订阅

多平台阅读

微信订阅

杂志

申请纸刊赠阅

订阅每日电邮

移动应用

专栏 - 苹果2_0

苹果摆平中国媒体的代价

Philip Elmer-DeWitt 2013年05月07日

苹果(Apple)公司内部流传着一个老笑话,那就是史蒂夫·乔布斯周围是一片“现实扭曲力场”:你离他太近的话,就会相信他所说的话。苹果的数百万用户中已经有不少成了该公司的“信徒”,而很多苹果投资者也赚得盆满钵满。不过,Elmer-DeWitt认为,在报道苹果公司时有点怀疑精神不是坏事。听他的应该没错。要知道,他自从1982年就开始报道苹果、观察史蒂夫·乔布斯经营该公司。
为了平息中国媒体对苹果口诛笔伐引发的舆论风暴,苹果CEO在上个财季的最后一天出面向中国消费者道歉,同时延长了中国市场iPhone手机的保修期。就是因为这一天之内发生的事情,导致苹果随后公布的利润率下滑,由此引发了市场的连锁反应。

    不久前,苹果公司(Apple)公布季报后,我们接触到的几乎所有分析师均指出,苹果公司37.5%的毛利率只达到了最低预期。分析师预测它的毛利率将在37.5%至38.5%之间。毛利率被用于衡量一家公司将销售转变成利润的效率。

    对此,分析师们给出了各种解释,但大多都将利润减少归因于来自三星(Samsung)和其他安卓(Android)智能手机与平板电脑制造商日益激烈的竞争。

    不过,还有一个更简单的答案:中国。

    笔者并不清楚无意中提出这种观点的第一个人是谁,因为华尔街的分析师们从来不会承认独家新闻来自竞争对手。

    • 数据调查机构Asymco的贺拉斯•德迪乌在一篇名为“补仓2”的博客中提到这种观点,文章的时间为4月25日,星期四凌晨2:38。

    • 当天上午晚些时候,富国银行集团(Wells Fargo)的梅纳德•阿姆在一份客户报告中提供了相同的解释。

    • 五天以后,即4月30日星期二,摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)的凯蒂•休伯蒂也发表了与此有关的文章。

    这种观点认为:在上个财季的最后一天,为了让连续两周每天都对苹果口诛笔伐的中国媒体满意,蒂姆•库克出面向中国消费者道歉,同时还修改了保修与返修政策——如将在中国参加维修的iPhone手机保修期延长一年。

    与此同时,在提交给美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的Form 10-Q季度报表中,苹果公司登记了4.14亿美元所谓的应计保修开支,对个别未提及的改变“服务政策和其他估算保修成本”所产生的影响进行了解释。而这4.14亿美元直接来自上个季度iPhone手机所带来的收入,使公司的总体毛利率下降了1个百分点。

    摩根士丹利的休伯蒂估计,如果不是由于中国媒体的攻势和库克的回应,苹果公司的毛利率可能在38.4%左右——恰好在其指导范围的上限。

    如果苹果公布的是更高的利润率,市场第二天又会出现什么样的反应呢?对此,我们可能永远无法知道答案。(财富中文网)

    译者:刘进龙/汪皓

    After Apple's (AAPL) quarterly report last week nearly every analyst we heard from pointed out that the company's 37.5% gross margin -- the measure of how efficiently a company turns sales into profits -- was at very bottom of its 37.5%-to-38.5% forecast range.

    The analysts offered a variety explanations, but most attributed the reduced margins to increased competition from Samsung and other manufacturers of Android smartphones and tablets.

    But there's a simpler answer: China.

    I don't know who hit on this theory first, because Wall Street analysts never credit their competitors' scoops.

    • Asymco's Horace Dediu had it in a post called Margin Call 2 that was time-stamped Thursday, April 25 at 2:38 a.m.

    • Wells Fargo's Maynard Um offered the same explanation in a note to clients issued later that morning.

    • Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty wrote about it on Tuesday April 30, five days later.

    The theory is this: On the last day of the quarter Tim Cook, to appease government-owned media outlets that for two weeks had been attacking Apple on a daily basis, issued an apology to his Chinese customers and changed Apple's warranty and return policies -- among other things, extending the warranties on any iPhone brought in for repair in China for a full year.

    At the same time, according to the company's SEC Form 10-Q, Apple booked $414 million in so-called warranty accruals to account for the impact of changes to certain unnamed "service policies and other estimated warranty costs." That $414 million came directly out of last quarter's iPhone revenue and reduced the company's overall gross margin by nearly 1 percentage point.

    Morgan Stanley's Huberty estimates that if it weren't for China's media campaign and Cook's response, Apple would have reported a gross margin of approximately 38.4% -- just shy of the top of its guidance range.

    How the market would have reacted the next day to the higher margins, we will never know.

我来点评

  最新文章

最新文章:

中国煤业大迁徙

500强情报中心

财富专栏