
围绕AI股票是否存在泡沫的争论在2025年下半年持续升温,而如今,这一泡沫实际上已经破裂。这是凯投宏观(Capital Economics)首席市场经济学家约翰·希金斯得出的结论。不过,他更担心的是,另一种泡沫正在酝酿之中。
所谓“泡沫”,通常是指资产估值远远超出其内在价值的情况,往往表现为:即便企业财务业绩强劲,股价仍被持续推高。希金斯对《财富》杂志表示:“如果根据估值是否被过度拉伸作为判断泡沫的依据,那么可以说,这个泡沫已经破裂。”
希金斯在本周发布的一份客户报告中指出,过去几年,信息技术行业及整个“大科技”板块的市盈率(股价与每股收益之比)持续攀升,显示出估值虚高的迹象。但从2025年10月前后开始,这一指标开始回落,目前已降至疫情以来的最低水平。他还提到,世纪之交的互联网泡沫基本也遵循了类似轨迹,不过当时的市盈率水平要高得多——21世纪初,IT行业的市盈率曾超过150%,而本轮周期的峰值出现在2024年末,接近75%。
AI领域的估值经历了一路飙升。根据科技市场情报平台CB Insights的数据,截至2025年秋季,全球共有498家AI独角兽公司,总估值达到2.7万亿美元,其中有100家成立于2023年或之后。此外,还有超过1,300家AI初创公司的估值超过1亿美元。OpenAI首席财务官莎拉·弗莱尔表示,公司估值在上个月达到7,300亿美元,而不到六个月前(2025年10月),这个数字还是5,000亿美元。
不过,科技行业整体已经开始“回归现实”。其中一个原因是所谓的“SaaS末日”——由于投资者担心“智能体式AI”可能轻松取代传统的软件商业模式,软件即服务(SaaS)股票遭遇快速抛售。自今年年初以来,赛富时(Salesforce)和ServiceNow的市值均已缩水约30%。
希金斯表示:“投资者已经意识到,软件服务行业是AI浪潮下相对脆弱的板块之一,因此我们看到该行业的估值出现了大幅回调。”
希金斯还指出,受到冲击的并非只有SaaS行业。半导体行业近期也出现放缓迹象:一方面,需求高涨引发了芯片短缺;另一方面,关税以及伊朗战争等地缘政治紧张局势,也对供应链造成了冲击。
AI将面临一种罕见的泡沫
希金斯认为,在这些行业所面临的挑战背后,可能还隐藏着另一种泡沫。过去几年,科技公司的盈利大幅飙升,这也引发了一个关键问题:这种增长究竟能持续多久?彭博行业研究(Bloomberg Intelligence)预计,“美股七雄”的盈利增速约为18%,而标普500指数中其余493家公司的增速仅为11%。上月,英伟达(Nvidia)公布第四季度营收为681亿美元,同比增长73%。
希金斯表示:“实际上,可能有一种泡沫出现在基本面本身,这种情况相当罕见。通常我们所说的泡沫,是指价格与基本面脱节……但这一次,泡沫可能恰恰就存在于盈利本身。”希金斯此言直指“反泡沫派”科技支持者的核心论据:即主导“美股七雄”的大型上市科技公司,正在创造出惊人的利润。换言之,希金斯提出的问题是:如果这些公司利润开始下滑,会发生什么?
AI盈利可能很快遭遇“断崖”,并引发市场回调,背后有多重原因。首先,希金斯指出,AI需求可能远低于最初预期,科技公司将难以消化沉重的投资成本——据高盛(Goldman Sachs)估算,科技公司在2026年的AI资本支出将达到5,390亿美元。麦肯锡(McKinsey)的数据显示,尽管有88%的企业表示正在常态化使用AI,但由于员工担心被技术取代,AI的实际落地进程可能陷入停滞。
希金斯认为,AI盈利面临的更大风险在于经济持续处于不稳定状态。持续的伊朗战争已导致卡塔尔氦气停产,而卡塔尔供应着全球约三分之一的氦气——这种无色无味的气体是制造计算机芯片的重要原料。冲突不仅使数据中心沦为攻击目标,能源价格的上涨还会推高这些设施的投入成本。
希金斯表示:“如果整体经济走弱,即便AI本身的需求并没有明显下降,同样会拖累股市表现,并削弱那些依靠AI落地获利的公司的盈利。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
围绕AI股票是否存在泡沫的争论在2025年下半年持续升温,而如今,这一泡沫实际上已经破裂。这是凯投宏观(Capital Economics)首席市场经济学家约翰·希金斯得出的结论。不过,他更担心的是,另一种泡沫正在酝酿之中。
所谓“泡沫”,通常是指资产估值远远超出其内在价值的情况,往往表现为:即便企业财务业绩强劲,股价仍被持续推高。希金斯对《财富》杂志表示:“如果根据估值是否被过度拉伸作为判断泡沫的依据,那么可以说,这个泡沫已经破裂。”
希金斯在本周发布的一份客户报告中指出,过去几年,信息技术行业及整个“大科技”板块的市盈率(股价与每股收益之比)持续攀升,显示出估值虚高的迹象。但从2025年10月前后开始,这一指标开始回落,目前已降至疫情以来的最低水平。他还提到,世纪之交的互联网泡沫基本也遵循了类似轨迹,不过当时的市盈率水平要高得多——21世纪初,IT行业的市盈率曾超过150%,而本轮周期的峰值出现在2024年末,接近75%。
AI领域的估值经历了一路飙升。根据科技市场情报平台CB Insights的数据,截至2025年秋季,全球共有498家AI独角兽公司,总估值达到2.7万亿美元,其中有100家成立于2023年或之后。此外,还有超过1,300家AI初创公司的估值超过1亿美元。OpenAI首席财务官莎拉·弗莱尔表示,公司估值在上个月达到7,300亿美元,而不到六个月前(2025年10月),这个数字还是5,000亿美元。
不过,科技行业整体已经开始“回归现实”。其中一个原因是所谓的“SaaS末日”——由于投资者担心“智能体式AI”可能轻松取代传统的软件商业模式,软件即服务(SaaS)股票遭遇快速抛售。自今年年初以来,赛富时(Salesforce)和ServiceNow的市值均已缩水约30%。
希金斯表示:“投资者已经意识到,软件服务行业是AI浪潮下相对脆弱的板块之一,因此我们看到该行业的估值出现了大幅回调。”
希金斯还指出,受到冲击的并非只有SaaS行业。半导体行业近期也出现放缓迹象:一方面,需求高涨引发了芯片短缺;另一方面,关税以及伊朗战争等地缘政治紧张局势,也对供应链造成了冲击。
AI将面临一种罕见的泡沫
希金斯认为,在这些行业所面临的挑战背后,可能还隐藏着另一种泡沫。过去几年,科技公司的盈利大幅飙升,这也引发了一个关键问题:这种增长究竟能持续多久?彭博行业研究(Bloomberg Intelligence)预计,“美股七雄”的盈利增速约为18%,而标普500指数中其余493家公司的增速仅为11%。上月,英伟达(Nvidia)公布第四季度营收为681亿美元,同比增长73%。
希金斯表示:“实际上,可能有一种泡沫出现在基本面本身,这种情况相当罕见。通常我们所说的泡沫,是指价格与基本面脱节……但这一次,泡沫可能恰恰就存在于盈利本身。”希金斯此言直指“反泡沫派”科技支持者的核心论据:即主导“美股七雄”的大型上市科技公司,正在创造出惊人的利润。换言之,希金斯提出的问题是:如果这些公司利润开始下滑,会发生什么?
AI盈利可能很快遭遇“断崖”,并引发市场回调,背后有多重原因。首先,希金斯指出,AI需求可能远低于最初预期,科技公司将难以消化沉重的投资成本——据高盛(Goldman Sachs)估算,科技公司在2026年的AI资本支出将达到5,390亿美元。麦肯锡(McKinsey)的数据显示,尽管有88%的企业表示正在常态化使用AI,但由于员工担心被技术取代,AI的实际落地进程可能陷入停滞。
希金斯认为,AI盈利面临的更大风险在于经济持续处于不稳定状态。持续的伊朗战争已导致卡塔尔氦气停产,而卡塔尔供应着全球约三分之一的氦气——这种无色无味的气体是制造计算机芯片的重要原料。冲突不仅使数据中心沦为攻击目标,能源价格的上涨还会推高这些设施的投入成本。
希金斯表示:“如果整体经济走弱,即便AI本身的需求并没有明显下降,同样会拖累股市表现,并削弱那些依靠AI落地获利的公司的盈利。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
The AI stock bubble, much debated through the back half of 2025, has already burst. That’s the conclusion of John Higgins, chief markets economist at Capital Economics. He’s more worried about what’s still brewing.
A bubble typically refers to when assets have valuations that far exceed their intrinsic worth, usually seen when share prices soar despite solid evidence of strong financial results. “If you’re judging whether a bubble exists or not in relation to how stretched or otherwise its valuation is, then there’s an argument that the bubble has burst,” Higgins told Fortune.
In a note to clients published this week, Higgins found that for information technology and the rest of Big Tech, the ratio of the current share price to earnings per share has risen over the last few years, showing inflated valuations. But as of around October 2025, that price-earnings ratio fell and is now the smallest since the pandemic. The dotcom bubble at the turn of the century largely followed the same pattern, though the price-earnings ratio was much greater, exceeding 150% for the IT sector in the early 2000s, compared to a peak of nearly 75% in late 2024, Higgins noted.
AI valuations have indeed soared. As of fall 2025, there were 498 AI unicorns with a combined valuation of $2.7 trillion, according to data from tech market intelligence platform CB Insights, 100 of which were founded in 2023 or after. More than 1,300 AI startups have valuations over $100 million. OpenAI’s valuation reached $730 billion last month, according to CFO Sarah Friar, up from $500 billion in October, less than six months prior.
However, the tech sector has come back down to earth, a result, in part, of the “SaaSpocalypse,” a rapid selloff of software-as-a-service (SaaS) stocks as investors fear agentic AI being able to easily replace traditional software business models. Both Salesforce and ServiceNow have lost about 30% of their respective values since the beginning of the year.
“Investors had sort of honed in on that software services industry group as being one of those sectors that was relatively vulnerable to that rollout of AI,” Higgins said. “And therefore we had a big paring back in the valuation of that sector in particular.”
It’s not just the SaaS industry taking a hit, Higgins argued. The semiconductor industry has also seen a recent slowdown, with high demand fuelling a chip shortage, and recent geopolitical tensions, such as tariffs and the war in Iran triggering supply chain challenges.
AI’s next bubble is a rare one
Another bubble may be hiding within the story of these industries’ obstacles, according to Higgins. Tech companies’ earnings have rocketed upward in the last few years, raising the question of how sustainable this amount of growth can be. Bloomberg Intelligence estimates earnings growth for the Magnificent Seven to be around 18%, compared to 11% growth from the remaining 493 companies in the S&P 500. Last month Nvidia reported a revenue of $68.1 billion for its fourth quarter, a 73% year-over-year increase.
“There may be one [bubble] actually in the fundamental side of things, which is quite rare,” Higgins said. “Normally we think of a bubble as being something where the price has gotten out of whack with the fundamentals themselves…In this case, the bubble actually may be in the earnings themselves.” By this, Higgins was referring to the main argument that tech boosters in the anti-bubble camp have turned to: the enormous profits being produced by the biggest public tech firms that dominate the Magnificent Seven. In other words, he’s asking, what if these profits go down?
There’s a couple of reasons why AI earnings may soon reach a cliff and end up in a market correction. For one, Higgins said, demand for AI may be much lower than initially anticipated, leaving tech companies to reckon with the estimated $539 billion in AI capex for 2026, per Goldman Sachs. While 88% of companies report regular AI use, according to McKinsey, adoption may be stalling as a result of employees’ anxiety around the technology displacing them from their jobs.
The greater risk to AI earnings will be if the economy remains in a precarious position, Higgins suggested. The ongoing Iran war has halted the helium output in Qatar, responsible for about one-third of the world’s supply of the odorless gas used to manufacture computer chips. Not only have data centers become a target of attacks during the conflict, but energy prices could also drive up input costs of these facilities.
“If the economy, more generally, were to weaken, that could also weigh on the stock market and weigh on the earnings of companies who are making money from the rollout of AI,” Higgins said, “even if demand for AI itself isn’t really weakening much.”