
• 别再迷信24小时连轴转或者拥有最高智商了。《财富》美国500强公司高管职业教练比尔·胡格特普指出,那些位高权重的亿万富翁和CEO们深谙何时该走捷径,更懂得如何更高效地利用时间。
数十年来,比尔·胡格特普一直为美国最具权势的董事会中的名人、首席执行官和冉冉升起的新星提供咨询服务。通过他的教练公司LifeHikes,他已帮助超过70万名专业人士提升了沟通和领导技能,并亲自与“数千名”高管进行了一对一辅导,其中许多人登上了《财富》最有影响力的人物榜单。
你或许认为他们成功的秘诀在于天赋异禀或埋头苦干,但事实并非如此。胡格特普表示,这些超级成功人士身上共有的,或许也最令人惊讶的一个特质便是“懒惰”。
他对《财富》杂志表示:“我认为他们身上具备几种与常理相悖的特质。大多数成功人士,比如那些著名政客,他们未必是优等生。他们也未必是最聪明的。”
“大多数CEO拥有一种几乎无人能及的特质,那就是旺盛的野心。现在,如果你把这种特质与‘懒惰’结合起来,就能形成一种非常美妙的组合。因为如果你极度渴望成功,却又总在寻找捷径,这两者的结合就会带来许多微小的突破。”
他所说的“懒惰”,并非指他们放松身心、享受“安静假期”而不去努力。胡格特普解释道:“他们的心态是:‘我怎样才能更快、更轻松、更出色地完成这件事,从而腾出时间和精力去做其他事情?’”
行之有效的成功捷径:不开大会、不用缩略词、不搞一对一会议
许多知名创始人都践行着胡格特普提出的这一看似矛盾的法则。他们走捷径并非为了混日子,而是为了智胜对手、加速创新,并在瞬息万变的市场中保持灵活性。
其中最著名的例子或许当属Meta的马克·扎克伯格。在将Facebook发展成为如今市值1.8万亿美元的社交媒体巨头的过程中,他提出了著名的口号“快速行动,打破常规”。
无独有偶,杰夫·贝佐斯给他曾经的得力助手格雷格·哈特最重要的职业建议,直白地说就是自己少做事,多把工作交给员工去做。这位亚马逊(Amazon)的亿万富翁创始人告诫哈特:“需要由CEO拍板的决定越少,组织的运转速度就越快。”
英伟达(Nvidia)CEO兼联合创始人黄仁勋从不与他直接管理的60名下属进行一对一会议,这是刻意为之的创新捷径。这种做法不仅节省了双方的时间,更重要的是,它能避免任何想法和问题在私下交谈中被孤立处理。他表示:“通过这种方式,我们公司就能做到更加灵活,信息能尽可能快速流通。”
还有埃隆·马斯克,他为员工制定了一整套省时走捷径的规则,包括禁止召开大型和频繁的会议、废除层级指挥链和禁用缩略词,并鼓励员工无需理会不必要的对话。这位特斯拉(Tesla)老板明确表示:“一旦你明显感觉到自己无法提供附加价值,就立即起身离开会议或挂断电话。离开并非无礼,强留他人、浪费他们的时间才是无礼之举。”
只有聪明的大脑不见得能让你登顶高位,甚至找到工作
胡格特普关于“最成功的人并非最聪明的人”这番论断,不仅适用于CEO。这种观点在招聘方面同样适用。无数首席执行官和创始人都表示,他们更看重态度而非能力。
亚马逊的人工智能主管独家向《财富》杂志透露,在面试中磕磕绊绊地回答问题并不会让你失去工作机会。但弄虚作假则不然。该公司CEO(也是他的上司)安迪·贾西也认为态度是决定求职成败的关键特质,这对于二十多岁的年轻人尤其重要。
思科(Cisco)英国负责人莎拉·沃克关注的也是潜在新员工是否具有积极活力和实干态度,因为她认为这些特质是无法后天习得的。沃克对《财富》杂志表示:“最重要的是看人本身,而不是技能或经验。”
持此观点的远不止他们:约80%的《财富》美国500强公司在招聘时使用性格测试,亚马逊、Meta和微软(Microsoft)等科技巨头亦是如此。
积极的态度如此重要,以至于一些公司领导者宁愿人员配备不足,也不愿冒险让“害群之马”破坏了整个团队。正如多邻国(Duolingo)CEO对《财富》杂志所说:“宁缺毋滥。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
• 别再迷信24小时连轴转或者拥有最高智商了。《财富》美国500强公司高管职业教练比尔·胡格特普指出,那些位高权重的亿万富翁和CEO们深谙何时该走捷径,更懂得如何更高效地利用时间。
数十年来,比尔·胡格特普一直为美国最具权势的董事会中的名人、首席执行官和冉冉升起的新星提供咨询服务。通过他的教练公司LifeHikes,他已帮助超过70万名专业人士提升了沟通和领导技能,并亲自与“数千名”高管进行了一对一辅导,其中许多人登上了《财富》最有影响力的人物榜单。
你或许认为他们成功的秘诀在于天赋异禀或埋头苦干,但事实并非如此。胡格特普表示,这些超级成功人士身上共有的,或许也最令人惊讶的一个特质便是“懒惰”。
他对《财富》杂志表示:“我认为他们身上具备几种与常理相悖的特质。大多数成功人士,比如那些著名政客,他们未必是优等生。他们也未必是最聪明的。”
“大多数CEO拥有一种几乎无人能及的特质,那就是旺盛的野心。现在,如果你把这种特质与‘懒惰’结合起来,就能形成一种非常美妙的组合。因为如果你极度渴望成功,却又总在寻找捷径,这两者的结合就会带来许多微小的突破。”
他所说的“懒惰”,并非指他们放松身心、享受“安静假期”而不去努力。胡格特普解释道:“他们的心态是:‘我怎样才能更快、更轻松、更出色地完成这件事,从而腾出时间和精力去做其他事情?’”
行之有效的成功捷径:不开大会、不用缩略词、不搞一对一会议
许多知名创始人都践行着胡格特普提出的这一看似矛盾的法则。他们走捷径并非为了混日子,而是为了智胜对手、加速创新,并在瞬息万变的市场中保持灵活性。
其中最著名的例子或许当属Meta的马克·扎克伯格。在将Facebook发展成为如今市值1.8万亿美元的社交媒体巨头的过程中,他提出了著名的口号“快速行动,打破常规”。
无独有偶,杰夫·贝佐斯给他曾经的得力助手格雷格·哈特最重要的职业建议,直白地说就是自己少做事,多把工作交给员工去做。这位亚马逊(Amazon)的亿万富翁创始人告诫哈特:“需要由CEO拍板的决定越少,组织的运转速度就越快。”
英伟达(Nvidia)CEO兼联合创始人黄仁勋从不与他直接管理的60名下属进行一对一会议,这是刻意为之的创新捷径。这种做法不仅节省了双方的时间,更重要的是,它能避免任何想法和问题在私下交谈中被孤立处理。他表示:“通过这种方式,我们公司就能做到更加灵活,信息能尽可能快速流通。”
还有埃隆·马斯克,他为员工制定了一整套省时走捷径的规则,包括禁止召开大型和频繁的会议、废除层级指挥链和禁用缩略词,并鼓励员工无需理会不必要的对话。这位特斯拉(Tesla)老板明确表示:“一旦你明显感觉到自己无法提供附加价值,就立即起身离开会议或挂断电话。离开并非无礼,强留他人、浪费他们的时间才是无礼之举。”
只有聪明的大脑不见得能让你登顶高位,甚至找到工作
胡格特普关于“最成功的人并非最聪明的人”这番论断,不仅适用于CEO。这种观点在招聘方面同样适用。无数首席执行官和创始人都表示,他们更看重态度而非能力。
亚马逊的人工智能主管独家向《财富》杂志透露,在面试中磕磕绊绊地回答问题并不会让你失去工作机会。但弄虚作假则不然。该公司CEO(也是他的上司)安迪·贾西也认为态度是决定求职成败的关键特质,这对于二十多岁的年轻人尤其重要。
思科(Cisco)英国负责人莎拉·沃克关注的也是潜在新员工是否具有积极活力和实干态度,因为她认为这些特质是无法后天习得的。沃克对《财富》杂志表示:“最重要的是看人本身,而不是技能或经验。”
持此观点的远不止他们:约80%的《财富》美国500强公司在招聘时使用性格测试,亚马逊、Meta和微软(Microsoft)等科技巨头亦是如此。
积极的态度如此重要,以至于一些公司领导者宁愿人员配备不足,也不愿冒险让“害群之马”破坏了整个团队。正如多邻国(Duolingo)CEO对《财富》杂志所说:“宁缺毋滥。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
• Forget grinding 24/7 or having the highest IQ in the room. The most powerful billionaires and CEOs know exactly when to cut corners—and how to use their time better than anyone else, the career coach to the Fortune 500, Bill Hoogterp, reveals.
Bill Hoogterp has spent decades advising celebrities, CEOs, and rising stars inside some of America’s most powerful boardrooms. Through his coaching firm, LifeHikes, he’s helped more than 700,000 professionals level up their communication and leadership skills—and personally worked one-on-one with “thousands” of executives, many of whom appear on Fortune’s most powerful lists.
But if you think the secret to their success is raw intelligence or long hours, you’d be mistaken. According to Hoogter, one of the most consistent—and perhaps surprising—qualities shared by the ultra-successful is laziness.
“I would say there’s a juxtaposition of almost counterintuitive traits,” he tells Fortune. “Most successful people, if you meet most famous politicians, they weren’t necessarily the A students. They aren’t necessarily the smartest.”
“What most CEOs have—that almost nobody else has—is that their ambition is way over the top. Now, if you combine that with lazy, you create a really nice blend because if you’re really, really hungry to get success, but you’re always looking for shortcuts, the combination of those two things leads to lots of little breakthroughs.”
By lazy, he doesn’t mean they’re kicking up their feet and taking a “quiet vacation” instead of grinding. “They’re like: ‘How can I get this done faster, easier, better, and have time and energy for other things?’” Hoogterp explains.
Tried and tested shortcuts for success: No big meetings, acronyms or one-to-ones
Plenty of high-profile founders embody Hooterp’s paradoxical formula. They’re not cutting corners to coast—but to outsmart the competition, innovate faster and remain agile in a fast-moving market.
Perhaps the most famous example of this is Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, who famously coined move fast and break things when scaling Facebook into the $1.8 trillion social media giant it is today.
Likewise, Jeff Bezos’ top career advice for his once right-hand man, Greg Hart, was literally to do less himself and delegate more to his employees. “The fewer decisions that have to go to the CEO, the faster the organization will move,” the billionaire Amazon founder told him.
Nvidia CEO and co-founder Jensen Huang doesn’t have one-to-one meetings with his 60 direct reports—and it’s a deliberate shortcut to innovation. Not only does it save time in their schedules, but more importantly, it ensures ideas and problems aren’t siloed in private conversations. “In that way, our company was designed for agility—for information to flow as quickly as possible,” he said.
Then there’s Elon Musk, who has a whole list of time-saving and corner-cutting rules for staff, including a ban on big and frequent meetings, no chain of command or acronyms, and an encouragement to walk out of unnecessary conversations. “Walk out of a meeting or drop off a call as soon as it is obvious you aren’t adding value,” the Tesla boss outlined. “It is not rude to leave, it is rude to make someone stay and waste their time.”
Brains alone won’t get you to the top—or even hired
Hooterp’s claim that the most successful aren’t the smartest doesn’t just apply to CEOs. It’s a theme echoed when it comes to hiring too. Countless CEOs and founders have said that they value attitude over aptitude.
Amazon’s AI boss exclusively told Fortune that stumbling your way through an interview question won’t cost you the job. But being fake will. Andy Jassy, the company’s CEO (and his boss), has similarly shared that attitude is the make-or-break trait that’ll determine your success—especially, he says, in your 20s.
Likewise, Cisco’s U.K. chief focuses on whether a potential new hire has a positive energy and can-do attitude because, she says, that can’t be taught. “It’s more about the person first and foremost than it is about skills or experience,” Sarah Walker told Fortune.
And they’re far from alone: About 80% of the Fortune 500 use personality tests in hiring, as well as tech giants like Amazon, Meta and Microsoft.
A positive attitude is so important that some chiefs would rather remain understaffed than risk having a bad apple spoil the bunch. As Duolingo’s CEO told Fortune, “it’s better to have a hole than an asshole.”