
美国看上去并不像一个陷入财政困境的国家,这恰恰是问题所在。
过去五年,标准普尔500指数(S&P 500)的涨幅超过一倍,失业率降至数十年来的低点,社会保障金仍然照常发放。
然而,这些表象之下,或许潜藏着更深层次的脆弱性。中东局势日益紧张(美伊冲突升级),这提醒我们经济形势可能骤然生变。一旦全球石油供应中断,能源价格或将飙升,进而再度引发通胀并推高利率。对于一个已经背负超过38万亿美元债务、债务利息支出甚至超过国防开支的国家而言,此类冲击会给联邦财政带来更大的压力。
潜在趋势已经令人深感忧虑。美国国债正在攀升至和平时期前所未有的高位,预计未来十年内,联邦债务占到国内生产总值(GDP)的比重将升至约120%。这意味着联邦政府的债务将超过美国全年经济总产出。
这一趋势不会在一夜之间触发警报。正如欧内斯特·海明威所写,破产“开始是每况愈下,接着便是一泻千里”。财政衰败亦是如此。
成立两党财政委员会,能够为议员提供一个制度化的、具备公信力的议事平台,使各方将所有议题摆上台面,制定改革方案,从而在财政渐进式恶化演变为真正危机之前,稳定国家财政根基。
美国国债已经超过38万亿美元,如今每年的债务利息支出已经超过军费开支。社会保障(Social Security)和联邦医疗保险(Medicare)的核心信托基金,预计将在未来七年内耗尽。届时将触发福利支出自动削减,抑或是通过扩大财政赤字来填补这些项目的资金缺口。随着人口老龄化加剧、医疗成本上升及经济增速放缓,这些财政压力只会持续加码。
对于美国企业而言,这场迫在眉睫的债务危机,将带来切实的现实冲击。政府债务高企迫使联邦政府增加利息支出,进而挤占基础设施、教育、国防与社会福利等领域的公共投入。倘若投资者开始认为美国债务风险上升,利率可能进一步攀升,进而推高企业扩张、招聘和投资的借贷成本。
英国便是前车之鉴。2022年,时任英国首相的利兹·特拉斯宣布实施数十年来规模最大的减税计划,其资金主要依靠财政赤字支撑。此举引发金融市场动荡,英镑大幅贬值,甚至威胁到英国养老基金的偿付能力。短短几周内,首相和财政大臣便被迫辞职。美国经济体量更大,且美元拥有储备货币地位,但市场信心在逐渐丧失后一朝崩塌的动态变化,与英国的情况并无二致。
在国会设立两党财政委员会以应对债务危机,虽然无法一夜之间解决问题,但可以打破两党僵局,推动两党携手探寻解决方案,赋予改革方案两党共同背书的公信力,同时提升公众认知、赢得公众支持。这一机制既能够为改革赋予两党共同背书的公信力,也可以筑牢民意基础,推动国会采取行动。
该委员会应该设定三大核心战略目标:改善联邦政府的长期财政状况、将预期的债务与国内生产总值之比控制在更可持续的水平(例如100%),以及解决社会保障与联邦医疗保险信托基金的长期偿付能力问题。
委员会若要取得成功,就必须将所有相关议题摆上台面。委员会应该对联邦政府所有的财政支出与收入来源,进行一次自上而下的全面审查。为避免政治推进动力流失,设立委员会的相关法案需要设定严格的时间表,并承诺在众议院和参议院进行投票表决。法案通过后,国会应该建立强有力的执行机制,以确保后续财政决策不偏离新的财政轨道。
美国民众必须认清其中的利害关系。有必要发起一场全民教育活动,阐释财政危机的严峻性,广泛征集公众意见,凝聚推动国会采取行动的政治共识。这项工作尤其应该聚焦受债务危机影响最大的群体——年轻一代、低收入群体,以及三明治一代。
美国的债务危机已然来临。组建两党财政委员会,制定系统性方案化解国家债务困境、推动国会采取行动,已经是当务之急。唯有如此,我们才能为子孙后代守护国家的繁荣。
大卫·K·杨(David K. Young)担任经济发展委员会(Committee for Economic Development)主席,该委员会是美国经济咨商局(The Conference Board)下设的公共政策研究中心。
大卫曾经担任全球顶尖地缘政治与宏观经济分析咨询机构牛津分析(Oxford Analytica)的首席执行官。在加入牛津分析之前,他曾经在源讯公司(Atos)担任管理顾问。
Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
美国看上去并不像一个陷入财政困境的国家,这恰恰是问题所在。
过去五年,标准普尔500指数(S&P 500)的涨幅超过一倍,失业率降至数十年来的低点,社会保障金仍然照常发放。
然而,这些表象之下,或许潜藏着更深层次的脆弱性。中东局势日益紧张(美伊冲突升级),这提醒我们经济形势可能骤然生变。一旦全球石油供应中断,能源价格或将飙升,进而再度引发通胀并推高利率。对于一个已经背负超过38万亿美元债务、债务利息支出甚至超过国防开支的国家而言,此类冲击会给联邦财政带来更大的压力。
潜在趋势已经令人深感忧虑。美国国债正在攀升至和平时期前所未有的高位,预计未来十年内,联邦债务占到国内生产总值(GDP)的比重将升至约120%。这意味着联邦政府的债务将超过美国全年经济总产出。
这一趋势不会在一夜之间触发警报。正如欧内斯特·海明威所写,破产“开始是每况愈下,接着便是一泻千里”。财政衰败亦是如此。
成立两党财政委员会,能够为议员提供一个制度化的、具备公信力的议事平台,使各方将所有议题摆上台面,制定改革方案,从而在财政渐进式恶化演变为真正危机之前,稳定国家财政根基。
美国国债已经超过38万亿美元,如今每年的债务利息支出已经超过军费开支。社会保障(Social Security)和联邦医疗保险(Medicare)的核心信托基金,预计将在未来七年内耗尽。届时将触发福利支出自动削减,抑或是通过扩大财政赤字来填补这些项目的资金缺口。随着人口老龄化加剧、医疗成本上升及经济增速放缓,这些财政压力只会持续加码。
对于美国企业而言,这场迫在眉睫的债务危机,将带来切实的现实冲击。政府债务高企迫使联邦政府增加利息支出,进而挤占基础设施、教育、国防与社会福利等领域的公共投入。倘若投资者开始认为美国债务风险上升,利率可能进一步攀升,进而推高企业扩张、招聘和投资的借贷成本。
英国便是前车之鉴。2022年,时任英国首相的利兹·特拉斯宣布实施数十年来规模最大的减税计划,其资金主要依靠财政赤字支撑。此举引发金融市场动荡,英镑大幅贬值,甚至威胁到英国养老基金的偿付能力。短短几周内,首相和财政大臣便被迫辞职。美国经济体量更大,且美元拥有储备货币地位,但市场信心在逐渐丧失后一朝崩塌的动态变化,与英国的情况并无二致。
在国会设立两党财政委员会以应对债务危机,虽然无法一夜之间解决问题,但可以打破两党僵局,推动两党携手探寻解决方案,赋予改革方案两党共同背书的公信力,同时提升公众认知、赢得公众支持。这一机制既能够为改革赋予两党共同背书的公信力,也可以筑牢民意基础,推动国会采取行动。
该委员会应该设定三大核心战略目标:改善联邦政府的长期财政状况、将预期的债务与国内生产总值之比控制在更可持续的水平(例如100%),以及解决社会保障与联邦医疗保险信托基金的长期偿付能力问题。
委员会若要取得成功,就必须将所有相关议题摆上台面。委员会应该对联邦政府所有的财政支出与收入来源,进行一次自上而下的全面审查。为避免政治推进动力流失,设立委员会的相关法案需要设定严格的时间表,并承诺在众议院和参议院进行投票表决。法案通过后,国会应该建立强有力的执行机制,以确保后续财政决策不偏离新的财政轨道。
美国民众必须认清其中的利害关系。有必要发起一场全民教育活动,阐释财政危机的严峻性,广泛征集公众意见,凝聚推动国会采取行动的政治共识。这项工作尤其应该聚焦受债务危机影响最大的群体——年轻一代、低收入群体,以及三明治一代。
美国的债务危机已然来临。组建两党财政委员会,制定系统性方案化解国家债务困境、推动国会采取行动,已经是当务之急。唯有如此,我们才能为子孙后代守护国家的繁荣。
大卫·K·杨(David K. Young)担任经济发展委员会(Committee for Economic Development)主席,该委员会是美国经济咨商局(The Conference Board)下设的公共政策研究中心。
大卫曾经担任全球顶尖地缘政治与宏观经济分析咨询机构牛津分析(Oxford Analytica)的首席执行官。在加入牛津分析之前,他曾经在源讯公司(Atos)担任管理顾问。
Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
America does not look like a nation in fiscal distress—and that’s exactly the problem.
The S&P 500 has more than doubled in the past five years. Unemployment is at a multi-decade low. Social Security checks are going out.
But moments like these can hide deeper vulnerabilities. Rising tensions in the Middle East, including the conflict with Iran, are a reminder of how quickly economic conditions can shift. A disruption to global oil supplies could send energy prices higher, reigniting inflation and pushing interest rates upward. For a country already carrying more than $38 trillion in debt and spending more on interest than on national defense, that kind of shock would put even greater strain on federal finances.
And the underlying trend is already troubling. The national debt is on track to reach levels never seen outside of wartime—projected to climb to roughly 120% of GDP within the next decade. That means that the federal government would owe more than the entire annual output of the US economy.
That trajectory will not trigger an alarm bell overnight. As Ernest Hemingway wrote, bankruptcy happens “gradually and then suddenly.” The same can be true of fiscal decline.
A bipartisan fiscal commission offers a structured, credible forum for lawmakers to put everything on the table and produce a package of reforms capable of stabilizing the nation’s finances before gradual erosion becomes genuine crisis.
The US has over $38 trillion of national debt. We now spend more annually on interest than on the military. The primary trust funds for Social Security and Medicare are also projected to become insolvent within the next seven years, requiring an automatic benefit cut or even more deficit spending to backfill these programs. These pressures will intensify as the population ages, health care costs rise, and economic growth slows.
For American businesses, the looming debt crisis carries tangible, real-world consequences. High levels of government debt require the federal government to spend more on interest payments, leaving fewer resources available for infrastructure, education, national defense, and social programs. If investors begin to view US debt as riskier, interest rates could rise further, increasing borrowing costs for expansion, hiring, and investment.
The U.K. offered a preview. In 2022, Prime Minister Liz Truss announced some of the largest tax cuts in decades primarily financed via deficit spending, financial markets were rattled, causing precipitous declines in the value of the pound and threatening the solvency of British pension funds. Within weeks, the prime minister and the country’s finance head were forced to resign. The U.S. economy is larger and the dollar holds reserve currency status—but the dynamic of confidence lost suddenly after building gradually is the same.
Establishing a bipartisan fiscal commission in Congress to address the debt crisis would not solve the problem overnight, but it could break partisan logjams, focus both political parties on finding a solution, bring bipartisan credibility to reforms, and encourage public awareness and support. It would bring bipartisan credibility to reforms and build the public mandate needed for Congress to act.
The commission’s three primary strategic objectives should be to improve the long-term fiscal condition of the federal government, hold the expected debt-to-GDP ratio to a more sustainable level (such as 100%), and address the long-term solvency of the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds.
For a commission to be successful, everything must be on the table. The commission should undertake a top-to-bottom review of all federal spending and revenue sources. To avoid losing political momentum, the law establishing the commission should include strict timelines and commitments for votes on the House and Senate floor. Following enactment, Congress should adopt strong enforcement mechanisms for future fiscal decisions to avoid altering the new fiscal trajectory.
The American people must understand the stakes. A public education campaign should explain the fiscal crisis, invite broad input, and build the political will needed for Congress to act. This effort should focus especially on groups most vulnerable to a debt crisis—younger generations, low-income communities, and the “sandwich” generation.
The U.S. debt crisis is already here. Forming a bipartisan fiscal commission is an immediate first step in developing a comprehensive plan to address the national debt and forcing action in Congress. Only then can we preserve our national prosperity for future generations.
David K. Young is President of the Committee for Economic Development, the public policy center of The Conference Board (CED).
Previously, David was CEO of Oxford Analytica, a leading geopolitical and macroeconomic analysis and advisory firm. Prior to his time at Oxford Analytica, David was a management consultant at Atos.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.