立即打开
混合办公赚得更多?

混合办公赚得更多?

TREY WILLIAMS 2022-12-29
数据显示混合办公的员工每周只去办公一到四天,却比全居家或全职在办公室的人们赚得更多。

混合办公员工薪水最高。图片来源:ALVAREZ—GETTY IMAGES

到底是先有蛋还是先有鸡?之所以提这个问题,是因为答案可能有助于解释WFH Research最新研究结果,数据显示混合办公的员工每周只去办公一到四天,却比全居家或全职在办公室的人们赚得更多。

如今问题变成:混合办公的岗位原本工资就更高,还是因为从事工作可以采取混合方式从而赚得更多?先有鸡还是先有蛋?

这项研究由何塞·玛利亚·巴雷罗、尼古拉斯·布鲁姆、谢尔比·巴克曼和史蒂文·J·戴维斯主导,研究中将员工分为三类:完全远程办公的员工、混合型员工和从不居家的员工,例如必须在场提供服务(如零售或餐饮服务)或操作特殊设备(如机械师)的员工。

根据WFH Research的数据,研究群体平均年薪为5.5万美元。然而混合式办公人群,也就是在家工作一到四天的员工薪水明显更高。此类员工年薪超过8万美元,其中每周工作远程办公室时间最长的人平均年薪达8.8万美元。

混合办公人群的收入甚至超过了完全远程办公人群,后者的平均年薪为7.4万美元。

WFH团队认为,混合办公员工薪水较高主要因为,此类人群更有可能从事知识型工作,需要大学或更高学历,由此推论,薪水也就更高。

“专业人员和管理层往往收入最高,也很可能采取混合办公模式,因为不管对他们自身还是对公司来说,跟同事交流很有价值,”研究报告中写道。“相比之下,完全远程的员工往往从事IT支持或工资发放等工作,需要的交流相对较少,薪酬也低于经理、顾问和律师。这可能是完全远程员工平均收入低于混合办公员工的原因。”

从薪资水平来看,目前还说不清混合工作模式到底是鸡还是蛋,但确实能看出白领和知识型员工在过去一年里承受的压力。美国“大辞职潮”中,大批员工辞去原来的工作,寻找提供更大灵活性和更丰厚福利的机会。

该现象反过来又引发疯狂的人才争夺战,催生出炙手可热的就业市场,如今的市场上,公司愿意支付更高工资,倾尽所能提供各种福利。当然,由于最近对经济衰退的担心加剧,公司有所收敛。

疫情爆发近三年,混合工作已成为一种福利,对大量美国员工来说,混合办公模式肯定会继续存在,甚至让没法采取这种工作方式的人有些嫉妒。尽管存在各种各样的冲击和好处,混合办公确实更符合疫情后人们寻求工作与生活更平衡的大环境,人人都可以争取更高收入(让鸡生蛋),成为混合办公的高收入打工人。(财富中文网)

译者:梁宇

审校:夏林

到底是先有蛋还是先有鸡?之所以提这个问题,是因为答案可能有助于解释WFH Research最新研究结果,数据显示混合办公的员工每周只去办公一到四天,却比全居家或全职在办公室的人们赚得更多。

如今问题变成:混合办公的岗位原本工资就更高,还是因为从事工作可以采取混合方式从而赚得更多?先有鸡还是先有蛋?

这项研究由何塞·玛利亚·巴雷罗、尼古拉斯·布鲁姆、谢尔比·巴克曼和史蒂文·J·戴维斯主导,研究中将员工分为三类:完全远程办公的员工、混合型员工和从不居家的员工,例如必须在场提供服务(如零售或餐饮服务)或操作特殊设备(如机械师)的员工。

根据WFH Research的数据,研究群体平均年薪为5.5万美元。然而混合式办公人群,也就是在家工作一到四天的员工薪水明显更高。此类员工年薪超过8万美元,其中每周工作远程办公室时间最长的人平均年薪达8.8万美元。

混合办公人群的收入甚至超过了完全远程办公人群,后者的平均年薪为7.4万美元。

WFH团队认为,混合办公员工薪水较高主要因为,此类人群更有可能从事知识型工作,需要大学或更高学历,由此推论,薪水也就更高。

“专业人员和管理层往往收入最高,也很可能采取混合办公模式,因为不管对他们自身还是对公司来说,跟同事交流很有价值,”研究报告中写道。“相比之下,完全远程的员工往往从事IT支持或工资发放等工作,需要的交流相对较少,薪酬也低于经理、顾问和律师。这可能是完全远程员工平均收入低于混合办公员工的原因。”

从薪资水平来看,目前还说不清混合工作模式到底是鸡还是蛋,但确实能看出白领和知识型员工在过去一年里承受的压力。美国“大辞职潮”中,大批员工辞去原来的工作,寻找提供更大灵活性和更丰厚福利的机会。

该现象反过来又引发疯狂的人才争夺战,催生出炙手可热的就业市场,如今的市场上,公司愿意支付更高工资,倾尽所能提供各种福利。当然,由于最近对经济衰退的担心加剧,公司有所收敛。

疫情爆发近三年,混合工作已成为一种福利,对大量美国员工来说,混合办公模式肯定会继续存在,甚至让没法采取这种工作方式的人有些嫉妒。尽管存在各种各样的冲击和好处,混合办公确实更符合疫情后人们寻求工作与生活更平衡的大环境,人人都可以争取更高收入(让鸡生蛋),成为混合办公的高收入打工人。(财富中文网)

译者:梁宇

审校:夏林

Did we ever figure out whether it was the chicken or the egg that came first? Asking because the answer could help explain recent data from WFH Research that shows that people who work in a hybrid environment—one to four days in the office a week—make more than people who work either from home, or in-person full time.

The question becomes: Do hybrid jobs simply pay more, or do they make more because they’re in jobs that allow them to work a hybrid schedule? Chicken, or egg?

The research, conducted by Jose Maria Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Shelby Buckman, and Steven J. Davis, divided pools of workers into three categories: fully remote workers, hybrid workers, and those who never work from home—ie. employees who absolutely have to physically be in the workplace either to provide services in person (such as retail or food services) or to interact with special equipment (such as a mechanic).

This group had an average annual salary of $55,000, according to WFH Research data. That number rocketed up significantly for hybrid workers, who spent anywhere from one to four days working from home. The annual salary for those employees broke $80,000, with the people who spent the most days out of the workweek remote earning $88,000 on average.

They even earned more than fully remote workers, who raked in $74,000 annually.

The WFH team attributed hybrid workers’ higher salaries to the fact that they’re more likely to work in knowledge jobs that require a college or advanced degree that, , pays more.

“Professional and managerial staff, who are some of the highest paid workers, are especially likely to be in hybrid roles because interacting with colleagues is valuable for them and their employers,” the report read. “Fully remote workers, by contrast, often perform specialized functions like IT support or payroll that require comparatively little interaction, and are less highly paid than managers, consultants, and lawyers. And that is probably why average earnings for the fully remote group are lower than for the hybrid group.”

It’s unclear if that makes hybrid work the chicken or the egg when it comes to salaries, but it does speak to a lot of the pressure white-collar and knowledge workers experienced for a large part of the year. Workers left jobs in droves as part of the Great Resignation, in search of opportunities that offered more flexibility and better benefits—hybrid work among the most attractive of lures.

That in turn created a mad dash for talent that fueled a hot job market where companies were willing to pay more and offer everything but the kitchen sink. That is, of course, until heightened recession fears forced them to clamp down.

Hybrid work has proven to be a boon nearly three years after the pandemic first hit, and for a large swath of American workers it’s bound to stick around. It even makes those on the outside looking in a little jealous. Hybrid work, for all its knocks and benefits, fits more squarely in the world of better work-life balance people are seeking post-pandemic—and you can add higher pay (and eggs) to the list as well.

热读文章
热门视频
扫描二维码下载财富APP