首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

加州通过22号提案,“零工”公司斩获重大胜利

Danielle Abril
2020-11-05

优步、Lyft和DoorDash这样的零工公司就可以继续将各自的工人归类为独立承包商。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

加州选民已经郑重表态:只要提供一些额外的福利,像优步、Lyft和DoorDash这样的零工公司就可以继续将各自的工人归类为独立承包商。

截至美国东部时间11月4日下午2点40分,630万张已计选票中有58%支持该举措。这项名为“22号提案”的投票倡议由此获得通过,从而使得上述公司免受加州最近颁布的一项法律的约束。该法律要求这些公司将其工人归类为雇员。相反,22号提案将为零工工人提供最低时薪保障,为至少工作15个小时的工人提供新的健康福利,为工伤和疾病提供医疗和伤残保险。对于许多零工工人来说,这些福利都是前所未闻的,但仍然低于他们被视为雇员后应该享受的待遇。

“零工经济公司会在今晚松一口气。”财富管理公司D.A. Davidson的分析师汤姆•怀特表示,“零工经济公司意识到,在对工人身份认定方面需要有更多的中间地带,所以他们会再接再厉。”

“22号提案”由受益于零工工人的公司资助和开发,旨在取代《第5号议会法案》(AB 5)。1月签署成为法律并生效后,这项法案使得一些公司更加难以将工人归类为独立承包商,并且面临着将他们视为雇员的巨大压力。这项决议为那些商业模式最近受到该法案威胁的零工公司规划了一条成本较低的路线。

投票结果公布后,优步在一封发送给网约车司机的电子邮件中表示,鉴于这项提案已经通过,“未来的独立工作将更有保障。”获得零工公司鼎力支持的“支持22号提案运动”(Yes on 22)也对这场胜利称赞有加。

“22号提案之所以成功通过,是因为它代表了全州成千上万网约车司机的最佳利益和偏好。”该组织发表声明称,“今晚的胜利清楚地表明,这种解决方案得到了大多数司机、客户和选民的青睐。这样一种模式有助于保持网约车司机和外卖送餐员需要和想要的灵活性。 ”

但批评人士认为,该提案对司机和送餐员的帮助还远远不够,其中包括一个名为“零工崛起”(Gig Workers Rising),致力于倡导工人权益的司机团体。该组织此前称22提案是“企业夺权”,使工人无法享受医保、公平工资和工伤补偿等待遇。

“22号提案堪称美国历史上代价最高昂的投票提案。它的胜利是美国民主的失败,很可能会为企业自己制定法律的其他尝试打开方便之门。”零工崛起组织发表声明称,“这些企业花费数亿美元来制定他们自己的劳动法,即使我们的民选官员和公共机构已经无数次地拒绝了这些法律。对于我们的政府体系和广大劳动人民来说,这是一次重大挫败。”

D.A. Davidson公司的怀特指出,尽管这项决议为企业带来了一丝慰藉,但它仍有可能推高消费者的乘车成本。他说,为了支付其加州工人的新福利,这些零工公司很可能不得不将部分成本转嫁给客户。然而,它也可能为其他考虑对零工公司实施类似新法律的州提供一个路线图。如此一来,在司机获得更多福利的州,乘客预计将支付更高的出行费用。

“随着时间的推移,我认为在对待零工经济工人方面,将出现更多的中间地带。”怀特说,“这些工人的身份认定,将介于《第5号议会法案》和我们过去认为的独立承包商之间。”

加州选民投票通过22号提案,帮助优步和Lyft摆脱了他们在加州法院面临的棘手局面。今年8月,在《第5号议会法案》正式实施,而优步和Lyft仍然没有将其司机重新归类为雇员之后,一位加州高等法院法官批准了一项初步禁令。上个月,两家公司的上诉失败,并被给予约60天的时间要求加州最高法院进行复审。

两家公司此前声称,如果22号提案没有通过,他们将不得不削减“数千个”工作岗位,并永久关闭许多地区的服务,以避免把工人视为领薪员工所带来的高昂成本。但批评人士表示,长期以来,这些零工公司对工人的补偿极其不公,而22号提案只会允许这种情况继续下去。(财富中文网)

译者:任文科

加州选民已经郑重表态:只要提供一些额外的福利,像优步、Lyft和DoorDash这样的零工公司就可以继续将各自的工人归类为独立承包商。

截至美国东部时间11月4日下午2点40分,630万张已计选票中有58%支持该举措。这项名为“22号提案”的投票倡议由此获得通过,从而使得上述公司免受加州最近颁布的一项法律的约束。该法律要求这些公司将其工人归类为雇员。相反,22号提案将为零工工人提供最低时薪保障,为至少工作15个小时的工人提供新的健康福利,为工伤和疾病提供医疗和伤残保险。对于许多零工工人来说,这些福利都是前所未闻的,但仍然低于他们被视为雇员后应该享受的待遇。

“零工经济公司会在今晚松一口气。”财富管理公司D.A. Davidson的分析师汤姆•怀特表示,“零工经济公司意识到,在对工人身份认定方面需要有更多的中间地带,所以他们会再接再厉。”

“22号提案”由受益于零工工人的公司资助和开发,旨在取代《第5号议会法案》(AB 5)。1月签署成为法律并生效后,这项法案使得一些公司更加难以将工人归类为独立承包商,并且面临着将他们视为雇员的巨大压力。这项决议为那些商业模式最近受到该法案威胁的零工公司规划了一条成本较低的路线。

投票结果公布后,优步在一封发送给网约车司机的电子邮件中表示,鉴于这项提案已经通过,“未来的独立工作将更有保障。”获得零工公司鼎力支持的“支持22号提案运动”(Yes on 22)也对这场胜利称赞有加。

“22号提案之所以成功通过,是因为它代表了全州成千上万网约车司机的最佳利益和偏好。”该组织发表声明称,“今晚的胜利清楚地表明,这种解决方案得到了大多数司机、客户和选民的青睐。这样一种模式有助于保持网约车司机和外卖送餐员需要和想要的灵活性。 ”

但批评人士认为,该提案对司机和送餐员的帮助还远远不够,其中包括一个名为“零工崛起”(Gig Workers Rising),致力于倡导工人权益的司机团体。该组织此前称22提案是“企业夺权”,使工人无法享受医保、公平工资和工伤补偿等待遇。

“22号提案堪称美国历史上代价最高昂的投票提案。它的胜利是美国民主的失败,很可能会为企业自己制定法律的其他尝试打开方便之门。”零工崛起组织发表声明称,“这些企业花费数亿美元来制定他们自己的劳动法,即使我们的民选官员和公共机构已经无数次地拒绝了这些法律。对于我们的政府体系和广大劳动人民来说,这是一次重大挫败。”

D.A. Davidson公司的怀特指出,尽管这项决议为企业带来了一丝慰藉,但它仍有可能推高消费者的乘车成本。他说,为了支付其加州工人的新福利,这些零工公司很可能不得不将部分成本转嫁给客户。然而,它也可能为其他考虑对零工公司实施类似新法律的州提供一个路线图。如此一来,在司机获得更多福利的州,乘客预计将支付更高的出行费用。

“随着时间的推移,我认为在对待零工经济工人方面,将出现更多的中间地带。”怀特说,“这些工人的身份认定,将介于《第5号议会法案》和我们过去认为的独立承包商之间。”

加州选民投票通过22号提案,帮助优步和Lyft摆脱了他们在加州法院面临的棘手局面。今年8月,在《第5号议会法案》正式实施,而优步和Lyft仍然没有将其司机重新归类为雇员之后,一位加州高等法院法官批准了一项初步禁令。上个月,两家公司的上诉失败,并被给予约60天的时间要求加州最高法院进行复审。

两家公司此前声称,如果22号提案没有通过,他们将不得不削减“数千个”工作岗位,并永久关闭许多地区的服务,以避免把工人视为领薪员工所带来的高昂成本。但批评人士表示,长期以来,这些零工公司对工人的补偿极其不公,而22号提案只会允许这种情况继续下去。(财富中文网)

译者:任文科

California voters have spoken: Gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash will be allowed to continue classifying their workers as independent contractors by providing them with a few additional benefits.

The ballot initiative called Prop 22 passed, with 58% of the 6.3 million votes counted by 2:40 p.m. ET supporting the measure. The initiative exempts these companies from a recent state law that would require the companies classify their workers as employees. Instead, Prop 22 will guarantee gig workers a minimum hourly wage, new health benefits for workers who log a minimum of 15 hours, and medical and disability coverage for injuries and illnesses on the job—benefits that will be new to many gig workers but still short of what they would receive as employees.

“The gig economy companies will be breathing a sigh of relief tonight,” said Tom White, analyst at D.A. Davidson. "The gig economy companies realize there needs to be more of a middle ground, so they’ll be stepping up."

Prop 22, which was funded and developed by the companies that benefit from gig workers, was posed as an alternative to Assembly Bill 5, a bill that was signed into law and took effect in January, making it harder for some companies to classify their workers as independent contractors versus employees. The decision maps a less costly course for gig companies, whose business models were recently threatened by AB 5.

Following the results, Uber sent an email to its drivers suggesting that "the future of independent work is more secure" now that the measure has passed. The Yes on 22 campaign, supported by the gig companies, also lauded the win.

“Prop 22 was successful because it represented the best interests and preferences of hundreds of thousands of app-based drivers across the state," reads a statement from the campaign. "Tonight’s victory clearly indicates this solution was preferred by a majority of drivers, customers, and voters, and a model for preserving the flexibility app-based rideshare and delivery drivers need and want."

But critics, including a group of drivers advocating for workers’ rights called Gig Workers Rising, argue that the proposition doesn’t do enough for drivers and delivery people. The group previously called Prop 22 a "corporate power grab" keeping workers from healthcare, fair wages, and workers compensation.

"The victory of Prop 22, the most expensive ballot measure in U.S. history, is a loss for our democracy that could open the door to other attempts by corporations to write their own laws," a statement from Gig Workers Rising reads. "When corporations spend hundreds of millions of dollars to write their own labor laws even after our elected officials and public institutions have, numerous times, rejected them, that is a loss for our system of government and working people."

White of D.A. Davidson said that though the decision provides some welcome relief to companies, it will still likely drive up the costs of riders’ fares. In order to cover the new benefits of their California employees, the companies will likely have to pass on some of the costs to customers, he said. However, it could also provide a roadmap for other states that may have considered imposing similar new laws on the gig companies. If that happens, riders can expect higher prices in states where drivers get more benefits.

“Over time, I think it’s inevitable that you are going to see more of a middle ground treatment of gig economy workers,” White said. “Somewhere that falls between AB 5 and what we historically think as an independent contractor.”

The vote in favor of Prop 22 removes Uber and Lyft from a sticky situation they were facing in the California courts. In August, a California Superior Court Judge granted a preliminary injunction after Uber and Lyft did not reclassify their drivers following the implementation of AB 5. Then last month, the companies lost their appeal and were given about 60 days to request a review from the California Supreme Court.

The companies previously argued that if Prop 22 hadn’t passed, they would’ve had to eliminate “thousands” of jobs and permanently shut down service in many areas to account for the higher costs associated with paying employees. But critics say that for far too long, the companies have unfairly compensated their workers and that Prop 22 only allows that to continue.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开