立即打开
获得大学文凭将不再是通往中产阶级的最佳途径,这或许是件好事

获得大学文凭将不再是通往中产阶级的最佳途径,这或许是件好事

LINDSAY DAUGHERTY 2022-04-10
大学学费的激增,加上劳动力市场的旺盛,使得人们对大学文凭的效用产生了怀疑。

琳赛·多尔蒂写道:“大学学费的激增,加上劳动力市场的旺盛,使得人们对大学文凭的效用产生了怀疑。”图片来源:GETTY IMAGES

数十年来,接受高等教育、获取学士学位始终被视为一块必要的敲门砖,在此基础之上,才能拿到足以让人迈入中产阶级或更高阶层的工资收益。然而,目前仍有超过一半的美国民众尚未获得,且很大几率不可能获得四年制学位;2021年间,全美高校招生的人数甚至还有所下降。

究其原因,一定程度上确实是受到了新冠疫情的影响,但更深处的暗流涌动也不容忽视:自1980年代以来,大学学费翻了不止五倍,许多人需要几十年才能还清当初的学生贷款。而与此同时,各公司都在招人,薪酬水平越来越高,因此,请假攻读学位的成本也随之不断提升。难怪许多美国民众都对大学文凭的效用产生了怀疑。

实际上,通往中产阶级的途径有很多,并非一定要完成四年制的学位课程。如今,大学、继续教育培训机构,甚至公司都能够开设一系列短期学分课程。这类项目大多只需要不到两年的时间,完全不会耽误找份好工作。项目授予的个人证书(如文凭或短期教育证书)通常都与大学学分、行业认证(细分为工程、护理和人力资源等各种行业)以及学徒身份(如医疗保健、信息技术和焊接等领域)挂钩。

研究表明,获取此类短期非学位证书后,个人年收入有望增加2000至6500美元。这跟大学学费根本无法相比:两年制公立大学年均学费约为3800美元,四年制公立大学年均学费则约为9400美元。大概有四分之一的学生需要至少六年才能顺利毕业拿到学士学位,也就是说,他们的开支随随便便就能超过5万美元。而许多非学位证书的课程只需花费不到5000美元就能结业。

在高中毕业后选择短期技术教育的学生还可以凭借此类证书,继续攻读学位。越来越多的大学开设了“叠加”项目,即个人可参与证书课程获得初始大学学分,在以加分的方式计入正式学分,最终可拿到已申请的副学士或学士学位。俄亥俄州的统计数据表明,先获取非学位证书,再继续攻读学位的人,每年可以多挣9000美元。

尽管在大多数情况下,四年制学位仍然能带来最高的收入,但并非所有专业的学位都具有同等的价值。在科学、技术、工程与数学(STEM)、建筑、商业和医疗保健领域获得学士学位的人一辈子能挣到的相对较多,获得文科和人文学科学位的人往往收入较低。至于副学士,专攻技术和特定行业领域(如医疗保健和工程技术)的人往往比专攻普通教育和文科的人薪酬水平更高。当然,非学位证书的效用也存在相当大的差别。因此对个人来说,甄别判断非常重要。诸如美国教育部大学记分卡之类的工具就能够通过比较收益和成本信息,帮助美国民众评估不同大学和机构证书的价值。

不过,学费和收入并不能代表大学文凭的整体价值。考虑到在攻读学位的过程中可能损失的薪酬和高昂的辍学率,一些短期非学位课程或许更有价值。获得新证书将伴随着许多无法用价值衡量的收益,包括更好的工作条件、更健康的身体和更低的监禁率。更好的工作环境、更稳定灵活的生活,或者仅仅是一份更令人满意的工作,其“价值”都不能简单地用收入的整体增长来衡量。毕竟,生活中许多最重要的东西有钱也买不到的。

获得大学文凭还是通往中产阶级的最佳途径吗?情况有些复杂。大学文凭确实能为很多人带来更高的收入,但大学学费的激增,加上劳动力市场的旺盛,使得人们对大学文凭的效用产生了怀疑。事实上,通往中产阶级的途径有很多条,可能对一些人(特别是在职成年人、为父母者和那些缺时间、缺钱去上大学的人)来说,短期技术证书和副学士学位是更优解。重要的是,美国民众理应在决定入学之前仔细考虑所有不同的途径、不同大学和文凭的成本和收益,做有见地、负责任的消费者。(财富中文网)

琳赛·多尔蒂是无党派非营利机构兰德公司的高级策略研究员,专注于研究与劳动力发展、大学入学和成功相关的问题。

译者:殷圆圆

数十年来,接受高等教育、获取学士学位始终被视为一块必要的敲门砖,在此基础之上,才能拿到足以让人迈入中产阶级或更高阶层的工资收益。然而,目前仍有超过一半的美国民众尚未获得,且很大几率不可能获得四年制学位;2021年间,全美高校招生的人数甚至还有所下降。

究其原因,一定程度上确实是受到了新冠疫情的影响,但更深处的暗流涌动也不容忽视:自1980年代以来,大学学费翻了不止五倍,许多人需要几十年才能还清当初的学生贷款。而与此同时,各公司都在招人,薪酬水平越来越高,因此,请假攻读学位的成本也随之不断提升。难怪许多美国民众都对大学文凭的效用产生了怀疑。

实际上,通往中产阶级的途径有很多,并非一定要完成四年制的学位课程。如今,大学、继续教育培训机构,甚至公司都能够开设一系列短期学分课程。这类项目大多只需要不到两年的时间,完全不会耽误找份好工作。项目授予的个人证书(如文凭或短期教育证书)通常都与大学学分、行业认证(细分为工程、护理和人力资源等各种行业)以及学徒身份(如医疗保健、信息技术和焊接等领域)挂钩。

研究表明,获取此类短期非学位证书后,个人年收入有望增加2000至6500美元。这跟大学学费根本无法相比:两年制公立大学年均学费约为3800美元,四年制公立大学年均学费则约为9400美元。大概有四分之一的学生需要至少六年才能顺利毕业拿到学士学位,也就是说,他们的开支随随便便就能超过5万美元。而许多非学位证书的课程只需花费不到5000美元就能结业。

在高中毕业后选择短期技术教育的学生还可以凭借此类证书,继续攻读学位。越来越多的大学开设了“叠加”项目,即个人可参与证书课程获得初始大学学分,在以加分的方式计入正式学分,最终可拿到已申请的副学士或学士学位。俄亥俄州的统计数据表明,先获取非学位证书,再继续攻读学位的人,每年可以多挣9000美元。

尽管在大多数情况下,四年制学位仍然能带来最高的收入,但并非所有专业的学位都具有同等的价值。在科学、技术、工程与数学(STEM)、建筑、商业和医疗保健领域获得学士学位的人一辈子能挣到的相对较多,获得文科和人文学科学位的人往往收入较低。至于副学士,专攻技术和特定行业领域(如医疗保健和工程技术)的人往往比专攻普通教育和文科的人薪酬水平更高。当然,非学位证书的效用也存在相当大的差别。因此对个人来说,甄别判断非常重要。诸如美国教育部大学记分卡之类的工具就能够通过比较收益和成本信息,帮助美国民众评估不同大学和机构证书的价值。

不过,学费和收入并不能代表大学文凭的整体价值。考虑到在攻读学位的过程中可能损失的薪酬和高昂的辍学率,一些短期非学位课程或许更有价值。获得新证书将伴随着许多无法用价值衡量的收益,包括更好的工作条件、更健康的身体和更低的监禁率。更好的工作环境、更稳定灵活的生活,或者仅仅是一份更令人满意的工作,其“价值”都不能简单地用收入的整体增长来衡量。毕竟,生活中许多最重要的东西有钱也买不到的。

获得大学文凭还是通往中产阶级的最佳途径吗?情况有些复杂。大学文凭确实能为很多人带来更高的收入,但大学学费的激增,加上劳动力市场的旺盛,使得人们对大学文凭的效用产生了怀疑。事实上,通往中产阶级的途径有很多条,可能对一些人(特别是在职成年人、为父母者和那些缺时间、缺钱去上大学的人)来说,短期技术证书和副学士学位是更优解。重要的是,美国民众理应在决定入学之前仔细考虑所有不同的途径、不同大学和文凭的成本和收益,做有见地、负责任的消费者。(财富中文网)

琳赛·多尔蒂是无党派非营利机构兰德公司的高级策略研究员,专注于研究与劳动力发展、大学入学和成功相关的问题。

译者:殷圆圆

For decades, higher education and a bachelor’s degree have been viewed as crucial, near essential stepping stones to the sorts of earnings that would grant someone access to the middle class and beyond. But more than half of Americans still have not, and likely will not, receive four-year degrees; in 2021, college enrollment actually declined.

Part of this drop is surely due to the pandemic, but deeper trends persist: Tuition costs have increased by more than 500% since the 1980s, and many students end up with student loan debt that takes decades to pay off. At the same time, businesses are hiring and wages are rising, so the cost of taking time off work to earn a degree is higher, too. It’s no wonder that many Americans seem to be questioning the value of a college degree.

There are, in fact, many pathways to the middle class, and not all of them run through four-year degree programs. Colleges, continuing education training providers, and even employers now offer an array of short-term credential programs. Most of these require fewer than two years of coursework, and offer opportunities to more or less immediately move into good jobs. Such programs grant individuals credentials like certificates, or short-term educational credentials that often come with college credit; industry certifications, in careers as varied as engineering, nursing, and human resources; and apprenticeships in fields like health care, IT, and welding.

Research indicates that these shorter-term, nondegree credentials often lead to increases in earnings of $2,000 to $6,500 per year, while costing a fraction of what college tuition does, on average—two-year public colleges charge on average about$3,800 a year, versus $9,400 for four-year public college. About a quarter of students enrolled in bachelor’s degree programs will take at least six years to graduate, which means they could easily spend more than $50,000, compared to less than $5,000 for many nondegree credentials.

Students who start their post-high school education with these short-term technical credentials can also use them to work towards degrees. Colleges are increasingly embracing “stackable” programs that allow individuals to take the initial college credit from their certificate program and add to it (or “stack” on top of it) to eventually earn an applied associates or bachelor’s degree. Evidence from Ohio shows that those who started with a nondegree credential and went on to earn another credential saw more than $9,000 in additional earnings each year.

While four-year degrees still most often result in careers with the highest earnings, not all degrees have the same value. Those who earn a bachelor’s degree in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), architecture, business, and health care fields tend to earn more over their lifetimes, while those with liberal arts and humanities degrees tend to have lower earnings. And for associates degrees, credentials in technical, occupation-specific fields like health care and engineering technology tend to pay better than degrees in general education and liberal arts. Of course, there is also wide variation in the payoff to nondegree credentials, so it’s important for individuals to be discerning. Tools like the U.S. Department of Education’s College Scorecard can help Americans to assess the value of different college credentials and institutions by comparing information on earnings and costs.

But looking only at tuition and earnings doesn’t tell the whole story about the value of college credentials. When you factor in lost wages and the high dropout rates in many degree programs, some shorter-term nondegree programs can begin to look a lot more valuable. And there are many benefits to gaining new credentials that are impossible to capture in measures of value, including better working conditions, improved health, and lower incarceration rates. The “value” of a better work environment, a more stable and flexible life, or simply a more fulfilling job cannot simply be measured by an overall increase in earnings. After all, much of what’s most important in life money can’t buy.

Is college still the best path to the middle class? It’s complicated. College credentials still do lead many to increased earnings, but the rapid increases in college costs, coupled with such a strong labor market, have made the payoff for a college degree no longer a sure thing. The fact is there are multiple paths to the middle class, and shorter-term technical certificates and applied associates degrees may be better options for some—particularly working adults, parents, and those with limited time and money to devote to college. It’s important that Americans act as informed, responsible consumers, and think carefully about all the different pathways, the costs and benefits of different colleges and credentials, before deciding to enroll.

Lindsay Daugherty is a senior policy researcher at the nonprofit, nonpartisan RAND Corporation. Her research focuses on issues related to workforce development and college access and success.

热读文章
热门视频
扫描二维码下载财富APP