首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

美国1,660亿美元关税退税通道开启,但小企业或已失去先机

Sasha Rogelberg
2026-04-22

相比资金实力雄厚的大型企业,深受进口关税冲击、试图收回成本的美国小企业收回这笔资金的难度更大。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

2026年4月14日,美国财政部长斯科特·贝森特。在最高法院裁定相关关税违宪两个月后,特朗普政府开始受理退税申请。图片来源:Oliver Contreras—AFP/Getty Images

在等待数月之后,美国进口商终于可以向政府申请,要求退还被判违宪的1,660亿美元关税。但对于深受进口关税冲击、正试图收回成本的美国小企业而言,它们可能会发现,相比资金实力雄厚的大型企业,它们收回这笔资金的难度更大。

周一,美国海关与边境保护局(U.S. Customs and Border Protection,CBP)推出了电子关税退税系统一期,也就是所谓的“报关条目综合管理与处理系统”(CAPE),允许进口商就被最高法院判定无效的关税提出退款申请。

最高法院在今年2月裁定,根据《国际紧急经济权力法》(International Emergency Economic Powers Act,IEEPA)征收的相关关税属非法,但并未就如何向承担了大部分关税成本的企业退款给出具体指引,而是将这一任务交由国际贸易法院(Court of International Trade)和CBP处理。

根据CBP最新提交的文件,在超过33万家美国进口商中,目前已有约56,497家申请退税,涉及金额约1,270亿美元。CBP表示,退款将在申请受理后60至90天内发放。

小企业受关税冲击尤为严重。美联储上月发布的一项调查显示,42%的小企业将关税导致的成本上升列为首要财务压力。由于利润空间有限,这些小企业更难通过囤货或自行消化关税成本来避免将价格上涨转嫁给消费者。美国进步中心(Center for American Progress)今年3月的一份报告显示,小企业去年平均承担的关税支出高达30.6万美元。

开市客(Costco)、联邦快递(FedEx)等大型企业已通过起诉特朗普政府来确保退税资格。而相比之下,中小企业往往缺乏应对复杂法律程序和不确定性的关键资源,这使它们能否追回过去一年损失的数十万美元充满变数。

格雷霍克律师事务所(Grayhawk Law)创始人、首席律师、专注宪法诉讼的联邦律师马修·塞利格曼对《财富》杂志表示:“尤其是在当前充满不确定性的法律环境下,我深感忧虑,担心中小型进口商可能因为缺乏专业贸易法律支持,最终失去申请退税的权利。”

小企业面临的特殊关税挑战

对小企业而言,退税只是关税带来的众多令人头疼的问题之一。反对政府关税政策的小企业联盟“We Pay the Tariffs”执行主任丹·安东尼表示,在很多情况下,企业主缺乏足够的人手和精力,去密切跟踪相关的法律和合规问题。对许多小企业来说,研究如何申请退税,往往意味着不得不从新品开发和业务增长中抽调资源。

他对《财富》杂志表示:“结果就是,小企业主或者产品开发人员,现在还得被迫变成‘关税专家’。”

安东尼解释称,小企业还普遍面临现金流紧张、流动性不足的问题。在关税生效前,为了锁定更低价格,进口商往往需要向海外供应商预付款。但这种囤货行为,也可能带来库存积压,其成本往往需要数月才能回笼。

安东尼补充道,他接触过的一些小企业主已经提高了信用额度,甚至为此给自住房做了二次抵押贷款。因此,这些退税承诺对他们来说几乎成了“救命钱”。

一些风险偏好更高的企业,则选择将退税申请作为贷款抵押品,或直接出售相关权益,以换取即时现金流。

但安东尼表示,小企业更倾向于对退税流程采取“观望”态度,以判断哪种策略能帮它们拿回更多资金。

他表示:“它们需要拿回这笔钱,才能摆脱债务泥潭。”

令人头疼的关税退税流程

格雷霍克律师事务所首席律师塞利格曼表示,关税退税流程中存在的诸多法律不确定性,让本就缺乏资源的小企业更难理清其中的具体规则和操作细节。

其中一大挑战是通过CAPE系统申请退税的时间窗口有限。目前,退税仅适用于“未结清”报关单(即CBP尚未最终确认应缴金额)以及过去80天内“已结清”的报关单(即CBP已确定应缴金额)。对于后者,企业必须尽快提交申请,否则一旦超过80天期限,就可能失去退税资格。

塞利格曼指出,失去退税资格的企业,想要争取退税,可能只能通过向CBP提出正式申诉,或向国际贸易法院提起诉讼,但政府尚未明确相关流程。他表示,没有法律顾问支持的小企业,在失去通过CAPE申请退税的资格后,往往既不了解这些后续途径,也没有能力做好准备。

塞利格曼还强调,退税能否最终发放给进口商,仍存在较大不确定性。他认为,特朗普政府可能对国际贸易法院要求“普遍退税”的裁决提出上诉;一旦如此,通过CAPE申请退税“很可能变成徒劳”。此外,他的一些客户在使用系统时还遇到了技术问题,例如提交申请时出现报错。

CBP未立即回应《财富》杂志的置评请求。

塞利格曼表示:“这些技术故障不仅仅是延误问题,它们还可能直接导致企业失去申请资格;如果没有适当的法律支持,它们甚至可能会永久失去退税权利。”(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

在等待数月之后,美国进口商终于可以向政府申请,要求退还被判违宪的1,660亿美元关税。但对于深受进口关税冲击、正试图收回成本的美国小企业而言,它们可能会发现,相比资金实力雄厚的大型企业,它们收回这笔资金的难度更大。

周一,美国海关与边境保护局(U.S. Customs and Border Protection,CBP)推出了电子关税退税系统一期,也就是所谓的“报关条目综合管理与处理系统”(CAPE),允许进口商就被最高法院判定无效的关税提出退款申请。

最高法院在今年2月裁定,根据《国际紧急经济权力法》(International Emergency Economic Powers Act,IEEPA)征收的相关关税属非法,但并未就如何向承担了大部分关税成本的企业退款给出具体指引,而是将这一任务交由国际贸易法院(Court of International Trade)和CBP处理。

根据CBP最新提交的文件,在超过33万家美国进口商中,目前已有约56,497家申请退税,涉及金额约1,270亿美元。CBP表示,退款将在申请受理后60至90天内发放。

小企业受关税冲击尤为严重。美联储上月发布的一项调查显示,42%的小企业将关税导致的成本上升列为首要财务压力。由于利润空间有限,这些小企业更难通过囤货或自行消化关税成本来避免将价格上涨转嫁给消费者。美国进步中心(Center for American Progress)今年3月的一份报告显示,小企业去年平均承担的关税支出高达30.6万美元。

开市客(Costco)、联邦快递(FedEx)等大型企业已通过起诉特朗普政府来确保退税资格。而相比之下,中小企业往往缺乏应对复杂法律程序和不确定性的关键资源,这使它们能否追回过去一年损失的数十万美元充满变数。

格雷霍克律师事务所(Grayhawk Law)创始人、首席律师、专注宪法诉讼的联邦律师马修·塞利格曼对《财富》杂志表示:“尤其是在当前充满不确定性的法律环境下,我深感忧虑,担心中小型进口商可能因为缺乏专业贸易法律支持,最终失去申请退税的权利。”

小企业面临的特殊关税挑战

对小企业而言,退税只是关税带来的众多令人头疼的问题之一。反对政府关税政策的小企业联盟“We Pay the Tariffs”执行主任丹·安东尼表示,在很多情况下,企业主缺乏足够的人手和精力,去密切跟踪相关的法律和合规问题。对许多小企业来说,研究如何申请退税,往往意味着不得不从新品开发和业务增长中抽调资源。

他对《财富》杂志表示:“结果就是,小企业主或者产品开发人员,现在还得被迫变成‘关税专家’。”

安东尼解释称,小企业还普遍面临现金流紧张、流动性不足的问题。在关税生效前,为了锁定更低价格,进口商往往需要向海外供应商预付款。但这种囤货行为,也可能带来库存积压,其成本往往需要数月才能回笼。

安东尼补充道,他接触过的一些小企业主已经提高了信用额度,甚至为此给自住房做了二次抵押贷款。因此,这些退税承诺对他们来说几乎成了“救命钱”。

一些风险偏好更高的企业,则选择将退税申请作为贷款抵押品,或直接出售相关权益,以换取即时现金流。

但安东尼表示,小企业更倾向于对退税流程采取“观望”态度,以判断哪种策略能帮它们拿回更多资金。

他表示:“它们需要拿回这笔钱,才能摆脱债务泥潭。”

令人头疼的关税退税流程

格雷霍克律师事务所首席律师塞利格曼表示,关税退税流程中存在的诸多法律不确定性,让本就缺乏资源的小企业更难理清其中的具体规则和操作细节。

其中一大挑战是通过CAPE系统申请退税的时间窗口有限。目前,退税仅适用于“未结清”报关单(即CBP尚未最终确认应缴金额)以及过去80天内“已结清”的报关单(即CBP已确定应缴金额)。对于后者,企业必须尽快提交申请,否则一旦超过80天期限,就可能失去退税资格。

塞利格曼指出,失去退税资格的企业,想要争取退税,可能只能通过向CBP提出正式申诉,或向国际贸易法院提起诉讼,但政府尚未明确相关流程。他表示,没有法律顾问支持的小企业,在失去通过CAPE申请退税的资格后,往往既不了解这些后续途径,也没有能力做好准备。

塞利格曼还强调,退税能否最终发放给进口商,仍存在较大不确定性。他认为,特朗普政府可能对国际贸易法院要求“普遍退税”的裁决提出上诉;一旦如此,通过CAPE申请退税“很可能变成徒劳”。此外,他的一些客户在使用系统时还遇到了技术问题,例如提交申请时出现报错。

CBP未立即回应《财富》杂志的置评请求。

塞利格曼表示:“这些技术故障不仅仅是延误问题,它们还可能直接导致企业失去申请资格;如果没有适当的法律支持,它们甚至可能会永久失去退税权利。”(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

After months of waiting, U.S. importers will finally have access to the $166 billion collected from tariffs that were ruled unconstitutional. But as American small businesses battered by the import taxes look to recoup the cost of the levies, they may find it’s more difficult for them than it is for larger, wealthier firms.

On Monday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) rolled out the first phase of its electronic tariff refund system, also known as the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE), allowing importers to apply for refunds on tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court.

The justices ruled in February that the duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were illegal, but gave no recommendations on how to provide refunds for companies that paid for the brunt of the import taxes, leaving the process to the Court of International Trade and CBP.

Of more than 330,000 U.S. importers, about 56,497 have applied for refunds, according to recent filings from CBP. Claims from those importers total about $127 billion. CBP said refunds are to be distributed 60 to 90 days after they are processed.

Small businesses were hit particularly hard by the levies. A Federal Reserve survey published last month found 42% of small firms called rising costs owing to tariffs a primary financial concern. These smaller businesses, which operate on tiny margins, have a harder time stockpiling inventories or eating tariff costs to avoid passing down higher prices to consumers. A March report from the Center for American Progress found small businesses paid $306,000 in tariffs on average last year.

But unlike larger companies—such as Costco and FedEx, which have already sued the Trump administration to ensure eligibility for refunds—smaller businesses often lack key resources in navigating the legal intricacies and uncertainties to secure the refunds, jeopardizing their ability to recoup the hundreds of thousands of dollars they lost in the past year.

“Especially given the uncertain legal environment that we’re operating in right now, I am deeply worried that small and medium-sized importers are going to end up losing their refund rights because they haven’t had access to trade counsel to help back them through it,” Matthew Seligman, founder and principal of Grayhawk Law and a federal litigator focusing on constitutional law, told Fortune.

Small businesses’ unique tariff challenges

For small businesses, the refunds have been just part of the headaches surrounding tariffs. In many cases, owners lack the personnel and bandwidth to closely track legal and compliance issues, said Dan Anthony, executive director of We Pay the Tariffs, a coalition of small businesses opposing the administration’s tariff policies. For many of these companies, looking into tariff refunds means diverting resources away from new products and growth.

“What you end up with is small-business owners or someone who does product development, who is now expected to be a tariff expert,” he told Fortune.

Small businesses also are navigating tight cash flows and lack of liquidity, Anthony explained. When importers bought products from overseas, they may have made advanced payments to vendors to lock in lower prices before tariffs went into effect. But the stockpiling may have resulted in an inventory surplus whose costs took months to recoup, he said.

Anthony added he spoke with small-business owners who have increased lines of credit and even taken out a second mortgage on their house, so promises of refunds have become a lifeline.

Some companies with a larger risk appetite have opted to use refund claims as collateral for loans or to sell the rights to claims outright in exchange for immediate cash.

But according to Anthony, small businesses are more likely to take a “wait-and-see” approach to the tariff refund process to figure out which strategy will get them the largest chunk of change.

“That’s money that they need to come back so they can climb out of that debt,” he said.

Tariff refund headaches

The many legal question marks hanging over the tariff refund process make it even harder for small businesses without resources to parse through the ins and outs of the refund system, Grayhawk principal Seligman said.

Among the challenges is the tight time frame for applying to CAPE. At this time, refunds are available for “unliquidated” entries—meaning CBP hasn’t made a final determination on how much is owed—or on entries “liquidated” in the past 80 days, where CBP has determined what is owed. Businesses with those already liquidated entries have to file immediately or risk being ineligible for refunds if they time out of the 80-day window.

Ineligible companies will likely either have to file a formal protest with CBP or sue in the Court of International Trade for refunds, though the government hasn’t made the necessary processes clear, Seligman said. He indicated that smaller businesses without legal counsel may not be aware of or prepared to take these next steps should they be ineligible for CAPE.

Seligman noted there is still plenty of uncertainty around whether the refunds will even reach importers. The Trump administration may choose to appeal the Court of International Trade’s order that the government must dole out universal refunds, which Seligman said would render applying to CAPE “sort of a waste of time.” He added that some of his clients have experienced technical difficulties with the portal and have received error messages on attempted submissions.

CBP did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

“These types of glitches, again, are not just delays,” Seligman said. “They are delays that can lead to ineligibility, and potentially—if importers don’t have appropriate counsel—can result in permanent loss of refund rights.”

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开