首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

2026财年前四个月,美国政府财政支出巨大

Eleanor Pringle
2026-02-25

美国政府支出持续高于财政收入,债务利息支出进一步加剧了财政压力。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

2026年2月6日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在离开华盛顿特区白宫前接受记者采访。图片来源:ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP - Getty Images

美国国会预算办公室(CBO)最新估算显示,2026财年前四个月,美国政府财政支出巨大。

该机构昨日发布的报告显示,2026财年前四个月(自10月起),美国政府持续处于财政赤字状态,累计借款6960亿美元。其中仅1月份就借款940亿美元,相当于过去四个月(16周)平均每周借款435亿美元。

美国政府支出持续高于财政收入,债务利息支出进一步加剧了财政压力。目前美国国债总额已超过38.5万亿美元。据圣路易斯联邦储备银行(Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis)的数据,美国国内生产总值(GDP)约为31万亿美元。

美国财政部数据显示,截至1月31日,利息支出累计达4270亿美元。按照这一趋势推算全年,叠加新增债务产生的额外利息,美国政府每年需支付1万亿美元利息。美国在2024财年首次突破这一关口,当年利息支出总额达1.13万亿美元,2025财年进一步攀升至1.22万亿美元。

负责任联邦预算委员会(Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget)主席马娅·麦吉尼亚斯(Maya MacGuineas)表示:"2026财年才过去三分之一,我们仍深陷无休止的借贷循环……若继续以当前速度借款,本财年财政赤字可能再度达到1.8万亿美元,甚至更高。"

"如果这些估算还不足以敲响警钟,那么美国国债持续攀升至创纪录水平,目前已接近美国经济总量……除非立法者希望债务和赤字屡创新高成为常态,否则两党必须携手解决不可持续的债务问题。立法者拖延越久,美国民众付出的代价越大。"

尽管相关数据触目惊心,委员会主席们也发出警告,但市场和许多经济学家对美国财政状况仍持相对乐观态度。若市场对美国政府支出感到恐慌,债券收益率会是最早发出预警的指标之一。例如,收益率上升意味着投资者认为借贷风险上升,因而要求更高溢价;反之,收益率下降则可能表明债券发行规模超过投资者需求。

目前这两种情况均未出现。截至撰稿时,30年期美国国债收益率为4.8%,虽较去年年末有所回升,但仍与2025年大部分时间的水平持平。10年期美国国债收益率走势相似,自去年春季以来始终在4.2%附近徘徊。

在影响力范围内

尽管有理论认为,外国投资者可能利用持有的美国国债惩罚美国对盟友愈发激进的挑衅行为;也有警告称,投资者可能因政策因素退出市场(如英国前首相利兹·特拉斯(Liz Truss)时期的情况),但许多经济学家认为,实际局面并不会如此极端。其中一种应对方式是“金融抑制”:强制要求机构增持国债,确保买家支撑国债价值。另一种策略是放任通胀温和上升:虽会损害消费者利益,但能稀释债务实际价值。量化宽松同样是备选方案,原因是增加货币供应虽可能引发通胀,但能达到降低实际借贷成本的效果。

这可能是投资者保持信心的原因——即便债务危机真的爆发,美国也足以妥善应对。

但若美国无法通过经济增长改善失衡的债务与国内生产总值比率,那么后果将不堪设想。更多资金被用于维持借贷,这正是桥水基金(Bridgewater Associates)创始人瑞·达利欧(Ray Dalio)常抱怨的问题。达利欧在一系列社交媒体帖子和访谈[包括与《财富》杂志黛安·布雷迪(Diane Brady)的对话]中警告称,美国经济即将面临“心脏病发作”的风险。

“我们的支出比收入高出40%,这是一个长期存在的问题,”他去年在接受福克斯商业频道采访时说,“你们会看到债务利息支出……正不断挤压购买力,就像动脉中的斑块一样。”(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

美国国会预算办公室(CBO)最新估算显示,2026财年前四个月,美国政府财政支出巨大。

该机构昨日发布的报告显示,2026财年前四个月(自10月起),美国政府持续处于财政赤字状态,累计借款6960亿美元。其中仅1月份就借款940亿美元,相当于过去四个月(16周)平均每周借款435亿美元。

美国政府支出持续高于财政收入,债务利息支出进一步加剧了财政压力。目前美国国债总额已超过38.5万亿美元。据圣路易斯联邦储备银行(Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis)的数据,美国国内生产总值(GDP)约为31万亿美元。

美国财政部数据显示,截至1月31日,利息支出累计达4270亿美元。按照这一趋势推算全年,叠加新增债务产生的额外利息,美国政府每年需支付1万亿美元利息。美国在2024财年首次突破这一关口,当年利息支出总额达1.13万亿美元,2025财年进一步攀升至1.22万亿美元。

负责任联邦预算委员会(Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget)主席马娅·麦吉尼亚斯(Maya MacGuineas)表示:"2026财年才过去三分之一,我们仍深陷无休止的借贷循环……若继续以当前速度借款,本财年财政赤字可能再度达到1.8万亿美元,甚至更高。"

"如果这些估算还不足以敲响警钟,那么美国国债持续攀升至创纪录水平,目前已接近美国经济总量……除非立法者希望债务和赤字屡创新高成为常态,否则两党必须携手解决不可持续的债务问题。立法者拖延越久,美国民众付出的代价越大。"

尽管相关数据触目惊心,委员会主席们也发出警告,但市场和许多经济学家对美国财政状况仍持相对乐观态度。若市场对美国政府支出感到恐慌,债券收益率会是最早发出预警的指标之一。例如,收益率上升意味着投资者认为借贷风险上升,因而要求更高溢价;反之,收益率下降则可能表明债券发行规模超过投资者需求。

目前这两种情况均未出现。截至撰稿时,30年期美国国债收益率为4.8%,虽较去年年末有所回升,但仍与2025年大部分时间的水平持平。10年期美国国债收益率走势相似,自去年春季以来始终在4.2%附近徘徊。

在影响力范围内

尽管有理论认为,外国投资者可能利用持有的美国国债惩罚美国对盟友愈发激进的挑衅行为;也有警告称,投资者可能因政策因素退出市场(如英国前首相利兹·特拉斯(Liz Truss)时期的情况),但许多经济学家认为,实际局面并不会如此极端。其中一种应对方式是“金融抑制”:强制要求机构增持国债,确保买家支撑国债价值。另一种策略是放任通胀温和上升:虽会损害消费者利益,但能稀释债务实际价值。量化宽松同样是备选方案,原因是增加货币供应虽可能引发通胀,但能达到降低实际借贷成本的效果。

这可能是投资者保持信心的原因——即便债务危机真的爆发,美国也足以妥善应对。

但若美国无法通过经济增长改善失衡的债务与国内生产总值比率,那么后果将不堪设想。更多资金被用于维持借贷,这正是桥水基金(Bridgewater Associates)创始人瑞·达利欧(Ray Dalio)常抱怨的问题。达利欧在一系列社交媒体帖子和访谈[包括与《财富》杂志黛安·布雷迪(Diane Brady)的对话]中警告称,美国经济即将面临“心脏病发作”的风险。

“我们的支出比收入高出40%,这是一个长期存在的问题,”他去年在接受福克斯商业频道采访时说,“你们会看到债务利息支出……正不断挤压购买力,就像动脉中的斑块一样。”(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

The first four months of fiscal year 2026 got off to an expensive start for the U.S., according to the latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) .

The CBO released a report yesterday detailing that, for the first third of FY26 (which began in October), the U.S. government operated at a deficit, and so borrowed $696 billion. That included $94 billion in January alone, and works out to an average of $43.5 billion for each of the 16 weeks of the four months since.

While America’s government spending outweighs its revenue generation, its finances are also negatively compounded by the interest payments needed to maintain its debt. Total national debt now sits at more than $38.5 trillion. U.S. GDP is about $31 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Per Treasury data, up to Jan. 31, the interest expenses paid out have totaled $427 billion. Extending that trajectory over the course of a year, and with additional debt being added, requiring additional interest payments, the U.S. government will need to pay out $1 trillion annually to service its borrowing. This benchmark was first hit in FY2024 when interest payments totaled $1.13 trillion. In FY2025 that rose to $1.22 trillion.

“We are only a third into FY 2026, and yet we remain in the routine of endless borrowing…If we continue to borrow at this rate, it leaves us on the path to another year of a $1.8 trillion or higher deficit,” according to Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

“If these estimates aren’t alarming enough, the national debt continues to climb toward record levels, equaling about the size of the entire U.S. economy today…Unless lawmakers want record-high debts and deficits to be our norm, both sides of the aisle must come together to address our unsustainable borrowing. The longer lawmakers wait, the higher the price for Americans.”

Despite the eye-watering figures and the warnings from committee chiefs, the market and many economists are still relatively comfortable with America’s fiscal situation. If markets were to panic about Uncle Sam’s spending, bond yields would be among the earliest red flags to go up. Yields rising, for example, might be a signal that investors are demanding higher premiums because the perceived risk of the lending has increased. Contrarily, yields moving lower may be a signal that bond issuance is outpacing demand from investors.

Neither of these has happened. At the time of writing, 30-year Treasuries sit at 4.8%—relatively elevated compared to late last year but still in line with much of 2025. Ten-year Treasuries are similar, floating around the 4.2% mark since last spring.

Within sphere of influence

Despite theories that foreign investors could leverage their holdings of U.S. debt to punish America for its increasing aggression toward its allies, or warnings that investors may back out of the market over policy (à la Liz Truss), many economists think the outcome will be somewhat less dramatic. “Financial repression” is one option: mandating that institutions must hold more debt, thus ensuring buyers prop up its value. Or inflation could be allowed to trickle higher: bad for consumers, but it would erode the real value of the debt. Quantitative easing could be another option, as increasing the money supply may prove inflationary but would have the desired effect of lowering the real value of borrowing.

This is likely what gives investors confidence, because the U.S. may be relatively well-equipped to handle a debt crisis, should one occur.

But if the country cannot grow itself out of an unhealthy debt-to-GDP balance, the outcome isn’t a palatable one. More funds would continue to be diverted to maintaining borrowing—something Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio often complains about. Dalio has warned of an impending economic “heart attack” in a series of social media posts and interviews, including with Fortune’s Diane Brady.

“We’re spending 40% more than we’re taking in, and this is a chronic problem,” he said in an appearance on Fox Business last year. “What you’re seeing is the debt service payments…well into squeezing away, so it’s like plaque in the arteries, squeezing away buying power.”

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开