首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

美国关税战只会加快中国科技界自给自足的步伐

Grace Shao
2025-05-07

中国并未试图在人工智能基础设施领域与美国创新正面竞争,而是充分发挥制造业优势,聚焦机器人、智能电动汽车等人工智能实体应用领域。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

图片来源:Huang Zongzhi—Xinhua via Getty Images

唐纳德·特朗普的“解放日”关税政策震动全球市场,再度引发对持久贸易战的担忧。尽管这位美国总统正在重新考虑部分最有破坏性的关税措施,并释放出可能达成协议的信号,但他仍在威胁对半导体、药品等领域实施新制裁,试图重塑全球贸易体系。

这些关税措施将如何影响中国科技行业?就在不久前,中国科技界还因深度求索(DeepSeek)AI模型的成功而士气高涨。

自2018年特朗普发起首轮关税战以来,中国一直在备战。中国早已预料到美国会发动第二轮关税战。面对美国对先进技术更严格的封锁,中国有条不紊地构建了技术供应链。除了兴建本土芯片工厂外,中国还在提升可再生能源产能,通过“东数西算”等国家级工程提升云计算能力,以及投资激光雷达和电池技术。

中国并未试图在人工智能基础设施领域与美国创新正面竞争,而是充分发挥制造业优势,聚焦机器人、智能电动汽车等人工智能实体应用领域。

虽然中国芯片产业仍落后于尖端水平,但与五年前美国首次收紧芯片出口时相比,中国已大幅提升自给自足的能力。中国科技实力不仅体现在硬件领域,深度求索的开源AI模型更降低了大语言模型的应用门槛。

即便特朗普收回他的关税威胁,美国对华科技遏制的态势仍将持续,芯片出口管制等措施已获得美国两党共识。

阿里巴巴(Alibaba)、字节跳动(ByteDance)和深度求索等中国AI企业曾严重依赖备受争议的英伟达(Nvidia)H20芯片——不久前,这款中国境内可合法销售的最先进处理器,是这些公司发展AI业务的关键。全面禁令将迫使中国科技巨头调整芯片战略,华为(Huawei)产品可能成为替代选择。

分析师预测,随着客户放弃英伟达,转而选用华为的人工智能系统,华为的营收可能会大幅增长。半导体分析机构SemiAnalysis的最新报告显示,华为的最新产品在某些配置上甚至可能超越英伟达。

对担忧战略竞争、需要更有韧性的供应链的美国而言,出口管制、针对性关税和产业政策或许有其逻辑。这也正是中国采取类似举措的原因。

供应链转移

自2018年以来,大小企业纷纷将制造和采购转移至越南、孟加拉国和泰国等国。但它们无法彻底放弃中国市场。正如苹果(Apple)首席执行官蒂姆·库克在2015年所言,中国的市场规模、劳动力技能水平和基础设施的综合优势,至少在短期内是其他国家难以企及的。至今仍有超80%的iPhone手机在中国生产。

特朗普的惩罚性关税不仅会推高消费者成本,更会迫使美国科技巨头重新评估数十年构建的供应链战略。对依赖长期规划和稳定环境的跨国企业而言,真正的“隐形税负”是政策的不可预测性,而不是关税。无论是关税调整、出口禁令、实体清单还是豁免政策,政策的任何风吹草动都会在全球市场引发涟漪效应。

目前部分中国企业为规避风险,采取了审慎的观望策略:暂停在美业务,聚焦非美市场。中国企业已经在悄然布局以应对贸易中断:优先深耕国内市场,调整扩张战略,或将研发和销售转向友好地区。

关税也间接影响到中国的人工智能规划。中国的人工智能初创公司服务整个科技行业;高管重新评估AI计划,将对中国的AI初创公司生态系统产生下游影响。

人工智能、云计算和半导体并非孤立的行业,其发展依赖跨国学术界、商界和政府协作。尽管战略自主价值凸显,但技术进步仍受益于开放的环境。

未来会发生些什么?

美国或许期待通过关税、补贴和出口管制的组合拳保持其科技领导地位。但现实是,美国继续限制中国获得先进技术,正倒逼中国加速实现自给自足。即便贸易战最终达成协议,也将强化中国对科技领域的投入。未来若美国再实施类似H20芯片禁令,对中国AI生态系统的影响或将微乎其微。

竞争可以是良性的,无需走向零和博弈。中美面临的共同挑战是如何设定明确的边界,以保障各自的国家安全,但又不能因此完全关闭彼此之间的合作渠道。气候科技、医疗健康、AI安全与开源开发等领域,仍存在合作引领全球创新的现实空间。

本文作者格蕾丝·邵为行业通讯AI Proem的创始人。AI Proem提供对中国AI和科技发展的深度洞察分析,曾与亚太地区的大型科技公司和AI初创公司合作。

Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

唐纳德·特朗普的“解放日”关税政策震动全球市场,再度引发对持久贸易战的担忧。尽管这位美国总统正在重新考虑部分最有破坏性的关税措施,并释放出可能达成协议的信号,但他仍在威胁对半导体、药品等领域实施新制裁,试图重塑全球贸易体系。

这些关税措施将如何影响中国科技行业?就在不久前,中国科技界还因深度求索(DeepSeek)AI模型的成功而士气高涨。

自2018年特朗普发起首轮关税战以来,中国一直在备战。中国早已预料到美国会发动第二轮关税战。面对美国对先进技术更严格的封锁,中国有条不紊地构建了技术供应链。除了兴建本土芯片工厂外,中国还在提升可再生能源产能,通过“东数西算”等国家级工程提升云计算能力,以及投资激光雷达和电池技术。

中国并未试图在人工智能基础设施领域与美国创新正面竞争,而是充分发挥制造业优势,聚焦机器人、智能电动汽车等人工智能实体应用领域。

虽然中国芯片产业仍落后于尖端水平,但与五年前美国首次收紧芯片出口时相比,中国已大幅提升自给自足的能力。中国科技实力不仅体现在硬件领域,深度求索的开源AI模型更降低了大语言模型的应用门槛。

即便特朗普收回他的关税威胁,美国对华科技遏制的态势仍将持续,芯片出口管制等措施已获得美国两党共识。

阿里巴巴(Alibaba)、字节跳动(ByteDance)和深度求索等中国AI企业曾严重依赖备受争议的英伟达(Nvidia)H20芯片——不久前,这款中国境内可合法销售的最先进处理器,是这些公司发展AI业务的关键。全面禁令将迫使中国科技巨头调整芯片战略,华为(Huawei)产品可能成为替代选择。

分析师预测,随着客户放弃英伟达,转而选用华为的人工智能系统,华为的营收可能会大幅增长。半导体分析机构SemiAnalysis的最新报告显示,华为的最新产品在某些配置上甚至可能超越英伟达。

对担忧战略竞争、需要更有韧性的供应链的美国而言,出口管制、针对性关税和产业政策或许有其逻辑。这也正是中国采取类似举措的原因。

供应链转移

自2018年以来,大小企业纷纷将制造和采购转移至越南、孟加拉国和泰国等国。但它们无法彻底放弃中国市场。正如苹果(Apple)首席执行官蒂姆·库克在2015年所言,中国的市场规模、劳动力技能水平和基础设施的综合优势,至少在短期内是其他国家难以企及的。至今仍有超80%的iPhone手机在中国生产。

特朗普的惩罚性关税不仅会推高消费者成本,更会迫使美国科技巨头重新评估数十年构建的供应链战略。对依赖长期规划和稳定环境的跨国企业而言,真正的“隐形税负”是政策的不可预测性,而不是关税。无论是关税调整、出口禁令、实体清单还是豁免政策,政策的任何风吹草动都会在全球市场引发涟漪效应。

目前部分中国企业为规避风险,采取了审慎的观望策略:暂停在美业务,聚焦非美市场。中国企业已经在悄然布局以应对贸易中断:优先深耕国内市场,调整扩张战略,或将研发和销售转向友好地区。

关税也间接影响到中国的人工智能规划。中国的人工智能初创公司服务整个科技行业;高管重新评估AI计划,将对中国的AI初创公司生态系统产生下游影响。

人工智能、云计算和半导体并非孤立的行业,其发展依赖跨国学术界、商界和政府协作。尽管战略自主价值凸显,但技术进步仍受益于开放的环境。

未来会发生些什么?

美国或许期待通过关税、补贴和出口管制的组合拳保持其科技领导地位。但现实是,美国继续限制中国获得先进技术,正倒逼中国加速实现自给自足。即便贸易战最终达成协议,也将强化中国对科技领域的投入。未来若美国再实施类似H20芯片禁令,对中国AI生态系统的影响或将微乎其微。

竞争可以是良性的,无需走向零和博弈。中美面临的共同挑战是如何设定明确的边界,以保障各自的国家安全,但又不能因此完全关闭彼此之间的合作渠道。气候科技、医疗健康、AI安全与开源开发等领域,仍存在合作引领全球创新的现实空间。

本文作者格蕾丝·邵为行业通讯AI Proem的创始人。AI Proem提供对中国AI和科技发展的深度洞察分析,曾与亚太地区的大型科技公司和AI初创公司合作。

Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。(财富中文网)

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs are shocking global markets and rekindling fears of a prolonged trade war. The U.S. president may be reconsidering some of his most disruptive tariffs as he floats the possibility of a deal—but he also continues to threaten new measures on goods like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals as he tries to shake up the global trading system.

How will the tariffs affect China’s tech sector which—even just a month ago—was riding high on the success of DeepSeek’s AI model?

China has been preparing since Trump first imposed tariffs back in 2018. Beijing has long anticipated a second round with the U.S. Faced with tighter restrictions on its access to advanced technology, China has methodically built out its technology supply chains. It’s not just constructing local chip plants: Beijing’s measures include bolstering renewable energy capacity, building out cloud computing capabilities through national projects like East Data West Compute, and investing in lidar technology and batteries.

Beijing isn’t trying to out-compete U.S. innovation in AI infrastructure. Instead, it’s leveraging its manufacturing expertise and doubling down on physical AI, like robotics and AI-enabled EVs.

China’s chip industry still lags the cutting-edge. But it’s far more self-sufficient today than it was five years ago, when the U.S. first started tightening the screws on chip exports. The country’s strength goes beyond hardware, as DeepSeek’s open-source AI models make affordable LLMs possible.

The U.S. will likely continue to constrain China’s tech sector, even if Trump pulls back on his tariffs threats. Measures like the chip export controls now enjoy bipartisan support in Washington.

AI companies like Alibaba, ByteDance and DeepSeek previously relied heavily on the contentious Nvidia H20 chip, until recently the most cutting-edge processor that could be legally sold in China, were vital to. A full ban will force China’s Big Tech companies to rethink their chip strategy—and maybe consider alternatives, like those made by Huawei.

Analysts suggest Huawei’s revenue will likely see a big jump in revenue as customers turn to its AI systems instead of Nvidia’s. One recent report from SemiAnalysis suggests Huawei’s latest product might even surpass Nvidia’s in some configurations.

Export controls, targeted tariffs and industrial policy may make sense for a U.S. worried about strategic competition and a need for more resilient supply chains. And that’s why China has done the same.

Supply chain moves

Since 2018, companies large and small have moved manufacturing and sourcing to countries like Vietnam, Bangladesh and Thailand. But companies can’t cut out China completely. As Apple CEO Tim Cook noted in 2015, it’s hard to match China’s combination of scale, labor skill, and infrastructure, at least in the short term. More than 80% of iPhones are still made in China.

Trump’s punitive tariffs don’t just raise costs for consumers. They’ll force U.S. Big Tech to rethink supply chain strategies that have taken decades to build. Unpredictability, not tariffs, is the real tax for global firms that rely on long-term planning and stable conditions. Each policy tweak, whether its tariffs, export bans, blacklists or exemptions, ripples through global markets.

For some Chinese firms, it’s translating into a cautious and risk-averse “wait-and-see” stance, pausing U.S. business and focusing on non-U.S. business for now. Chinese companies are already quietly hedging against trade disruption: building for the domestic market first, rethinking their expansion strategies, or rerouting development and sales to friendlier jurisdictions.

Tariffs also affect China’s AI plans, albeit indirectly. China’s AI startups serve the broader tech sector; Executives rethinking AI plans will have a downstream effect on China’s AI startup ecosystem.

AI, cloud computing and semiconductors aren’t isolated sectors. They’re built on academic, commercial and governmental collaboration across borders. Technological progress still benefits from openness, whatever the value of strategic autonomy.

What happens next?

The U.S. may hope that the right mix of tariffs, subsidies and export controls can preserve its tech leadership. But instead, the continued push to cut off China’s access to advanced technology is going to make it more self-sufficient out of necessity. The trade war, even if it leads to a deal, will push China to invest in its tech sector even more. The next time the U.S. tries something like the H20 chip ban, it may mean very little to the China AI ecosystem.

Competition can be healthy, but doesn’t need to mean collapse. The challenge for both the U.S. and China is to draw clear guardrails to support national security without shutting down collaboration entirely. Climate tech, healthcare, AI safety and open-source development could still present real possibilities for cooperative leadership.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开