劲”的现象。
分析人士还指出,这类调查结果容易受到党派立场影响。里士满联储(Richmond Fed)2024年的一项研究发现,如果受访者支持的政党掌权,他们对经济的感受会比实际数据所反映的水平高出31%。
问题在于,消费者信心调查衡量的也许并不是人们真实的感受,而是人们学会了描述自身感受的惯用话术。
美国海军联邦信用合作社(Navy Federal Credit Union)首席经济学家希瑟·朗,因报道新冠疫情引发的经济衰退而广为人知。她认为,消费者信心数据确实反映了现实问题。
她对《财富》杂志表示:“美国人现在确实正被现实一点点榨干。这不只是情绪问题,而是真实的财务压力。”
在过去五年持续高通胀的背景下,美国劳动者表现出惊人的韧性。但今年春季可能成为一个转折点。根据美国劳工统计局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)上周五发布的就业报告,过去一年,美国平均时薪上涨了3.6%。而受美以对伊战争以及全美汽油价格突破每加仑4.55美元的影响,4月通胀率预计将在4%左右。
RSM首席经济学家约瑟夫·布鲁苏埃拉斯表示,一旦中东战争引发的供应冲击波及整体经济,4月美国实际平均时薪很可能持平甚至下滑,5月数据“必定转为负增长”。换言之,劳动者正因为大多数人并不支持的一场战争而变相被降薪。
当然,零售销售额仍在增长。今年3月,美国零售销售额同比增长4%。但美国全国零售联合会(National Retail Federation)首席经济学家马克·马修斯表示,目前消费呈现明显“两极分化”,其中大部分支出实际上来自高收入家庭。
而美国的低收入群体已经感受到了捉襟见肘的窘况。纽约联储(Federal Reserve Bank of New York)上周发布的一份研究报告发现,加油消费已呈现“K型分化”格局:高收入家庭购买的汽油量与战前大致相同,而低收入家庭则大幅削减用油,在条件允许的情况下转而使用公共交通。
美国银行(Bank of America)的另一项研究显示,高收入家庭与中低收入家庭之间的工资增速差距,已经达到2015年以来的最高水平。
朗表示,美国海军联邦信用合作社掌握的会员数据中,也能看到类似的分化趋势。该机构覆盖超过1,400万个家庭,其中不乏大量军人家庭和工薪阶层家庭。
她表示:“对于年收入达到15万美元以上的群体——如果是在纽约,我认为门槛甚至更高——在他们的生活中根本感受不到经济衰退。他们仍然照常预订暑期度假行程。”
她提到,迪士尼(Disney)最近确认,其美国本土主题公园预订情况以及邮轮预订需求,到2026年下半年依然保持强劲。朗表示:“这些消费者,基本上都是年收入超过15万美元的人群。”
与此同时,美国低收入群体的境况则截然不同。朗表示:“低收入群体本就已经承受压力,而现在的情况变得更加艰难。”
她还表示,自己已经注意到越来越多人开始申请个人贷款,或者动用信用卡。“他们不得不举债度日,因为工资已经不足以支撑日常开销。”这种分化现象,正是经济学家口中愈发常见的“K型复苏”:高收入群体不断上升,而其他群体则逐渐下滑。与此同时,股市持续创下历史新高。上周五,标普500指数首次突破7,400点。而随着股市上涨,那些持有大量股票资产的富人财富也在继续增加。
推动这轮股市上涨的同一组数据,也反映出相对于劳动收入,资本的优势正在进一步扩大。安联(Allianz)首席经济顾问穆罕默德·埃尔-埃利安周五指出,4月就业报告中相对疲弱的工资增长(对市场而言是利好消息,因为这有助于缓解市场对“工资-通胀相互推升”风险的担忧)也放大了一个长期存在的问题:劳动收入占GDP的比重正在下降。过去20年来,这一比例持续走低,并在近期跌至美国劳工统计局有记录以来的最低水平。
不过,上周五公布的就业数据,至少缓解了对经济滑向全面衰退的担忧。美国4月新增就业岗位11.5万个,失业率维持在4.3%不变,而且招聘活动的覆盖范围也比过去几个月更为广泛。
但朗所描述的“挤压感”,往往不会第一时间体现在就业数据上。它会先反映在信用卡欠款额度上,然后表现为汽油需求下降,再到那些原本就无力安排旅行的低收入群体取消度假计划。
而在这一切真正显现之前,它首先会体现在消费者信心上。正如一些经济学家所警告的那样,消费者信心也许只是虚假信号;但它也可能是危机出现的第一道裂缝。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
Consumer sentiment in the U.S. has officially never been worse. The University of Michigan’s final April reading came in at 49.8, the lowest in the survey’s 74-year-history. Three of the four lowest sentiment readings ever recorded have now happened in the past nine months.
To be fair, the survey isn’t without its critics. Economists have pointed out for years that the gap between what consumers say in surveys and what they actually do has widened. Gen Z economic commentator Kyla Scanlon coined the term “vibecession” when sentiment was grim but spending was buoyant during the Biden administration.
Analysts also note that the survey can be distorted by partisanship. A 2024 Richmond Fed study found that people feel 31% better about the economy than the data would suggest if their party controls the White House.
The trouble is that sentiment surveys may measure not how people feel, but which words people have learned to use to describe how they feel.
Heather Long, a chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union who made her name covering the pandemic recession, believes the sentiment data speaks to something real.
“Americans are literally getting squeezed now,” she told Fortune. “It’s not just a vibe, it’s a financial reality.”
American workers have remained famously resilient in the battle against five years of sticky inflation. This spring could mark a turning point. Average hourly earnings rose 3.6% over the past year, according to Friday’s jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Inflation in April is expected to come in around 4%, intensified by the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran and gas prices that have now crossed $4.55 a gallon nationally.
Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, said this week that real average hourly earnings will likely register flat to negative for April and “definitely negative” in May, once the supply shock from the Middle East war works its way through the economy. In other words, workers are about to take a pay cut for a war most didn’t ask for.
To be sure, retail sales are still rising, and March receipts were up 4% year over year. But the National Retail Federation’s chief economist, Mark Mathews, has said that the spending is “bifurcated” and that higher-income households are accounting for the majority of it.
For lower-income Americans, the squeeze is already here. A research note released this week by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found a “K-shaped pattern at the pump,” with higher-income households buying roughly the same amount of gasoline they bought before the war, while lower-income households cut back sharply, substituting public transit when available.
Other research from Bank of America showed the highest gap between wage growth for higher-income households versus lower- and middle-income households since 2015.
Long sees the same divide in Navy Federal’s own member data, which captures spending patterns across more than 14 million households, many of them military and working-class families.
“There’s the people who earn—I’d put it at $150,000 or more in New York, I’d put it at $125,000 or more elsewhere—there’s no recession going on in their world,” she said. “They continue to book their summer vacations.”
She noted that Disney recently confirmed that its domestic park bookings and cruise reservations remained strong through the second half of 2026. “That’s the $150,000-and-above crowd,” Long said.
Meanwhile, the bottom half of the income distribution experiences a very different reality. “The lower tier was already strained, and now it’s really hard,” Long said.
She added she can see the uptick in more people applying for personal loans, or turning to credit cards. “They’re having to use debt because they aren’t making it paycheck to paycheck.” That divide is what economists increasingly call the “K-shaped” recovery, with the top earners rising and the rest falling. As the stock market continues to reach record highs—Friday marked the first time the S&P 500 touched 7,400—the equity-invested rich just keep getting richer.
The same numbers powering that rally show capital pulling further ahead of labor. Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic adviser at Allianz, flagged Friday that the muted wage growth in the April jobs report (which is, by the way, good news for markets, because it dampens any wage-price spiral fears) also amplifies a longer-running concern: labor’s share of GDP, which has been trending down for two decades and recently hit its lowest level in BLS history.
However, Friday’s labor data, at least, dampened fears the squeeze is spiraling into a full recession. The U.S. economy added 115,000 jobs in April and unemployment held steady at 4.3%. Hiring is broader than it has been in months.
But the squeeze Long described happens on a different timeline than payrolls—it shows up first in credit card balances, then in demand destruction for gas, in canceled vacations the lower tier never booked.
Before any of that, it shows up in sentiment. Sentiment could be a false flag, as some economists warn. Or it could be the first crack.