
2025年仅剩最后几周,并购交易的撮合者们正身处一场涉及千亿美元悬念的大戏之中。
派拉蒙天舞公司(Paramount Skydance Corp.)从奈飞公司(Netflix Inc.)眼皮底下抢走华纳兄弟探索公司的敌意收购企图,集中体现了造就这个并购丰收年的几大主题:对变革性联姻重燃渴望、华尔街开出巨额支票、中东资金持续流入,以及美国总统唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)同时扮演的搅局者与促成者双重角色。
彭博汇总数据显示,在更为友好的监管环境鼓舞下,企业竞相追逐超大规模的合并,推动今年全球并购交易总额增长约40%,达到约4.5万亿美元。这是有记录以来第二高的年度总额,并包含了史上最多交易价值在300亿美元及以上的大型交易。
高盛集团(Goldman Sachs Group Inc.)美洲区并购业务联席主管本·华莱士(Ben Wallace)表示:“董事会和首席执行官们普遍认为,当前是一个可能持续多年的机遇窗口,可以大胆构想。我们正处于降息周期的开端,因此预期流动性将进一步增加。”
除了奈飞收购华纳兄弟,今年的重磅交易还包括:联合太平洋公司(Union Pacific Corp.)以含债超过800亿美元的价格收购竞争对手铁路运营商诺福克南方公司(Norfolk Southern Corp.)、对视频游戏制造商艺电公司(Electronic Arts Inc.)创纪录的杠杆收购,以及英美资源集团(Anglo American Plc)为重塑全球矿业格局而收购泰克资源有限公司(Teck Resources Ltd.)。
凯易律师事务所(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)纽约办公室合伙人玛吉·弗洛雷斯(Maggie Flores)指出:“当你环顾四周,看到同行们借助顺风进行这些大交易时,你也不想被落下。当前的监管环境非常有利于交易开展,人们正在利用这一点。”
同时,这一交易总额也显示出某些领域存在一定程度的狂热,令一些顾问和分析师担忧其不可持续。全球贸易紧张局势持续,市场观察人士日益警告,为并购复苏提供支撑的白热化股票市场可能出现抛售。
高盛、摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase & Co.)和摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)的高管均警示未来几个月存在市场回调风险,部分原因是对过热的人工智能生态系统的担忧——大量投资已推高了科技股股价。
摩根大通全球投行业务主席查理·杜普利(Charlie Dupree)表示:“这些股票回报确实来自于人工智能,而人工智能的支出是不可持续的。如果这方面支出收缩,那么你将看到更广泛的市场停滞不前。”
人工智能热潮催生了今年一些瞩目的交易。萨姆·奥尔特曼(Sam Altman)的OpenAI获得了来自软银集团(SoftBank Group Corp.)、英伟达(Nvidia Corp.)和华特迪士尼公司(Walt Disney Co.)等公司的主要投资;由贝莱德(BlackRock Inc.)旗下全球基础设施合作伙伴(Global Infrastructure Partners)牵头的财团同意以400亿美元收购Aligned Data Centers。今年3月,谷歌母公司Alphabet Inc.将其以320亿美元收购网络安全初创公司Wiz Inc.表述为在人工智能时代为客户提供新保障的一种方式。
摩根士丹利全球科技并购主管沃利·郑(Wally Cheng)表示:“现在每个人都需要成为人工智能领域的银行家。正如15年前软件开始‘吞噬’世界一样,如今人工智能正在‘吞噬’软件。你必须精通人工智能,并理解它将如何影响每一家公司。”
得益于公开和私募市场的一系列高额收购,更广泛的科技行业交易量已经创下年度纪录。这一趋势在夏季延伸至白宫,美国政府采取非常规举措,收购了英特尔公司(Intel Corp.)约10%的股份,旨在重振该公司并提振国内芯片制造。
这是特朗普在第二任期内有意模糊政府与产业的界限、并亲自介入并购交易的最明确迹象之一,尤其是在那些被视为使命关键的行业。他的政府还收购了稀土生产商MP Materials Corp.的股份,商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克(Howard Lutnick)也暗示将在国防领域进行类似交易。
特朗普还在另外一些高调交易中将自己定位为“造王者”。政府以获得美国钢铁公司(United States Steel Corp.)所谓“黄金股”作为批准其被日本新日铁(Nippon Steel Corp.)收购的条件,而总统最近也表示,他将反对任何不涉及CNN所有权变更的华纳兄弟收购案。
波士顿学院法学院教授布莱恩·奎因(Brian Quinn)表示:“与上一任期相比,特朗普政府目前对待并购监管的方式明显不同。”奎因说,他想不出15到20年前有哪个共和党人会认为美国政府“应该参与挑选赢家的业务”。
诚然,投行人士会想,若非年初那段混乱时期——特朗普的贸易战拖累市场导致交易暂停——他们在2025年本可以取得更多成果。全球宣布的交易数量持平,这表明持续的经济挑战仍在影响并购市场的某些部分。
麦肯锡公司(McKinsey & Co.)全球并购业务联席主管杰克·亨利(Jake Henry)表示,许多中小型公司表现落后于大盘,因此选择推行自己的战略计划,而不是考虑外部增长选项。
他说:“他们在想,‘我最好还是专心经营自己的业务,达成目标。’除非报价极具爆炸性,否则他们不会坐到谈判桌前。”
与此同时,作为并购关键晴雨表的私募股权公司,由于与买家存在估值差距,在处置某些资产时仍然面临更大困难。这对其筹集资金和进行新收购的能力产生了连锁反应。但随着利率下降,吸引了更多潜在收购方入场,投行人士也开始看到该领域的复苏迹象。
美国银行(Bank of America Corp.)全球金融赞助商业务主席萨巴·纳扎尔(Saba Nazar)表示:“最激励这些赞助方(指私募股权公司)的,莫过于他们需要向投资者返还现金。过去几个月我们一直处于竞标狂潮中。”
冲击纪录之路
交易撮合者们年初曾私下议论,在特朗普亲商政府的领导下,并购交易可能创下纪录。尽管2025年他们将与这一里程碑失之交臂,但华尔街普遍强烈感觉,年初的波折只是推迟了必然会发生的事情。
花旗集团(Citigroup Inc.)北美并购业务联席主管布莱恩·林克(Brian Link)表示,在四月的“解放日”之后,他原以为需要花更多时间弄清楚关税对不同业务的影响以及如何围绕其进行调整。
他说:“但情况并非如此。除非恐惧情绪重新蔓延市场,否则短期内似乎没有什么会改变这里的动态。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
2025年仅剩最后几周,并购交易的撮合者们正身处一场涉及千亿美元悬念的大戏之中。
派拉蒙天舞公司(Paramount Skydance Corp.)从奈飞公司(Netflix Inc.)眼皮底下抢走华纳兄弟探索公司的敌意收购企图,集中体现了造就这个并购丰收年的几大主题:对变革性联姻重燃渴望、华尔街开出巨额支票、中东资金持续流入,以及美国总统唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)同时扮演的搅局者与促成者双重角色。
彭博汇总数据显示,在更为友好的监管环境鼓舞下,企业竞相追逐超大规模的合并,推动今年全球并购交易总额增长约40%,达到约4.5万亿美元。这是有记录以来第二高的年度总额,并包含了史上最多交易价值在300亿美元及以上的大型交易。
高盛集团(Goldman Sachs Group Inc.)美洲区并购业务联席主管本·华莱士(Ben Wallace)表示:“董事会和首席执行官们普遍认为,当前是一个可能持续多年的机遇窗口,可以大胆构想。我们正处于降息周期的开端,因此预期流动性将进一步增加。”
除了奈飞收购华纳兄弟,今年的重磅交易还包括:联合太平洋公司(Union Pacific Corp.)以含债超过800亿美元的价格收购竞争对手铁路运营商诺福克南方公司(Norfolk Southern Corp.)、对视频游戏制造商艺电公司(Electronic Arts Inc.)创纪录的杠杆收购,以及英美资源集团(Anglo American Plc)为重塑全球矿业格局而收购泰克资源有限公司(Teck Resources Ltd.)。
凯易律师事务所(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)纽约办公室合伙人玛吉·弗洛雷斯(Maggie Flores)指出:“当你环顾四周,看到同行们借助顺风进行这些大交易时,你也不想被落下。当前的监管环境非常有利于交易开展,人们正在利用这一点。”
同时,这一交易总额也显示出某些领域存在一定程度的狂热,令一些顾问和分析师担忧其不可持续。全球贸易紧张局势持续,市场观察人士日益警告,为并购复苏提供支撑的白热化股票市场可能出现抛售。
高盛、摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase & Co.)和摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)的高管均警示未来几个月存在市场回调风险,部分原因是对过热的人工智能生态系统的担忧——大量投资已推高了科技股股价。
摩根大通全球投行业务主席查理·杜普利(Charlie Dupree)表示:“这些股票回报确实来自于人工智能,而人工智能的支出是不可持续的。如果这方面支出收缩,那么你将看到更广泛的市场停滞不前。”
人工智能热潮催生了今年一些瞩目的交易。萨姆·奥尔特曼(Sam Altman)的OpenAI获得了来自软银集团(SoftBank Group Corp.)、英伟达(Nvidia Corp.)和华特迪士尼公司(Walt Disney Co.)等公司的主要投资;由贝莱德(BlackRock Inc.)旗下全球基础设施合作伙伴(Global Infrastructure Partners)牵头的财团同意以400亿美元收购Aligned Data Centers。今年3月,谷歌母公司Alphabet Inc.将其以320亿美元收购网络安全初创公司Wiz Inc.表述为在人工智能时代为客户提供新保障的一种方式。
摩根士丹利全球科技并购主管沃利·郑(Wally Cheng)表示:“现在每个人都需要成为人工智能领域的银行家。正如15年前软件开始‘吞噬’世界一样,如今人工智能正在‘吞噬’软件。你必须精通人工智能,并理解它将如何影响每一家公司。”
得益于公开和私募市场的一系列高额收购,更广泛的科技行业交易量已经创下年度纪录。这一趋势在夏季延伸至白宫,美国政府采取非常规举措,收购了英特尔公司(Intel Corp.)约10%的股份,旨在重振该公司并提振国内芯片制造。
这是特朗普在第二任期内有意模糊政府与产业的界限、并亲自介入并购交易的最明确迹象之一,尤其是在那些被视为使命关键的行业。他的政府还收购了稀土生产商MP Materials Corp.的股份,商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克(Howard Lutnick)也暗示将在国防领域进行类似交易。
特朗普还在另外一些高调交易中将自己定位为“造王者”。政府以获得美国钢铁公司(United States Steel Corp.)所谓“黄金股”作为批准其被日本新日铁(Nippon Steel Corp.)收购的条件,而总统最近也表示,他将反对任何不涉及CNN所有权变更的华纳兄弟收购案。
波士顿学院法学院教授布莱恩·奎因(Brian Quinn)表示:“与上一任期相比,特朗普政府目前对待并购监管的方式明显不同。”奎因说,他想不出15到20年前有哪个共和党人会认为美国政府“应该参与挑选赢家的业务”。
诚然,投行人士会想,若非年初那段混乱时期——特朗普的贸易战拖累市场导致交易暂停——他们在2025年本可以取得更多成果。全球宣布的交易数量持平,这表明持续的经济挑战仍在影响并购市场的某些部分。
麦肯锡公司(McKinsey & Co.)全球并购业务联席主管杰克·亨利(Jake Henry)表示,许多中小型公司表现落后于大盘,因此选择推行自己的战略计划,而不是考虑外部增长选项。
他说:“他们在想,‘我最好还是专心经营自己的业务,达成目标。’除非报价极具爆炸性,否则他们不会坐到谈判桌前。”
与此同时,作为并购关键晴雨表的私募股权公司,由于与买家存在估值差距,在处置某些资产时仍然面临更大困难。这对其筹集资金和进行新收购的能力产生了连锁反应。但随着利率下降,吸引了更多潜在收购方入场,投行人士也开始看到该领域的复苏迹象。
美国银行(Bank of America Corp.)全球金融赞助商业务主席萨巴·纳扎尔(Saba Nazar)表示:“最激励这些赞助方(指私募股权公司)的,莫过于他们需要向投资者返还现金。过去几个月我们一直处于竞标狂潮中。”
冲击纪录之路
交易撮合者们年初曾私下议论,在特朗普亲商政府的领导下,并购交易可能创下纪录。尽管2025年他们将与这一里程碑失之交臂,但华尔街普遍强烈感觉,年初的波折只是推迟了必然会发生的事情。
花旗集团(Citigroup Inc.)北美并购业务联席主管布莱恩·林克(Brian Link)表示,在四月的“解放日”之后,他原以为需要花更多时间弄清楚关税对不同业务的影响以及如何围绕其进行调整。
他说:“但情况并非如此。除非恐惧情绪重新蔓延市场,否则短期内似乎没有什么会改变这里的动态。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
Dealmakers are heading into the final weeks of 2025 on a $100 billion cliffhanger.
Paramount Skydance Corp.’s hostile bid to snatch Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. from under the nose of Netflix Inc. encapsulates the themes that have shaped a banner year for mergers and acquisitions: renewed desire for transformative tie-ups, massive checks from Wall Street, the flow of Middle East money and US President Donald Trump’s role as both disruptor and dealmaker.
Global transaction values have risen around 40% to about $4.5 trillion this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show, as companies chase ultra-ambitious combinations, emboldened by friendlier regulators. That’s the second-highest tally on record and includes the biggest haul of deals valued at $30 billion or more.
“There’s a sentiment in boardrooms and among CEOs that this is a potential multi-year window where it’s possible to dream big,” said Ben Wallace, co-head of Americas M&A at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. “We’re at the beginning of a rate-cutting cycle so there’s anticipation that there will be more liquidity.”
Beyond Netflix’s purchase of Warner Bros., this year’s blockbusters include Union Pacific Corp.’s acquisition of rival railroad operator Norfolk Southern Corp. for more than $80 billion including debt, the record leveraged buyout of video game maker Electronic Arts Inc., and Anglo American Plc’s takeover of Teck Resources Ltd. to reshape global mining.
“When you look around and you see your peers doing these big deals and taking advantage of the tailwinds, you don’t want to be left out,” said Maggie Flores, partner at law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP in New York. “The regulatory environment is in a position that is very conducive to dealmaking and people are taking advantage of it.”
The tally also shows a level of exuberance in certain pockets that some advisers and analysts worry is unsustainable. Global trade tensions are ongoing, and market observers are increasingly warning of a selloff in the white-hot equity markets that have underpinned the M&A resurgence.
Top executives at Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley have all flagged the risk of a correction in the months ahead, in part tied to concerns about an overheated artificial intelligence ecosystem, where huge amounts of investment have juiced technology stocks.
“These equity returns are really coming out of AI, and AI spend is not sustainable,” said Charlie Dupree, global chair of investment banking at JPMorgan. “If that pulls back, then you are going to see a broader market that isn’t really advancing.”
The AI buzz led to some of the year’s standout transactions. Sam Altman’s OpenAI took in major investments from the likes of SoftBank Group Corp., Nvidia Corp. and Walt Disney Co., and a consortium led by BlackRock Inc.’s Global Infrastructure Partners agreed to pay $40 billion for Aligned Data Centers. In March, Google parent Alphabet Inc. framed its $32 billion acquisition of cybersecurity startup Wiz Inc. as a way to provide customers with new safeguards in the AI era.
“Everyone needs to be an AI banker now,” said Wally Cheng, head of global technology M&A at Morgan Stanley. “Just as software began eating the world 15 years ago, AI is now eating software. You have to be conversant in AI and understand how it will affect every company.”
The technology sector more broadly has already notched a record year for deals, thanks to a series of big-ticket takeovers across public and private markets. The trend extended to the White House over the summer, when the US government took a roughly 10% stake in Intel Corp. in an unconventional move aimed at reinvigorating the company and boosting domestic chip manufacturing.
It was one of the clearest indications of Trump’s willingness to blur the lines between state and industry and insert himself into M&A situations during his second term, particularly in sectors deemed mission critical. His administration also acquired a stake in rare-earth producer MP Materials Corp. and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has hinted at similar deals in the defense sector.
Trump has separately been positioning himself as kingmaker on high-profile transactions. The government secured a so-called golden share in United States Steel Corp. as a condition for approving its takeover by Japan’s Nippon Steel Corp., and the president recently signaled he’ll oppose any acquisition of Warner Bros. that doesn’t include new ownership of CNN.
“The Trump administration’s approach to merger regulation today is markedly different compared to the first time around,” said Brian Quinn, a professor at Boston College Law School. Quinn said he couldn’t think of a member of the Republican Party from 15 to 20 years ago who would now believe the US government “is involved in the business of picking winners.”
To be sure, bankers will be wondering if they could have achieved more in 2025 had it not been for the chaotic period earlier in the year, when deals were put on hold after Trump’s trade war hobbled markets. And in a sign that persistent economic challenges are still impacting some parts of M&A, the number of deals being announced globally remains flat.
Many small and mid-cap companies have lagged the broader stock market and are opting to pursue their own strategic plans instead of weighing inorganic options, according to Jake Henry, global co-leader of the M&A practice at consultancy McKinsey & Co.
“They’re thinking ‘I’m better off just operating my business and getting there.’ It has to be an explosive offer for them to come to the table,” he said.
Meanwhile, private equity firms, whose buying and selling is a key barometer for M&A, are still having a harder time offloading certain assets because of valuation gaps with buyers. This has had a knock-on effect on their ability to raise funds and spend on new acquisitions. But bankers are starting to see a recovery here too as interest rates come down and bring more potential acquirers to the table.
“What’s motivating sponsors more than anything is their need to return cash to investors,” said Saba Nazar, chair of global financial sponsors at Bank of America Corp. “We have been in bake-off frenzy for the last couple of months.”
Road to Record
Dealmakers began the year whispering of M&A records under Trump’s pro-business administration. While they will just miss out on the milestone in 2025, there is a strong sense on Wall Street that those early bumps only delayed the inevitable.
Brian Link, co-head of North America M&A at Citigroup Inc., said that after ‘Liberation Day’ in April, he expected to spend more time figuring out the impact of tariffs on different business and how to adjust around that.
“That has not been the case,” he said. “Unless fear creeps back into the market, there doesn’t seem to be anything in the near term that’s going to change the dynamic here.”