首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

这个欧洲小国悄然转向四天工作制

Emma Burleigh
2025-09-01

荷兰员工每周只工作四天,而陷于“拼命工作模式”的美国员工平均每周工作时长高达43小时。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

图片来源:lechatnoir / Getty Images

• 在美国,员工仍然采用混合办公模式以保持一定的灵活性;而在荷兰,职场人士则悄然告别了每周五天工作制,2024年的平均工作时长仅为32.1小时。这一变化主要得益于女性的推动。这种新的工作标准有助于留住劳动力,而在美国,随着重返办公室的要求增加,大量女性已选择退出职场。

自疫情以来,美国员工尽可能坚持采用远程办公模式,而企业高管们则一直试图让员工重返办公室。许多人享受弹性工作时间带来的自由,有人甚至呼吁实行四天工作制,但在这个欧洲小国,这一梦想早已成为现实。

欧盟统计局的数据显示,2024年,荷兰20岁至64岁员工的平均每周工作时长仅为 32.1小时,是欧洲短工时最普遍的国家。紧随其后的是奥地利、德国和丹麦,这些国家的平均工作时长均为34小时左右。

相比之下,根据盖洛普民意调查,2024 年美国全职员工的平均每周工作时长为42.9 小时,略低于2019 年的44.1小时。而欧盟统计局的数据也显示,不仅是北美在延续“拼命工作文化”,去年欧盟超过三分之一的就业人口每周的工作时长接近40至45小时。

职场女性助力荷兰迈向32小时工作周

荷兰能悄然转向四天工作制,背后主要推动力是女性。自女性大规模进入职场以来,工作方式发生了根本性的变化。

和世界上许多其他国家一样,荷兰过去也实行以男性为中心的工作模式,男性被视为家庭经济支柱。当时工作时长更长,更接近美国传统的40小时工作制。但自20世纪 80年代起,女性开始以兼职形式进入劳动力市场。

在此后的几十年里,女性的职场参与改变了家庭的收入结构和国家的税收制度。荷兰逐步形成了“一人全职、一人兼职的‘一又二分之一收入模式’”,即一方全职工作,另一方兼职工作。这一趋势得到了税收减免和福利政策的支持,最终成为一种所有员工(无论性别)普遍接受的工作常态。即便是有工作的父亲们,也充分利用这种模式,早早结束工作去照顾年幼的孩子。

缩短工作时间或能缓解失业问题——美国职场女性尤为需要

如今,这一政策转变不仅有助于需要兼顾照料家庭责任的职场父母,也助于维持劳动力的稳定,而其他国家则面临着失业率高企的问题。

世界银行的数据显示,1991年,正值越来越多女性在荷兰选择兼职工作之际,该国失业率高达7.3%。然而仅十年后,这一数字便大幅下降,全国失业人口仅占2.1%。此后虽有波动,但自2018年以来,失业率始终维持在低位,目前仅为3.6%。由于荷兰公民拥有更灵活的工作周安排,更多公民能够在兼顾个人责任的同时留在劳动力市场。

相比之下,美国劳工统计局的数据显示,2024年7月,美国失业率为4.2%。但考虑到美国人口超过3.42亿,而荷兰仅有1780万人,0.6%的失业率差距意味着数以百万计的美国人处于失业状态。而在美国,女性是最有可能面临失业风险的群体之一。

无论是重返办公室的政策反复、晋升机会的减少,又或是社会环境的变化,大量女性被迫退出职场。美国劳工统计局的分析显示,今年1月至6月间,20岁及以上的女性中有21.2万人离开了劳动力市场;与此同时,有4.4万名男性进入职场。在这六个月内,25至44岁、家中有五岁以下子女的女性的就业率从69.7%降至66.9%。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

• 在美国,员工仍然采用混合办公模式以保持一定的灵活性;而在荷兰,职场人士则悄然告别了每周五天工作制,2024年的平均工作时长仅为32.1小时。这一变化主要得益于女性的推动。这种新的工作标准有助于留住劳动力,而在美国,随着重返办公室的要求增加,大量女性已选择退出职场。

自疫情以来,美国员工尽可能坚持采用远程办公模式,而企业高管们则一直试图让员工重返办公室。许多人享受弹性工作时间带来的自由,有人甚至呼吁实行四天工作制,但在这个欧洲小国,这一梦想早已成为现实。

欧盟统计局的数据显示,2024年,荷兰20岁至64岁员工的平均每周工作时长仅为 32.1小时,是欧洲短工时最普遍的国家。紧随其后的是奥地利、德国和丹麦,这些国家的平均工作时长均为34小时左右。

相比之下,根据盖洛普民意调查,2024 年美国全职员工的平均每周工作时长为42.9 小时,略低于2019 年的44.1小时。而欧盟统计局的数据也显示,不仅是北美在延续“拼命工作文化”,去年欧盟超过三分之一的就业人口每周的工作时长接近40至45小时。

职场女性助力荷兰迈向32小时工作周

荷兰能悄然转向四天工作制,背后主要推动力是女性。自女性大规模进入职场以来,工作方式发生了根本性的变化。

和世界上许多其他国家一样,荷兰过去也实行以男性为中心的工作模式,男性被视为家庭经济支柱。当时工作时长更长,更接近美国传统的40小时工作制。但自20世纪 80年代起,女性开始以兼职形式进入劳动力市场。

在此后的几十年里,女性的职场参与改变了家庭的收入结构和国家的税收制度。荷兰逐步形成了“一人全职、一人兼职的‘一又二分之一收入模式’”,即一方全职工作,另一方兼职工作。这一趋势得到了税收减免和福利政策的支持,最终成为一种所有员工(无论性别)普遍接受的工作常态。即便是有工作的父亲们,也充分利用这种模式,早早结束工作去照顾年幼的孩子。

缩短工作时间或能缓解失业问题——美国职场女性尤为需要

如今,这一政策转变不仅有助于需要兼顾照料家庭责任的职场父母,也助于维持劳动力的稳定,而其他国家则面临着失业率高企的问题。

世界银行的数据显示,1991年,正值越来越多女性在荷兰选择兼职工作之际,该国失业率高达7.3%。然而仅十年后,这一数字便大幅下降,全国失业人口仅占2.1%。此后虽有波动,但自2018年以来,失业率始终维持在低位,目前仅为3.6%。由于荷兰公民拥有更灵活的工作周安排,更多公民能够在兼顾个人责任的同时留在劳动力市场。

相比之下,美国劳工统计局的数据显示,2024年7月,美国失业率为4.2%。但考虑到美国人口超过3.42亿,而荷兰仅有1780万人,0.6%的失业率差距意味着数以百万计的美国人处于失业状态。而在美国,女性是最有可能面临失业风险的群体之一。

无论是重返办公室的政策反复、晋升机会的减少,又或是社会环境的变化,大量女性被迫退出职场。美国劳工统计局的分析显示,今年1月至6月间,20岁及以上的女性中有21.2万人离开了劳动力市场;与此同时,有4.4万名男性进入职场。在这六个月内,25至44岁、家中有五岁以下子女的女性的就业率从69.7%降至66.9%。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

• While Americans cling to their hybrid schedules to have some flexibility with their jobs, workers in the Netherlands have quietly abandoned the five-day workweek, working an average of 32.1 hours in 2024. And the country’s staffers have women to thank for the change. The new work standard could help keep people in the labor force, as working women in the U.S. have dropped out in droves amid RTO pushes.

Ever since the pandemic, American workers have clung to their remote schedules for as long as possible as CEOs drag their staffers back into the office. Loving the freedom that comes with flexible schedules, some have even pushed for four-day workweeks—but for one tiny European nation, that dream’s already a reality.

Workers in the Netherlands between the ages of 20 and 64 worked an average of 32.1 hours per week in 2024, according to data from Eurostat. The country has the highest rate of shorter workweeks in Europe, followed by Austria, Germany and Denmark, all with around 34-hour workweeks.

In contrast, Americans employed full-time worked an average of 42.9 hours weekly in 2024, according to a Gallup poll—and that’s actually an improvement from 2019, when U.S. staffers clocked in 44.1 hours weekly. And it’s not only North Americans putting on the grind, as over a third of employed people in the EU spent nearly 40 to 45 hours on the job weekly last year, according to the Eurostat data.

How women in the workforce helped shift the Netherlands to 32 hour workweeks

There’s a primary reason why the Dutch have quietly shifted to a four-day workweek: women. After their entrance into the workforce, things would never be the same.

Like many other nations around the world, the Netherlands used to operate on a male-centered working model that placed men as the breadwinners. The weeks were longer, more similar to America’s traditional 40-hour workweek—but then women started to join the labor force in part time roles starting in the 1980s.

Over the next few decades, women’s workforce participation would shift the family earning structure and the country’s tax codes. The Netherlands went on to adopt a “one-and-a-half” earning model, where one parent worked full-time and the other part-time. The trending system was bolstered with tax breaks and benefits, and the working pattern became a standard among employees of all genders. Even working dads were taking advantage of the new structure, peeling out of work early to care for their young children.

Shorter workweeks could also combat unemployment—and America’s working women need it

Today, the policy change is not only helping employed parents juggling caretaking responsibilities—it’s also keeping people in the labor force, as other countries struggle with unemployment rates.

In 1991, just as more women were taking on part-time roles in the Netherlands, the country’s unemployment rate stood at 7.3%, according to data from The World Bank. Only a decade later, that number shot down dramatically—only 2.1% of the country’s population was jobless. While there have been fluctuations in the years since, the unemployment rate has remained steadily low since 2018, currently resting at just 3.6%. Since its citizens have more flexible workweek options, more are able to stay in the labor force while juggling their personal responsibilities.

Comparatively, the U.S.’s unemployment rate stood at just 4.2% in July, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But with the U.S.’s population encompassing more than 342 million people, compared to the Netherlands with just 17.8 million citizens, the 0.6% difference in unemployment rates represents millions and millions more Americans out of work. And there’s one group of people who may be most at risk of being unemployed in the U.S.: women.

Whether it be the pendulum swing back to RTO, dwindling promotions, or a changing social landscape, women are being pushed out of the workforce in droves: Between January and June this year, 212,000 women aged 20 and older have left the American workforce, according to a BLS analysis. Meanwhile, 44,000 men entered the labor force in that same time period. In that six-month span, the employment rate of women ages 25 to 44 living with a child under five fell from 69.7% to 66.9%.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开