
阿波罗全球管理公司(Apollo)的首席经济学家托斯滕·斯洛克指出,美国财政部(Treasury Department)正在着力确保投资者持续认购新发国债,而企业债发行带来的竞争日趋激烈,这或将进一步推高市场利率。
他在1月10日的报告中强调,华尔街预计本年度投资级债券的发行规模将高达2.25万亿美元。
在人工智能热潮的驱动下,包括超大规模企业及相关公司在内的众多企业涌入债券市场,为数据中心及其他基础设施的巨额投资筹集资金。
斯洛克表示:“超大规模企业债券发行量激增引发疑问:谁将成为投资级债券的边际买家?是来自美国国债买家,进而推高利率水平?还是来自抵押贷款市场的投资者,进而推高抵押贷款利差?”
美国国会预算办公室(Congressional Budget Office)的最新数据显示,美国债务规模已经突破38万亿美元,在2026财年前三个月(自2025年10月起),联邦政府的新增借贷额已达6010亿美元。
得益于关税政策推动财政收入增速超过支出增速,这一赤字规模较去年同期缩减1100亿美元。不过,美国最高法院(Supreme Court)近期或裁定特朗普总统推行的全球关税政策违宪,同时,受到《大而美法案》(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)新减税条款的影响,本年度报税季的退税规模预计将大幅攀升。
与此同时,特朗普承诺将国防开支从1万亿美元上调至1.5万亿美元,此举或将进一步加剧联邦预算赤字。
尽管美联储(Federal Reserve)在去年秋季连续降息,但美国国债收益率仍然维持在9月初的水平,表明政府债务偿还成本难以出现明显回落——该成本继续推高整体赤字规模。
斯洛克指出:“核心问题在于,本年度流入市场的固定收益产品规模庞大,或在2026年前持续推高利率和信用利差。”

为确保债券市场需求端保持充裕,相较于其他竞争性资产,美国国债收益率必须保持吸引力。若无法吸引足额的市场投资者参与认购,就会加剧所谓的“财政主导”风险——即央行将被迫介入,为不断扩大的财政赤字融资。
美国财政部前部长珍妮特·耶伦1月4日在美国经济学会(American Economic Association)的专题研讨会上就此发出警告。
她指出:“财政主导的各项先决条件正日益凸显”,并强调未来三十年美国债务规模占到国内生产总值的比重将呈陡峭上升趋势,最终可能达到150%。
与此同时,过去十年间美国债务持有者结构发生剧变,持有主体正在从对价格敏感度较低的外国政府,转向盈利导向的私人投资者。
摩根大通(JPMorgan)董事总经理、曾经在耶伦担任财政部长期间出任其副幕僚长的耿恩·加姆布纳南特称,这一转变或导致美国金融体系在市场承压时期脆弱性加剧。
他上月在《纽约时报》(New York Times)的专栏文章中指出,21世纪10年代初,外国政府持有美国国债的比例超过40%,而这一比例在20世纪90年代中期仅略高于10%。外国政府曾经是美国国债的稳定持有群体,这也为美国在人为压低利率的环境下大规模举债提供了支撑。
他警告道:“宽松时期已然终结。外国政府持有美国国债的占比已经不足15%。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
阿波罗全球管理公司(Apollo)的首席经济学家托斯滕·斯洛克指出,美国财政部(Treasury Department)正在着力确保投资者持续认购新发国债,而企业债发行带来的竞争日趋激烈,这或将进一步推高市场利率。
他在1月10日的报告中强调,华尔街预计本年度投资级债券的发行规模将高达2.25万亿美元。
在人工智能热潮的驱动下,包括超大规模企业及相关公司在内的众多企业涌入债券市场,为数据中心及其他基础设施的巨额投资筹集资金。
斯洛克表示:“超大规模企业债券发行量激增引发疑问:谁将成为投资级债券的边际买家?是来自美国国债买家,进而推高利率水平?还是来自抵押贷款市场的投资者,进而推高抵押贷款利差?”
美国国会预算办公室(Congressional Budget Office)的最新数据显示,美国债务规模已经突破38万亿美元,在2026财年前三个月(自2025年10月起),联邦政府的新增借贷额已达6010亿美元。
得益于关税政策推动财政收入增速超过支出增速,这一赤字规模较去年同期缩减1100亿美元。不过,美国最高法院(Supreme Court)近期或裁定特朗普总统推行的全球关税政策违宪,同时,受到《大而美法案》(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)新减税条款的影响,本年度报税季的退税规模预计将大幅攀升。
与此同时,特朗普承诺将国防开支从1万亿美元上调至1.5万亿美元,此举或将进一步加剧联邦预算赤字。
尽管美联储(Federal Reserve)在去年秋季连续降息,但美国国债收益率仍然维持在9月初的水平,表明政府债务偿还成本难以出现明显回落——该成本继续推高整体赤字规模。
斯洛克指出:“核心问题在于,本年度流入市场的固定收益产品规模庞大,或在2026年前持续推高利率和信用利差。”
为确保债券市场需求端保持充裕,相较于其他竞争性资产,美国国债收益率必须保持吸引力。若无法吸引足额的市场投资者参与认购,就会加剧所谓的“财政主导”风险——即央行将被迫介入,为不断扩大的财政赤字融资。
美国财政部前部长珍妮特·耶伦1月4日在美国经济学会(American Economic Association)的专题研讨会上就此发出警告。
她指出:“财政主导的各项先决条件正日益凸显”,并强调未来三十年美国债务规模占到国内生产总值的比重将呈陡峭上升趋势,最终可能达到150%。
与此同时,过去十年间美国债务持有者结构发生剧变,持有主体正在从对价格敏感度较低的外国政府,转向盈利导向的私人投资者。
摩根大通(JPMorgan)董事总经理、曾经在耶伦担任财政部长期间出任其副幕僚长的耿恩·加姆布纳南特称,这一转变或导致美国金融体系在市场承压时期脆弱性加剧。
他上月在《纽约时报》(New York Times)的专栏文章中指出,21世纪10年代初,外国政府持有美国国债的比例超过40%,而这一比例在20世纪90年代中期仅略高于10%。外国政府曾经是美国国债的稳定持有群体,这也为美国在人为压低利率的环境下大规模举债提供了支撑。
他警告道:“宽松时期已然终结。外国政府持有美国国债的占比已经不足15%。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
As the Treasury Department looks to ensure investors continue absorbing the fresh supply of debt it must sell, growing competition from companies issuing their own bonds could send rates higher, according to Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok.
In a note on Saturday, he pointed out that Wall Street estimates for the volume of investment grade debt that’s on the way this year reach as high as $2.25 trillion.
That’s as the AI boom increasingly sends companies, including hyperscalers and adjacent firms, to the bond market to fund massive investments in data centers and other infrastructure.
“The significant increase in hyperscaler issuance raises questions about who will be the marginal buyer of IG paper,” Slok said. “Will it come from Treasury purchases and hence put upward pressure on the level of rates? Or might it come from mortgage purchases, putting upward pressure on mortgage spreads?”
With U.S. debt topping $38 trillion, the federal government has already borrowed $601 billion in the first three months of the 2026 fiscal year, which began in October 2025, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office.
That’s $110 billion less than the deficit during the same period a year earlier as tariffs helped revenue outpace spending. But the Supreme Court could strike down President Donald Trump’s global tariffs soon, and this year’s tax season should see a surge of refunds to account for new tax cuts under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Meanwhile, Trump has vowed to boost defense spending to $1.5 trillion a year from $1 trillion, threatening to further deepen federal budget deficits.
And despite the Federal Reserve’s series of rate cuts this past autumn, Treasury yields remain about where they were in early September, suggesting the government will not see much relief on debt-servicing costs that are also contributing to the overall tally of red ink.
“The bottom line is that the volume of fixed-income products coming to market this year is significant and is likely to put upward pressure on rates and credit spreads as we go through 2026,” Slok said.
To make sure there’s sufficient demand among bond investors, Treasury yields must remain attractive relative to the competition. Failure to draw enough investors raises the risk of so-called fiscal dominance, or when a central bank must step into to finance widening deficits.
That’s what former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned of last weekend, during a panel hosted by the American Economic Association.
“The preconditions for fiscal dominance are clearly strengthening,” she said, noting debt is on a steep upward trajectory toward 150% of GDP over the next three decades.
At the same time, he holders of U.S. debt have shifted drastically over the past decade, tilting more toward profit-driven private investors and away from foreign governments that are less sensitive to prices.
That threatens to turn the U.S. financial system more fragile in times of market stress, according to Geng Ngarmboonanant, a managing director at JPMorgan and former deputy chief of staff to Yellen during her tenure at Treasury.
Foreign governments accounted for more than 40% of Treasury bond holdings in the early 2010s, up from just over 10% in the mid-1990s, he wrote in a New York Times op-ed last month. This reliable bloc of investors allowed the U.S. to borrow vast sums at artificially low rates.
“Those easy times are over,” he warned. “Foreign governments now make up less than 15% of the overall Treasury market.”