首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

加州百万富翁抨击谷歌创始人为避税而与加州切割

Jacqueline Munis
2026-01-21

围绕美国加州最新提出的《2026年亿万富翁税法案》,该州的200多位亿万富翁纷纷表态,观点不一。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

当一些美国加州的亿万富翁猛烈抨击拟征收的财富税,并选择与加州“切割”之际,另有一些富裕人士站出来支持该政策。

戴夫·尼克松曾经是一名医疗健康行业高管,他于2022年从佛罗里达州搬到加州帕萨迪纳,希望寻找一个在价值观上更契合的社区。他是“爱国百万富翁”(Patriotic Millionaires)组织的成员。该组织由一群美国富人组成,倡导建立更公平的税收体系、可维持生活的体面工资以及平等的政治参与机会。

尼克松在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“我只是觉得,在佛罗里达州,教育、医疗这些我所关注的能够改善社会公平的事情,并没有得到应有的重视。我依然认为,加州在这些重要议题上做得更出色。”

加州最新提出的“巨富税”方案《2026年亿万富翁税法案》(2026 Billionaire Tax Act),拟对净资产超过10亿美元的居民,按其总资产的5%征税。除现有的所得税和资本利得税外,该群体目前并不需要缴纳任何经常性的财富税。该措施预计可以筹集约1,000亿美元资金,其中约90%将用于医疗项目,其余部分则用于教育、食品援助,以及通过设立专项储备基金来承担该税种的行政管理成本。

尼克松此前曾经在《财富》杂志撰文,对一些富裕居民威胁离开纽约、伊利诺伊等高税州,迁居佛罗里达、得克萨斯等低税州的做法,表达了强烈不满。他至今仍然对“加税会引发富人大规模外逃”的说法持怀疑态度。

他写道:“这种说法纯属虚构,是美国各地的百万富翁经常抛出的空洞威胁,只是为了阻止州立法者提高税率。加州对像我这样的富裕人群征收更高的税,恰恰是它可以成为我理想定居之所的原因。”

围绕这项拟议中的税收政策,加州200多位亿万富翁纷纷表态,观点不一。据报道,风险投资人彼得·蒂尔,以及谷歌(Google)创始人拉里·佩奇和谢尔盖·布林,正在准备离开加州迁居佛罗里达州。也有其他亿万富翁持不同立场,例如英伟达(Nvidia)首席执行官黄仁勋就表示,“从未考虑过”因为税收问题而离开加州。

当被问及谷歌创始人谢尔盖·布林和拉里·佩奇近期的举动时,尼克松直言不讳地说:“这种行为卑劣又贪婪。”

尼克松称:“加州一直待他们不薄,并且培育了一个令谷歌创始人受益的创新经济生态。”长久以来,加州都是大型科技公司的大本营,并通过税收优惠等方式鼓励企业留在本州发展。2025年,加州还与谷歌、Adobe、IBM和微软(Microsoft)签署协议,将人工智能培训引入高中、社区学院以及加州州立大学体系。

尼克松表示:“任何不把缴纳公平税收视为自身责任的人,都令我失望。”

“缴纳公平税收”

“爱国百万富翁”组织的另一名成员莫琳·肯尼迪,是一位居住在马林县的慈善人士,自1996年以来一直在加州生活。她曾经在美国前总统比尔·克林顿执政期间担任联邦住房政策官员。她表示,州政府有责任设法抵消医疗支出。她认同该项税收政策背后的立法初衷,即通过征收“巨富税”,为医疗、教育和食品援助提供资金支持。

肯尼迪称:“加州的生活成本很高,而医疗支出的涨幅一直高于工资增长速度。”根据美国社会保障署(Social Security Administration)的数据,2022年至2023年间,医疗支出增长7.5%,而同期平均工资仅增长4.43%。美世(Mercer)的一项调查显示,如果雇主不主动采取措施降低成本,2026年的医疗成本预计将上涨9%。

“大而美法案”(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)计划在未来十年削减近万亿美元医疗补助(Medicaid)资金、并新增工作要求,受此影响,预计将有约340万加州居民失去MediCal医疗保障资格。

肯尼迪说:“在加州,像我退休前那样的高收入工薪群体,要将相当高比例的收入用来缴税,但亿万富翁阶层却不用承担这样的税负。”

根据美国国家经济研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research )在2025年发布的一篇论文,2018年至2020年间,亿万富翁的平均税率为24%,而全体人口的平均税率为30%,高收入工薪群体的平均税率则高达45%。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

当一些美国加州的亿万富翁猛烈抨击拟征收的财富税,并选择与加州“切割”之际,另有一些富裕人士站出来支持该政策。

戴夫·尼克松曾经是一名医疗健康行业高管,他于2022年从佛罗里达州搬到加州帕萨迪纳,希望寻找一个在价值观上更契合的社区。他是“爱国百万富翁”(Patriotic Millionaires)组织的成员。该组织由一群美国富人组成,倡导建立更公平的税收体系、可维持生活的体面工资以及平等的政治参与机会。

尼克松在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“我只是觉得,在佛罗里达州,教育、医疗这些我所关注的能够改善社会公平的事情,并没有得到应有的重视。我依然认为,加州在这些重要议题上做得更出色。”

加州最新提出的“巨富税”方案《2026年亿万富翁税法案》(2026 Billionaire Tax Act),拟对净资产超过10亿美元的居民,按其总资产的5%征税。除现有的所得税和资本利得税外,该群体目前并不需要缴纳任何经常性的财富税。该措施预计可以筹集约1,000亿美元资金,其中约90%将用于医疗项目,其余部分则用于教育、食品援助,以及通过设立专项储备基金来承担该税种的行政管理成本。

尼克松此前曾经在《财富》杂志撰文,对一些富裕居民威胁离开纽约、伊利诺伊等高税州,迁居佛罗里达、得克萨斯等低税州的做法,表达了强烈不满。他至今仍然对“加税会引发富人大规模外逃”的说法持怀疑态度。

他写道:“这种说法纯属虚构,是美国各地的百万富翁经常抛出的空洞威胁,只是为了阻止州立法者提高税率。加州对像我这样的富裕人群征收更高的税,恰恰是它可以成为我理想定居之所的原因。”

围绕这项拟议中的税收政策,加州200多位亿万富翁纷纷表态,观点不一。据报道,风险投资人彼得·蒂尔,以及谷歌(Google)创始人拉里·佩奇和谢尔盖·布林,正在准备离开加州迁居佛罗里达州。也有其他亿万富翁持不同立场,例如英伟达(Nvidia)首席执行官黄仁勋就表示,“从未考虑过”因为税收问题而离开加州。

当被问及谷歌创始人谢尔盖·布林和拉里·佩奇近期的举动时,尼克松直言不讳地说:“这种行为卑劣又贪婪。”

尼克松称:“加州一直待他们不薄,并且培育了一个令谷歌创始人受益的创新经济生态。”长久以来,加州都是大型科技公司的大本营,并通过税收优惠等方式鼓励企业留在本州发展。2025年,加州还与谷歌、Adobe、IBM和微软(Microsoft)签署协议,将人工智能培训引入高中、社区学院以及加州州立大学体系。

尼克松表示:“任何不把缴纳公平税收视为自身责任的人,都令我失望。”

“缴纳公平税收”

“爱国百万富翁”组织的另一名成员莫琳·肯尼迪,是一位居住在马林县的慈善人士,自1996年以来一直在加州生活。她曾经在美国前总统比尔·克林顿执政期间担任联邦住房政策官员。她表示,州政府有责任设法抵消医疗支出。她认同该项税收政策背后的立法初衷,即通过征收“巨富税”,为医疗、教育和食品援助提供资金支持。

肯尼迪称:“加州的生活成本很高,而医疗支出的涨幅一直高于工资增长速度。”根据美国社会保障署(Social Security Administration)的数据,2022年至2023年间,医疗支出增长7.5%,而同期平均工资仅增长4.43%。美世(Mercer)的一项调查显示,如果雇主不主动采取措施降低成本,2026年的医疗成本预计将上涨9%。

“大而美法案”(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)计划在未来十年削减近万亿美元医疗补助(Medicaid)资金、并新增工作要求,受此影响,预计将有约340万加州居民失去MediCal医疗保障资格。

肯尼迪说:“在加州,像我退休前那样的高收入工薪群体,要将相当高比例的收入用来缴税,但亿万富翁阶层却不用承担这样的税负。”

根据美国国家经济研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research )在2025年发布的一篇论文,2018年至2020年间,亿万富翁的平均税率为24%,而全体人口的平均税率为30%,高收入工薪群体的平均税率则高达45%。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

While some California billionaires are slamming the proposed wealth tax and cutting ties with the state, other wealthy citizens are stepping forward to defend the policy.

Dave Nixon, a former healthcare executive, relocated from Florida to Pasadena, California, in 2022 in search of a community that more closely aligned with his values. He is a member of Patriotic Millionaires, an organization of affluent Americans that advocates for a fairer tax system, livable wages, and equal access to political power.

“I just felt like education, healthcare, all the things I care about that equalize society, were not being paid attention to [in Florida],” Nixon said in an interview with Fortune. “I still think that California does a better job on those things that matter.”

California’s latest proposal to tax extreme wealth, the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act, would impose a one-time 5% levy on the net worth of residents with assets of at least $1 billion, a category that currently pays no recurring wealth tax beyond existing income and capital-gains taxes. The measure is projected to raise on the order of $100 billion and would channel roughly 90% of the new revenue into health care programs, with the remainder earmarked for education, food assistance, and administering the tax through a dedicated reserve fund.

Nixon previously wrote in Fortune about his disapproval of wealthy residents threatening to leave high-tax states such as New York and Illinois for lower-tax states like Florida and Texas. He remains skeptical of the claim that raising taxes will prompt a widespread flight of wealthy residents.

“That idea is a myth, an empty threat constantly laid down by millionaires across the country looking for a way to discourage state lawmakers from raising their taxes,” he wrote. “California’s higher taxes on wealthy people like me are exactly what makes it the kind of state I want to live in.”

Many of the state’s more than 200 billionaires have weighed in on the proposed tax policy, with varying opinions. Venture capitalist Peter Thiel and Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are reportedly preparing to abandon the state for Florida. Other billionaires such, as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, said it “never crossed [his] mind” to leave the state because of the tax.

When asked about Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page’s recent actions, Nixon said, “It’s sickening and greedy.”

“California has been very good to them and has supported an innovation economy that, for example, the founders of Google have benefited from,” Nixon said. The state has long been home to Big Tech and has incentivized companies to stay and grow through tax credits. In 2025, California signed deals with Google, Adobe, IBM, and Microsoft, to bring AI training into high schools, community colleges, and the California State University system.

“I’m just disappointed in anybody that doesn’t see it as a responsibility to pay their fair share of taxes,” Nixon said.

‘Get them to pay their fair share’

Maureen Kennedy, another member of Patriotic Millionaires, is a philanthropist based in Marin County who has lived in California since 1996. A former federal housing policy official under former President Bill Clinton, she said it’s up to the state to figure out how to offset healthcare costs. She agrees with the rationale behind the bill, which would use the tax to fund health care, education, and food assistance.

“We’re a high-cost state, and [healthcare costs] have been outstripping increases in wages,” Kennedy said. Health spending increased 7.5% between 2022 and 2023, whereas average wages grew by 4.43% during that period, according to the Social Security Administration. Employers expect healthcare costs to increase by 9% in 2026 if they don’t try to lower costs, according to a survey from Mercer.

About 3.4 million Californians are expected to lose MediCal coverage after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act cut nearly a trillion dollars from Medicaid over the next ten years and added new work requirements.

“Higher income working people like I was before I retired pay a very large percentage of their income in California, but the billionaire class don’t pay that,” Kennedy said.

Billionaires averaged a 24% tax rate between 2018 and 2020, compared with 30% for the total population and 45% for top income earners, according to a 2025 paper published in the National Bureau of Economic Research.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开