首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

研究表明,房产财富会加剧下一代的贫富差距

Emma Burleigh
2026-01-19

英国坐拥房产的富裕家庭子女更易斩获高薪工作,男性后代受益尤为显著。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

在英国,富裕家庭的父母所持房产价值每增加13.38万美元,其子女的资产便会多出2万美元。这类家庭的子女不仅更容易斩获高薪职位,而且男性后代受益尤为显著。图片来源:puhhha / Getty Images

富裕家庭的子女在追逐成功的道路上占据先天优势,这早已不是什么秘密——财富与人脉的加持,历来是他们进军好莱坞、甚至跻身企业高管层的重要助力。如今,一项最新研究表明,那些在三十年前搭上英国房地产市场繁荣快车的父母,早已为子女的未来成功筑牢根基。

21世纪初,英国房价经历了飙升:从1995年相当于居民年收入的4倍,到2010年攀升至8倍。财政经济学研究所(Institute for Fiscal Studies)的最新研究表明,有房群体积累了巨额财富,其子女不仅继承了更多房产资产,也更易斩获高薪职位。相比之下,低收入租房群体则面临新住房可负担性难题。

报告指出:“房地产繁荣使部分家庭实现了巨额财富增值,另一些家庭却未能受益。我们的研究表明,排除父母职业技能等其他因素的影响,房产财富会加剧下一代的贫富差距。”

为了更直观地呈现这种财富鸿沟,研究发现:富裕家庭的父母所持房产价值每增加10万英镑(约合13.38万美元),其子女在近30岁时的家庭资产,便会多出1.5万英镑(约合2万美元)。这笔财富极大地推动了富裕家庭子女的社会阶层跃升——他们手握充足资金,得以赴伦敦寻找高薪工作;而租房家庭的子女,则被剥夺了积累代际财富的机会。

无独有偶,在美国,高房价让父母有更多的资金投入子女教育,这使得有房家庭子女的薪资水平普遍高于租房家庭子女。

为何受益于房地产繁荣的父母,其子女能够占得先机

研究发现,无论富裕父母从事何种职业、拥有何种学历,其子女均能从中获益。这些子女能够坐拥数万美元额外财富的关键原因在于地理位置——那些在房地产繁荣浪潮中获利最多的家庭,要么在伦敦拥有房产,要么具备迁居这座优质工作机会云集的首都城市的经济实力。

报告阐释道:“这一研究结论的核心逻辑在于,父母从房地产繁荣浪潮中获益越多,其子女越有可能在伦敦拥有房产——伦敦是全英房价最高的房产市场。”

“部分原因在于,那些父母在房地产繁荣浪潮中获益颇丰、但在伦敦以外地区长大的人,更倾向于迁居伦敦。”

研究发现,父母在房地产市场获利颇丰,其子女不太会选择在伦敦以外地区从事中等收入工作。与租房家庭的子女相比,他们更倾向于涌入伦敦的高薪职业领域。

不过,房产富裕家庭的子女并未平等地享有红利。男性后代最有可能斩获高薪工作,而女性后代则“未受显著影响”。研究指出,“父母的财富似乎对男性后代的助力尤为突出,能帮助他们获得更优质的就业机会。”

英国住房可负担性与薪资停滞困局

富裕家庭的子女因为父母在房地产繁荣期积累的红利而收获财富与职业发展的双重优势,而许多英国人却因为薪资微薄,打消了购房念头。

英国决议基金会(The Resolution Foundation)2024年的一项分析显示,英国房产在发达国家中性价比最低。研究发现,英国的住房成本相较于整体物价水平,远超经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的所有成员国;不仅如此,英格兰地区的住宅空间甚至比纽约更局促。目前,英国的平均房价约为27万英镑(折合36.11万美元)。租房群体同样面临可负担性危机:房地产集团Hamptons International在2023年预测,未来四年英格兰地区的租金涨幅将高达25%。

英国决议基金会(Resolution Foundation)的首席经济学家亚当·科利特在接受彭博社(Bloomberg)采访时表示:“英国的住房危机是数十年积弊酿成的沉疴,历届政府始终未能新建足量住房,也未能完成现有住房的现代化改造。如今,这样的局面亟待扭转。”

然而在住房成本逐年攀升之际,英国劳动者的年薪涨幅却未能与之同步,收入处于底层的年轻人更是如此。彭博社对政府数据的分析显示,英国适龄就业大学毕业生的平均薪资较15年前下降了30%。

Z世代在相同职业阶段的薪资仅为千禧一代的三分之二左右,这促使许多人重新审视自己在英国的发展前景。亚当·斯密研究所(Adam Smith Institute)2025年的一项研究显示,在18岁至30岁的英国青年中,有四分之一的人表示可能离开英国,其中多数人表明原因在于难以负担的住房成本与居高不下的生活开支。(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

富裕家庭的子女在追逐成功的道路上占据先天优势,这早已不是什么秘密——财富与人脉的加持,历来是他们进军好莱坞、甚至跻身企业高管层的重要助力。如今,一项最新研究表明,那些在三十年前搭上英国房地产市场繁荣快车的父母,早已为子女的未来成功筑牢根基。

21世纪初,英国房价经历了飙升:从1995年相当于居民年收入的4倍,到2010年攀升至8倍。财政经济学研究所(Institute for Fiscal Studies)的最新研究表明,有房群体积累了巨额财富,其子女不仅继承了更多房产资产,也更易斩获高薪职位。相比之下,低收入租房群体则面临新住房可负担性难题。

报告指出:“房地产繁荣使部分家庭实现了巨额财富增值,另一些家庭却未能受益。我们的研究表明,排除父母职业技能等其他因素的影响,房产财富会加剧下一代的贫富差距。”

为了更直观地呈现这种财富鸿沟,研究发现:富裕家庭的父母所持房产价值每增加10万英镑(约合13.38万美元),其子女在近30岁时的家庭资产,便会多出1.5万英镑(约合2万美元)。这笔财富极大地推动了富裕家庭子女的社会阶层跃升——他们手握充足资金,得以赴伦敦寻找高薪工作;而租房家庭的子女,则被剥夺了积累代际财富的机会。

无独有偶,在美国,高房价让父母有更多的资金投入子女教育,这使得有房家庭子女的薪资水平普遍高于租房家庭子女。

为何受益于房地产繁荣的父母,其子女能够占得先机

研究发现,无论富裕父母从事何种职业、拥有何种学历,其子女均能从中获益。这些子女能够坐拥数万美元额外财富的关键原因在于地理位置——那些在房地产繁荣浪潮中获利最多的家庭,要么在伦敦拥有房产,要么具备迁居这座优质工作机会云集的首都城市的经济实力。

报告阐释道:“这一研究结论的核心逻辑在于,父母从房地产繁荣浪潮中获益越多,其子女越有可能在伦敦拥有房产——伦敦是全英房价最高的房产市场。”

“部分原因在于,那些父母在房地产繁荣浪潮中获益颇丰、但在伦敦以外地区长大的人,更倾向于迁居伦敦。”

研究发现,父母在房地产市场获利颇丰,其子女不太会选择在伦敦以外地区从事中等收入工作。与租房家庭的子女相比,他们更倾向于涌入伦敦的高薪职业领域。

不过,房产富裕家庭的子女并未平等地享有红利。男性后代最有可能斩获高薪工作,而女性后代则“未受显著影响”。研究指出,“父母的财富似乎对男性后代的助力尤为突出,能帮助他们获得更优质的就业机会。”

英国住房可负担性与薪资停滞困局

富裕家庭的子女因为父母在房地产繁荣期积累的红利而收获财富与职业发展的双重优势,而许多英国人却因为薪资微薄,打消了购房念头。

英国决议基金会(The Resolution Foundation)2024年的一项分析显示,英国房产在发达国家中性价比最低。研究发现,英国的住房成本相较于整体物价水平,远超经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的所有成员国;不仅如此,英格兰地区的住宅空间甚至比纽约更局促。目前,英国的平均房价约为27万英镑(折合36.11万美元)。租房群体同样面临可负担性危机:房地产集团Hamptons International在2023年预测,未来四年英格兰地区的租金涨幅将高达25%。

英国决议基金会(Resolution Foundation)的首席经济学家亚当·科利特在接受彭博社(Bloomberg)采访时表示:“英国的住房危机是数十年积弊酿成的沉疴,历届政府始终未能新建足量住房,也未能完成现有住房的现代化改造。如今,这样的局面亟待扭转。”

然而在住房成本逐年攀升之际,英国劳动者的年薪涨幅却未能与之同步,收入处于底层的年轻人更是如此。彭博社对政府数据的分析显示,英国适龄就业大学毕业生的平均薪资较15年前下降了30%。

Z世代在相同职业阶段的薪资仅为千禧一代的三分之二左右,这促使许多人重新审视自己在英国的发展前景。亚当·斯密研究所(Adam Smith Institute)2025年的一项研究显示,在18岁至30岁的英国青年中,有四分之一的人表示可能离开英国,其中多数人表明原因在于难以负担的住房成本与居高不下的生活开支。(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

It’s no secret that the children of wealthy families have an upper hand in success—money and connections have historically helped them break into Hollywood, and even the C-suite. Now, new research shows that U.K. parents who reaped the rewards of the country’s housing boom three decades ago set their kids up for success down the line.

Around the turn of the 21st century, the U.K. witnessed a dramatic surge in housing prices: the costs rose from four times peoples’ annual earnings in 1995, to eight times by 2010. Homeowners subsequently enjoyed a wealth windfall, and it resulted in their kids receiving more housing wealth and higher-paying jobs, according to recent research from the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Lower-income renters, on the other hand, were faced with new affordability challenges.

“This property boom meant enormous wealth gains for some households but not others,” the report notes. “Our results show that housing wealth, independent of other factors such as parents’ skills, substantially affects inequality in the subsequent generation.”

To put the wealth divide into perspective, the study found that for every £100,000 ($133,800) of extra property the wealthy parents had, the children were £15,000 ($20,000) better off in household assets when they reached their late 20s. It catapulted the social mobility of rich kids—who had enough funds to move to high-paying jobs in London—while the children of renters were blocked from generational wealth opportunities.

Likewise, in the U.S. higher house prices provide parents with additional funding to invest in their children, resulting in higher salaries than the children of renters.

Why the children of property-boom parents have an upperhand

It didn’t matter what wealthy parents did for work, or what degrees they had—the study found the kids of rich homeowners benefited regardless. And a key reason why they were able to secure tens of thousands of dollars in wealth gains is because of location; those who benefitted most from the housing boom owned property in London, or were able to move to the capital city brimming with better job opportunities.

“An important explanation for this finding is that the children of parents more exposed to the house price boom were more likely to own in London—the most expensive property market in the country,” the report explains.

“This is partly explained by an increased tendency of people whose parents did relatively well out of the house price boom, but who grew up outside of London, to move to the capital.”

The children of parents who fared better in the housing boom were less likely to take on middle-paying jobs outside of the U.K.’s capital, the study found. Instead, they were inclined to funnel into higher-paying occupations in the city compared to their family renter counterparts.

However, the benefits have not been equally distributed among the children of these housing-rich families. Their sons were the most likely to secure jobs at the top of the earnings distribution—meanwhile, there was “no significant effect” with the daughters. The study found that “wealth from parents may help male children in particular access better labour market opportunities.”

U.K.’s housing affordability and stagnating wages

While rich kids are reaping wealth and career gains from their parents’ housing boom success, many in the U.K. have given up on buying a home with their abysmal salaries.

U.K. property offers the worst value for money in the developed world, according to a 2024 analysis from The Resolution Foundation. Not only are U.K. housing costs more expensive relative to general prices than in any OECD country, the study found, but homes in England are even more cramped than those in New York City. The average house price in the U.K. currently rests at about £270,000 ($361,100). And those who rent are also up against an affordability crisis: rent in England is set to skyrocket by 25% in the next four years, real estate group Hamptons International predicted in 2023.

“Britain’s housing crisis is decades in the making, with successive governments failing to build enough new homes and modernize our existing stock,” Adam Corlett, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation, told Bloomberg. “That now has to change.”

But as housing costs increase every year, U.K.’s workers aren’t seeing the same bumps in their annual salaries—especially young people at the bottom of the totem pole. The average salary for working-age U.K. graduates is 30% lower than it was 15 years ago, according to government data analyzed by Bloomberg.

Gen Zers are only getting around two-thirds of the pay their millennial counterparts received at the same career stage, and it’s causing many to reconsider if they can even succeed in the U.K. One in four Britons between the ages of 18 and 30 said they might leave, with many pointing fingers at the lack of affordable housing and high cost of living, according to a 2025 study from the Adam Smith Institute.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开