首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

成功人士最大的共同点是什么?天赋是次要的

Dave Smith
2025-10-17

达克沃斯解释说:“无论他们取得的是什么成就,成功人士的共同点在于一种特殊的品质:对长期目标的激情与毅力。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

2012年9月24日,安杰拉·达克沃斯在纽约公共图书馆举行的NBC新闻“教育国家峰会”上发言。图片来源:Charles Sykes—NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal/Getty Images

经过多年对不同领域杰出人士的研究,顶尖心理学家安杰拉·达克沃斯确定了被她称为最可靠的成功预测因素,这对认为天赋和智力才是成功关键的传统观念构成了挑战。在周一发布的播客节目录制中,拥有460万YouTube订阅者的作家梅尔·罗宾斯就这项研究成果采访了达克沃斯。

达克沃斯解释说:“无论他们取得的是什么成就,成功人士的共同点在于一种特殊的组合:对长期目标的激情与毅力。简而言之,就是他们的‘坚毅’。”

作为宾夕法尼亚大学(University of Pennsylvania)教授和麦克阿瑟天才奖(MacArthur Fellow)得主,达克沃斯将坚毅定义为两个随时间推移而相互作用、相互关联的组成部分。她说道:“就是这两个部分,对吧?对长期目标的激情,比如热爱某事并始终保持热爱,而不是经常更换目标。他们始终有一个目标,如‘北极星’般指引着他们前进。”

达克沃斯认为,毅力同样至关重要。“一方面是要付出努力,对吧?一方面你需要练习尚未掌握的技能,另一方面要有韧性。所以,所谓毅力的部分含义在于:在极其糟糕的日子里,你能否重新振作起来?”

研究表明,对孩子或西点军校学员而言,坚毅是最重要的因素

达克沃斯自2007年开始的研究提出了一个观点:坚毅品质优于传统的成功预测指标。她对美国军事学院(U.S. Military Academy)[西点军校(West Point)]超过11,000名学员进行了多年研究,在入学时测量他们的"坚毅得分",并追踪他们在以极其艰苦著称的“野兽营”训练计划中的表现。

结果令人震惊:坚毅成为预测哪些学员能完成这项为期六周的高强度训练的最有力指标,其预测效果超过了SAT成绩、高中平均绩点、体能测试,甚至超过了西点军校的综合“候选人总评分”。尽管通常有3%的新学员会在“野兽营”中途退出,但坚毅得分较高的学员坚持到底的可能性明显更大。

军校的传统指标未能反映出最关键的因素:在面对极端挑战时坚持下去的能力。

达克沃斯对全美拼字比赛(National Spelling Bee)选手的研究中也发现了类似规律。坚毅得分较高的孩子更有可能进入比赛后期阶段,这与其智力水平无关。研究显示,这些“坚毅型”选手更频繁地进行研究人员所说的“刻意练习”:即独自进行艰苦、往往不愉快的单词背诵与学习,而不是选择更轻松的方式,比如由他人出题测验。

努力的方程式

达克沃斯的研究揭示了坚毅与传统能力指标之间一种出人意料的关系。她在播客中对罗宾斯表示:“我认为,任何心理学家告诉你值得拥有的品质,在某种程度上都是可控的。我并不是说基因不会发挥作用,因为每位心理学家都会告诉你,基因在任何事情中都扮演一定角色——坚毅也不例外。但你知道,我们有多坚毅,很大程度上取决于我们的知识、所处的圈子和所处的环境。”

在一项研究中,达克沃斯发现智力较高的学生实际上比智力测试得分较低的同龄人更缺乏坚毅这种品质。这一发现表明,那些并非天赋异禀的人往往能通过更加努力和更坚定的决心来弥补这一差距,而他们的努力最终会获得回报。在一所常春藤盟校,取得最高平均绩点的是最坚毅的学生,而非最聪明的学生。

达克沃斯认为,在成就的方程式中,“努力会出现两次”。她的公式如下:天赋 × 努力 = 技能,技能 × 努力 = 成就。

她在2017年接受《福布斯》杂志采访时表示:“天赋是指当你投入努力时技能提升的速度。成就是指当你运用所掌握的技能时所取得的结果。”

重要提醒:坚毅并非万能

达克沃斯的研究对教育政策讨论和军事训练项目产生了影响,尽管她对这一特质所起作用的看法已有所改变。2018年,她在接受EdSurge采访时承认:“当我们谈论孩子们成长为幸福、健康、并能造福他人的成年人所需的品质时,这个清单很长。坚毅是其中一种品质,但并非唯一的品质。”

近期的研究既支持又完善了达克沃斯的发现。2019年一项关于西点军校学员的研究(达克沃斯亦为合著者)发现,尽管坚毅仍是毕业的重要预测指标,但认知能力才是预测学业和军事表现的最强指标。其他研究则质疑,坚毅是否在既有的人格特质(如责任心)之外,能带来显著的预测作用。

尽管学术界对坚毅作为独立概念的独特性仍有争论,但核心见解依然具有吸引力:持续的努力与对长期目标的投入,往往比天赋本身更为重要。正如达克沃斯在2017年所说的那样:“我们的潜力是一回事,如何运用它则是另一回事。”(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

经过多年对不同领域杰出人士的研究,顶尖心理学家安杰拉·达克沃斯确定了被她称为最可靠的成功预测因素,这对认为天赋和智力才是成功关键的传统观念构成了挑战。在周一发布的播客节目录制中,拥有460万YouTube订阅者的作家梅尔·罗宾斯就这项研究成果采访了达克沃斯。

达克沃斯解释说:“无论他们取得的是什么成就,成功人士的共同点在于一种特殊的组合:对长期目标的激情与毅力。简而言之,就是他们的‘坚毅’。”

作为宾夕法尼亚大学(University of Pennsylvania)教授和麦克阿瑟天才奖(MacArthur Fellow)得主,达克沃斯将坚毅定义为两个随时间推移而相互作用、相互关联的组成部分。她说道:“就是这两个部分,对吧?对长期目标的激情,比如热爱某事并始终保持热爱,而不是经常更换目标。他们始终有一个目标,如‘北极星’般指引着他们前进。”

达克沃斯认为,毅力同样至关重要。“一方面是要付出努力,对吧?一方面你需要练习尚未掌握的技能,另一方面要有韧性。所以,所谓毅力的部分含义在于:在极其糟糕的日子里,你能否重新振作起来?”

研究表明,对孩子或西点军校学员而言,坚毅是最重要的因素

达克沃斯自2007年开始的研究提出了一个观点:坚毅品质优于传统的成功预测指标。她对美国军事学院(U.S. Military Academy)[西点军校(West Point)]超过11,000名学员进行了多年研究,在入学时测量他们的"坚毅得分",并追踪他们在以极其艰苦著称的“野兽营”训练计划中的表现。

结果令人震惊:坚毅成为预测哪些学员能完成这项为期六周的高强度训练的最有力指标,其预测效果超过了SAT成绩、高中平均绩点、体能测试,甚至超过了西点军校的综合“候选人总评分”。尽管通常有3%的新学员会在“野兽营”中途退出,但坚毅得分较高的学员坚持到底的可能性明显更大。

军校的传统指标未能反映出最关键的因素:在面对极端挑战时坚持下去的能力。

达克沃斯对全美拼字比赛(National Spelling Bee)选手的研究中也发现了类似规律。坚毅得分较高的孩子更有可能进入比赛后期阶段,这与其智力水平无关。研究显示,这些“坚毅型”选手更频繁地进行研究人员所说的“刻意练习”:即独自进行艰苦、往往不愉快的单词背诵与学习,而不是选择更轻松的方式,比如由他人出题测验。

努力的方程式

达克沃斯的研究揭示了坚毅与传统能力指标之间一种出人意料的关系。她在播客中对罗宾斯表示:“我认为,任何心理学家告诉你值得拥有的品质,在某种程度上都是可控的。我并不是说基因不会发挥作用,因为每位心理学家都会告诉你,基因在任何事情中都扮演一定角色——坚毅也不例外。但你知道,我们有多坚毅,很大程度上取决于我们的知识、所处的圈子和所处的环境。”

在一项研究中,达克沃斯发现智力较高的学生实际上比智力测试得分较低的同龄人更缺乏坚毅这种品质。这一发现表明,那些并非天赋异禀的人往往能通过更加努力和更坚定的决心来弥补这一差距,而他们的努力最终会获得回报。在一所常春藤盟校,取得最高平均绩点的是最坚毅的学生,而非最聪明的学生。

达克沃斯认为,在成就的方程式中,“努力会出现两次”。她的公式如下:天赋 × 努力 = 技能,技能 × 努力 = 成就。

她在2017年接受《福布斯》杂志采访时表示:“天赋是指当你投入努力时技能提升的速度。成就是指当你运用所掌握的技能时所取得的结果。”

重要提醒:坚毅并非万能

达克沃斯的研究对教育政策讨论和军事训练项目产生了影响,尽管她对这一特质所起作用的看法已有所改变。2018年,她在接受EdSurge采访时承认:“当我们谈论孩子们成长为幸福、健康、并能造福他人的成年人所需的品质时,这个清单很长。坚毅是其中一种品质,但并非唯一的品质。”

近期的研究既支持又完善了达克沃斯的发现。2019年一项关于西点军校学员的研究(达克沃斯亦为合著者)发现,尽管坚毅仍是毕业的重要预测指标,但认知能力才是预测学业和军事表现的最强指标。其他研究则质疑,坚毅是否在既有的人格特质(如责任心)之外,能带来显著的预测作用。

尽管学术界对坚毅作为独立概念的独特性仍有争论,但核心见解依然具有吸引力:持续的努力与对长期目标的投入,往往比天赋本身更为重要。正如达克沃斯在2017年所说的那样:“我们的潜力是一回事,如何运用它则是另一回事。”(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

After years of studying high achievers across diverse fields, top psychologist Angela Duckworth has identified what she calls the most reliable predictor of success—and it challenges conventional wisdom about talent and intelligence. Author Mel Robbins, who has 4.6 million subscribers on YouTube, recently asked Duckworth about her findings during a recording of her podcast, released Monday.

“The common denominator of high achievers, no matter what they’re achieving, is this special combination of passion and perseverance for really long-term goals,” Duckworth explains. “And in a word, it’s grit.”

Duckworth, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and MacArthur Fellow, defines grit as two interconnected components that work together over time. “It’s these two parts, right? Passion for long-term goals, like loving something and staying in love with it. Not kind of wandering off and doing something else, and then something else again, and then something else again, but having a kind of North Star,” she said.

The perseverance component is equally crucial, according to Duckworth. “Partly, it’s hard work, right? Partly it’s practicing what you can’t yet do, and partly it’s resilience. So part of perseverance is, on the really bad days, do you get up again?”

In children or West Point cadets, research shows grit matters most

Duckworth’s research, which dates back to 2007, has pushed the idea that grit outperforms traditional predictors of success. She studied over 11,000 cadets across multiple years at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, measuring their “grit scores” upon entry and tracking their performance through the notoriously difficult “Beast Barracks” training program.

The results were striking: Grit proved to be the strongest predictor of which cadets would complete the grueling six-week program, outperforming SAT scores, high school GPA, physical fitness assessments, and even West Point’s comprehensive “Whole Candidate Score.” While 3% of new cadets typically leave during Beast Barracks, those with higher grit scores were significantly more likely to persist.

The academy’s traditional metrics failed to capture what mattered most: the ability to persist when facing extreme challenges.

Similar patterns emerged in Duckworth’s study of National Spelling Bee contestants. Children with higher grit scores were more likely to advance to later rounds of competition, regardless of their measured intelligence. The research showed that gritty spellers engaged more frequently in what researchers call “deliberate practice”: the effortful, often unenjoyable work of studying and memorizing words alone, rather than more pleasant activities like being quizzed by others.

The effort equation

Duckworth’s research revealed a counterintuitive relationship between grit and traditional measures of ability. “I think that absolutely anything that any psychologist tells you is a good thing to have is partly under control,” she told Robbins during the podcast. “I am not saying there aren’t genes that are at play, because every psychologist will tell you that that’s also part of the story for everything—grit included. But you know, how gritty we are is very much a function of what we know, who we’re around, and the places we go.”

In one study, Duckworth found smarter students actually had less grit than their peers who scored lower on intelligence tests. This finding suggests that individuals who aren’t naturally gifted often compensate by working harder and with greater determination—and their effort pays off. At an Ivy League university, the grittiest students, not the smartest ones, achieved the highest GPAs.

Duckworth believes “effort counts twice” in the achievement equation. Her formula is as follows: Talent × Effort = Skill, and Skill × Effort = Achievement.

“Talent is how quickly your skills improve when you invest effort. Achievement is what happens when you take your acquired skills and use them,” she told Forbes in 2017.

An important caveat: Grit isn’t everything

Duckworth’s work has influenced educational policy discussions and military training programs, though she has evolved her thinking about the trait’s role. In 2018, she acknowledged during an interview with EdSurge that “when we are talking about what kids need to grow up and live lives that are happy and healthy and good for other people, it’s a long list of things. Grit is on that list, but it is not the only thing on the list.”

Recent studies have both supported and refined Duckworth’s findings. A 2019 study of West Point cadets, which Duckworth also contributed to, found that while grit remained a significant predictor of graduation, cognitive ability was the strongest predictor of academic and military performance. Other research has questioned whether grit adds substantial predictive power beyond established personality traits like conscientiousness.

Despite ongoing scholarly debate about grit’s uniqueness as a construct, the core insight remains compelling: Sustained effort and commitment to long-term goals often matter more than natural ability alone. As Duckworth put it back in 2017, “Our potential is one thing. What we do with it is quite another.”

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开