
传言甚嚣尘上,称埃隆·马斯克计划于今夏推动SpaceX上市。如今,马斯克已经将这家火箭企业与其商业帝国的另一大支柱xAI合并,他预计合并后的实体将筹集500亿美元资金,估值高达1.5万亿美元。若按此估值,SpaceX将创下史上最大规模的单次IPO融资纪录,总市值将仅次于沙特阿美(Saudi Aramco),稳居全球第二位,远超2014年上市时以1670亿美元估值位居全球第二的阿里巴巴。
在SpaceX发布招股说明书前,我们无法详尽了解其财务状况,但目前已经掌握部分关键信息。马斯克曾经透露SpaceX去年营收约为150亿美元,且据广泛报道,该公司的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)约为80亿美元。而媒体广泛流传、马斯克并未否认的财报数据显示,2025年前9个月,公司亏损24亿美元。
这些数据未计入利息和折旧支出,其中后者指SpaceX在厂房和设备方面的支出。结合目前合并后企业有限的财务信息来看,当前SpaceX按公认会计准则(GAAP)计算的收益,很可能为零,甚至为负。
史诗级估值设下过高业绩门槛,或为SpaceX股票埋下隐患
因此,SpaceX无法依据当前利润进行估值,只能基于其在最具开创性行业中的巨大增长前景来估值,然而这一行业的未来走向同样难以预料。不过,我们确实掌握了关于SpaceX的两个既定事实,这足以让投资者对1.5万亿美元的估值深感忧虑。
其一:两家企业是资本密集型企业的典型代表。马斯克宣布SpaceX计划打造1万枚完全可重复使用的星链火箭,单枚火箭高度超过400英尺(约121.9米)。据Payload Research估算,单枚火箭制造成本为3500万美元,仅氪气推进器、太阳能电池阵列、不锈钢合金等部件的总现金投入就将高达3500亿美元。xAI则是高成本数据中心的主要建设者,这些数据中心运行着如GROK聊天机器人等产品。据报道,2025年该公司现金消耗达80亿美元,主要用于投建超大型数据中心,包括其位于密西西比州、耗资200亿美元的MACROHARDRR数据中心。结论是:这两家公司并非轻资产的软件企业,即便未来取得成功,也很难实现公认会计准则下35%的净利润率。总体而言,无论是飞机制造商还是数据生成商,这类“制造型企业”极少可以达到如此高的盈利水平。
第二个“既定”事实是SpaceX未来为回馈股东必须实现的盈利水平。值得注意的是,鉴于SpaceX当前几乎没有盈利,相当于从零起步。五年后SpaceX需要达到怎样的盈利水平?这是一场风险极高的豪赌。参考投资者对类似高风险企业的要求,我们估计股东至少需要每年10%的总回报率才会愿意持有该股票。因此,到2031年,其市值必须至少增长到2.4万亿美元,才能满足股东的回报预期。这一市值规模将超越全球除英伟达(Nvidia)、微软(Microsoft)、Alphabet和苹果(Apple)这四家公司之外的所有企业,远超Meta Platforms和沙特阿美,甚至比马斯克旗下的王牌企业特斯拉(Tesla)还要高出1.2万亿美元。
我们假设届时其市盈率能够达到“美股七巨头”(Mag 7)的中位数30倍,以2.4万亿美元市值计算,其公认会计准则下的净利润目标高达每年800亿美元。这比Meta高出33%,比伯克希尔-哈撒韦(Berkshire Hathaway)高出21%,约为Alphabet和苹果利润水平的三分之二。
美国顶尖会计专家杰克·切谢尔斯基表示:“SpaceX想要实现这一目标,无异于登月级别的挑战。未来航天产业可以发展到何种规模,谁都说不准。”不过,SpaceX仍有可能实现目标,但需满足两大条件:一是相关市场实现极快的规模扩张,二是公司取得显著的垄断地位。目前,SpaceX已经面临众多规模较小的竞争对手,其中就包括杰夫·贝佐斯旗下的蓝色起源(Blue Origin)。SpaceX最大的胜算,是在火箭制造领域建立起绝对领先优势,形成竞争对手无法企及的规模效应。
这一愿景能否实现,充满巨大的不确定性,而作为股东,想要搭上这枚火箭、赌它一飞冲天而非中途熄火,需要付出的天价成本早已板上钉钉。据媒体报道,SpaceX计划将其上市时间,定在木星与金星“相合”这一罕见天文现象出现之际。而最有可能出现的结局是:SpaceX在科技领域成就辉煌,却在股市遭遇厄运。(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
传言甚嚣尘上,称埃隆·马斯克计划于今夏推动SpaceX上市。如今,马斯克已经将这家火箭企业与其商业帝国的另一大支柱xAI合并,他预计合并后的实体将筹集500亿美元资金,估值高达1.5万亿美元。若按此估值,SpaceX将创下史上最大规模的单次IPO融资纪录,总市值将仅次于沙特阿美(Saudi Aramco),稳居全球第二位,远超2014年上市时以1670亿美元估值位居全球第二的阿里巴巴。
在SpaceX发布招股说明书前,我们无法详尽了解其财务状况,但目前已经掌握部分关键信息。马斯克曾经透露SpaceX去年营收约为150亿美元,且据广泛报道,该公司的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)约为80亿美元。而媒体广泛流传、马斯克并未否认的财报数据显示,2025年前9个月,公司亏损24亿美元。
这些数据未计入利息和折旧支出,其中后者指SpaceX在厂房和设备方面的支出。结合目前合并后企业有限的财务信息来看,当前SpaceX按公认会计准则(GAAP)计算的收益,很可能为零,甚至为负。
史诗级估值设下过高业绩门槛,或为SpaceX股票埋下隐患
因此,SpaceX无法依据当前利润进行估值,只能基于其在最具开创性行业中的巨大增长前景来估值,然而这一行业的未来走向同样难以预料。不过,我们确实掌握了关于SpaceX的两个既定事实,这足以让投资者对1.5万亿美元的估值深感忧虑。
其一:两家企业是资本密集型企业的典型代表。马斯克宣布SpaceX计划打造1万枚完全可重复使用的星链火箭,单枚火箭高度超过400英尺(约121.9米)。据Payload Research估算,单枚火箭制造成本为3500万美元,仅氪气推进器、太阳能电池阵列、不锈钢合金等部件的总现金投入就将高达3500亿美元。xAI则是高成本数据中心的主要建设者,这些数据中心运行着如GROK聊天机器人等产品。据报道,2025年该公司现金消耗达80亿美元,主要用于投建超大型数据中心,包括其位于密西西比州、耗资200亿美元的MACROHARDRR数据中心。结论是:这两家公司并非轻资产的软件企业,即便未来取得成功,也很难实现公认会计准则下35%的净利润率。总体而言,无论是飞机制造商还是数据生成商,这类“制造型企业”极少可以达到如此高的盈利水平。
第二个“既定”事实是SpaceX未来为回馈股东必须实现的盈利水平。值得注意的是,鉴于SpaceX当前几乎没有盈利,相当于从零起步。五年后SpaceX需要达到怎样的盈利水平?这是一场风险极高的豪赌。参考投资者对类似高风险企业的要求,我们估计股东至少需要每年10%的总回报率才会愿意持有该股票。因此,到2031年,其市值必须至少增长到2.4万亿美元,才能满足股东的回报预期。这一市值规模将超越全球除英伟达(Nvidia)、微软(Microsoft)、Alphabet和苹果(Apple)这四家公司之外的所有企业,远超Meta Platforms和沙特阿美,甚至比马斯克旗下的王牌企业特斯拉(Tesla)还要高出1.2万亿美元。
我们假设届时其市盈率能够达到“美股七巨头”(Mag 7)的中位数30倍,以2.4万亿美元市值计算,其公认会计准则下的净利润目标高达每年800亿美元。这比Meta高出33%,比伯克希尔-哈撒韦(Berkshire Hathaway)高出21%,约为Alphabet和苹果利润水平的三分之二。
美国顶尖会计专家杰克·切谢尔斯基表示:“SpaceX想要实现这一目标,无异于登月级别的挑战。未来航天产业可以发展到何种规模,谁都说不准。”不过,SpaceX仍有可能实现目标,但需满足两大条件:一是相关市场实现极快的规模扩张,二是公司取得显著的垄断地位。目前,SpaceX已经面临众多规模较小的竞争对手,其中就包括杰夫·贝佐斯旗下的蓝色起源(Blue Origin)。SpaceX最大的胜算,是在火箭制造领域建立起绝对领先优势,形成竞争对手无法企及的规模效应。
这一愿景能否实现,充满巨大的不确定性,而作为股东,想要搭上这枚火箭、赌它一飞冲天而非中途熄火,需要付出的天价成本早已板上钉钉。据媒体报道,SpaceX计划将其上市时间,定在木星与金星“相合”这一罕见天文现象出现之际。而最有可能出现的结局是:SpaceX在科技领域成就辉煌,却在股市遭遇厄运。(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
Reports are swirling that Elon Musk is planning an IPO for SpaceX this summer. Now that Musk’s merged the rocket enterprise with xAI, another pillar of his empire, he expects the combination to raise $50 billion in capital, and garner a market cap of $1.5 trillion. At those numbers, SpaceX would notch the biggest single IPO capital raise of all time, and also rank as second highest in total valuation to Saudi Aramco, and far ahead of second place Alibaba’s introduction in 2018 at $167 million.
Until SpaceX publishes its prospectus for the offering, we won’t have a detailed look at its financials. We do, however, have important snippets of information. Musk’s stated that SpaceX generated some $15 billion revenues last year, and it’s been widely reported that it booked roughly $8 billion in EBITDA. The scenario circulating widely in the media, and not refuted by Musk, shows a loss of $2.4 billion for the first 9 months of 2025.
These numbers don’t include interest and depreciation, the latter SpaceX’s outlays for plant and equipment. Knitting this limited view of the now-united businesses, it appears likely that the current SpaceX is showing zero or even negative GAAP earnings.
The epic valuation may doom SpaceX stock by setting the bar too high
Hence, SpaceX can’t be valued on its current profits, but only on its prospects from gigantic growth in the most pioneering of industries whose future trajectory is also unknowable. However, we do know two things about SpaceX that should give investors big worries about a $1.5 trillion valuation.
The first: These are the ultimate in capital intensive enterprises. Musk announced SpaceX’s intention to build 10,000 fully reusable Starlink rockets, each over 400 feet tall. At a cost that Payload Research estimates at $35 million each, that’s $350 billion in cash for the like of krypton-gas burners, solar arrays, and stainless steel alloy. xAI is a major builder of high-cost data centers than run such products as its GROK chatbot. In 2025, it reportedly burned $8 billion in cash, primarily to fund such behemoths at $20 billion “MACROHARDRR” facility in Mississippi. The upshot: These aren’t low investment software plays that if successful, could easily post 35% net GAAP margins. In general, it’s extremely rare for “manufacturers,” whether it’s in aircraft or data-generators, to achieve such loft levels of profitability.
The second “known” is the earnings SpaceX must produce to reward shareholders going forward. Keep in mind, it’s beginning at a standing start, given its apparent lack of current earnings. Where does SpaceX need to be in five years? This is the riskiest of bets. Looking at what investors demand from similarly risky enterprises, let’s estimate shareholders will want total returns of at least 10% a year to hold the stock. Hence, by 2031, its market cap must grow to at least $2.4 trillion to ring the bell. That’s bigger than all but four of the world’s companies, Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Apple are today, far larger than Meta Platforms and Saudi Aramco, and $1.2 trillion bigger than Musk’s flagship Tesla.
We’ll assume it will then merit a price-to-earnings multiple of 30, the median for the Mag 7. At our $2.4 trillion cap, the bogey for GAAP net earnings towers at $80 billion a year. That’s 33% more than Meta, 21% above Berkshire Hathaway, and about two-thirds the numbers for Alphabet and Apple.
“Whether SpaceX can get there is really a moonshot,” says Jack Ciesielski, one of America’s leading accounting experts. “It’s anybody’s guess how big the space industry will become in the future.” SpaceX could get there. But it would need two things: An extremely fast-growing market, and significant monopoly power. It already faces a number of smaller competitors, including Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin. SpaceX’s best chance is developing a huge lead that gives it economies of scale in rocket production that no competitor can match.
The chances of that happening are highly uncertain, while the gigantic price you’ll pay as a shareholder to ride the rocket, and hope it soars not sputters, is pre-set. According to media accounts, SpaceX is planning its own stock market launch to coincide with a rare planetary event where Jupiter and Venus appear close together in the sky. The best bet is that SpaceX proves a scientific triumph, and star-crossed as an stock.